The analysis framework of quality management, organizational innovation and organizational performance is constructed to study the relationship and interaction mechanism, and 156 manufacturing enterprises in the more developed manufacturing areas of our country are selected as samples for empirical research. The results show that quality management can directly affect technological innovation in organizational innovation, and directly affect management innovation through technological innovation. Organizational innovation is the intermediate variable of quality management on the organizational performance. In manufacturing enterprises, the impact of technological innovation on organizational performance is greater than that of management innovation on organizational performance.
R.Veliyath and P.Shrivastava, Hypercompetition. Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering.Das Summa Summarum des Management.Gabler. (1996).
2.
D.I.Prajogo and A.S.Sohal, Tqm and innovation: a literature review and research framework, Technovation21(9) (2001), 539–558.
3.
A.Abrunhosa, and Patrícia Moura ESá, Are tqm principles supporting innovation in the portuguese footwear industry?Technovation28(4) (2008), 0–221.
4.
XuQinrui, ZhuJianzhong and ZhengGang, how total quality management affects innovation: positive or negative? [J].Technology Economics (7) (2006), 23–26.
5.
JesúsPerdomo-Ortiz, JavierGonzález-Benito and JesúsGalende, Total quality management as a forerunner of business innovation capability, Technovation26(10) (2006), 0–1185.
6.
M.Zollo and S.G.Winter, Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities, Organization Science13(3) (2002), 339–351.
7.
R.Sousa and C.A.Voss, Quality management re-visited: a reflective review and agenda for future research, Journal of Operations Management20(1) (2002), 91–109.
8.
V.Saraph, P.Benson and R.A.Schroeder, An instrument for measuring the critical factors of quality management, Decision Sciences20(4) (2010), 810–829.
9.
I.Sila and M.Ebrahimpour, An investigation of the total quality management survey based research published between 1989 and 2000 a literature review, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management19(7) (2002), 902–970.
10.
H.A.Quazi, C.W.Hong and C.Tuck, Impact of iso 9000 certification on quality management practices: A comparative study, Total Quality Management13(1) (2002), 53–67.
11.
D.Samson and M.Terziovski, Relationship between total quality management practices and operational performance, Journal of Operations Management17(4) (2017), 393–409.
12.
S.U.Rahman and A.S.Sohal, A review and classification of total quality management research in Australia and an agenda for future research, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management19(1) (2001), 46–66.
13.
D.R.Thompson and R.S.Siegler, Buy low, sell high: The development of an informal theory of economics, Child Development71(3) (2000), 660–677.
14.
F.Damanpour, Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators, The Academy of Management Journal34(3) (1991), 555–590.
15.
R.L.Daft, A dual-core model of organizational innovation, Academy of Management Journal21(2) (1978), 193–210.
16.
F.Damanpour, Organizational complexity and innovation: Developing and testing multiple contingency models, Management Science42(5) (1996), 693–716.
17.
K.Cormican and D.O'Sullivan, Auditing best practice for effective product innovation management, Technovation24(10) (2004), 819–829.
18.
G.Ekvall and L.Ryhammar, The creative climate: Its determinants and effects at a swedish university, Creativity Research Journal12(4) (1999), 303–310.
19.
RuiMingjie and LvYufang, An empirical study on the impact between leadership behavior, organizational learning, innovation and performance, [J]. Shanghai Management Science27(2) (2005), 30–35.
20.
J.Bessant and S.Caffyn, High-involvement innovation through continuous improvement, International Journal of Technology Management14(1) (1997), 7–28(22).
21.
R.Mcadam and J.Henderson, Influencing the future of tqm: Internal and external driving factors, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management21(1) (2004), 51–71.
22.
E.R.Ziegel, J.M.Juran and F.M.Gryna, Juran's Quality Control Handbook.McGraw-Hill.(0).
23.
C.Gunn, Innovators and Institutions Working as Partners on Sustainable Change.Curriculum Models for the 21st Century. (2014).
24.
R.Mcadam, G.Armstrong and B.Kelly, Investigation of the relationship between total quality and innovation: A research study involving small organisations, European Journal of Innovation Management1(3) (1998), 139–147.
25.
Milgrom, Paul, Roberts, & John, The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy, and organization, American Economic Review80(3) (1990), 511–528.
26.
I.J.Feng, D.S.Sohal and P.K.C.T.Amrik, The impact of tqm practices on performance, Hemoglobin32(3) (2006), 561–571(11).
27.
JuanJosé Tarí, JoséFrancisco Molina and JuanLuis Castejón, The relationship between quality management practices and their effects on quality outcomes, European Journal of Operational Research183(2) (2007), 483–501.
28.
DuPeng and WanHoufen, An empirical study on the relationship of market orientation, Quality Orientation and Business Performance[J]. Chinese Journal of Management6(5) (2009), 98–703.
29.
XieHongming, WangCheng and WuLongzeng, Knowledge integration, organizational innovation and organizational performance: Empirical study on enterprises in South China, [J]. Chinese Journal of Management3(5) (2006), 600–606.
30.
HuangPeilun, ShangHangbiao and ZhaoLizhu, Study on the relationship between organizational innovation, organizational ability and organizational performance, [J]. Chinese Journal of Management5(2) (2008), 250–257.
31.
D.I.Prajogo and A.S.Sohal, The integration of tqm and technology/R&D management in determining quality and innovation performance, Omega34(3) (2009), 296–312.
32.
LinYiping, Study on the Relationship between Market Orientation, Organizational Learning, Organizational Innovation and Organizational Performance - Taking Information Electronics Industry in the Scientific Area as an Example [D].Kaohsiung: Unpublished doctoral dissertation of School of Business Administration in Sun Yat-Sen University, 2001.
33.
C.T.Su, S.C.Li and C.H.Su, An empirical study of the taiwan national quality award causal model, Total Quality Management & Business Excellence14(8) (2003), 875–893.
34.
R.Kline and R.B.Kline and R.Kline, Principles and practice of structural equation modelling, Journal of the American Statistical Association101(12) (2011).
35.
R.P.Bagozzi and Y.Yi, On the evaluation of structural equation models, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science16(1) (1988), 74–94.
