Considering the fast time varying characteristic of pitch channel model of hypersonic model with coupling of engine, a kind of hybrid attack angle tracking controller is designed based on variable structure and Taylor type FLNN neural network method. And the adoption of variable structure control method make the system response very fast and robust. The Taylor type FLNN neural network is constructed with the format of fitting function which is used to describe the force and moment caused by attack angle, so it can compensate the interruption caused by the uncertainty and unconsidered factors effectively. At last, detailed numerical simulation is done to testify the rightness of the proposed hybrid method.
XuH.J., MirmiraniM., Robust Adaptive Sliding Control for a Class of MIMO Nonlinear Systems, Proceedings of AIAA Guidance, Navigation,and Control Confe Fence and Exhibit, Montreal, Canada, AIAA, 2001, pp. 4168–4176.
2.
XuH.J. and MirmiraniM., Adaptive sliding mode control design for a hypersonic flight vehicle, Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics27(5) (2004), 829–838.
3.
HaojianX.U., MajD.M. and PetrosA.I., Adaptive sliding mode control design for a hypersonic flight vehicle, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics5(27) (2004), 829–838.
4.
HallC.E., ShtesselY.B., Sliding mode disturbance observer-based control for a reusable launch Vehicle [C], AlAA Guidance Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit, Reston: AIAA, 2005, pp. 1–26.
5.
ShtesselY., TournesC., KruppD., Reusable launch vehicle control in sliding modes [A], In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference[C], New Orleans: AIAA, 1997, pp. 335–345.
6.
ShtesselY., McDuffieJ., JacksonM., ., Sliding mode control of the X-33 vehicle in launch and re-entry modes [A], In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit[C], Reston: AIAA, 1998, pp. 1352–1362.
7.
ShtesselY., HallC., JacksonM., Reusable launch vehicle control in multiple time sale sliding modes[A], In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit[C], Reston: AIAA, 2000, pp. 1–11.
8.
HallC.E., ShtesselY.B., Sliding mode disturbance observer-based control for a reusable launch vehicle [A], AIAA Guidance Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit[C], Reston: AIAA, 2005, pp. 1, 22–26.
9.
PolycarpouM.M. and IoannouP.A., A robust adaptive nonlinear control design, Automatica32(3) (1996), 423–427.
10.
KimS.-H., KimY.-S. and SongC., A robust adaptive nonlinear control approach to missile autopilot design, Control Engineering Practice12 (2004), 149–154.
11.
GauthierJ.P., HammouriH. and OthmanS., A simple observer for nonlinear systems, applications to bioreactors, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control37 (1992), 875–880.
12.
KhalilH.K. and SaberiA., Adaptive stabilization of a class of nonlinear systems using high-gain feedback, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control32 (1987), 1031–1035.
13.
LeiH. and LinW., Universal adaptive control of nonlinear systems with unknown growth rate by output feedback, Automatica42 (2006), 1783–1789.
14.
LeiH. and LinW., Adaptive regulation of uncertain nonlinear systems by output feedback: Auniversal control approach, Systems & Control Letters56 (2007), 529–537.
15.
NussbaumR.D., Some remarks on the conjecture in parameter adaptive control, Systems and Control Letters3(3) (1983), 243–246.
16.
YeX.D. and JiangJ.P., Adaptive nonlinear design without a prioriknowledge of control directions, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control43(11) (1998), 1617–1621.
17.
GeS.S., HongF. and LeeT.H., Adaptive neural control of nonlinear time-delay system with unknown virtual control coefficients, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-PartB: Cybernetics34(1) (2004), 499–516.
18.
LiY. and ChenY.Q., When is a Mittag_Leffler function a Nussbaum function?Automatica45 (2009), 1957–1959.
19.
GeS.S. and WangJ., Robust adaptive tracking for time-varying uncertain nonlinear systems with unknown control coefficients, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control48(8) (2003), 1463–1469.
20.
ZhangT.P. and GeS.S., Adaptive neural control of MIMO nonlinear state time-varying delay systems with unknown dead-zones and gain signs, Automatica43 (2007), 1021–1033.
21.
LiuZ., TanX. and YuanR., Guoliang Fan and Jianqiang Yi, Adaptive trajectory tracking control system design for hypersonic vehicles with parametric uncertainty[J], Proc IMechE Part G:JAerospace Engineering229(1) (2015), 119–134.
22.
HeJ., QiR., JiangB. and QianJ., Adaptive outputfeedbackfault tolerant control design for hypersonic flight vehicles[J], Journal of the Franklin Institute352 (2015), 1811–1835.
23.
WangS., RenX. and NaJ., Adaptive dynamic surface control based on fuzzy disturbance observer for drive system with elasticcoupling[J], Journal of the franklin institute353 (2016), 1899–1919.
24.
ZhangY., YanP. and ZhangZ., A disturbance observer-based adaptive control approach for flexure beam nano manipulators [J], ISA Transactions60 (2016), 206–217.
25.
BuX., WuX., ZhangR., MaZ. and HuangJ., Tracking differentiator design for the robust backstepping control of a flexible air-breathing hypersonic vehicle[J], Journal of the Franklin Institute352 (2015), 1739–1765.
26.
XinglingS. and HonglunW., Sliding mode based trajectory linearization control for hypersonic reentry vehicle via extended disturbance observer[J], ISA Transactions53 (2014), 1771–1786.
27.
ShaoX. and WangH., Back-stepping robust trajectory linearization control for hypersonic reentry vehicle via novel tracking differentiator[J], Journal of the Franklin Institute353 (2016), 1957–1984.
28.
WuG. and MengX., Nonlinear disturbance observer based robust backstepping control fora flexible air-breathing hypersonic vehicle[J], Aerospace Science and Technology54 (2016), 174–182.
