This paper focuses on the multiple attribute decision making problems in evaluation of experiment platforms with 2-tuple linguistic information. The traditional teaching can’t meet the demand of increasing talent training. The requirement of educational quality has been more and higher in the background of the information science development. The modern experiment teaching has some major problems: inadequate funding, carrying experiment teaching in remote and continuing education is difficulty, practice and innovation ability limited by resource. The research design the 2-tuple power Einstein weighted average (2TPEWA) operator for aggregating 2-tuple linguistic information inspired by the idea of power aggregation and Einstein operations. Then the 2TPEWA operator is used to construct the model for multiple attribute decision making with 2-tuple linguistic information. In the end, an example for performance evaluation of experiment platforms is proposed to test the given method and to prove its practicality and effectiveness.
ZhaoY.X., XuP.P., XiaG.B. and SongT.C., Design and realization of teaching experiment based on wireless sensor networks, Journal of Electrical & Electronic Education30(5) (2008), 48–53.
2.
SunB., OsborneL. and YangT.A., WSNED: A suite of data collection and dissemination applications for Wireless Sensor Network Education, Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges25(4) (2010), 104–111.
3.
LiuA.F., RenJ. and ChenZ.G., WSN routing experimental teaching platform based on omnet++, Computer Engineering38(11) (2012), 258–261.
4.
HloupisaG., StavrakasI., MoutzourisK., AlexandridisA. and TriantisD., WSN open source development platform: Application to green learning, Procedia Engineering25(35) (2011), 1049–1052.
5.
GirodL., RamanathanN., ElsonJ., StathopoulosT., LukacM. and EstrinD., Emstar: A software environment for developing and deploying heterogeneous sensor-actuator networks, ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks3(3) (2007), 3305–3321.
6.
KuoS.P., LinC.Y., LeeY.F., FangH.W., et al., The NTP experimental platform for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Testbeds and Research Infrastructures for the Development of Networks & Communities, 2008, pp. 1–6.
7.
HandziskiV., KöpkeA., WilligA. and WoliszA., TWIST: A scalable and reconfigurable testbed for wireless indoor experiments with sensor networks, Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Multi-hop Ad Hoc Networks: From Theory to Reality, 2006, pp. 63–70.
8.
ErtinE., AroraA., RamnathR. and NesterenkoM., Kansei: A testbed for sensing at scale, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2006, pp. 399–406.
9.
NamboothiriP.G., KumarA.A., SivalingamK.M. and MurtyS.A.V.S., A testbed for distributed target tracking with directional sensors, in Proceedings of the IFIP Wireless Days Conference, 2011, pp. 10–12.
10.
SchillerJ., LiersA. and RitterH., ScatterWeb: A wireless sensornet platform for research and teaching, Computer Communications28(13) (2005), 1545–1551.
11.
Werner-AllenG., SwieskowskiP. and WelshM., MoteLab: A wireless sensor network testbed, in Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2005, pp. 483–488.
12.
KuzuA., ErboralS., BogosyanS. and GokasanM., Multipurpose wireless sensor network platform for research and training in data fusion, and multi-feature target tracking, in Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Human System Interactions, 2009, pp. 184–189.
13.
SheuJ.P., ChangC.J., SunC.Y. and HuW.K., WSNTB: A testbed for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks, in Proceedings of the 1st IEEE International Conference on Ubi-Media Computing and Workshops, 2008, pp. 338–343.
14.
YeJ., Fuzzy decision-making method based on the weighted correlation coefficient under intuitionistic fuzzy environment, European Journal of Operational Research205(1) (2010), 202–204.
15.
MerigóJ.M., Gil-LafuenteA.M., ZhouL.G. and ChenH.Y., Induced and linguistic generalized aggregation operators and their application in linguistic group decision making, Group Decision and Negotiation21(4) (2012), 531–549.
16.
LiuP., Multi-attribute decision-making method research based on interval vague set and TOPSIS method, Technological and Economic Development of Economy15(3) (2009), 453–463.
17.
WeiG.W., Some generalized aggregating operators with linguistic information and their application to multiple attribute group decision making, Computers and Industrial Engineering61(1) (2011), 32–38.
18.
ZhangZ.M., WangC. and TianX.D., A consensus model for group decision making with hesitant fuzzy information, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems23(3) (2015), 459–480.
19.
WeiG.W. and ZhaoX.F., Methods for probabilistic decision making with linguistic information, Technological and Economic Development of Economy20(2) (2014), 193–209.
20.
ZhaoX.F., LinR. and WeiG.W., Hesitant triangular fuzzy information aggregation based on einstein operations and their application to multiple attribute decision making, Expert Systems with Applications41(4) (2014), 1086–1094.
21.
WeiG.W., WangJ.M. and ChenJ., Potential optimality and robust optimality in multiattribute decision analysis with incomplete information: A comparative study, Decision Support Systems55(3) (2013), 679–684.
22.
XuZ.S. and ChenJ., An approach to group decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic judgment matrices, System Engineer-Theory & Practice27(4) (2007), 126–133.
23.
HerreraF. and Herrera-ViedmaE., Choice functions and mechanisms for linguistic preference relations, European Journal of Operational Research120(1) (2000), 144–161.
24.
HerreraF. and Herrera-ViedmaE., Linguistic decision analysis: Steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information, Fuzzy Sets and Systems115(1) (2000), 67–82.
25.
HerreraF., Herrera-ViedmaE. and MartínezL., A fusion approach for managing multi-granularity linguistic term sets in decision making, Fuzzy Sets and Systems114(1) (2000), 43–58.
26.
DelgadoM., VerdegayJ.L. and VilaM.A., On aggregation operations of linguistic labels, International Journal of Intelligent Systems8(3) (1993), 351–370.
27.
DeganiR. and BortolanG., The problem of linguistic approximation in clinical decision making, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning2(2) (1988), 143–162.
28.
WeiG.W., A method for multiple attribute group decision making based on the ET-WG and ET-OWG operators with 2-tuple linguistic information, Expert Systems with Applications37(12) (2010), 7895–7900.
29.
WeiG.W., Some harmonic averaging operators with 2-tuple linguistic assessment information and their application to multiple attribute group decision making, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge- Based Systems19(6) (2011), 977–998.
30.
YagerR.R., The power average operator, Systems Man and Cybernetics Part A Systems and Humans31(6) (2001), 724–731.
31.
WangW.Z. and LiuX.W., Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy hybrid weighted averaging operator based on Einstein operation and its application to decision making, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems25(2) (2013), 279–290.
32.
ZhaoX.F., LiQ.X. and WeiG.W., Model for multiple attribute decision making Based on the Einstein correlated Information Fusion with Hesitant Fuzzy Information, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems26(6) (2014), 3057–3064.
33.
YuD.J., Archimedean aggregation operators based on dual hesitant fuzzy set and their application to GDM, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems23(5) (2015), 761–780.
34.
MerigóJ.M., CasanovasM. and MartínezL., Linguistic aggregation operators for linguistic decision making based on the Dempster-Shafer theory of Evidence, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems18(3) (2010), 287–304.
35.
KlementE.P., MesiarR. and PapE., Triangular norms. position paper I: Basic analytical and algebraic properties, Fuzzy Sets System143(1) (2004), 5–26.
36.
YagerR.R. and FilevD.P., Induced ordered weighted averaging operators, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics- Part B: Cybernetics29(2) (1999), 141–150.
37.
TangY.C. and ZhengJ.C., Linguistic modeling based on semantic similarity relation among linguistic labels, Fuzzy Sets and Systems157(12) (2006), 1662–1673.
38.
LiuX.W., Some properties of the weighted OWA operator, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics36(1) (2006), 118–127.
