The virtualization design management and adaptive resource migration techniques are typically used for energy saving and system reliability improvement in the cloud computing system. The paper presents a resource migration technique based on node performance and failure rule (NPFR-RMT). It uses Broker to access node performance to determine abnormal nodes and failure nodes. All nodes in the idle queue are conducted failure rule detection with failure model. The fast and slow nodes are determined by node performance threshold analysis. The NPFR-RMT adds slow nodes and failure nodes into idle queue. The virtual machine (VM) migration method is also adapted to migrate tasks to normal nodes in idle queue for re-execution. Comparison experiment results show that the NPFR-RMT method presented in the paper can achieve expected aim that reducing energy consumption of data centers while ensuring service performance.
ChenF., GuoK., LinJ. and La PortaT., Intra-cloud lightning: Building CDNs in the cloud, in Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, 2012, pp. 433–441.
2.
HuM., LuoJ., WangY. and VeeravalliB., Practical resource provisioning and caching with dynamic resilience for cloud-based content distribution networks, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems25(8) (2014), 2169–2179.
3.
ZhuangZ. and GuoC., Building cloud-ready video transcoding system for Content Delivery Networks (CDNs), in Proceedings of IEEE Global Communications Conference, 2012, pp. 2048–2053.
4.
TsoF.P. and PezarosD.P., Improving data center network utilization using near-optimal traffic engineering, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems24(6) (2013), 1139–1148.
5.
KellerG., TigheM., LutfiyyaH. and BauerM., A hierarchical, topology-aware approach to dynamic data center management, in Proceedings of IEEE Network Operations and Management Symposium, 2014, pp. 1–7.
6.
SaadA. and El-MahdyA., Network topology identification for cloud instances, in Proceedings of Third International Conference on Cloud and Green Computing, 2013, pp. 92–98.
7.
IosupA., Nezih YigitbasiM. and
ProdanR., Performance analysis of cloud computing services for many-tasks scientific computing, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems22(6) (2011), 931–945.
8.
DominguesP., SilvaL. and MonitorD.R., A distributed resource monitoring system, in Proceedings of 11th Euro Micro Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Network-based Processing, 2003, pp. 127–133.
9.
ZhengP., CuiL.-Z., WangH.-Y. and XuM., A data placement strategy for data-intensive applications in Cloud, Chinese Journal of Computers33(8) (2010), 1472–1480.
10.
WoitaszekM. and TufoH.M., Developing a cloud computing charging model for high-performance computing resources, in Proceedings of IEEE 10th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology, 2010, pp. 210–217.
11.
ShinD. and AkkanH., Domain-based virtualized resource management in cloud computing, in Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing, 2010, pp. 1–6.
12.
CaronE., DesprezF. and LoureiroD., Cloud computing resource management through a grid middleware: A case study with DIET and eucalyptus, in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing, 2009, pp. 151–154.
13.
SchroederB. and GibsonG., A large-scale study of failures in high-performance computing systems, IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing7(4) (2010), 337–350.
14.
SahooR.K., SquillanteM.S., SivasubramaniamA. and ZhangY., Failure data analysis of a large-scale heterogeneous server environment, in Proceedings of International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks, 2004, pp. 772–781.
15.
TianG.-H., MengD. and ZhanJ.-F., Reliable resource provision policy for cloud computing, Chinese Journal of Computers33(10) (2010), 1859–1871.
16.
NiyatoD., ChaisiriS. and LeeB.-S., Economic analysis of resource market in cloud computing environment, in Proceedings of IEEE Asia-Pacific Services Computing Conference, 2009, 156–162.
17.
WangC., MuellerF., EngelmannC. and ScottS.L., Proactive process-level live migration in HPC environments, in Proceedings of International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, 2008, pp. 1–12.
18.
LinW. and QiD., Research on resource self-organizing model for cloud computing, in Proceedings of International Conference on Internet Technology and Applications, 2010, pp. 1–5.
19.
ShiY., JiangX. and YeK., An energy-efficient scheme for cloud resource provisioning based on cloudSim, in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing, 2011, pp. 595–599.
20.
LongW., YuqingL. and QingxinX., Using cloudSim to model and simulate cloud computing environment, in Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security, 2013, pp. 323–328.
21.
BuyyaR., RanjanR. and CalheirosR.N., Modeling and simulation of scalable Cloud computing environments and the CloudSim toolkit: Challenges and opportunities, in Proceedings of International Conference on High Performance Computing & Simulation, 2009, pp. 1–9.
22.
LongS. and ZhaoY., A toolkit for modeling and simulating cloud data storage: An extension to cloudSim, in Proceedings of 2012 International Conference on Control Engineering and Communication Technology, 2012, pp. 597–600.
23.
JiangD.et al., Collaborative multi-hop routing in cognitive wireless networks, Wireless Personal Communications86(2) (2016), 901–923.
24.
YangJ.et al., Multimedia cloud transmission and storage system based on internet of things, Multimedia Tools and Applications (2016), 1–16.
25.
JiangD., XuZ. and LvZ., A multicast delivery approach with minimum energy consumption for wireless multi-hop networks, Telecommunication Systems (2016), 1–12.
26.
LvZ., ChirivellaJ. and GagliardoP., Bigdata oriented multimedia mobile health applications, Journal of Medical Systems40(5), 1–10.
27.
JiangD.et al., An energy-efficient multicast algorithm with maximum network throughput in multi-hop wireless networks, J Commun Netw (2016).
