A high-speed solenoid valve (HSV) with high dynamic responses is a key component of the common rail injector, where it provides accurate and flexible control of the injection. In this study, finite element methods were used to investigate the eddy current inside an HSV. The results demonstrated that the appearance and change in the eddy current were related to the driving current, and significantly influenced the HSV dynamics, particularly the opening response. By considering the eddy current effect, the calculations were seen to match the experimental data effectively during the opening response, but did not match them strongly during the closing response. During the HSV opening process, the eddy current at the surface of the magnetic materials impeded the magnetization; during the closing stage, it prevented the magnetic flux inside the magnetic material from spreading out and delayed demagnetization. An eddy current was proven to always block the magnetic field change and worsen the HSV dynamic response. Slotting on the yoke can significantly reduce the open response time, while hardly influence the close response. It was deemed necessary to optimize the HSV structure to weaken the eddy current effect on the opening and closing response.
PayriR.SalvadorF.J.CarreresM. and De la MorenaJ., Fuel temperature influence on the performance of a last generation common-rail diesel ballistic injector. Part II: 1D model development, validation and analysis, Energy Conversion and Management114 (2016), 376–391, doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2016.02.042.
2.
WangJ.G.WangX.R.ChenH.JinZ.L. and XiangK., Experimental study on puffing and evaporation characteristics of jatropha straight vegetable oil (SVO) droplets, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer119 (2018), 392–399, doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.11.130.
3.
JiaX.Y.SunB.G. and WuD.W., , Analysis on the influence of key parameters of control valve on the performance characteristics of electromagnetic injector SAE Technology paper 2017-01-231. doi:10.4271/2017-01-2310.
4.
ChengQ.XuM.ZhangZ. and XieN., Investigation on the spray characteristics of standard gasoline, N-pentane, iso-octane and ethanol with a novel heated tip SIDI injector, Applied Thermal Engineering110 (2017), 539–552, doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.07.201.
5.
CoppoM.DongiovanniC. and NegriC., Numerical analysis and experimental investigation of a common rail type diesel injector, Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power- Transactions of the Asme126(4) (2004), 874–885, doi:10.1115/1.1787502.
6.
ChengQ.ZhangZ.D.GuoH. and XieN., Improved processing and performance of GDI injector based on metal injection molding technology, International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics44 (2014), 99–114, doi:10.3233/JAE-131739.
7.
SunZ.Y.LiG.X.WangL.WangW.H.GaoQ.X. and WangJ., Effects of structure parameters on the static electromagnetic characteristics of solenoid valve for an electronic unit pump, Energy Conversion and Management113 (2016), 119–130, doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2016.01.031.
8.
ZhaoJ.H.ShiY.GrekhovL. and MaX.Z., Effects of structure parameters on the static electromagnetic characteristics of high speed solenoid valves, International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics55 (2017), 45–60, doi:10.3233/JAE-160129.
9.
LiL.ZhangC.YanB. and LiX., Research of a giant magnetostrictive valve with internal cooling structure, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics47 (2017), 2897–2900, doi:10.1109/TMAG.2011.2157902.
10.
XueG.ZhangP.HeZ.LiD.HuangY. and XieW., Design and experimental study of a novel giant magnetostrictive actuator, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials420 (2016), 185–191, doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2016.07.037.
11.
ProctorD.L.AlbertD.R. and DavisH.F., Improved piezoelectric actuators for use in high-speed pulsed valves, Review of Scientific Instruments81(2) (2010), 023–106, doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2016.07.037.
12.
MaitiR.SahaR. and WatoonJ., The static and dynamic characteristics of a pressure relief valve with a proportional solenoid-controlled pilot stage, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering216(2) (2002), 143–156, doi:10.1243/0959651021541516.
13.
YeQ. and ChenJ., Dynamic analysis of a pilot-operated two-stage solenoid valve used in pneumatic systems, Simulation Modeling Practice and Theory17(5) (2009), 794–816, doi:10.1016/j.simpat.2009.01.005.
14.
CvetkovicD.CosicI. and SubicA., Improved performance of the electromagnetic fuel injector solenoid actuator using a modelling approach, International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics27 (2008), 251–273, doi:10.3233/JAE-2008-939.
15.
ChengQ.ZhangZ.D. and XieN.L., Power losses and dynamic response analysis of ultra-high speed solenoid injector within different driven strategies, Applied Thermal Engineering91 (2015), 611–621, doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.08.053.
16.
ZhaoJ.H.WangM.WangZ.J.GrekhovL.QiuT. and MaX.Z., Different boost voltage effects on the dynamic response and energy losses of high-speed solenoid valve, Applied Thermal Engineering123 (2017), 1949–1503, doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.05.117.
17.
AngadiS.V.JacksonR.L.ChoeS.Y.FlowersG.T.SuhlingJ.C. and ChangY.K., Reliability and life study of hydraulic solenoid valve. Part 1: A multi-physics finite element model, Engineering Failure Analysis16 (2009), 874–887, doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2008.08.011.
18.
AngadiS.V.JacksonR.L.ChoeS.Y.FlowersG.T.SuhlingJ.C. and ChangY.K., Reliability and life study of hydraulic solenoid valve. Part 2: Experimental study, Engineering Failure Analysis16 (2009), 944–963, doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2008.08.012.
19.
WuS.ZhaoX.Y.LiC.F.JiaoZ. X. and QuY.F., Multi-objective optimization of a hollow plunger type solenoid for high speed on/off valve, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics65(4) (2018), 3115–3124, doi:10.1109/TIE.2017.2756578.
BarriereO.RagusaC.AppinoC. and FiorilloF., Prediction of energy losses in soft magnetic materials under arbitrary induction waveforms and DC bias, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics64(3) (2017), 2522–2529, doi:10.1109/TIE.2016.2608886.
22.
KowalD.SergeantP.DupreL. and VandenbosscheL., Comparison of Iron loss models for electrical machines with different frequency domain and time domain methods for excess loss prediction, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics51 (2015), 1–10, doi:10.1109/TMAG.2014.2338836.
23.
YamazakiK. and IshigamiH., Rotor-shape optimization of interior-permanent-magnet motors to reduce harmonic iron losses, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics57 (2010), 61–69, doi:10.1109/TIE.2009.2025285.
24.
BertottiG., Hysteresis in Magnetism, Academic, San Diego, CA, USA, 1998.
25.
BertottiG., General properties of power losses in soft ferromagnetic materials, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics24 (1988), 621–630, doi:10.1109/20.43994.
26.
Ansoft Maxwell manual, Technical manual 2015.
27.
HuynhC.ZhengL. and AcharyaD., Losses in high speed permanent magnet machines used in microturbine applications, Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power131(2) (2008), 697–703, doi:10.1115/1.2982151.
