Abstract
Keywords
INTRODUCTION
The global population is aging at a rate unprecedented in human history. This increase in aging, whereby over 2 billion people will be ≥ 60 years of age by 2050 [1], will obviously be paralleled by a rise in age-related cognitive impairments. Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) has been noted to range between 10–20% in samples of population-based studies of older adults [2]. Individuals with MCI have a 2.5-fold high risk for developing all-cause dementia, and MCI is often a precursor to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [2]. MCI is thought to represent a continuum between healthy aging and AD [3], and thus can be used as models for preventive interventions. As such, there is increasing interest in the neural circuits and other factors that affect and predict progress to AD; as well as novel interventions.
Yoga is one such technique that is rapidly gaining interest and popularity in the West (although it has been used in the East for thousands of years), mainly being used by millions of people for stress-reduction, according to surveys. For example, in England there was a rise from 0.46 to 1.11% of population between 1999 and 2008 [4]; and in the US, 2012 data suggests 9.5% of the US population uses yoga therapies [5]. New data is now suggesting that mind-body interventions including yoga, tai chi, mindfulness meditation, and qi gong, have promising effects on cognitive issues related to aging [6–8]. A recent study by Gothe et al. [9] compared the effects of Hatha yoga and stretching-strengthening control on cognition over 8 weeks in 118 community-dwelling older adults, and found significantly improved executive function, working memory and efficiency of mental-set shifting and flexibility in the yoga group compared with the control group. A study by Hariprasadet al. [10] compared yoga with waitlist controls over 6 months among 87 residents of nursing homes in India. Findings showed that individuals in the yoga intervention group showed marked improvements in an array of cognitive domains compared to wait-listcontrols.
However, there are no studies to date examining functional brain connectivity in relation to memory following a yoga intervention among older adults [11]. In a previous pilot study using Kirtan Kriya (KK, a meditation that involves chanting mantra, hand movements, and visualization), older family dementia caregivers showed significant improvements in cognition, memory, and brain metabolism compared to a relaxation control condition [12]. A pilot study by Wells et al. [13] explored the effect of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) versus usual care on neural outcomes among 14 MCI subjects. They explored resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) and structural MRI data around the default mode network (DMN) and hippocampus, and found enhanced DMN activity and lesser bilateral hippocampal atrophy. These results are very relevant for subjects with MCI and AD, which typically affects DMN and hippocampus very early in the disease process, and some have used these are early markers of AD [14].
Memory enhancement training (MET) is another technique that has been increasingly explored for the prevention of cognitive decline, and is thus considered a ‘gold-standard’ and rigorous control for studies of cognitive impairment. The goal of MET is to optimize cognitive function to support individuals’ life functioning and quality of life [15]. There is evidence suggesting that MET promotes significant improvements in cognitive performance among healthy, older adults [16]; however there is no clear consensus on the mechanisms of action underlying reported benefits [17]. A number of systematic reviews have been conducted on the effects of MET in individuals with MCI. For example, one review by Jean et al. [18] analyzed 15 studies and found effects on memory, and quality and life. Simon et al. [19] explored this field for amnestic MCI patient and ground effects on cognitive performance and subjective perceptions of cognition. There are no studies to date exploring the effect of MET on rs-fMRI.
To our knowledge, yoga has never been compared to MET in a direct head-to-head comparative clinical trial and this has not occurred with
METHODS
Data were collected for the “
Participants
Participants were recruited via advertisements from UCLA outpatient clinics and the UCLA Long-evity Center Program, and from the community. This study was approved by the UCLA Institutional Review Board (IRB). All participants underwent IRB-approved informed consent procedures prior to enrolling in the study.
Inclusion criteria were: 1) age ≥ 55 years; 2) subjective memory complaints; 3) Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) Scale score of 0.5 [20]; 3) sufficient English proficiency at the 8th grade level or higher as determined by the word reading subtest of the Wide Range Achievement Test-4 [21] to participate in MET; 4) capacity to provide informed consent.
Exclusion criteria included: 1) current or past Axis I psychiatric disorders, or recent unstable medical or neurological disorders; 2) any disabilities preventing participation in the MET or KY+KK conditions (e.g., severe visual or hearing impairment); 3) insufficient English proficiency; 4) a diagnosis of dementia per the DSM-IV/5; 5) Mini-Mental Health Examination (MMSE) [22] score of 24 or below; 6) use of psychoactive medications; 7) participation in a psychotherapy that involves cognitive training; and 8) participants with prior or current training inyoga.
At baseline, participants underwent a screen including: 1) an interview by a trained study staff to identify physical and cognitive symptoms; 2) a standard battery of hematologic studies; 3) neurological examination (i.e., the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) [23]; 3) select memory tests (the Fluid Object Memory Evaluation [24]; and 4) a neuropsychiatric evaluation (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders) [25]; 5) medical comorbidity was assessed with the Cerebrovascular Risk Factor Prediction Chart [26]; the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale-Geriatric [23, 27–30]; 6) mood assessments included the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) [31].
Randomization and blinding procedures
After all baseline test results were reviewed and eligibility criteria were confirmed, subjects were randomized to either MET or KY groups using a computer-generated random assignment scheme, which assigns subjects in a 1:1 ratio to each group in the blocks of 8–10 subjects. All groups were called “wellness and mental stimulation” groups. All behavioral raters, the principal investigator, all statisticians and data managers were blind to the group assignment, and subjects were asked not to disclose their group assignment to the raters. No unblinding occurred in the process of assessment.
Neuropsychological assessment schedule
Participants were assessed at baseline (pre-treatment) and at 12-weeks (post-treatment). While an extensive neuropsychological battery was administered for the full trial, the focus of this research was to identify the neural networks associated with memory improvements resulting from a meditation (KK) and MET among older individuals with MCI. The following memory tests were used: A verbal list-learning measure, the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test–Revised (HVLT-R) [32] (20-min delay recall raw scores) and a visuospatial memory measure, the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Test (Rey-O) (30-min delay recall raw scores) [33]. Only HVLT and Rey-O delayed recall change scores were correlated with connectivity changes in this study to compare the effects of interventions on network connectivity specifically associated with long-termmemory.
Yoga intervention
Participants were randomly assigned to the KK meditation group (which included 60-min weekly KY classes and a 12-min KK meditation daily as a homework assignment). The structure of the 60-min weekly yoga sessions were the same for each group and standard for KY classes conducted by a certified KY yoga teacher. The content and structure of the class did not differ from one week to another and contained the following elements: 1) Tuning in (5 min); 2) Warm up (10 min); 3) Breath techniques “Pranayama” (10 min); 4) Kriya (20 min); 5) Meditation (11 min); 6) Rest “Shavasana” and closing (4 min). KK was taught during the class using standardized CDs for the 12-min meditation. Standardized handouts and CDs were given to each participant for home practice. This protocol is standard for the KK and KY practice and has been utilized in previous studies with older adults [34]. A brief (3–5 min) warm-up with 12-min yogic practice includes an ancient chanting meditation, KK, performed every day at the same time for a total of 12 weeks, using a previously tested protocol. The meditation involves repetitive finger movements (or mudras), as well as chanting of the mantra “Saa, Taa, Naa, Maa,” meaning “Birth, Life, Death, and Rebirth,” first chanted aloud, then in a whisper, and silently for the total of 11 min followed by 1-min of the final deep breathing relaxation accompanied by the visualization of light [35]. Adverse events were monitored at each visit by using the UKU Side Effect Rating Scale [36].
Memory enhancement training
Developed at the UCLA Longevity Center by Dr. Ercoli and colleagues, MET involves a scripted curriculum for trainers and a companion workbook for participants. The standard detailed protocol for the MET program is based on evidence-based techniques that use verbal and visual association strategies and practical strategies for memory compensation [16, 37]. MET is manualized and includes several components common to effective memory training programs [16] such as: (1) education about memory; (2) preliminary instruction in the basic elements of memory strategies (i.e., “pre-training”); (3) instruction in specific memory strategies; (4) home practice with logs to track activity; (5) addressing non-cognitive factors such as self-confidence, anxiety, and negative expectations; and (6) small (i.e., about 10 persons) groups and short (60-min) sessions. The curriculum is divided into 12 weekly-sessions that are organized in the same way in which trainers: (1) document the number of participants attending the session, collect homework completion logs and assess engagement in alternative treatments; (2) review the previous session’s homework to reinforce techniques; (3) teach new techniques, reviews, and conduct in-class exercises; and (4) assign homework. Each session is devoted to learning and practicing techniques, and 15 min are reserved for reviewing homework. Specific techniques taught include: Visual associative strategies for learning faces and names (adapted from McCarthy [38]); verbal associative techniques (such as the use of stories) to remember lists; organizational strategies (categorizing items on a grocery list); learning memory habits to recall where one places items, what one has done in the recent past (e.g., locking doors, turning off appliances); and how to remember future tasks (i.e., appointments).
Neuroimaging acquisition and preprocessing
Image acquisition
Resting-state (rs) fMRI data were collected with a 3T TIM Trio scanner (Siemens AG, Munich & Berlin, Germany) at baseline and at 12-weeks (immediately post-intervention). Participants’ heads were positioned comfortably within a 32-channel head coil, and head motion was minimized with firm cushions. We instructed participants to close their eyes and stay awake during image acquisition. RS-fMRI images were acquired for 5 min and 41 s with a multi-band gradient-echo echo-planar imaging (EPI) sequence sensitive to BOLD contrast effects. We acquired 275 contiguous EPI resting-state volumes, and the parameters for functional imaging were: Repetition time 1.24 s, echo time 38.2 ms, flip angle 65°, field of view 21.2 × 21.2 cm2, acquisition matrix 118 × 118, 1.8 mm3 iso-voxel size (no gap), 78 slices, and 6 bands. We also acquired anatomic images with3-dimensional MPRAGE sequence (acquisition matrix 256 × 256 with 1 mm thick contiguous slices) for co-registration with the rs-fMRI data.
Image preprocessing
Brain imaging data were pre-processed using FSL (FMRIB Software Library (FSL, www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl) for motion correction, high-pass filter (0.01 Hz), image normalization and 5-mm3 Gaussian spatial smoothing. MELODIC (Multivariate Exploratory Linear Decomposition into Independent Components, a tool of FSL) was used to remove significant brain motion, scanner, and physiological artifacts using independent component analysis (ICA). The processed functional data from all participants were temporally concatenated to form a 4-dimensional data set, which was decomposed into group-level independent components (ICs) using ICA as implemented in MELODIC. The MELODIC automated dimensionality estimate was used to determine the number and order of the ICs [39]. Twenty-five ICs were identified with this method. Each component includes brain structures that share the same temporal pattern of signal after mixture modeling was applied. The dual regression approach was subsequently used to back-reconstruct individual-specific connectivity maps associated with each group-level component, which been shown to be an effective and reliable approach to analyses of resting state fMRI data [40]. This approach yielded 36 ICs; 26 of these overlapped grey matter and were considered biologically plausible and considered for subsequent statistical analysis (described below).
Statistical analysis
The two groups were compared on all demographic and clinical measures at baseline to assess that randomization procedures were effective. We used Fisher’s exact tests for the categorical measures and Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests for the continuousmeasures. Changes in clinical and the memory measures were examined between groups using Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests and within groups using Wilcoxon signed rank tests. A significance level of 0.05, two-tailed was used for all inferences.
The present study focused primarily on 4 ICs for analyses, based on group level ICs relevant to the tests of long-term memory, including: The DMN, posterior DMN, language network, and superior parietal network. For each IC, we analyzed correlations between voxel-wise changes in network connectivity and changes in memory performance across all the participants (using years of education, age, sex, and days of training duration as covariates). These analyses were restricted to component-specific masks generated by thresholding the group-level IC probability image to voxels having 0.5 or higher probability of contributing to each IC map. Voxel-wise thresholds were chosen at
RESULTS
Figure 1 presents the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) flow. Groups were statistically equivalent across all measures at baseline. Table 1 presents the baseline clinical and demographic characteristics of the intervention. Twenty-five individuals total were involved in this study with: 14 individuals in the yoga group (mean age of 67.1 ± 9.5 years) and 11 individuals in the MET group (mean age of 67.8 ± 9.7 years).
Change scores did not significantly differ between the two groups in most of the clinical or memory measures; however the yoga group improved significantly in depression (GDS) and in visuospatial memory (Rey-O delayed recall). The clinical improvement in GDS for the yoga group was only minimal (baseline 7.5 (5.1) and follow up 3.9 (2.5);
In terms of functional connectivity, we focused our analyses on four components related to long-term memory (the DMN, posterior DMN, language network, and superior parietal network). Results showed significant correlations between changes in connectivity and long-term declarative memory performance alterations for both groups after training (
Default mode network findings for yoga and memory enhancement training
In our analyses, we identified two DMNs. The first included regions most typically associated with the DMN, including the precuneus, PCC, ACC, medial frontal cortex (MFC), and hippocampus. The second DMN was more posterior and included precuneus, PCC, lateral parietal cortex, and hippocampus. No significant effects were identified in this latter posterior DMN. Results within the more typical DMN are discussed below.
In analyses of the DMN (Fig. 2), improvement in the HVLT delayed recall in both in yoga and MET groups correlated with greater connectivity in two anterior clusters, the pregenual ACC and frontal medial cortex (FMC). ROI analyses confirmed the effects were present in both groups for the ACC (R14 = 0.84,
Increased HVLT delayed recall positively correlated with increased DMN-connectivity within two posterior clusters: The PCC and left lateral occipital cortex. In ROI analyses, this positive correlation was present for both groups in the PCC (R14 = 0.78,
An additional cluster in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (middle frontal gyrus) also showed increased connectivity in association with increased HVLT delayed recall scores. ROI analyses indicated the effect was present in both groups (R14 = 0.87,
Language network findings for yoga and memory enhancement training
The language resting-state network included the bilateral frontal orbital cortex, superior frontal gyrus, left middle and inferior frontal gyrus, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, left middle and superior temporal gyrus, and angular gyrus. Subjects showed positive correlations between long-term verbal memory performance changes and altered functional connectivity in one cluster, the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG). ROI analyses indicated that this positive correlation was present for both groups (R14 = 0.82,
Superior parietal network findings for yoga and memory enhancement training
The superior parietal network (known for its role in long-term and working memory [41]) included the bilateral PCC, precuneus, precentral and postcentral gyrus, and parietal operculum cortex. With respect to this network, a single cluster near the precentral and postcentral gyri exhibited a negative relationship between changes in functional connectivity and changes in long-term visuospatial memory performance. In an ROI analysis, both the yoga and MET groups showed significant effects in this cluster (R14 = –0.59,
DISCUSSION
The present study was the first to examine changes in neural connectivity and memory associated with a yoga intervention (specifically KK) and MET among a group of elderly individuals experiencing MCI. Overall, we found comparable changes for both yoga and MET in neural connectivity networks associated with memory performance.
Both the yoga and MET group showed resting-state brain activity changes reflecting improvements in memory. Mainly, results showed increased connectivity within DMN and the language network in association with improved verbal memory performance for both Yoga and MET groups. Changes in the superior parietal network were also negativelycorrelated with memory recall improvements. We discuss these findings in detail below.
The DMN is a network of regions showing synchronized activity patterns when the brain is at-rest and decreased when the mind is engaged in the external environment [42, 43]. The DMN includes areas in the medial prefrontal cortex, the PCC, precuneus and medial temporal lobe structures including the hippocampus [44, 45]. Evidence suggests involvement of the DMN in episodic memory retrieval, prospective memory encoding, social cognition, self-referential processing, including self-prospecting and internal monitoring, autobiographical memory retrieval, future planning, and theory of mind [45–47]. Some research suggests that the DMN is the main rs-fMRI network affected in aging [48–51], showing reductions in connectivity between anterior and posterior nodes [48, 52–56]. Decreased DMN connectivity has been noted in AD [57] and involves areas affected by cerebral atrophy, reduced metabolism, and amyloid in AD and MCI [58]. The suggestion for alterations of DMN connectivity has been previously attributed to inefficiency reallocation of brain resources. From a neuroanatomical perspective this may be due to poorer cingulum bundle integrity which connects posterior to anterior and temporal DMN nodes [59]. Poorer antero-posterior connectivity was recently correlated with visual and verbal memory scores in a study of 116 healthy elders [55].
Our study findings suggest that yoga may be helpful in enhancing memory recall, specifically visual memory encoding. However, we acknowledge that practice effects may factor into observed improvements. Moreover, these findings suggest that improved memory recall is associated with increased DMN connectivity in anterior, posterior and frontal medial areas. Relevant to these findings are a number of other studies. A pilot study by Wells et al. [13] explored the effect of MBSR versus usual care on 14 MCI subjects. They explored rs-fMRI and structural MRI data around the DMN and hippocampus, respectively. The study found enhanced DMN activity (increased functional connectivity between the PCC and medial prefrontal cortices and hippocampus), as well as lesser bilateral hippocampal atrophy. These results are promising given that these regions are associated with MCI and AD. Yoga is believed to exert its effect via lowering stress, lowering inflammation, enhancing neuroplasticity processes (e.g., production of brain derived neurotrophic factor), increasing antioxidant levels and increasing telomerase activity [12, 60–64].
A number of studies have explored the effect of meditative therapies on the DMN, supporting the present study findings. For example, Tayloret al. [65] recently compared DMN functional connectivity between 13 experienced meditators and 11 beginner meditators; and found that experienced meditators had weaker functional connectivity between DMN regions involved in self-referential processing and emotional appraisal, however they showed greater connectivity in regions associated with present-moment awareness. It is likely that present-moment awareness facilitates verbal memory, processing and recall as the individual is attentive to the moment. Brewer et al. [66] conducted a similar analysis of experienced meditators versuss meditation-naïve controls across a number of difference meditation types, i.e., concentration, loving-kindness, and choice-less awareness. Experienced meditators showed deactivation in the main nodes of the DMN (MFC and PCC) across all meditation types; as well as stronger coupling between the PC, dorsal ACC and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices at both baseline and during meditation. This suggests enhanced efficiency of self-monitoring and cognitive control among experienced meditators. Given the complex nature of KK meditation (as it involves chanting, hand movements, and visualization), we believe that it engages language, visual and frontal networks important for self-regulation resulting in enhanced verbal and visual memory as shown in the present study. Other proposed potential mechanisms are via stress reduction and increased global attention/awareness.
Improved visual-spatial memory performance correlated inversely with connectivity in the superior parietal network, which has been shown to be associated with attention, translation of visual to motor information, and working memory [41, 67]. It is possible that these network connectivity changes reflect enhanced efficiency of connectivity between the relevant brain regions (i.e., between the bilateral posterior cingulate cortex, precuneus cortex, precentral, postcentral gyrus, and parietal operculum cortex). The less-wiring-more-firing hypothesis suggests that greater activity of neurons in older age compensates for impaired white-matter connectivity, that there is an over-recruitment of neuronal activity for functional compensation [68]. In this study, we suggest that yoga improves white-matter connectivity thereby reducing neuronal activity with the result of improved visuospatial memory performance. This hypothesis can be tested more accurately with the use of diffusion tensor imaging which measures white-matter integrity.
Although there are several limitations we believe that the findings are promising, as we used strong control group (MET) and found significant connectivity changes even with a small sample size that are in-line with previous findings. The sample size was only powered towards rs-fMRI findings, and exploring relationships between memory and functional connectivity, not exploring multi-domain effects on cognition. Additionally, we do not have long-term follow-up, which means we are unable to explore cognitive decline towards dementia. Also, it is possible that the enhanced cognitive benefits and connectivity changes resulting from the KK yogic intervention were due to the 60 min of instruction per week, the 12 min per day of Kirtan kriya meditation (shown to positively affect blood flow in the brain [34]), or a combination of these factors. However, as previous studies only using KK meditation found activation patterns that are in-line with those from the present research, it is unlikely that the weekly classes presented a large deviation. Nevertheless, this is a fruitful area for future research studies, which may aim to parse out the effects of these various activities, or perhaps determine that for optimal benefits weekly classes in addition to a daily meditative practice is recommended.
CONCLUSION
The present study examining resting state neural connectivity changes among individuals undergoing a KK yoga intervention versus MET showed that both were as effective in improving memory functions (namely memory recall) and functional connectivity-related to verbal, attentional, and self-regulatory performance. The improvement in verbal and visuo-spatial memory performance may be explained by the use of the components of the chanting mantra meditation (Kirtan Kriya) with visualization that may strengthen specific verbal and visual skills, and enhance global awareness and attention.
