Systemic Constellations Work (SCW) is a non-conventional method of dealing with organizational development and change that has been gaining popularity since the 1990s.
OBJECTIVE:
The goal of this study was to understand how kinesthetic and spatial sensations gained through SCW translate into knowledge with a particular focus on the longer-term organizational effects.
METHODS:
We performed semi-structured interviews and used triangulation of sources (constellator and clients) and methods (inductive, deductive coding and ethnographic approach).
RESULTS:
The study identified a phase model of SCW process revolving around organizational trauma enmeshed in the context of personal, organizational and social systemic fields.
CONCLUSIONS:
The results imply that SCW is a valid method of trauma healing and prevention.
MartinuzziA, KoppU. Systemic Constellations in Theory Based Evaluation - Tools and Experiences. 6th European Conference on Evaluation of Cohesion Policy on 1251 “New Methods for Cohesion Policy Evaluation: Promoting Accountability and Learning”.Warsaw: European Commission; 2010.
3.
ArnoldM. Systemic Structural Constellations and Sustainability in Academia A New Method for Sustainable Higher Education. New York: Routledge; 2019.
4.
CarnabucciK, AndersonR. Integrating psychodrama and systemic constellations work: ned directions for action methods, mind-body therapies and energy healing. London, UK: Jessica Kinglsley Publishers; 2012.
5.
RoevensJ. Systemic ConstellationsWork in Organizations. Amsterdam: ScienceGuide; 2008.
BirenkraheM. System constellations as a tool supporting organizational learning and change processes. International Journal of Learning and Change. 2008;3(2):125–44.
8.
BullingK. Systems Constellation as an Instrument for Change Agents: A Case Study, General Conceptual Model and Exploration of Intervention Effects. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden; 2019.
9.
ArnoldMG. Combining conscious and unconscious knowledge within human-machine-interfaces to foster sustainability with decision-making concerning production processes. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018;179:581–92.
10.
FrickéMH. Data-Information-Knowledge-Wisdom (DI KW) Pyramid, Framework, Continuum. In L. A. Schintler & C. L. McNeely (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Big Data (pp. 1–4). Springer International Publishing; 2018. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-32001-4_331-1.
11.
TuomiI. Data Is More than Knowledge: Implications of the Reversed Knowledge Hierarchy for Knowledge Management and Organizational Memory. Journal of Management Information Systems. 1999;16(3):103–17.
12.
UlsamerB. The Healing Power of the Past:ANewApproach to Healing FamilyWounds. Nevada City, CA, USA: Underwood Books; 2005.
13.
WhittingtonJ. Systemic Coaching and Constellations: An Introduction to the Principles, Practices and Application. London, UK: Kogan Page; 2016.
Levin-KeitelM, LelongB, ThalerT. Zur Darstellung von Macht in der räumlichen Planung–Potenziale und Grenzen der Methode der systemischen Aufstellung. Raumforschung und Raumordnung-Spatial Research and Planning. 2017;75(1):31–44.
16.
JurgW, BloemerJ, DoorewaardH, PeelenE, SimonsR. Systems constellations: A better way to identify branding opportunities?Journal of Brand Management. 2008;15(4):239–57. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.bm.2550116.
17.
Ulsamer B. The healing power of the past: The systemic therapy of Bert Hellinger. Underwood Books; 2005.
18.
BiggieroL. Organizations as cognitive systems: what do they process and deliver. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA) Working Paper; 2007.
19.
CohenDB. Family Constellations: An Innovative Systemic Phenomenological Group Process From Germany. The Family Journal. 2006;14(3):226–33. doi: 10.1177/1066480706287279.
20.
RoevensJ, Gómez GómezF. Organizational change based on the new perspective of Systemic Constellations. The Knowing Field International Constellations Journal. 2017.
BurchardtC. Business Coaching and Consulting –the Systemic Constellation Approach in Business. In M. Sch- abacker, K. Gericke, N. Szelig, S. Vajna, Modelling and Management of Engineering Processes (pp. 101–112). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2014.
23.
WadeH. Systemic working: the constellations approach. Industrial and Commercial Training. 2004;36(5):194–9. doi: 10.1108/00197850410548576.
24.
SchlötterP. Vertraute Sprache und ihre Entdeckung: Systemaufstellungen sind keine Zufallsprodukte - der empirische Nachweis. Heidelberg: Carl-Auer Verlag GmbH; 2005.
25.
RosseletC. Andersherum zur Lösung: die Organisationsaufstellung als Verfahren der intuitiven Entscheidungsfindung. Zürich: Versus; 2013.
26.
KoppU. Systemische Nachhaltigkeitskompetenzen für Führungskräfte–Erfahrungen mit Aufstellungsarbeit in der Managementaus-und weiterbildung. Die Unternehmung. 2013;67(2):126–51.
27.
CohenDB. Systemic family constellations and their use with prisoners serving long-term sentences for murder or rape. Doctoral dissertation. Oakland, CA, USA: Saybrook University; 2009.
28.
FinckhCA, ReichK. Systemic constellations in diversity management. International Journal of Organizational Diversity. 2016;16(4):17–38.
29.
WeberG. Organizational Constellations: Basics and Special Situations. In A. Jaritz, Praxis der Organisationsaufstellungen. Heidelberg: Auer-System-Verlag Carl; 2002.
BorekL. Team structural constellations and intra-team conflict. Team Performance Management. 2011;17(7/8):405–17. doi: 10.1108/13527591111182652.
32.
HornKP, BrickR. Invisible dynamics: Systemic constellations in organisations and in business. Heidelberg: Carl-Auer Verlag; 2018.
33.
MišeM. Introducing Concept of Personal Responsibility on the Base of Organizational Constellations in the Course of Entrepreneurship (DOBA Faculty). The 12th IRDO International Scientific Conference: Social responsibility and current challenges. Maribor; 2007.
34.
KirbyR. Constellations for Organizations. Inside Out. Retrieved from IAHIP - Irish Association of Humanistic and Integrative Psyhotherapy; 2008, August.
35.
Müller-ChristG, LiebscherAK. Transdisciplinary teaching of CSR by systemic constellations. In New perspectives on corporate social responsibility: locating the missing link (pp. 563–583). Weisbaden: Springer Gabler; 2015.
Müller- ChristG, PijetlovićD. Komplexe System lesen: Das Potential von Systemaufstellungen inWissenschaft und Praxis. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler; 2018.
38.
MottoC. La pratique systémique des constellations appliquée au coaching. Revue Internationale de Psychosociologie. 2006;13(27):105–21.
39.
Müller-ChristG, LiebscherAK. AdvancedTraining for Sustainability Change Agents—Insights and Experiences from a Seminar Series Using the Method of Systemic Constellations. InW. Leal Filho, L. Brandli, O. Kuznetsova, A. Paço. Springer; 2015. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-10690-8_31.
40.
Müller-ChristG, LiebshcherAK, HussmannG. Nachhaltigkeit lernen durch Systemaufstellungen*/Learning Sustainability via Systemic Constellations. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik. 2015;16(1):29–51.
41.
AbcouwerT, SmitB. Learning in a dynamic Information Managementworld. International Conference on Enterprise Systems (ES). (pp. 131-138). IEEE; 2015. doi: 10.1109/ES.2015.32.
Müller-ChristG. Values and the maturing process of companies: Counterintuitive hypotheses discovered in a systemic setup using the theory U. In CSR and Business Psychology. Management Series Corporate Social Responsibility (pp. 47–70). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Gabler; 2017.
44.
MayerC-H, ViviersR. Exploring cultural issues for constellation work in South Africa. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy. 2015;36(2):289–306. doi: doi.org/10.1002/anzf.1103.
45.
MayrFP. Consciousising Relatedness: Systemic Conflict Transformation in Political Transformations. Düsseldorf: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing; 2012.
46.
MahrA. Konfliktfelder –Wissende Felder. Systemaufstellungen in der Friedens- und Versöhnungsarbeit (Fields of conflict –knowing fields. Systemic constellations in peace and reconciliation). Heidelberg: Carl-Auer System; 2003.
47.
GatfieldE, HoR. Exploring Patterns of Relationship Between Trauma Symptomization and Family Constellation: Implications for Working With Trauma. The American Journal of Family Therapy. 2017;45(4):220–34. doi: 10.1080/01926187.2017.1348267.
48.
HrnčićJ. Porodične konstelacije kao tretman za prevazilaženje posledica koje nasilje ostavlja na žrtve. TEMIDA. 2017;20(2):219–40. doi: 10.2298/TEM1702218H.
49.
RuppertF. Trauma, Bonding & Family Constellations: Understanding and Healing Injuries of the Soul. Steyning, UK: Green Balloon Publishing; 2017.
50.
ZelenyM. Entering the age of accelerated change: In search of equilibrium. Human Systems Management. 2021;40:3–14.
51.
LiebowitzJ. Developing informed intuition for decisionmaking. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group; 2019.
52.
Megehee CM. Flipping Lewin on his head: There is nothing as usefully theoretical as a good practice. Journal of Business Research. 2016;69(11):5124–7.
53.
NisbettRE, WilsonTD. Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review. 1977;84(3):231–59. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231.
54.
LewinK. Fronteers in group dynamics. In D. Cartwright, Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers. New York: Harper & Row; 1951.
55.
GallagherS, ZakaviD. The phenomenological mind. Milton Park: Routledge; 2013.
56.
GiorgiA. The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: A modified Husserlian approach. Pittsburg: Duquesne University Press; 2009.
57.
NagelT. What is it like to be a bat?The philosophical review. 1974;83(4):435–50.
58.
EnglanderM. The Interview: Data Collection in Descriptive Phenomenological Human Scientific Research. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology. 2012;43(1):13–35.
59.
CreswellJW, PothCN. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design Choosing among Five Approaches (4th Edition). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Inc; 2018.
60.
MaxwellJ. Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach (Applied Social Research Methods) (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc; 2013.
61.
CorbettaP. Social research: theory. methods and techniques. London: Sage Publications; 2003.
62.
HolyoakM, LeiboldMA, MouquetNM, HoltRD, HoopesMF. Metacommunities: A Framework for Large-Scale Community Ecology. In M. Holyoak, M. Leibold HD. Robert, Metacommunities: Spatial Dynamics and Ecological Communities (pp. 1–32). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 2005.
63.
LeCompteMD, GoetzJP. Problems of Reliability and Validity in Ethnographic Research. Review of Educational Research. 1982;52(1):31–60.
64.
AlaseA. The interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA): A guide to a good qualitative research approach. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies. 2017;5(2).
65.
MorganDL. Focus group as qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Ltd; 1997.
ReiterS, StewartG, BruceC. A Strategy for Delayed Research Method Selection: Deciding Between Grounded Theory and Phenomenology. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, suppl. ECRM Special issue Part 2: EJBRM; Reading. 2011;9(1):35–46.
68.
YeongML, IsmailR, IsmailNH, HamzahMI. Interview protocol refinement: Fine-tuning qualitative research interview questions for multi-racial populations in Malaysia. The Qualitative Report. 2018;23(11):2700–13.
69.
BoydCO. Philosophical foundations of qualitative research. In P. L. Munhall, Nursing research:Aqualitative perspective (pp. 65–89). Sudburry: Jones and Bartlett; 2001.
70.
GuestG, BruceA, JohnsonL. How many interviews are enough?: An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods. 2006;18(1):59–82. doi: 10.1177/1525822X05279903.
71.
CreswellJW. Qualitative Inquiry and research design choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks:SAGE Publications; 2013.
72.
BakkerS, SteeghsL. Unlocking Systemic Wisdom: Bringing key knowledge from constellations to the work floor. San Francisco: Systemic Books Publishing; 2017.
73.
BurnardP, GillP, StewartK, TreasureE, ChadwickB. Analysing and presenting qualitative data. British Dental Journal. 2008;204(8):429–32.
74.
HadjistavropoulosT, SmytheWE. Elements of Risk in Qualitative Research. Ethics & Behavior. 2001;11(2):163–74. doi: 10.1207/S15327019EB1102_4.
75.
MillerT, BellL. “Consenting to what? Issues of access, gate-keeping and ‘informed’consent. In T. Miller, M. Birch, M. Mauthner, & J. Jessop, Ethics in qualitative research 53 (p. 69). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2002.
76.
IaconoVL, SymondsP, BrownDH. Skype as a Tool for Qualitative Research Interviews. Sociological Research Online. 2016;21(2):103–17.
77.
OatesJ. Use of Skype in interviews: the impact of the medium in a study of mental health nurses. Nurse Researcher. 2015;22(4):13–7. doi: 10.7748/nr.22.4.13.e1318.
78.
DeakinH, WakefieldK. Skype interviewing: reflections of two PhD researchers. Qualitative Research. 2014;14(5):603–16.
79.
BoldenGB. Transcribing as research:“manual” transcription and conversation analysis. Research on Language and Social Interaction. 2015;48(3):276–80. doi: 10.1080/08351813.2015.1058603.
80.
EloS, KyngäsH. The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2008;62(1):107–15.
BraunV, ClarkeV. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006;3(2):77–101.
83.
deKlerkM. Healing emotional trauma in organizations: An O.D. framework and case study. Organization Development Journal. 2007;25(1):35–41.
84.
HormannS, VivianP. Toward an understanding of traumatized organizations and how to intervene in them. Traumatology. 2005;11(3):159–69.
85.
MewbornKN. A grounded theory study of the multicultural experiences of school psychologists. Doctoral Dissertation; 2005.
86.
RichieBS, FassingerRE, LinnSG, JohnsonJ, ProsserJ, RobinsonS. Persistence, connection, and passion: A qualitative study of the career development of highly achieving African American–Black and White women. Journal of Counselling Psychology. 1997;44(2):133.
87.
ArchibaldMM, RadilAI, ZhangX, HansonWE. Current Mixed Methods Practices in Qualitative Research: A Content Analysis of Leading Journals. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2015;14(2):5–33.
88.
MorseJM. Confusing Categories and Themes. Qualitative Health Research. 2015;18(6):727–8.
89.
LugtRv. Open mind and open heart: Exploring the dynamics in stakeholder networks in complex co-design projects. Proceedings of Relating Systems Thinking and Design (RSD6) 2017 Symposium. Oslo; 2017.
90.
LuhmannN. The autopoiesis of social system. In F. Geyer, v. Johannes, Sociocybernetic paradoxes: observation, control and evolution of self-steering systems (Vol. 6, pp. 172–192). London: SAGE Publications; 1986.
91.
Varga von Kibéd MN, SparrerI. Ganz im Gegenteil. Tetralemmaarbeit und andere Grundformen Systemischer Strukturaufstellungen –für Querdenker und solche, die es warden. Heidelberg: Carl-Auer-Verlag; 2014.
92.
SparrerI, Varga von KibédM. Systemische Strukturaufstellungen: Simulation von Systemen. Lernende Organisation. 2001;4:6–14.
93.
HellingerB. NoWaves without the Ocean: Experiences and Thoughts. Heidelberg: Carl Auer International; 2006.
94.
Scharmer OB. Theory U: Leading from the future as it emerges. Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc; 2016.
95.
CorleyKG, SchinoffBS. Who, me? An inductive study of novice experts in the context of how editors come to understand theoretical contibution. Academy of Management Perspectives. 2017;31(1):4–27.
96.
ShepherdDA, SutcliffeKM. Inductive top-down theorizing: A source of new theories of organization. Academy of Management Review. 2011;36(2):361–80.
97.
GioiaDA, CorleyKG, HamiltonAL. Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods. 2012;16(1):15–31.
98.
StamJJ. Wings of change: systemic organizational development. San Francisco: Systemic Books Publishing; 2017.
