In the paper the optimal synthesis of the magnetic field in a device for Magneto-Fluid Hyperthermia (MFH) tests on cell cultured in Petri dishes is presented. Magneto-Fluid Hyperthermia is a cancer therapy that exploits magnetic fluid and time-harmonic magnetic field to heat nanoparticles localized in the target region. To this end, a modified version of Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II) is presented. The proposed optimization algorithm includes the periodic migration of a new population that enhances the genetic heritage of the current population. The convergence of the algorithm is automatically controlled by applying a suitable ‘stop criterion’. The optimal design of a class of power inductors for MFH is considered.
GneveckowU.JordanA.ScholzR.BrüssV.WaldöfnerN.RickeJ.FeussnerA.HildebrandtB.RauB. and WustP., Description and characterization of the novel hyperthermia- and thermoablation-system MFH 300F for clinical magnetic fluid hyperthermia, Med Phys31 (2004), 1444–1451.
2.
GoyaG.F.AsínL. and IbarraM.R., Cell death induced by AC magnetic fields and magnetic nanoparticles: Current state and perspectives, International Journal of Hyperthermia29 (2013), 810–818.
3.
Di BarbaP.DughieroF. and SieniE., Magnetic Field Synthesis in the Design of Inductors for Magnetic Fluid Hyperthermia, Magnetics, IEEE Transactions on46 (2010), 2931–2934.
4.
Di BarbaP.DughieroF. and SieniE., Field synthesis for the optimal treatment planning in Magnetic Fluid Hyperthermia, Archives of Electrical Engineering61 (2012), 57–67.
5.
BertaniR.ForzanM.SgarbossaP.SieniE.Di BarbaP.SpizzoF. and Del BiancoL., Multi-objective Design of a Magnetic Fluid Hyperthermia Device, in: Industrial Electronics Society, IECON 2015 – 40th Annual Conference of the IEEE, 2016.
6.
Di BarbaP.ForzanM.SieniE. and DughieroF., Sensitivity-based optimal shape design of induction-heating devices, IET Science, Measurement & Technology9 (2015), 579–586. doi: 10.1049/iet-smt.2014.0227.
7.
BertaniR.CerettaF.Di BarbaP.DughieroF.ForzanM.MichelinR.A.SgarbossaP.SieniE. and SpizzoF., Optimal inductor design for nanofluid heating characterisation, Engineering Computations32 (2015), 1870–1892.
8.
Di BarbaP.DughieroF.MognaschiM.E.SaviniA. and WiakS., Biogeography-Inspired Multiobjective Optimization and MEMS Design, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics52 (2016), 1–4.
9.
Di BarbaP.DolezelI.KarbanP.KusP.MachF.MognaschiM.E. and SaviniA., Multiphysics field analysis and multiobjective design optimization: a benchmark problem, Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering.22 (2014), 1214–1225. doi: 10.1080/17415977.2013.860590.
10.
CarcangiuS.Di BarbaP.FanniA.MognaschiM.E. and MontisciA., Comparison of multi-objective optimisation approaches for inverse magnetostatic problems, COMPEL – The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering26 (2007), 293–305.
11.
DebK.PratapA.AgarwalS. and MeyarivanT., A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II, Evolutionary Computation, IEEE Transactions on6 (2002), 182–197.
12.
DebK., Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms, 1st ed, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester; New York, 2001.
13.
SieniE.Di BarbaP. and ForzanM., Migration NSGA: method to improve a non-elitist searching of Pareto front, with application in magnetics, Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering24 (2016), 543–566.
14.
Di BarbaP.DughieroF.ForzanM. and SieniE., Optimal design of inductors for magnetic- fluid hyperthermia by means of migration- assisted NSGA, International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics51 (2016), S125–S134.
15.
Di BarbaP.DughieroF.ForzanM. and SieniE., Improved solution to a multi-objective benchmark problem of inverse induction heating, International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics49 (2015), 279–288. doi: 10.3233/JAE-150023.
16.
Di BarbaP.MognaschiM.E.SaviniA. and WiakS., Island biogeography as a paradigm for MEMS optimal design, International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics51(2016), S97–S105.
17.
Di BarbaP.DughieroF.ForzanM. and SieniE., A Paretian Approach to Optimal Design With Uncertainties: Application in Induction Heating, Magnetics, IEEE Transactions on50 (2014), 917–920.
18.
PlackettR.L. and BurmanJ.P., The Design of Optimum Multifactorial Experiments, Biometrika33 (1946), 305–325.
19.
Di BarbaP.DughieroF.ForzanM. and SieniE., Migration-corrected NSGA-II for improving multiobjective design optimization in electromagnetics, International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics51 (2016), 161–172.
20.
Di BarbaP.DughieroF.ForzanM. and SieniE., Multi-physics and multi-objective design of a benchmark device: a problem of inverse induction heating, in: VI International Conference on Computational Methods for Coupled Problems in Science and Engineering COUPLED PROBLEMS 2015, 2015.
21.
Di BarbaP.DughieroF.ForzanM. and SieniE., Handling sensitivity in multiobjective design optimization of MFH inductors, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics (2017), 1.
22.
Di BarbaP.DughieroF.SieniE. and CandeoA., Coupled Field Synthesis in Magnetic Fluid Hyperthermia, Magnetics, IEEE Transactions on47 (2011), 914–917.
23.
Di BarbaP.ForzanM. and SieniE., Multiobjective design optimization of an induction heating device: A benchmark problem, International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics47 (2015), 1003–1013.
24.
SrinivasN. and DebK., Multiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms, Evolutionary Computation2 (1994), 221–248.
25.
Di BarbaP., Multiobjective shape design in electricity and magnetism, Springer, Doredrecht; New York, 2010.
26.
Di BarbaP.DughieroF.ForzanM. and SieniE., Magnetic Design Optimization approach using Design of Experiments with Evolutionary Computing, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics52 (2016), 8000404.
27.
Di BarbaP.SaviniA. and WiakS., Field models in electricity and magnetism, Springer, [Dordrecht], 2008.
28.
FLUX, (CEDRAT): www.cedrat.com/software/flux/flux.html, [last visited May 2017].
29.
VassentE.MeunierG. and SabonnadierJ.C., Simulation of induction machine operation using complex magnetodynamic finite elements, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics25 (1989), 3064–3066.
30.
CanovaA.DughieroF.FasoloF.ForzanM.FreschiF.GiacconeL. and RepettoM., Simplified Approach for 3-D Nonlinear Induction Heating Problems, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics45 (2009), 1855–1858.
31.
Di BarbaP.DughieroF. and SieniE., Non-parametric optimal shape design of a magnetic device for biomedical applications, COMPEL – The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering31 (2012), 1358–1367.
32.
BertaniR.CerettaF.Di BarbaP.ForzanM.DughieroF.SgarbossaP. and SieniE., Optimal Inductor Design for Nanofluid Magnetic Characterisation, in: Proc. CEEC Annecy, France, 2014.
33.
Di BarbaP.ForzanM. and SieniE., Multi-objective design of a power inductor: a benchmark problem of inverse induction heating, COMPEL – The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering33 (2014), 1990–2005.
34.
MontgomeryD.C., Design and analysis of experiments, Eighth edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Hoboken, NJ, 2013.
