Simple field tests are often used to assess functional mobility in clinical settings. Despite having many benefits, these tests are susceptible to measurement error and individual variation.
OBJECTIVES:
To examine the test-retest and absolute reliability of timed up and go test (TUG), five times sit-to-stand (FTSTS), stair climb test (SCT) and 6 minute walk (6MWT).
METHODS:
Over two sessions, thirty-five subjects (30-74 years), repeated the five tests approximately four weeks apart. Test-retest reliability (intraclass correlations [ICC]) and absolute reliability (95% limit of agreements [95% LOA]; standard error of measurement [SEM] and minimum detectable change [MDC]) were calculated.
RESULTS:
All five tests had high test-retest reliability (ICC > 0.95) although significant between session changes were present for the TUG and FTSTS (p < 0.05). FTSTS displayed the greatest measurement error whilst 95% LOA was the most conservative measure of absolute reliability.
CONCLUSIONS:
The results of this study indicate that the TUG, FTSTS, SCT and 6MWT are reliable when performed four weeks apart. Furthermore, the inclusion of SEM, MDC and 95% LOA provides reference values to aid in identifying changes over time above those of measurement error and individual variation.
SamsonMM, MeeuwsenIB, CroweA, DessensJA, DuursmaSA, VerhaarHJ. Relationships between physical performance measures, age, height and body weight in healthy adults. Age Ageing. 2000; 29(3): 235-42.
2.
HakolaL, KomulainenP, HassinenM, SavonenK, LitmanenH, LakkaTA, et al. Cardiorespiratory fitness in aging men and women: the DR's EXTRA study. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011; 21(5): 679-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01127.x.
3.
YüminET, ŞimşekTT, SertelM, ÖztürkA, YüminM. The effect of functional mobility and balance on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among elderly people living at home and those living in nursing home. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2011; 52(3): e180-4. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2010.10.027.
4.
CarliF.Physiologic considerations of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs: implications of the stress response. Can J Anaesth. 2015; 62(2): 110-9. doi: 10.1007/s12630-014-0264-0.
5.
Shumway-CookA, BrauerS, WoollacottM. Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults using the Timed Up & Go Test. Phys Ther. 2000; 80(9): 896-903.
6.
PodsiadloD, RichardsonS. The timed ``Up & Go'': A test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991; 39(2): 142-8.
7.
IngleL, ClelandJG, ClarkAL. The relation between repeated 6-minute walk test performance and outcome in patients with chronic heart failure. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2014; 57(4): 244-53. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2014.03.004.
8.
AtkinsonG, NevillAM. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med. 1998; 26(4): 217-38.
9.
StratfordPW, GoldsmithCH. Use of the standard error as a reliability index of interest: An applied example using elbow flexor strength data. Phys Ther. 1997; 77(7): 745-50.
10.
HaleySM, Fragala-PinkhamMA. Interpreting change scores of tests and measures used in physical therapy. Phys Ther. 2006; 86(5): 735-43.
11.
GoldbergA, ChavisM, WatkinsJ, WilsonT. The five-times-sit-to-stand test: validity, reliability and detectable change in older females. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2012; 24(4): 339-44.
12.
LinYC, DaveyRC, CochraneT. Tests for physical function of the elderly with knee and hip osteoarthritis. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2001; 11(5): 280-6.
13.
American Thoracic Society. ATS statement: Guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002; 166(1): 111-7. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.166.1.at1102.
BlandJM, AltmanDG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1(8476): 307-10.
16.
PortneyL, WatkinsM. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River. 2008.
17.
Costa-SantosC, BernardesJ, Ayres-de-CamposD, CostaA, Amorim-CostaC. The limits of agreement and the intraclass correlation coefficient may be inconsistent in the interpretation of agreement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011; 64(3): 264-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.11.010.
18.
CarliF, CharleboisP, SteinB, FeldmanL, ZavorskyG, KimDJ, et al. Randomized clinical trial of prehabilitation in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2010; 97(8): 1187-97. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7102.
19.
RossRM, MurthyJN, WollakID, JacksonAS. The six minute walk test accurately estimates mean peak oxygen uptake. BMC Pulm Med. 2010; 10: 31. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-10-31.
20.
DemersC, McKelvieRS, NegassaA, YusufS. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the six-minute walk test in patients with heart failure. Am Heart J. 2001; 142: 698-703.
21.
HamiltonDM, HaennelRG. Validity and reliability of the 6-minute walk test in a cardiac population. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2000; 20(3): 156-64.
22.
HansonLC, McBurneyH, TaylorNF. The retest reliability of the six-minute walk test in patients referred to a cardiac rehabilitation programme. Physiother Res Int. 2012; 17(1): 55-61. doi: 10.1002/pri.513.
23.
Alfonso-RosaRM, Del Pozo-CruzB, Del Pozo-CruzJ, SanudoB, RogersME. Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change scores for fitness assessment in older adults with type 2 diabetes. Rehabil Nurs. 2014; 39(5): 260-8. doi: 10.1002/rnj.111.
24.
HaradaND, ChiuV, StewartAL. Mobility-related function in older adults: Assessment with a 6-minute walk test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999; 80(7): 837-41.
25.
KingMB, JudgeJO, WhippleR, WolfsonL. Reliability and responsiveness of two physical performance measures examined in the context of functional training intervention. Phys Ther. 2000; 80(1): 8-16.
26.
KervioG, CarreF, VilleNS. Reliability and intensity of the six-minute walk test in healthy elderly subjects. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003; 35(1): 169-74. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000043545.02712.a7.
27.
TroostersT, GosselinkR, DecramerM. Six minute walking distance in healthy elderly subjects. Eur Respir J. 1999; 14(2): 270-4.
28.
KristjánsdóttirÁ, RagnarsdóttirM, EinarssonMB, TorfasonB. A Comparison of the 6-Minute Walk Test and Symptom Limited Graded Exercise Test for Phase II Cardiac Rehabilitation of Older Adults. J Geriatric Physical Therapy. 2004; 27(2): 65-8.
29.
MontgomeryPS, GardnerAW. The clinical utility of a six-minute walk test in peripheral arterial occlusive disease patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998; 46(6): 706-11.
30.
BohannonRW, BubelaDJ, MagasiSR, GershonRC. Relative reliability of three objective tests of limb muscle strength. Isokinet Exerc Sci. 2011; 19(2): 77-81. doi: 10.3233/IES-2011-0400.
31.
SchaubertK, BohannonRW. Reliability of the sit-to-stand test over dispersed test sessions. Isokinet Exerc Sci. 2005; 13(2): 119-22.
32.
SchaubertKL, BohannonRW. Reliability and validity of three strength measures obtained from community-dwelling elderly persons. J Strength Cond Res. 2005; 19(3): 717-20. doi: 10.1519/R-15954.1.
33.
JetteAM, JetteDU, NgJ, PlotkinDJ, BachMA. Are performance-based measures sufficiently reliable for use in multicenter trials? Musculoskeletal Impairment (MSI) Study Group. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1999; 54(1): M3-6.
34.
BohannonRW. Test-retest reliability of the five-repetition sitto-stand test: A systematic review of the literature involving adults. J Strength Cond Res. 2011; 25(11): 3205-7. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318234e59f.
35.
RejeskiWJ, EttingerWH, Jr., SchumakerS, JamesP, BurnsR, ElamJT. Assessing performance-related disability in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1995; 3(3): 157-67.
