Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) seems to modulate cardiac autonomic function and blood pressure (BP) at rest and during exercise. Therefore, it is possible that anodal tDCS could influence post-exercise hypotension.
OBJECTIVE:
To investigate whether anodal tDCS applied over the motor cortex would affect cardiac autonomic modulation and BP after resistance exercise.
METHODS:
Twelve apparently healthy young men performed two experimental sessions: anodal tDCS or sham condition followed by resistance exercise. Blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), rate-pressure product (RPP), and HR variability (HRV) were obtained before and during post-exercise recovery (at 20 and 60 minutes).
RESULTS:
Compared to pre-exercise, systolic BP decreased at 20 and at 60 minutes of post-exercise recovery only in anodal tDCS condition(p = 0.03), with no statistical differences in sham condition (p > 0.05). Diastolic and mean BP reduced after both anodal tDCS and sham conditions with no differences between them (P> 0.05). In comparison with anodal tDCS, there were slower HR recovery (tDCS vs. sham: -2 ± 14 vs. 14 ± 8 bpm) and higher RPP (tDCS vs. sham: -1083 ± 1846 vs. 1672 ± 1275 mmHg × bpm) after exercise following sham condition (P< 0.01). No differences were found in any of the HRV analyzed parameters (P> 0.05).
CONCLUSION:
A single session of primary motor cortex tDCS is capable of decreasing the systolic BP and HR responses, as well as the cardiac work after a resistance exercise session in young normotensive subjects regardless of any changes in cardiac autonomic modulation.
PescatelloLS, FranklinBA, FagardR, FarquharWB, KelleyGA, RayCA. American college of sports medicine position stand. Exercise and hypertension. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004; 36(3): 533-53.
2.
ForjazCL, CardosoCG, Jr, RezkCC, SantaellaDF, TinucciT. Postexercise hypotension and hemodynamics: The role of exercise intensity. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2004; 44(1): 54-62.
3.
QueirozAC, GagliardiJF, ForjazCL, RezkCC. Clinic and ambulatory blood pressure responses after resistance exercise. J Strength Cond Res. 2009; 23(2): 571-8.
da NobregaAC. The subacute effects of exercise: Concept, characteristics, and clinical implications. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2005; 33(2): 84-7.
6.
HalliwillJR, BuckTM, LacewellAN, RomeroSA. Postexercise hypotension and sustained postexercise vasodilatation: What happens after we exercise? Experimental Physiology. 2013; 98(1): 7-18.
7.
ChenCY, BonhamAC. Postexercise hypotension: Central mechanisms. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2010; 38(3): 122-7.
8.
PottsJT. Inhibitory neurotransmission in the nucleus tractus solitarii: Implications for baroreflex resetting during exercise. Exp Physiol. Jan 2006; 91(1): 59-72. Epub 2005 Oct 20. 2006.
9.
NagaiM, HoshideS, KarioK. The insular cortex and cardiovascular system: A new insight into the brain-heart axis. Journal of the American Society of Hypertension: JASH. 2010; 4(4): 174-82.
10.
OppenheimerSM, GelbA, GirvinJP, HachinskiVC. Cardiovascular effects of human insular cortex stimulation. Neurology. 1992; 42(9): 1727-32.
11.
WilliamsonJW, QuerryR, McCollR, MathewsD. Are decreases in insular regional cerebral blood flow sustained during postexercise hypotension? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009; 41(3): 574-80.
12.
ViltartO, MullierO, BernetF, PoulainP, Ba-M'HamedS, SequeiraH. Motor cortical control of cardiovascular bulbar neurones projecting to spinal autonomic areas. J Neurosci Res. 2003; 73(1): 122-35.
13.
CogiamanianF, BrunoniAR, BoggioPS, FregniF, CioccaM, PrioriA. Non-invasive brain stimulation for the management of arterial hypertension. Med Hypotheses. 2010; 74(2): 332-6.
14.
GreenAL, WangS, OwenSL, PatersonDJ, SteinJF, AzizTZ. Controlling the heart via the brain: A potential new therapy for orthostatic hypotension. Neurosurgery. 2006; 58(6): 1176-83; discussion-83.
15.
BeeliG, CasuttG, BaumgartnerT, JanckeL. Modulating presence and impulsiveness by external stimulation of the brain. Behav Brain Funct. 2008; 4: 33.
MontenegroRA, FarinattiPT, FontesEB, SoaresPP, CunhaFA, GurgelJL, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation influences the cardiac autonomic nervous control. Neurosci Lett. 2011; 497(1): 32-6.
18.
MontenegroR, OkanoAH, CunhaFA, FontesEB, FarinattiP. Does prefrontal cortex transcranial direct current stimulation influence the oxygen uptake at rest and post-exercise? Int J Sports Med. 2013.
19.
OkanoAH, FontesEB, MontenegroRA, FarinattiPT, CyrinoES, LiLM, et al. Brain stimulation modulates the autonomic nervous system, rating of perceived exertion and performance during maximal exercise. Br J Sports Med. 2015; 49(18): 1213-8.
20.
NitscheMA, PaulusW. Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology. 2001; 57(10): 1899-901.
21.
NitscheMA, PaulusW. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol. 2000; 527 Pt 3: 633-9.
22.
ClancyJA, JohnsonR, RawR, DeucharsSA, DeucharsJ. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the motor cortex increases sympathetic nerve activity. Brain Stimul. 2014; 7(1): 97-104.
23.
RaimundoRJ, UribeCE, Brasil-NetoJP. Lack of clinically detectable acute changes on autonomic or thermoregulatory functions in healthy subjects after transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Brain Stimul. 2012; 5(3): 196-200.
24.
VandermeerenY, JamartJ, OssemannM. Effect of tDCS with an extracephalic reference electrode on cardio-respiratory and autonomic functions. BMC Neurosci. 2010; 11: 38.
25.
LangN, SiebnerHR, WardNS, LeeL, NitscheMA, PaulusW, et al. How does transcranial DC stimulation of the primary motor cortex alter regional neuronal activity in the human brain? Eur J Neurosci. 2005; 22(2): 495-504.
26.
SantarnecchiE, FeurraM, BarneschiF, AcampaM, BiancoG, CioncoloniD, et al. Time course of corticospinal excitability and autonomic function interplay during and following monopolar tDCS. Front Psychiatry. 2014; 5: 86.
27.
American College of Sports M. American college of sports medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009; 41(3): 687-708.
28.
MontenegroR, FarinattiPT, LimaPFM, OkanoAH, MenêsesAL, Oliveira-NetoL, et al. Motor cortex tDCS does not modulate perceived exertion within multiple-sets of resistance exercises. Isokinetics and Exercise Science. 2016; 24: 17-24.
29.
KlemGH, LudersHO, JasperHH, ElgerC. The ten-twenty electrode system of the international federation. The international federation of clinical neurophysiology. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 1999; 52: 3-6.
30.
GomesMAM, NobreF, AmodeoC, KohlmannO, Jr, PraxedesJN, MachadoCA, et al. VI brazilian guidelines on arterial hypertension. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2004; 82: 7-14.
31.
Heart rate variability: Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Circulation. 1996; 93(5): 1043-65.
32.
FochtBC, KoltynKF. Influence of resistance exercise of different intensities on state anxiety and blood pressure. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999; 31(3): 456-63.
33.
BrownSP, ClemonsJM, HeQ, LiuS. Effects of resistance exercise and cycling on recovery blood pressure. Journal of sports sciences. 1994; 12(5): 463-8.
