The first version of the RLGame ecosystem, which features a collection of conventional Artificial Intelligence and Reinforcement Learning techniques for learning to play (and, actually, playing) a board game, was adopted for the development of the second version that supports Multiagent Reinforcement Learning and a sequence of games. We present an experimental comparison of a variety of algorithms which are available within the ecosystem and comment on the potential to investigate single-player vs multi-player scenarios, alongside some experimental results which suggest that loosely co-ordinated game play can be superior to fully co-ordinated game play.
HolcombSDPorterWKAultSVMaoGWangJ. Overview on DeepMind and Its AlphaGo Zero AI. In: Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Big Data and Education [Internet]. Honolulu HI USA: ACM; 2018 [cited 2021 Nov 9]. pp. 67-71. Available from: doi: 10.1145/3206157.3206174.
14.
AlphaZero: Shedding new light on the grand games of chess, shogi and Go | DeepMind https://deepmind.com/blog/alphazero-shedding-new-light-grand-games-chess-shogi-and-go/.
15.
Internet chess server (ICS). (2021, March 12). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 16: 50; April 12, 2021, from https//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_chess_server.
16.
First Internet Backgammon Server (FIBS). (2020, October 21). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 16: 51; April 12 2021, from https//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Internet_Backgammon_Server.
17.
Internet Go server. (2021, April 1). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 16: 53; April 12 2021, from https//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Go_server.
18.
BaxterJTridgellAWeaverL. KnightCap: A chess program that learns by combining TD(lambda) with game-tree search. arXivcs/9901002 [Internet]. 1999 Jan 9 [cited 2021 Oct 5]; 1999.
19.
SchraudolphNNDayanPSejnowskiTJ. Temporal difference learning of position evaluation in the game of Go. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 1994; pp. 817-824.
20.
LanctotMZambaldiVGruslysALazaridouATuylsKPerolatJSilverDGraepelT. A Unified Game-Theoretic Approach to Multiagent Reinforcement Learning. ArXiv: 1711.00832 [Cs]. http//arxiv.org/abs/1711.00832; 2017.
21.
KallesD. Artificial Intelligence meets Software Engineering in Computing Education. In: Proceedings of the 9th Hellenic Conference on Artificial Intelligence [Internet]. Thessaloniki Greece: ACM; 2016 [cited 2021 Nov 10]. pp. 1-5. Available from: doi: 10.1145/2903220.2903223.
22.
CoulourisGF, editor. Distributed systems: concepts and design. 5th ed. Boston: Addison-Wesley; 2012. 1047 p.
23.
KallesDKanellopoulosP. On verifying game designs and playing strategies using reinforcement learning. In: Proceedings of the 2001 ACM symposium on Applied computing – SAC ’01 [Internet]. Las Vegas, Nevada, United States: ACM Press; 2001 [cited 2021 Nov 10]. pp. 6-11. Available from: http//portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=372202.372204.
24.
GiagtzoglouKKallesD. A gaming ecosystem as a tool for research and education in Artificial Intelligence. In: Proceedings of the 10th Hellenic Conference on Artificial Intelligence [Internet]. Patras Greece: ACM; 2018 [cited 2021 Nov 10]. pp. 1-2. Available from: doi: 10.1145/3200947.3201057.
25.
KallesD. Player co-modelling in a strategy board game: Discovering how to play fast. Cybernetics and Systems.2007 Dec 4; 39(1): 1-17.
26.
KallesDGiagtzoglouKMitropoulosK. Gaming Ecosystems for Education and Research: Where Artificial Intelligence meets with Software Engineering, at scale. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Management of Digital EcoSystems [Internet]. Limassol Cyprus: ACM; 2019 [cited 2021 Nov 10]. pp. 199-204. Available from: doi: 10.1145/3297662.3365811.
27.
RummeryGANiranjanM. On-line q-learning using connectionist systems. 22; 1994.
28.
SinghSPSuttonRS. Reinforcement learning with replacing eligibility traces. 36; 1996.
