The new generation networks (5G and beyond) will allow us to collect and process real-time information about a user and his context. Analyzing the adolescents’ behaviour and taking into account relations between their psychological frailty and socio-cultural context, it is possible to highlight situations of vulnerability.
OBJECTIVE:
It is crucial to shed light on how the nature of social relationships and the similarity among individuals play a role in the collective dynamics.
METHODS:
To understand these dynamics, Evolutionary Game Theory and the analysis of social networks, modeled as multiplex networks, are useful.
RESULTS:
Thanks to a simulative approach we evaluate the emergence and maintenance of cooperation within a class, assessing the role of social network structure and of the homophily on the dynamics.
CONCLUSION:
Exploiting these tools it is possible to design innovative ICT context-aware services based on collective cooperation and aimed at improving social inclusion, education and support for frail people.
AdelmanC. Kurt lewin and the origins of action research. Educational Action Research. 1993;1(1):7–24.
2.
Al-WashmiR, BanaJ, KnightI, BensonE, KerrOAA, BlanchfieldP, HopkinsG. Design of a math learning game using a minecraft mod. In: European Conference on Games Based Learning, vol. 1, p. 10. Academic Conferences International Limited, 2014.
3.
AlmquistY. The school class as a social network and contextual effects on childhood and adult health: Findings from the aberdeen children of the s cohort study. Social Networks. 2011;33(4):281–91.
BarrioCM, Muñoz-OrganeroM, SorianoJS. Can gamification improve the benefits of student response systems in learning? An experimental study. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing.. 2015;4(3):429–38.
6.
BattistonF, NicosiaV, LatoraV. Structural measures for multiplex networks. Physical Review E. 2014;89(3):032804.
7.
BattistonF, NicosiaV, LatoraV. The new challenges of multiplex networks: Measures and models. The European Physical Journal Special Topics. 2017;226(3):401–16.
8.
BattistonF, PercM, LatoraV. Determinants of public cooperation in multiplex networks. New Journal of Physics, 2017.
9.
BoavidaF, KliemA, RennerT, RiekkiJ, JouvrayC, JacoviM, IvanovS, GuadagniF, GilP, TriviñoA. People-centric internet of things—challenges, approach, and enabling technologies. In: Intelligent Distributed Computing IX, pp. 463–474. Springer, 2016.
10.
BoccalettiS, BianconiG, CriadoR, Del GenioCI, Gómez-GardeñesJ, RomanceM, Sendi˜na-NadalI, WangZ, ZaninM. The structure and dynamics of multilayer networks. Physics Reports. 2014;544(1):1–122.
CapraroV. A model of human cooperation in social dilemmas. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e72427.
13.
CarringtonPJ, ScottJ, WassermanS. Models and methods in social network analysis, vol. 28. Cambridge University Press, 2005.
14.
ChiodoJJ, FlaimML. The link between computer simulations and social studies learning: Debriefing. The Social Studies. 1993;84(3):119–21.
15.
CleggA, YoungJ, IliffeS, RikkertMO, RockwoodK. Frailty in elderly people. The Lancet. 2013;381(9868):752–62.
16.
CohenEG, LotanRA. Producing equal-status interaction in the heterogeneous classroom. American Educational Research Journal. 1995;32(1):99–120.
17.
ContiM, PassarellaA, DasSK. The internet of people (iop): A new wave in pervasive mobile computing. Pervasive and Mobile Computing. 2017;41:1–27.
18.
CrookC. Computers and the Collaborative Experience of Learning, 1994. Routledge, 2018.
19.
DashuaiR, BinZ. How does paradoxical leadership affect innovation in teams: An integrated multilevel dual process model. Human Systems Management. 2020;39(1):11–26.
20.
DawsonS. A study of the relationship between student social networks and sense of community. Journal of Educational Technology & Society. 2008;11(3):224–38.
21.
De ToniAF, GiacomelliF, IvisS. Il mondo invisibile dei pazienti fragili: la fragilit‘a interpretata dalla medicina di famiglia mediante la teoria della complessit‘a. UTET università, 2010.
22.
Di StefanoA, ScatàM, La CorteA, LiòP, CataniaE, GuardoE, PaganoS. Quantifying the role of homophily in human cooperation using multiplex evolutionary game theory. PLOS ONE. 2015;10(10):e0140646. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140646
23.
DoebeliM, HauertC. Models of cooperation based on the prisoner’s dilemma and the snowdrift game. Ecology Letters. 2005;8(7):748–66.
24.
EasleyD, KleinbergJ, et alNetworks, crowds, and markets, vol. 8. Cambridge University PressCambridge, 2010.
25.
FarmerTW, RodkinPC. Antisocial and prosocial correlates of classroom social positions: The social network centrality perspective. Social Development. 1996;5(2):174–88.
26.
FeatherstoneM. Using gamification to enhance self-directed, open learning in higher education, 2016.
27.
ForteA, DickardM, MageeR, AgostoDE. What do teens ask their online social networks? Social search practices among high school students. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACMconference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing, pp. 28–37, 2014.
28.
GobbensRJ, van AssenMA, LuijkxKG, Wijnen-SponseleeMT, ScholsJM. Determinants of frailty. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 2010;11(5):356–64.
29.
HamermanD. Toward an understanding of frailty. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1999;130(11):945–50.
30.
HaythornthwaiteC. Exploring multiplexity: Social network structures in a computer-supported distance learning class. The Information Society. 2001;17(3):211–26.
31.
IanesD, CramerottiS. Dirigere scuole inclusive: Strumenti e risorse per il Dirigente scolastico. Edizioni Centro Studi Erickson, 2016.
32.
IyerS, KillingbackT. Evolution of cooperation in social dilemmas on complex networks. PloS Computational Biology. 2016;12(2):e1004779.
33.
JavidiG, RajabionL, SheybaniE. Educational data mining and learning analytics: Overview of benefits and challenges. In: 2017 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI), pp. 1102–1107. IEEE, 2017.
34.
JohnsonDW, JohnsonRT. Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. Prentice-Hall, Inc, 1987.
35.
JohnsonDW, JohnsonRT. Making cooperative learning work. Theory into Practice. 1999;38(2):67–73.
36.
JohnsonDW, JohnsonRT, HolubecEJ, HolubecEJ. The new circles of learning: Cooperation in the classroom and school. ASCD, 1994.
37.
JohnsonRT, JohnsonDW. Cooperative learning in the science classroom. Science and children. 1986;24(2):31–2.
38.
JohnsonRT, JohnsonDW. Active learning: Cooperation in the classroom. The Annual Report of Educational Psychology in Japan. 2008;47:29–30.
39.
KaganS, KaganS. Cooperative learning, vol. 2. Kagan Cooperative Learning San Juan Capistrano, CA, 1994.
40.
KarunananthanS, WolfsonC, BergmanH, BélandF, HoganDB. A multidisciplinary systematic literature review on frailty: overview of the methodology used by the canadian initiative on frailty and aging. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2009;9(1):68.
41.
KayRH, LeSageA. Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: A review of the literature. Computers & Education. 2009;53(3):819–27.
42.
KekkiS, FeatherstoneW, FangY, KuureP, LiA, RanjanA, PurkayasthaD, JiangpingF, FrydmanD, VerinG, et alMec in 5g networks. ETSI White Paper. 2018;28:1–28.
43.
KohanNA, SafariA, TeimouriH. Friendship, transformational leadership and organizational climate. Human Systems Management. 2018;37(3):319–31.
44.
LiuCH, MatthewsR. Vygotsky’s philosophy: Constructivism and its criticisms examined. International Education Journal. 2005;6(3):386–99.
45.
LohrS. The age of big data. New York Times. 2012;11(2012).
46.
MatamalasJT, Poncela-CasasnovasJ, GómezS, ArenasA. Strategical incoherence regulates cooperation in social dilemmas on multiplex networks. Scientific Reports. 2015;5:9519.
47.
MirandaJ, MäkitaloN, Garcia-AlonsoJ, BerrocalJ, MikkonenT, CanalC, MurilloJM. From the internet of things to the internet of people. IEEE Internet Computing. 2015;19(2):40–7.
48.
MivehchiL, RajabionL. A framework for evaluating the impact of mobile games, technological innovation and collaborative learning on students’ motivation. Human Systems Management. 2020;39(1):27–36.
49.
MouttapaM, ValenteT, GallaherP, RohrbachLA, UngerJB. Social network predictors of bullying and victimization. Adolescence. 2004;39(154):315.
50.
MyersonRB. Game theory. Harvard university press, 2013.
51.
NicosiaV, SkardalPS, ArenasA, LatoraV. Collective phenomena emerging from the interactions between dynamical processes in multiplex networks. Physical Review Letters. 2017;118(13):138302.
52.
NiemeyerDJ, GerberHR. Maker culture and minecraft: Implications for the future of learning. Educational Media International. 2015;52(3):216–26.
53.
NowakMA. Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science. 2006;314(5805):1560–3.
54.
NunnaS, KousaridasA, IbrahimM, DillingerM, ThuemmlerC, FeussnerH, SchneiderA. Enabling real-time context-aware collaboration through 5g and mobile edge computing. In: 2015 12th International Conference on Information Technology-New Generations, pp. 601-605. IEEE, 2015.
55.
OrganizationWH, et al Policy options on mental health: a who-gulbenkian mental health platform collaboration, 2017.
56.
PercM, SzolnokiA. Coevolutionary games—a mini review. BioSystems. 2010;99(2):109–125.
57.
RajabionL, NazariN, BandarchiM, FarashianiA, HaddadS. Knowledge sharing mechanisms in virtual communities: A review of the current literature and recommendations for future research. Human Systems Management. 2019;38(4):365–84.
58.
RajabionL, WakilK, BadfarA, NaeiniSM, ZareieB. A new model for assessing the impact of ict and digital knowledge on students’ thoughts and beliefs. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 2019.
59.
RandDG, NowakMA. Human cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2013;17(8):413–25.
60.
RuggieroC, CherubiniA, SeninU. Alla scoperta delle origini dell’anziano fragile.GGERONTOL. 2007;55, 183–190.
61.
RussoTC, KoestenJ. Prestige, centrality, and learning: A social network analysis of an online class. Communication Education. 2005;54(3):254–61.
62.
ScatàM, Di StefanoA, La CorteA, LiòP. Quantifying the propagation of distress and mental disorders in social networks. Scientific Reports. 2018;8(1):5005.
63.
ScatàM, Di StefanoA, La CorteA, LiòP, CataniaE, GuardoE, PaganoS. Combining evolutionary game theory and network theory to analyze human cooperation patterns. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals. 2016;91:17–24.
64.
SchmuckRA, RunkelPJ, LangmeyerD. Improving organizational problem solving in a school faculty. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 1969;5(4):455–82.
65.
SchmuckRA, SchmuckPA. Group processes in the classroom. dubuque. Iowa: Brown, 1983.
66.
SiceP, BentleyE, RauchL. Ontology, epistemology and the complexity of human neurobiology. Human Systems Management. 2018;37(3):353–60.
67.
XiaF, YangLT, WangL, VinelA. Internet of things. International Journal of Communication Systems. 2012;25(9):1101.
68.
YasmeenH, WangY, ZameerH, WaheedA. Service-innovation capability founded on knowledge from customers. Human Systems Management. 2019;38(1):29–41.
69.
ZichermannG, CunninghamC. Gamification by design: Implementing game mechanics in web and mobile apps. “O’Reilly Media, Inc.“ 2011.
