Intersections of organizational citizenship behaviors and counterproductive work behaviors: Empirical evidence of moral licensing and cleansing theories
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online May 17, 2024
Intersections of organizational citizenship behaviors and counterproductive work behaviors: Empirical evidence of moral licensing and cleansing theories
Our research offers an empirically supported contribution regarding the co-occurrence of Organizational Citizenship Behaviors (OCBs) and Counterproductive Work Behaviors (CWBs). Traditionally, OCBs and CWBs are considered to be mutually exclusive types of organizational behaviors. However, the same employee may engage in both behaviors, as explained by the moral licensing and cleaning theories.
OBJECTIVE:
The aim of the paper is to validate that the moral licensing theory (which posits that one may feel authorized to behave badly due to previous positive behaviors) and the moral cleansing theory (which posits feelings of guilt for previous negative behaviors) stand behind the paradox of an individual member of an organization engaging in both OCBs and CWBs.
METHODS:
The analysis is based on the findings from a questionnaire survey conducted on a sample of employees of local government units in Poland (N = 736).
RESULTS:
Our results show the positive relations between moral licensing and CWBs (the Abuse and Withdrawal dimensions) and between moral cleansing and OCBs (the Altruistic dimension), thus providing empirical evidence of both theories in an organizational context.
CONCLUSIONS:
Our findings suggest complex relationships between positive and negative behaviors depending on whether employees feel authorized or not to compensate for positive behaviors or feel a moral obligation to repair for negative ones.
OrganDW. Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome. Lexington: Lexington Books, 1988.
2.
PodsakoffPM, MacKenzieSB, MoormanRH, et al. Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Leadersh Q. 1990;1;107–42. doi: 10.1016/1048-9843(90)90009-7.
3.
PodsakoffPM, MacKenzieSB, PaineJB, et al. Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. J Manage. 2000;26;513–63. doi: 10.1177/014920630002600307.
4.
SpectorPE, FoxS, PenneyLM, et al. The dimensionality of counterproductivity: Are all counterproductive behaviors created equal?J Vocat Behav/. 2006;68;446–0. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2005.10.005.
5.
KlotzAC, BolinoMC. Citizenship and counterproductive work behavior: A moral licensing view. Acad Manag Rev. 2013;38;292–306. doi: 10.5465/amr.2011.0109.
6.
DunlopPD, LeeK. Workplace deviance, organizational citizenship behavior, and business unit performance: The bad apples do spoil the whole barrel. J Organ Behav. 2004;25;67–80. doi: 10.1002/job.243.
7.
FelpsW, MitchellTR, ByingtonE. How, when, and why bad apples spoil the barrel: Negative group members and dysfunctional groups. Res Organ Behav. 2006;27;175–222. doi: 10.1016/S0191-3085(06)27005-9.
8.
SpectorPE, FoxS. An emotion-centered model of voluntary work behavior. Some parallels between counterproductive work behavior and organizational citizenship behavior. Hum Resour Manag Rev. 2002;12;269–92. doi: 10.1016/S1053-4822(02)00049-9.
9.
DalalR, LamH, WeissH, et al. A within-person approach to work behavior and performance: Concurrent and lagged citizenship-counterproductivity associations, and dynamic relationships with affect and overall job performance. Acad Manag J. 2009;52;1051–66. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2009.44636148.
10.
SpectorPE, FoxS. Counterproductive work behavior and organisational citizenship behavior: Are they opposite forms of active behavior?Appl Psychol. 2010;59;21–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2009.00414.x.
11.
SpectorPE, FoxS. Theorizing about the deviant citizen: An attributional explanation of the interplay of organizational citizenship and counterproductive work behavior. Hum Resour Manag Rev. 2010;20;132–43. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.06.002.
12.
MerrittAC, EffronDA, MoninB. Moral self-licensing: When being good frees us to be bad. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2010;4;344–57. doi: 10.1111/J.1751-9004.2010.00263.X.
13.
Glińska-NeweśA, LisA. Paradokswspółwystępowania organizacyjnych zachowańobywatelskich i kontrproduktywnych. Pr Nauk Uniw Ekon weWrocławiu. 2016;422;265–74. doi: 10.15611/PN.2016.422.22.
14.
JordanJ, MullenE, MurnighanJK. Striving for the moral self: The effects of recalling past moral actions on future moral behavior. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 2011;37;701–13. doi: 10.1177/0146167211400208.
15.
YamKC, KlotzAC, HeW, et al. From good soldiers to psychologically entitled: Examining when and why citizenship behavior leads to deviance. Acad Manag J. 2017;60;373–96. doi: 10.5465/amj.2014.0234.
16.
NilssonA, BergquistM, SchultzWP. Spillover effects in environmental behaviors, across time and context: A review and research agenda. Environ Educ Res. 2017;23;573–89. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2016.1250148.
17.
TrueloveHB, CarricoAR, WeberEU, et al. Positive and negative spillover of pro-environmental behavior: An integrative review and theoretical framework. Glob Environ Chang. 2014;29;127–38. doi: 10.1016/J.GLOENVCHA.2014.09.004.
FalagasME, PitsouniEI, MalietzisGA, et al. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 2008;22;338–42. doi: 10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF.
20.
PorterAL, KongthonA, LuJ-CC. Research profiling: Improving the literature review. Scientometrics. 2002;53;351–70. doi: 10.1023/A:1014873029258.
21.
ZupicI, CaterT. Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organ Res Methods. 2015;18;429–72. doi: 10.1177/1094428114562629.
GeorgeJM, BriefAP. Feeling good-doing good: A conceptual analysis of the mood at work-organizational spontaneity relationship. Psychol Bull. 1992;112:310–29. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.2.310.
24.
BormanWC, MotowidloSJ. Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In: Schmitt N, Borman WC (eds) Personnel Selection in Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1993, pp. 71-98.
Peyrat-GuillardD, Glinska-NeweśA. I respect you and I helpyou: Links between positive relationships at work and organizationalcitizenship behaviour. J Posit Manag. 2014;5;82–96. doi: 10.12775/JPM.2014.015.
27.
YunyiC, SinghJSK, KularajasingamJ. The influence of workforce diversity and job meaningfulness on employee engagement and organizational citizenship behaviors. Hum Syst Manag. 2023; Preprint: 1-15 doi: 10.3233/HSM-220184.
28.
WilliamsLJ, AndersonSE. Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. J Manage. 1991;17;601–17. doi: 10.1177/014920639101700305.
29.
SmithCA, OrganDW, NearJP. Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. J Appl Psychol. 1983;68;653–63. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.68.4.653.
30.
DalalRS. A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. J Appl Psychol. 2005;90;1241–55. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1241.
31.
PodsakoffNP, WhitingSW, PodsakoffPM, et al. Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2009;94;122–41. doi: 10.1037/a0013079.
32.
PodsakoffPM, AhearneM, MacKenzieSB. Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work group performance. J Appl Psychol. 1997;82;262–70. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.262.
33.
LePineJA, ErezA, JohnsonDE. The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review and meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2002;87;52–65. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.52.
34.
OrganDW, RyanK. A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Pers Psychol. 1995;48;775–802. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01781.x.
35.
MoormanRH. Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship?J Appl Psychol. 1991;76;845–55. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.76.6.845.
36.
Al-MamaryYHS. The impact of transformational leadership on organizational citizenship behaviour: Evidence from Malaysian higher education context. Hum Syst Manag. 2021;40;737–49. doi: 10.3233/HSM-201068.
37.
LeeK, AllenNJ. Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. J Appl Psychol. 2002;87;131–42. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.131.
38.
MeriacJP, GormanCA. Work ethic and work outcomes in an expanded criterion domain. J Bus Psychol. 2017;32;273–82. doi: 10.1007/s10869-016-9460-y.
39.
TurekD. Paradoksy ‘obywatelskich zachowań’ pracowników worganizacji. Organ i Kier. 2016;172:131–43.
40.
WarrenDE. Constructive and destructive deviance in organizations. Acad Manag Rev. 2003;28;622–32. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2003.10899440.
41.
VardiY, WeitzE. Misbehavior in Organizations. New Jersey: Lawrence Elbaum Associates, 2004.
42.
UmphressEE, BinghamJB. When employees do bad things for good reasons: Examining unethical pro-organizational behaviors. Organ Sci. 2011;22;621–40. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0559.
43.
PierceJR, AguinisH. Detrimental citizenship behaviour: A multilevel framework of antecedents and consequences. Manag Organ Rev. 2015;11;69–99. doi: 10.1111/more.12015.
44.
OrganDW, PodsakoffPM, MacKenzieSB. Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Its Nature, Antecedents and Consequences. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2006.
45.
BolinoMC, TurnleyWH, GilstrapJB, et al. Citizenship under pressure: What’s a ‘good soldier’ to do?J Organ Behav. 2010;31;835–55. doi: 10.1002/job.635.
46.
Vigoda-GadotE. Compulsory citizenship behavior: Theorizing some dark sides of the cood soldier syndrome in organizations. J Theory Soc Behav. 2006;36;77–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5914.2006.00297.x.
47.
HalbeslebenJRB, HarveyJ, BolinoMC. Too engaged? A conservation of resources view of the relationship between work engagement and work interference with family. J Appl Psychol. 2009;94;1452–65. doi: 10.1037/A0017595.
48.
MunyonTP, HochwarterWA, PerrewéPL, et al. Optimism and thenonlinear citizenship behavior-job satisfaction relationship inthree studies. J Manage. 2010;36;1505–28. doi: 10.1177/0149206309350085.
49.
BergeronDM, ShippAJ, RosenB, et al. Organizational citizenship behavior and career outcomes: The cost of being a good citizen. J Manage. 2013;39;958–84. doi: 10.1177/0149206311407508.
50.
FlynnFJ. How much should I give and how often? The effects of generosity and frequency of favor exchange on social status and productivity. Acad Manag J. 2003;46;539–53. doi: 10.2307/30040648.
51.
PodsakoffPM, MacKenzieSB. Organizational citizenship behaviors and sales unit effectiveness. J Mark Res. 1994;31;351–63. doi: 10.2307/3152222.
52.
BergeronDM. The potential paradox of organizational citizenship behavior: Good citizens at what cost?Acad Manag Rev. 2007;32;1078–95. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2007.26585791.
53.
BergeronD, OstroffC, SchroederT, et al. The dual effects of organizational citizenship behavior: Relationships to research productivity and career outcomes in academe. Hum Perform. 2014;27;99–128. doi: 10.1080/08959285.2014.882925.
54.
NielsenTM, BachrachDG, SundstromE, et al. Utility of OCB: Organizational citizenship behavior and group performance in a resource allocation framework. J Manage. 2012;38;668–94. doi: 10.1177/0149206309356326.
55.
RubinRS, DierdorffEC, BachrachDG. Boundaries of citizenship behavior: Curvilinearity and context in the citizenship and task performance relationship. Pers Psychol. 2013;66;377–406. doi: 10.1111/peps.12018.
56.
FoxS, SpectorPE. A model of work frustration-aggression. J Organ Behav. 1999;20;915–31. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199911)20:6<915::AID-JOB918>3.0.CO;2-6.
57.
GiacaloneRA, GreenbergJ. Antisocial Behavior in Organizations. London: Sage, 1997.
58.
RobinsonSL, BennettRJ. A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Acad Manag J. 1995;38;555–72. doi: 10.2307/256693.
59.
FoxS, SpectorPE, MilesD. Counterproductive work behavior (CWB) in response to job stressors and organizational justice: Some mediator and moderator tests for autonomy and emotions. J Vocat Behav. 2001;59;291–309. doi: 10.1006/JVBE.2001.1803.
60.
GruysML, SackettPR. Investigating the dimensionality of counterproductive work behavior. Int J Sel Assess. 2003;11;30–42. doi: 10.1111/1468-2389.00224.
61.
BerryCM, CarpenterNC, BarrattCL. Do other-reports of counterproductive work behavior provide an incremental contribution over self-reports? A meta-analytic comparison. J Appl Psychol. 2012;97;613–36. doi: 10.1037/A0026739.
62.
BennettRJ, RobinsonSL. Development of a measure of workplace deviance. J Appl Psychol. 2000;85;349–60. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.349.
63.
SackettPR. The structure of counterproductive work behaviors: Dimensionality and relationships with facets of job performance. Int J Sel Assess. 2002;10;5–11. doi: 10.1111/1468-2389.00189.
64.
MarcusB, TaylorOA, HastingsSE, et al. The structure of counterproductive work behavior: A review, a structural meta-analysis, and a primary study. J Manage. 2016;42;203–33. doi: 10.1177/0149206313503019.
65.
MurtazaG, RoquesO, TalpurQUA, et al. Religious beliefs as a moderator of the relationships between workplace incivility and counterproductive work behaviours. Hum Syst Manag. 2021;40;813–23. doi: 10.3233/HSM-200993.
66.
Cohen-CharashY, MuellerJS. Does perceived unfairness exacerbate or mitigate interpersonal counterproductive work behaviors related to envy?J Appl Psychol. 2007;92;666–80. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.666.
67.
PenneyLM, SpectorPE. Job stress, incivility, and counterproductive work behavior (CWB): The moderating role of negative affectivity. J Organ Behav. 2005;26;777–96. doi: 10.1002/JOB.336.
68.
LiuW, ZhouZE, CheXX. Effect of workplace incivility on OCB through burnout: The moderating role of affective commitment. J Bus Psychol. 2019;34;657–69. doi: 10.1007/s10869-018-9591-4.
69.
Bruk-LeeV, SpectorPE. The social stressors-counterproductive work behaviors link: Are conflicts with supervisors and coworkers the same?J Occup Health Psychol. 2006;11;145–56. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.11.2.145.
70.
MountM, IliesR, JohnsonE. Relationship of personality traits and counterproductive work behaviors: The mediating effects of job satisfaction. Pers Psychol. 2006;59;591–622. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00048.x.
71.
PenneyLM, SpectorPE. Narcissism and counterproductive work behavior: Do bigger egos mean bigger problems?Int J Sel Assess. 2002;10;126–3434. doi: 10.1111/1468-2389.00199.
McHenryJJ, HoughLM, ToquamJL, et al. Project A validity results: The relationship between predictor and criterion domains. Pers Psychol. 1990;43;335–54. doi: 10.1111/J.1744-6570.1990.TB01562.X.
74.
HuntST. Generic work behavior: An investigation into the dimensions of entry-level, hourly job performance. Pers Psychol. 1996;49;51–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01791.x.
75.
ViswesvaranC, SchmidtFL, OnesDS. The role of halo error in interdimensional ratings: The case of job performance ratings examined via meta-analysis.
76.
EffronDA, MoninB. Letting people off the hook: When do good deedsexcuse transgressions?Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 2010;36;1618–34. doi: 10.1177/0146167210385922.
77.
MillerDT, EffronDA. Psychological license. When it is needed and how it functions. Adv Exp Soc Psychol. 2010;43;115–55. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(10)43003-8.
78.
MoninB, MillerDT. Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001;81;33–43. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.33.
79.
TiefenbeckV, StaakeT, RothK, et al. For better or for worse? Empirical evidence of moral licensing in a behavioral energy conservation campaign. Energy Policy. 2013;57;160–71. doi: 10.1016/J.ENPOL.2013.01.021.
80.
PolmanE, PettitNC, WiesenfeldBM. Effects of wrongdoer status on moral licensing. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2013;49;614–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jes2013.03.012.
81.
NisanM. Moral balance: A model of how people arrive at moral decisions. In: Wren TE (ed) The Moral Domain: Essays in the Ongoing Discussion Between Philosophy and the Social Sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1990, pp. 283-314.
82.
NisanM. The moral balance model: Theory and research extending our understanding of moral choice and deviation. In:KurtinesWM,Gewirtz J (eds) Handbook of Moral Behavior and Development. Vol. 3. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1991, pp. 213-249.
83.
BlankenI, van de VenN, ZeelenbergM. A meta-analytic review of moral licensing. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 2015;41;540–58. doi: 10.1177/0146167215572134.
84.
LinSH, MaJ, JohnsonRE. When ethical leader behavior breaks bad: How ethical leader behavior can turn abusive via ego depletion and moral licensing. J Appl Psychol. 2016;101;815–30. doi: 10.1037/APL0000098.
85.
KouchakiM. Vicarious moral licensing: The influence of others’ past moral actions on moral behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011;101;702–15. doi: 10.1037/A0024552.
86.
CascioJ, PlantEA. Prospective moral licensing: Does anticipating doing good later allow you to be bad now?J Exp Soc Psychol. 2015;56:110–6. doi: 10.1016/J.JESP.2014.09.009.
87.
UrbanJ, BahníkŠ, KohlováMB. Green consumption doesnot make people cheat: Three attempts to replicate moral licensingeffect due to pro-environmental behavior. J Environ Psychol. 2019;63;139–47. doi: 10.1016/J.JENVP.2019.01.011.
88.
Brañas-GarzaP, BucheliM, Paz EspinosaM, et al. Moral cleansing and moral licenses: Experimental evidence. Econ Philos. 2013;29;199–212. doi: 10.1017/S0266267113000199.
89.
ZhongC-B, LiljenquistKA, CainDM. Moral self-regulation: Licensing and compensation. In: De Cremer D (ed) Psychological Perspectives on Ethical Behavior and Decision Making. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing,. 2009, pp. 75-89.
SachdevaS, IlievR, MedinDL. Sinning saints and saintly sinners: The paradox of moral self-regulation: Research Article. Psychol Sci. 2009;20;523–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02326.x.
92.
BlankenI, Van De VenN, ZeelenbergM, et al. Three attempts to replicate the moral licensing effect. Soc Psychol (Gott). 2014;45;232–8. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000189.
93.
EllithorpeME, CruzC, VelezJA, et al. Moral license in video games: When being right can mean doing wrong. Cyberpsychology, Behav Soc Netw. 2015;18:203–7. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2014.0599.
94.
RahwanZ, HauserOP, KochanowskaE, et al. High stakes: A little more cheating, a lot less charity. J Econ Behav Organ. 2018;152;276–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2018.04.021.
95.
MazarN, ZhongCB. Do green products make us better people?Psychol Sci. 2010;21;494–8. doi: 10.1177/0956797610363538.
96.
KhanU, DharR. Licensing effect in consumer choice. J Mark Res. 2006;43;259–66. doi: 10.1509/jmkr.43.2.259.
97.
KhanU, DharR. Where there is a way, is there a will? The effect of future choices on self-control. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007;136;277–88. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.2.277.
98.
HarkriderLN, TamborskiMA, WangX, et al. Threats to moral identity: Testing the effects of incentives and consequences of one’s actions on moral cleansing. Ethics Behav. 2013;23;133–47. doi: 10.1080/10508422.2012.714246.
99.
RotellaA, BarclayP. Failure to replicate moral licensing and moral cleansing in an online experiment. Pers Individ Dif. 2020;161;109967. doi: 10.1016/J.PAID.2020.109967.
100.
WestC, ZhongCB. Moral cleansing. Curr Opin Psychol. 2015;6;221–5. doi: 10.1016/J.COPSYC.2015.09.022.
101.
GholamzadehmirM, SparksP, FarsidesT. Moral licensing, moral cleansing and pro-environmental behaviour: The moderating role of pro-environmental attitudes. J Environ Psychol. 2019;65;101334. doi: 10.1016/J.JENVP.2019.101334.
102.
DingW, XieR, SunB, et al. Why does the ‘sinner’ act prosocially? The mediating role of guilt and the moderating role of moral identity in motivating moral cleansing. Front Psychol. 2016;7: art. 1317. doi: 10.3389/FPSYG.2016.01317.
103.
TetlockPE, KristelOV, ElsonSB, et al. The psychology of the unthinkable: Taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000;78;853–70. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.853.
104.
ZhongCB, LiljenquistK. Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science. 2006;313;1451–2. doi: 10.1126/science.1130726.
105.
LodewijkxHFM, KerstenGLE, Van ZomerenM. Dual pathways to engage in ‘silent marches’ against violence: Moral outrage, moral cleansing and modes of identification. J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 2008;18;153–67. doi: 10.1002/cas916.
106.
KimYH, CohenD. Information, perspective, and judgments about the self in face and dignity cultures. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 2010;36;537–50. doi: 10.1177/0146167210362398.
107.
ZhongCB, KuG, LountRB, et al. Compensatory ethics. J Bus Ethics. 2010;92;323–39. doi: 10.1007/S10551-009-0161-6.
108.
GollwitzerM, MelzerA. Macbeth and the Joystick: Evidence for moral cleansing after playing a violent video game. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2012;48;1356–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jes2012.07.001.
109.
LobelTE, CohenA, ShahinLK, et al. Being clean and acting dirty: The paradoxical effect of self-cleansing. Ethics Behav. 2015;25;307–13. doi: 10.1080/10508422.2014.931230.
110.
O’ConnorK, EffronDA, LucasBJ. Moral cleansing as hypocrisy: When private acts of charity make you feel better than you deserve. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020;119;540–50. doi: 10.1037/PSPA0000195.
111.
WangY, XiaoS, RenR. A moral cleansing process: How and when does unethical pro-organizational behavior increase prohibitive and promotive voice. J Bus Ethics. 2022;176;175–93. doi: 10.1007/S10551-020-04697-W.
112.
BurnesB, PopeR. Negative behaviours in the workplace: A study of two primary care trusts in the NHS. Int J Public Sect Manag. 2007;20;285–303. doi: 10.1108/09513550710750011.
113.
NasirM, BashirA. Examining workplace deviance in public sector organizations of Pakistan. Int J Soc Econ. 2012;39;240–53. doi: 10.1108/03068291211205677.
114.
ZapfD, EinarsenS, HoelH, et al. Empirical findings on bullying in the workplace. In: Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, et al. (eds) Bullying and Emotional Abuse in the Workplace: International Perspectives in Research and Practice. London: Taylor & Francis, 2003, pp. 103–126.
115.
LeymannH. The content and development of mobbing at work. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 1996;5;165–84. doi: 10.1080/13594329608414853.
116.
Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. Bullying at Work, Employment Relations and Union Services Health and Safety Briefing Pack. London, 1997.
117.
HendersonAA, FosterGC, MatthewsRA, et al. A psychometric assessment of OCB: Clarifying the distinction between OCB and CWB and developing a revised OCB measure. J Bus Psychol. 2020;35;697–712. doi: 10.1007/s10869-019-09653-8.
118.
Vigoda-GadotE. Redrawing the boundaries of OCB? An empirical examination of compulsory extra-role behavior in the workplace. J Bus Psychol. 2007;21;377–405. doi: 10.1007/S10869-006-9034-5.
119.
McAllisterDJ, KamdarD, MorrisonEW, et al. Disentangling role perceptions: How perceived role breadth, discretion, instrumentality, and efficacy relate to helping and taking charge. J Appl Psychol. 2007;92;1200–11. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1200.
120.
PodsakoffPM, MacKenzieSB, LeeJY, et al. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88;879–903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
121.
GriepY, VantilborghT. Reciprocal effects of psychological contract breach on counterproductive and organizational citizenship behaviors: The role of time. J Vocat Behav. 2018;104;141–53. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2017.10.013.
122.
CropanzanoR, AnthonyEL, DanielsSR, et al. Social exchange theory: A critical review with theoretical remedies. Acad Manag Ann. 2017;11;479–516. doi: 10.5465/annals.2015.0099.
