C-tactile (CT) afferents preferentially activate in response to slow caress-like touch, evoking a diffuse pleasant sensation and promoting autonomic regulation. According to Braak's classic model, the neurodegenerative process in Alzheimer's disease (AD) only affects somatosensory cortices in advanced disease stages; however, the processing of complex sensory stimuli, such as CT-mediated Affective Touch, may be impacted in earlier phases.
Objective
The present study aimed to assess the behavioral and psychophysiological response to CT-targeted touch in a group of biomarker-tested patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to AD, compared to a group of age, sex, and education matched controls.
Methods
The preference for CT-optimal stimulations (3 cm/s) over non-CT-optimal stimulations (30 cm/s), in terms of perceived pleasantness, was first assessed in both groups. The behavioral (i.e., perceived pleasantness) and psychophysiological (i.e., heart rate and heart rate variability) responses to 16 min of continuous CT-targeted stimulations were then evaluated. All participants also underwent quantitative sensory testing for the screening of tactile sensitivity, tactile acuity, nociception, and interoception.
Results
Despite both groups rating CT-optimal stimulations as more pleasant than non-CT-optimal ones, MCI patients specifically exhibited an altered response to prolonged CT-targeted stimulations, characterized by a progressive reduction of their perceived pleasantness and by an unvaried Heart Rate Variability. No group-differences emerged in other somatosensory-related functions.
Conclusions
A specific multi-level alteration of the pleasant and soothing features of CT-optimal touch was identified as a prodromal marker of AD, providing the first indications of how the CT system degrades in conditions of pathological aging.
Tahami MonfaredAAByrnesMJWhiteLA, et al.Alzheimer’s disease: epidemiology and clinical progression. Neurol Ther2022; 11: 553–569.
2.
ZhengQWangX. Alzheimer’s disease: insights into pathology, molecular mechanisms, and therapy. Protein Cell2025; 16: 83–120.
3.
Jack Jr.CRBennettDABlennowK, et al.NIA-AA Research Framework: toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement2018; 14: 535–562.
4.
DuboisBHampelHFeldmanHH, et al.Preclinical Alzheimer’s disease: definition, natural history, and diagnostic criteria. Alzheimers Dement2016; 12: 292–323.
5.
PetersenRC. Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity. J Intern Med2004; 256: 183–194.
6.
D’AntonioFDe BartoloMIFerrazzanoG, et al.Somatosensory temporal discrimination threshold in patients with cognitive disorders. J Alzheimers Dis2019; 70: 425–432.
7.
D’AntonioFBartoloMIDFerrazzanoG, et al.Blink rate study in patients with Alzheimer’s disease, mild cognitive impairment and subjective cognitive decline. Curr Alzheimer Res2021; 18: 1104–1110.
8.
KatayamaOSternYHabeckC, et al.Neurophysiological markers in community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment: an EEG study. Alzheimers Res Ther2023; 15: 217.
9.
Del PercioCLizioRLopezS, et al.Resting-state EEG alpha rhythms are related to CSF tau biomarkers in prodromal Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Mol Sci2025; 26: 356.
10.
CostanzoMCutronaCLeodoriG, et al.Exploring easily accessible neurophysiological biomarkers for predicting Alzheimer’s disease progression: a systematic review. Alzheimers Res Ther2024; 16: 244.
TherriaultJPascoalTALussierFZ, et al.Biomarker modeling of Alzheimer’s disease using PET-based Braak staging. Nat Aging2022; 2: 526–535.
13.
McGloneFWessbergJOlaussonH. Discriminative and affective touch: sensing and feeling. Neuron2014; 82: 737–755.
14.
MountcastleVB. The sensory hand: Neural mechanisms of somatic sensation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005.
15.
BjörnsdotterMMorrisonIOlaussonH. Feeling good: on the role of C fiber mediated touch in interoception. Exp Brain Res2010; 207: 149–155.
16.
FerentziEWilhelmOKötelesF. What counts when heartbeats are counted. Trends Cogn Sci2022; 26: 832–835.
17.
GarfinkelSNSethAKBarrettAB, et al.Knowing your own heart: distinguishing interoceptive accuracy from interoceptive awareness. Biol Psychol2015; 104: 65–74.
18.
HaggardPIannettiGDLongoMR. Spatial sensory organization and body representation in pain perception. Curr Biol2013; 23: R164–R176.
19.
ColeLJFarrellMJDuffEP, et al.Pain sensitivity and fMRI pain-related brain activity in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain2006; 129: 2957–2965.
20.
MonroeTBGoreJCChenLM, et al.Pain in people with Alzheimer disease: potential applications for psychophysical and neurophysiological research. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol2012; 25: 240–255.
21.
BeachPAHuckJTZhuDC, et al.Altered behavioral and autonomic pain responses in Alzheimer’s disease are associated with dysfunctional affective, self-reflective and salience network resting-state connectivity. Front Aging Neurosci2017; 9: 297.
22.
AndersonARMonroeTBDietrichMS, et al.Increased pain unpleasantness and pain-related fMRI activation in the periaqueductal gray in Alzheimer’s disease. Front Pain Res2022; 3: 914473.
23.
AckerleyRCarlssonIWesterH, et al.Touch perceptions across skin sites: differences between sensitivity, direction discrimination and pleasantness. Front Behav Neurosci2014; 8: 54.
24.
LökenLSWessbergJMorrisonI, et al.Coding of pleasant touch by unmyelinated afferents in humans. Nat Neurosci2009; 12: 547–548.
25.
VallboÅBOlaussonHWessbergJ. Unmyelinated afferents constitute a second system coding tactile stimuli of the human hairy skin. J Neurophysiol1999; 81: 2753–2763.
26.
VallboÅLökenLWessbergJ. Sensual touch: a slow touch system revealed with microneurography. In: OlaussonHWessbergJMorrisonI, et al. (eds) Affective touch and the neurophysiology of CT afferents. New York, NY: Springer, 2016, pp.1–30.
27.
AckerleyRSaarKMcGloneF, et al.Quantifying the sensory and emotional perception of touch: differences between glabrous and hairy skin. Front Behav Neurosci2014; 8: 34.
28.
AckerleyRWaslingHBLiljencrantzJ, et al.Human C-tactile afferents are tuned to the temperature of a skin-stroking caress. J Neurosci2014; 34: 2879–2883.
29.
SchirmerACroyIAckerleyR. What are C-tactile afferents and how do they relate to “affective touch”?Neurosci Biobehav Rev2023; 151: 105236.
30.
AckerleyRWatkinsRH. Microneurography as a tool to study the function of individual C-fiber afferents in humans: responses from nociceptors, thermoreceptors, and mechanoreceptors. J Neurophysiol2018; 120: 2834–2846.
31.
CroyIBierlingASailerU, et al.Individual variability of pleasantness ratings to stroking touch over different velocities. Neuroscience2021; 464: 33–43.
32.
TriscoliCCroyISteudte-SchmiedgenS, et al.Heart rate variability is enhanced by long-lasting pleasant touch at CT-optimized velocity. Biol Psychol2017; 128: 71–81.
33.
CammAJMalikMBiggerJT, et al.Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Circulation1996; 93: 1043–1065.
34.
ZulliRNicosiaFBorroniB, et al.QT Dispersion and heart rate variability abnormalities in Alzheimer’s disease and in mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc2005; 53: 2135–2139.
35.
AllanLMKerrSRJBallardCG, et al.Autonomic function assessed by heart rate variability is normal in Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord2005; 19: 140–144.
36.
AlbertMSDeKoskySTDicksonD, et al.The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement2011; 7: 270–279.
37.
LawtonMP. Assessment of older people; self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist1969; 9: 279–286.
38.
CarlesimoGABuccioneIFaddaL, et al.Standardizzazione di due test di memoria per uso clinico: breve raconto e Figura di Rey. Nuova Riv Neurol2002; 12: 1–13.
39.
OrsiniAGrossiDCapitaniE, et al.Verbal and spatial immediate memory span: normative data from 1355 adults and 1112 children. Ital J Neurol Sci1987; 8: 537–548.
40.
SpinnlerH. Standardizzazione e taratura italiana di test neuropsicologici. Ital J Neurol Sci1987; 6: 21–120.
41.
GiovagnoliARDel PesceMMascheroniS, et al.Trail making test: normative values from 287 normal adult controls. Ital J Neurol Sci1996; 17: 305–309.
42.
Van GorpWGSatzPKierschME, et al.Normative data on the Boston Naming test for a group of normal older adults. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol1986; 8: 702–705.
43.
NovelliGPapagnoCCapitaniE, et al.Tre test clinici di ricerca e produzione lessicale. Taratura su sogetti normali. [Three clinical tests to research and rate the lexical performance of normal subjects.]. Arch Psicol Neurol Psichiatr1986; 47: 477–506.
44.
ShulmanKIPushkar GoldDCohenCA, et al.Clock-drawing and dementia in the community: a longitudinal study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry1993; 8: 487–496.
45.
AppollonioILeoneMIsellaV, et al.The Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB): normative values in an Italian population sample. Neurol Sci2005; 26: 108–116.
46.
BassoACapitaniELaiaconaM. Raven’s coloured progressive matrices: normative values on 305 adult normal controls. Funct Neurol1987; 2: 189–194.
47.
RavenJC. Raven standard progressive matrices (RSPM). Washington, DC: APA PsycTests, 1936.
48.
FolsteinMFFolsteinSEMcHughPR. “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res1975; 12: 189–198.
49.
ZingarettiPPettaAMCrucianiG, et al.Tactile sensitivity, tactile acuity, and affective touch: from childhood to early adolescence. Somatosens Mot Res2019; 36: 90–96.
50.
CrucianiGZingarettiPLingiardiV, et al.The perception of pain, discriminative touch and affective touch in patients suffering from borderline personality disorder. J Affect Disord2023; 341: 185–193.
51.
SpitoniGFZingarettiPGiovanardiG, et al.Disorganized attachment pattern affects the perception of affective touch. Sci Rep2020; 10: 9658.
52.
ShafferFMcCratyRZerrCL. A healthy heart is not a metronome: an integrative review of the heart’s anatomy and heart rate variability. Front Psychol2014; 5: 1040.
53.
LabordeSMosleyEThayerJF. Heart rate variability and cardiac vagal tone in psychophysiological research–recommendations for experiment planning, data analysis, and data reporting. Front Psychol2017; 8: 213.
54.
WeberEH. E.H. Weber on the tactile senses. Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press, 1996.
55.
Paredes SanchezJTitmusMLawson-SmithH, et al.Tactile acuity improves during acute experimental pain of the limb. PAIN Rep2023; 8: e1091.
56.
FreyM. Untersuchungen uber die Sinnesfunctionen der menschlichen Haut; Druckempfindung und Schmerz. Abh. sachs. Ges. Wiss. Math-Phys Kl1896; 23: 175–266.
57.
SchandryR. Heart beat perception and emotional experience. Psychophysiology1981; 18: 483–488.
58.
AntonyMMMeadowsEABrownTA, et al.Cardiac awareness before and after cognitive-behavioral treatment for panic disorder. J Anxiety Disord1994; 8: 341–350.
59.
SnaithRPHamiltonMMorleyS, et al.A scale for the assessment of hedonic tone the Snaith–Hamilton Pleasure Scale. Br J Psychiatry1995; 167: 99–103.
60.
FrankenIHARassinEMurisP. The assessment of anhedonia in clinical and non-clinical populations: further validation of the Snaith–Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS). J Affect Disord2007; 99: 83–89.
61.
WilhelmFHKocharASRothWT, et al.Social anxiety and response to touch: incongruence between self-evaluative and physiological reactions. Biol Psychol2001; 58: 181–202.
62.
VieiraAIRamosAVCavalheiroLM, et al.Reliability and validity of the European Portuguese version of the social touch questionnaire. J Nonverbal Behav2016; 40: 363–377.
63.
Baron-CohenSWheelwrightSHillJ, et al.The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test Revised Version: a study with normal adults, and adults with asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. J Child Psychol Psychiatry2001; 42: 241–251.
64.
StaffordOGleesonCEganC, et al.A 20-year systematic review of the ‘Reading the Mind in the Eyes’ test across neurodegenerative conditions. Brain Sci2023; 13: 1268.
65.
TasiosKDouzenisAGournellisR, et al.Empathy and violence in schizophrenia and antisocial personality disorder. Healthcare2024; 12: 89.
66.
HarknessKSabbaghMJacobsonJ, et al.Enhanced accuracy of mental state decoding in dysphoric college students. Cogn Emot2005; 19: 999–1025.
67.
Gandia-FerreroMTAdrián-VenturaJCháfer-PericásC, et al.Relationship between neuroimaging and emotion recognition in mild cognitive impairment patients. Behav Brain Res2024; 461: 114844.
68.
KruegerCTianL. A comparison of the general linear mixed model and repeated measures ANOVA using a dataset with multiple missing data points. Biol Res Nurs2004; 6: 151–157.
69.
BjörnsdotterMLökenLOlaussonH, et al.Somatotopic organization of gentle touch processing in the posterior insular cortex. J Neurosci2009; 29: 9314–9320.
70.
KirschLPBesharatiSPapadakiC, et al.Damage to the right insula disrupts the perception of affective touch. eLife2020; 9: e47895.
71.
GordonIVoosACBennettRH, et al.Brain mechanisms for processing affective touch. Hum Brain Mapp2013; 34: 914–922.
72.
ScherderEJSergeantJASwaabDF. Pain processing in dementia and its relation to neuropathology. Lancet Neurol2003; 2: 677–686.
73.
StubbsBThompsonTSolmiM, et al.Is pain sensitivity altered in people with Alzheimer’s disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental pain research. Exp Gerontol2016; 82: 30–38.
74.
XieCBaiFYuH, et al.Abnormal insula functional network is associated with episodic memory decline in amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Neuroimage2012; 63: 320–327.
75.
SperlingSADruzgalJBlairJC, et al.Cholinergic nucleus 4 grey matter density is associated with apathy in Parkinson’s disease. Clin Neuropsychol2023; 37: 676–694.
76.
CrucianiGZaniniLRussoV, et al.Strengths and weaknesses of affective touch studies over the lifetime: a systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev2021; 127: 1–24.
77.
SehlstedtIIgnellHBacklund WaslingH, et al.Gentle touch perception across the lifespan. Psychol Aging2016; 31: 176–184.
78.
BehrmanSChouliarasLEbmeierKP. Considering the senses in the diagnosis and management of dementia. Maturitas2014; 77: 305–310.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
