This work is devoted to solve the problem of the determination of the spatial position, orientation and size of an electrically charged ellipsoidal conductor subjected to an external electric field. The problem, which is relevant to the field of the non destructive testing and evaluations engineering, is approached in fuzzy domain replacing it in an equivalent classification problem between images through the use of the fuzzy divergence concept. The obtained numerical results demonstrate how the performances of the proposed approach are totally comparable with those given by the more sophisticate and well established fuzzy clustering techniques exploited in literature, offering thus a viable alternative to solve identification problem in electrostatics.
YangF.JiangY.ShiQ.ChenT. and WeiW., Magnetic Field Inverse Problem of Grounding Grid and Its Application, International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics40(3) (2012), 173–183, doi 10.3233/JAE-2012-1580.
2.
LahayeD., Optimization and Inverse Problems in Electromagnetism, International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics53(S2) (2017), S1513, doi 10.3233/JAE-162250.
3.
KharytonovA., Solution of Elliptic Inverse Problems using Integral Equations, International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics24(1-2) (2006), 69–77.
4.
CacciolaM.DengY.MorabitoC.UdpaL.UdpaS. and VersaciM., Automatic Fuzzy Based Identification of Flawed Rivet in Magneto Optic Images, International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics28 (2008), 297–303.
5.
Aida-zadeK.R. and RahimovA.B., An Approach to Numerical Solution of Some Inverse Problems for Parabolic Equations, Inverse Problems in Sciences and Engineering22(1) (2004), 96–111, doi 10.1080/17415997.2013.827184.
6.
AnS.YangS.BaiY. et al., An Improved Physical Programming Method for Multi-Objective Inverse Problems, International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics52(3-4) (2016), 1151–1159, doi 10.3233/JAE-162123.
7.
BortolussiL.DinuL.P.FranzoiL. and SgarroA., Coding Theory: A General Framework and Two Inverse Problems, International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics141(4) (2015), 297–310, doi 10.3233/FI-2015-1277.
8.
ArtemevA.ParnovskyL. and PolterovichI., Inverse Electrostatic and Elasticity Problems for Checkered Distributions, Inverse Problems29(7) (2013), 1–22, doi 10.1088/0266-5611/29/7/075010.
9.
XiangH. and ZouJ., Randomized Algorithms for Large-Scale Inverse Problems with General Tikhonov Regularizations, Inverse Problems31(8) (2015), doi 10.1088/0266-5611/31/8/085008.
10.
ArkadanA. and Subramaniam-SivanesanS., Identifying an Inaccessible Electrostatic Source with Gradient-based Inverse Problem Methodology and Boundary Elements, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics35(3-Part 1) (1999), 1578–1581.
11.
HadefM.MekidecheM.R.DjerdirA. and MiraouiA., An inverse problem approach for parameter estimation of interior permanent magnet synchronous motor, Progress In Electromagnetics Research B31 (2011), 15–28, doi 10.2528.
12.
V.V.A.A., Computational Methods for Applied Inverse Problems, in: Inverse and Ill-Posed ProblemsWangY.YagolaA.G. and YangC. Eds, Degruyter, Series 56, 2012, ISBN: 978-3-11-025905-6.
13.
AnS.YangS. and WuX., An Improved Multi-Objective Cross-Entropy Method for Inverse Problems, International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics45(1-4) (2016), 689–695, doi 10.3233/JAE-141894.
14.
RetnajeevanS.HooleH.SubramaniamS.SaldanhaR.CoulombJ.L. and SabonnadiereJ.C., Inverse problem methodology and finite elements in the identification of cracks, sources, materials, and their geometry in inaccessible locations, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics27(3) (1991), 3433–3443, doi 10.1109/20.79086.
15.
CoccoreseE.MartoneR. and MorabitoF.C., A Neural Network Approach for the Solution of Electric and Magnetic Inverse Problems, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics30(5) (1994), 2829–2839, doi 10.1109/20.312527.
16.
AngiulliG., Design of Square Substrate Integrated Waveguide Cavity Resonators: Compensation of Modelling Errors by Support Vector Regression Machines, American Journal of Applied Sciences9(11) (2012), 1872–1875, doi 10.3844/ajassp.2012.1872.
17.
CalcagnoS.MorabitoF.C. and VersaciM., A Novel Approach for Detecting and Classifying Defects in Metallic Plates, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics39(3) (2003), 1531–1534, doi 10.1109/TMAG.2003.810353.
18.
PostorinoM.N. and VersaciM., A neuro-fuzzy approach to simulate the user mode choice behaviour in a travel decision framework, International Journal of Modelling and Simulation28(1) (2008), 64–71.
19.
CacciolaM.La ForestaF.MorabitoF.C. and VersaciM., Advanced Use of Soft Computing and Eddy Current Test to Evaluate Mechanical Integrity of Metallic Plates, NDT & E International40 (2007), 357–362, doi 10.1016/j.ndteint.2006.12.11.
PellicanóD.PalamaraI.CacciolaM.CalcagnoS.VersaciM. and MorabitoF.C., Fuzzy Similarity Measures for Detection and Classification of Defects in CFRP, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control60(9) (2013), 1917–1927, doi 10.1109/TUFFC.2013.2776.
22.
VersaciM., Fuzzy Approach and Eddy Currents NDT/NDE Devices in Industrial Applications, Electronics Letters52(11) (2016), 943–945, doi 10.1049/el.2015.3409.
23.
AA.VV., Fuzzy Sets, Rough Sets, Multisets and ClusteringTorraV.DahlbomA. and NarukawaY., Editors, Springer International Publishing, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-47557-8, 2017.
24.
WangD.G. and MengY.P. and LiH.X., A Fuzzy Similarity Inference Method for Fuzzy Reasoning, Computers and Mathematics with Applications56 (2008), 2445–2454.
25.
LandauL.D.PitaevskiiL.P. and LifsitsE.M., Electrodynamics of Continuous Media8, 2004, Elsevier.
26.
ChairaT. and RayA.K., Fuzzy Image Processing and Application with MatLab, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, London New York, 2010.
27.
JohaniyakZ.C. and KovacsS., Distance Based Similarities Misures on Fuzzy Sets, in: Proceedings of the Third Slovakian-Hungarian Joint Symposium on Applied Machine Intelligence, SAMI 2015, Herl’any, Slovakia (2005).
28.
BaccourL.AlimiA.M. and JohnR.I., Some Notes on Fuzzy Similarity Measures and Application to Classification of Shapes, Recognition of Arabic Sentences and Mosaic, IAENG International Journal of Computer Science41(2) (2014), 81–90.
29.
WekenD.V.NachtegaelM.DeW.V.SchulteS. and KerreE.E., A Survey on the Use and the Construction of Fuzzy Similarity Measures in Image Processing, in: IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Measurements Systems and Applications, CIMSA 2005, 2005, pp. 187–192, doi 10.1109/CIMSA.2005.1522858.
30.
PalS.K.KingR.A. and HishimA., Index of Area Coverage of Fuzzy Image Subset and Object Extraction, Pattern Recognition Letter11 (1992), 831–841.
31.
RosenfeldA., The Fuzzy Geometry of Image Subsets, Pattern Recognition Letter2 (1984), 311–317.
32.
FanJ. and XieW., Distance Measure and induced Fuzzy Entropy, Fuzzy Sets and Systems104 (1999), 305–314.
33.
YagerR.R., On the Measure of Fuzziness and Negation I. Membership in Unit Interval, International Journal of General Systems5 (1979), 221–229.
34.
HungC.C.KulkarniS. and KuoB.C., A New Weighted Fuzzy C-Means Clustering Algorithm for Remotely Sensed Image Classification, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing5(3) (2011), 543–553.
