This work introduces an algorithm for the computation of robust grasp preimages: the space of initial poses from which an object will converge into the desired grasp. Building on existing motion and friction models for pushed objects under contact, we describe a game-theoretic technique for estimating worst-case scenarios for difficult to observe properties like pressure and friction distributions. The use of this antagonistic model in the grasping simulations provides for a conservative estimate of the preimage of the given grasp. The antagonistic model is then validated against data from real grasping experiments on various robot grippers.
KovalMCPollardNSSrinivasaSS. Pre- and post-contact policy decomposition for planar contact manipulation under uncertainty. The International Journal of Robotics Research2016; 35(1-3): 244-264. Available from: http://ijr.sagepub.com/content/35/1-3/244.abstract.
2.
BerensonDSrinivasaSSKuffnerJJ. Addressing pose uncertainty in manipulation planning using task space regions. 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS2009; 1419-1425.
3.
Lozano-PérezTMasonMTTaylorRH. Automatic synthesis of fine-motion strategies for robots. The International Journal of Robotics Research1984; 3: 3-24.
4.
HsiaoK. Relatively Robust Grasping. Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2009.
DobashiHNodaAYokokohjiYNaganoHNagataniTOkudaH. Derivation of optimal robust grasping strategy under initial object pose errors. IEEE/RSJ 2010 International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS 2010 – Conference Proceedings2010; 2096-2102.
7.
DobashiHHiraokaJFukaoTYokokohjiYNodaANaganoH, et al. Robust grasping strategy for assembling parts in various shapes. Advanced Robotics2014; 28(15): 1005-1019. Available from: 10.1080/01691864.2014.902326http://prx.library.gatech.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=96920291&site=ehost-live.
8.
DogarMRSrinivasaSS. Push-grasping with dexterous hands: Mechanics and a method. IEEE/RSJ 2010 International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS 2010 – Conference Proceedings2010; 2123-2130.
9.
ChenZWimbockTRoaMAPleintingerBNevesMOttC, et al. An adaptive compliant multi-finger approach-to-grasp strategy for objects with position uncertainties. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), IEEE2015; 4911-4918. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=7139881.
10.
KaelblingLPLozano-PérezT. Implicit belief-space pre-images for hierarchical planning and execution. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Stockholm, Sweden2016; 5455-5462.
11.
MasonMT. Mechanics and planning of manipulator pushing operations. The International Journal of Robotics Research1986; 5(3): 53-71. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/027836498600500303.
12.
LynchKMMasonMT. Stable pushing: Mechanics, controllability, and planning. The International Journal of Robotics Research1996; 15(6): 533-556. Available from: http://ijr.sagepub.com/content/15/6/533.abstract.
13.
HermansTRehgJMBobickAF. Decoupling behavior, perception, and control for autonomous learning of affordances. 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation2013; 4989-4996. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=6631290.
14.
GoldbergKY. Orienting polygonal parts without sensors. Algorithmica1993; 10(2): 201-225. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01891840.
15.
MitchellIM. A Toolbox of Level Set Methods. Vancouver, BC, Canada: UBC Department of Computer Science, 2007.
16.
GillulaJHHoffmannGMHuangHVitusMPTomlinCJ. Applications of hybrid reachability analysis to robotic aerial vehicles. The International Journal of Robotics Research2011; 30(3): 335-354.
17.
FeatherstoneR. Rigid Body Dynamics Algorithms. New York, NY, USA: Springer US, 2008. Available from: http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/978-0-387-74315-8.
18.
DuQFaberVGunzburgerM. Centroidal Voronoi Tessellations: Applications and Algorithms. SIAM Review1999; 41(4): 637-676. Available from: http://epubs.siam.org/doi/abs/10.1137/S0036144599352836.
19.
LiuCKStilmanMLeeJGreyMX. Dynamic Animation and Robotics Toolkit (DART). 2011. Available from: http://dartsim.github.io/.
20.
LemkeCE. Some pivot schemes for the linear complementarity problem BT – Complementarity and Fixed Point Problems. Balinski ML, Cottle RW, editors. Complementarity and Fixed Point Problems. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg1978; 15-35. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BFb0120779.
21.
PriceABalakirskySBobickAChristensenHI. Affordance-feasible planning with manipulator wrench spaces. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 2016, Stockholm, Sweden2016.
22.
MillerATAllenPK. Examples of 3D grasp quality computations. Proceedings 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat No 99CH36288C)1999; 2: 1240-1246.
23.
PanJChittaSManochaD. FCL: A general purpose library for collision and proximity queries. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation2012; 3859-3866.
24.
AgarwalSMierleK, Others. Ceres Solver. Available from: http://ceres-solver.org.
25.
HauserK. Robust contact generation for robot simulation with unstructured meshes. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics2016; 114: 357-373.
