Time banditry recently has been introduced as a distinct construct in the counterproductive work behavior literature. Employees are engaged in time banditry when they pursue non–task-related activities during work time. We posit that they capitalize on the ambiguity in most work environments to manage impressions that their time banditry behavior really is productive and not counterproductive work behavior. In this investigation, two studies were conducted to explore variables that can be used to classify time bandits into four different categories. Discriminant function analysis was used to determine individual-level and job-level factors that classify time bandits. Results revealed that both situational and dispositional variables can be used to predict time bandit type. Suggestions for future research and implications for managing, reducing, and changing time banditry behaviors are discussed.
AlbaneseR.Van FleetD. D. (1985). Rational behavior in groups: The free-riding tendency. Academy of Management Review, 10, 244-255.
2.
AllenN. J.MeyerJ. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1-18.
3.
AquinoK.LewisM. U.BradfieldM. (1999). Justice constructs, negative affectivity, and employee deviance: A proposed model and empirical test. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 1073-1091.
4.
AveyJ. B.LuthansF.YoussefC. M. (2010). The additive value of positive psychological capital in predicting work attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Management, 36, 430-452.
5.
BarrickM. R.MountM. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
6.
BarrickM. R.ZimmermanR. D. (2009). Hiring for retention and performance. Human Resource Management, 48, 183-206.
7.
BerryC. M.OnesD. S.SackettP. R. (2007). Interpersonal deviance, organizational deviance, and their common correlates: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 410-424.
8.
BolinoM. C. (1999). Citizenship and impression management: Good soldiers or good actors?Academy of Management Review, 24, 82-98.
9.
BoyeM. W.WassermanA. R. (1996). Predicting counterproductivity among drug store applicants. Journal of Business and Psychology, 10, 337-349.
10.
BrockM. E.MartinL. E.BuckleyM. R. (2013). Time theft in organizations: The development of the time banditry questionnaire. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 21, 309-321.
11.
ColquittJ. A.ScottB. A.JudgeT. A.ShawJ. C. (2006). Justice and personality: Using integrative theories to derive moderators of justice effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100, 110-127.
12.
CrawfordJ. R.HenryJ. D. (2004). The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): Construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 245-265.
13.
DieterlyD. L.SchneiderB. (1974). The effect of organizational environment on perceived power and climate: A laboratory study. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 11, 316-337.
14.
EvertonW. J.JoltonJ. A.MastrangeloP. M. (2007). Be nice and fair or else: Understanding reasons for employees’ deviant behaviors. Journal of Management Development, 26, 117-131.
15.
FerrisG. R.KingT. R.JudgeT. A.KacmarK. M. (1991). The management of shared meaning in organizations: Opportunism in the reflection of attitudes, beliefs, and values. In GiacaloneR. A.RosenfeldP. (Eds.), Applied impression management: How image-making affects managerial decisions (pp. 41-64). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
16.
FleishmanE. A. (1953). The description of supervisory behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 37, 1-6.
17.
FoxS.SpectorP. E. (1999). A model of work frustration-aggression. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 915-931.
18.
GriffinM. (2001). Job satisfaction among detention officers: Assessing the relative contribution of organizational climate variables. Journal of Criminal Justice, 29, 219-232.
19.
HackmanJ. R.OldhamG. R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 159-170.
20.
HackmanJ. R.OldhamG. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
21.
HenleC. A.ReeveC. L.PittsV. E. (2010). Stealing time at work: Attitudes, social pressure, and perceived control as predictors of time theft. Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 53-67.
22.
GreenbergJ. (1990). Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden costs of pay cuts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 561-568.
23.
JackallR. (1988). Moral mazes. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
24.
JohnstonM. W.ParasuramanA.FutrellC. M.BlackW. C. (1990). A longitudinal assessment of the impact of selected organizational influences on salespeople’s organizational commitment during early employment. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 333-344.
25.
JonesD. A. (2009). Getting even with one’s supervisor and one’s organization: Relationships among types of injustice, desires for revenge, and counterproductive work behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 525-542.
26.
JudgeT. A.ChandlerT. D. (1996). Individual-level determinants of employee shirking. Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations, 51, 468-487.
27.
KamdarD.Van DyneL. (2007). The joint effects of personality and workplace social exchange relationships in predicting task performance and citizenship performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1286-1298.
28.
KetchenD. J.CraigheadC. W.BuckleyM. R. (2008). Time bandits: How they are created, why they are tolerated, and what can be done about them. Business Horizons, 51, 141-150.
29.
LataneB.WilliamsK.HarkinsS. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 822-832.
30.
LearyM. R. (1995). Self-presentation: Impression management and interpersonal behavior. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
31.
LernerA. W. (1990). The manipulators: Personality and politics in multiple perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32.
LimV. K. G. (2002). The IT way of loafing on the job: Cyberloafing, neutralizing and organizational justice. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 675-694.
MartinL. E.BrockM. E.BuckleyM. R.KetchenD. J. (2010). Time banditry: Examining the purloining of time in organizations. Human Resource Management Review, 20, 26-34.
35.
McElroyJ. C.MorrowP. C.FentonJ. B. (1995). Absenteeism and performance as predictors of voluntary turnover. Journal of Managerial Issues, 7, 217-220.
36.
MeyerJ. P.AllenN. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 1-89.
37.
OnesD. S.ViswesvaranC.SchmidtF. L. (1993). Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 679-703.
38.
PaulhusD. L. (1991). Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR). In RobinsonJ. P.ShaverP. R.WrightsmanL. S. (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 37-41). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
39.
PfefferJ. (1981). Management as symbolic action: The creation and maintenance of organizational paradigms. In CummingsL. L.StawB. M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 3, pp. 1-52). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
40.
PhippsS. T.PrietoL. C.DeisM. H. (2015). The role of personality in organizational citizenship behavior: Introducing counterproductive work behavior and integrating impression management as a moderating factor. Journal of Organizational Culture, Communication and Conflict, 19, 176-196.
41.
RobertsB. W.HarmsP. D.CaspiA.MoffittT. E. (2007). Predicting the counterproductive employee in a child-to-adult prospective study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1427-1436.
42.
RosenfeldP.GiacaloneR. A.RiordanC. A. (1995). Impression management in organizations: Theory, measurement, practice. New York NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
43.
SackettP. R.BurrisL. R.CallahanC. (1989). Integrity testing for personnel selection: An update. Personnel Psychology, 42, 491-529.
44.
SalgadoJ. F. (1997). The five factor model of personality and job performance in the European community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 30-43.
45.
SalgadoJ. F. (2002). The Big Five personality dimensions and counterproductive behaviors. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 117-125.
46.
SaucierG. (1994). Mini-markers: A brief version of Goldberg’s unipolar big-five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 506-516.
47.
SchaufeliW. B.BakkerA. B.SalanovaM. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 701-716.
48.
SinghJ. (2000). Performance productivity and quality of frontline employees in service organizations. Journal of Marketing, 64(2), 15-34.
49.
SkarlickiD. P.FolgerR. (1997). Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 434-443.
50.
SpectorP. E.DwyerD. J.JexS. M. (1988). Relation of job stressors to affective, health, and performance outcomes: A comparison of multiple data sources. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 11-19.
51.
SpectorP. E.FoxS. (2002). An emotion-centered model of voluntary work behavior: Some parallels between counterproductive work behavior and organizational citizenship behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 12, 269-292.
52.
SpectorP. E.FoxS.PenneyL. M.BruursemaK.GohA.KesslerS. (2006). The dimensionality of counterproductivity: Are all counterproductive behaviors created equal?Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 446-460.
53.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1063-1070.
