It is important for decision-makers such as leaders to be aware of employee silence behaviour within organizations. Failure to see this phenomenon tends to reduce the quality of information regarding potential issues in the organizations.
OBJECTIVE:
This study investigated the effect of trust in leaders on employee silence behaviour and the mediating role of organizational commitment within this relationship.
METHODS:
Data were collected from academicians working at private higher education institutions within an Indonesia city. Relying on the social exchange theory, the current study tested the hypotheses through the analysis of partial least square –structural equation modeling (PLS–SEM).
RESULTS:
Findings confirmed that trust in leaders positively affects organizational commitment and negatively affects employee silence behaviour. Furthermore, results suggested that organizational commitment fully mediates the link between trust in leaders and employee silence behaviour.
CONCLUSIONS:
These findings present a valuable contribution for scholars and managers in understanding the mechanism underlying the relationship between trust in leaders and employee silence behaviour, especially in non-profit organizational settings such as higher education institutions in Indonesia.
MorrisonEW. Employee voice and silence. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav. 2014;1(1):173–97.
2.
DjikhyS, MoustaghfirK. International faculty, knowledge transfer, and innovation in higher education: A human resource development perspective. Human Systems Management. 2019;38(4):423–31.
3.
MorrisonEW, SeeKE, PanC. An approach-inhibition model of employee silence: The joint effects of personal sense of power and target openness. Personnel Psychology. 2015;68(3):547–80.
4.
VakolaM, BouradasD. Antecedents and consequences of organisational silence: an empirical investigation. Employee Relations. 2005;27(5):441–58.
5.
DedahanovAT, RheeJ. Examining the relationships among trust, silence and organizational commitment. Management Decision. 2015;53(8):1843–57.
6.
DaftRL. Organization theory and design. Mason, OH: Cengage learning; 2015.
7.
CichyRF, ChaJ, KimS. The relationship between organizational commitment and contextual performance among private club leaders. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 2009;28(1):53–62.
8.
GautamT, Van DickR, WagnerU, UpadhyayN, DavisAJ. Organizational citizenship behavior and organizational commitment in Nepal. Asian Journal of Social Psychology. 2005;8(3):305–14.
9.
PrestonJB, BrownWA. Commitment and performance of nonprofit board members. Nonprofit Management and Leadership. 2004;15(2):221–38.
10.
AnugerahR, AnitaR, SariRN, AbdillahMR, IskandarTM. The analysis of reduced audit quality behavior: The intervening role of turnover intention. International Journal of Economics and Management. 2016;10(S2):341–53.
11.
AryatiAS, SudiroA, HadiwidjajaD, NoermijatiN. The influence of ethical leadership to deviant workplace behavior mediated by ethical climate and organizational commitment. International Journal of Law and Management. 2018;60(2):233–49.
12.
TangTL, ChiuRK. Income, money ethic, pay satisfaction, commitment, and unethical behavior: is the love of money the root of evil for Hong Kong employees? Journal of business ethics (2003;46(1):13–30.
13.
RiantoputraCD, MaharisaW, FaridhalT. Acquiescent and defensive silence in an Indonesian context. Makara Hubs-Asia. 2016;20(2):122–31.
14.
InceogluI, ThomasG, ChuC, PlansD, GerbasiA. Leadership behavior and employee well-being: An integrated review and a future research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly. 2018;29(1):179–202.
MayerRC, DavisJH, SchoormanFD. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of management review. 1995;20(3):709–34.
17.
DirksKT, SkarlickiDP. Trust in Leaders: Existing Research and Emerging Issues. In: Kramer RM, Cook KS, editors. The Russell Sage Foundation series on trust. Trust and distrust in organizations: Dilemmas and approaches. New York, NY, US: Russell Sage Foundation; 2004. p. 21-40.
18.
EllonenR, BlomqvistK, PuumalainenK. The role of trust in organisational innovativeness. European Journal of Innovation Management. 2008;11(2):160–81.
19.
GaoL, JanssenO, ShiK. Leader trust and employee voice: The moderating role of empowering leader behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly. 2011;22(4):787–98.
20.
DyneLV, AngS, BoteroIC. Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. Journal of management studies. 2003;40(6):1359–92.
21.
MorrisonEW, MillikenFJ. Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management review. 2000;25(4):706–25.
22.
PinderCC, HarlosKP. Employee silence: Quiescence and acquiescence as responses to perceived injustice. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management. 2001;20:331–69.
23.
BrinsfieldCD, EdwardsMS, GreenbergJ. Voice and silence in organizations: historical review and current conceptualizations. In: Greenberg J, Edwards MS. editors. Voice and Silence in Organizations. UK: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. 2009. p. 3-33
24.
ZhangZ, ChelladuraiP. Antecedents and consequences of athlete’s trust in the coach. Journal of Sport and Health Science. 2013;2(2):115–21.
25.
ByunG, DaiY, LeeS, KangS. Leader trust, competence, LMX, and member performance: A moderated mediation framework. Psychological Reports.. 2017;120(6):1137–59.
26.
KimTY, WangJ, ChenJ. Mutual trust between leader and subordinate and employee outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics. 2018;149(4):945–58.
27.
KacmarKM, BachrachDG, HarrisKJ, NobleD. Exploring the role of supervisor trust in the associations between multiple sources of relationship conflict and organizational citizenship behavior. The Leadership Quarterly. 2012;23(1):43–54.
28.
MoS, ShiJ. Linking ethical leadership to employee burnout, workplace deviance and performance: Testing the mediating roles of trust in leader and surface acting. Journal of Business Ethics. 2017;144(2):293–303.
29.
GatlingA, ShumC, BookL, BaiB. The influence of hospitality leaders’ relational transparency on followers’ trust and deviance behaviors: Mediating role of behavioral integrity. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 2017;62:11–20.
30.
LiSL, HuoY, LongLR. Chinese traditionality matters: Effects of differentiated empowering leadership on followers’ trust in leaders and work outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics. 2017;145(1):81–93.
31.
PremeauxSF, BedeianAG. Breaking the silence: The moderating effects of self-monitoring in predicting speaking up in the workplace. Journal of Management Studies. 2003;40(6):1537–62.
32.
KnollDL, GillH. Antecedents of trust in supervisors, subordinates, and peers. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 2011;26(4):313–30.
33.
FullerJB, BarnettT, HesterK, RelyeaC, FreyL. An exploratory examination of voice behavior from an impression management perspective. Journal of Managerial Issues. 2007:134-51.
34.
PorterLW, SteersRM, MowdayRT, BoulianPV. Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1974;59(5):603–9.
35.
ColquittJ, LepineJA, WessonMJ, GellatlyIR. Organizational behavior: Improving performance and commitment in the workplace. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Irwin; 2011.
36.
MeyerJP, AllenNJ, SmithCA. Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1993;78(4):538–51.
37.
BloemerJ, PluymaekersM, OdekerkenA. Trust and affective commitment as energizing forces for export performance. International Business Review. 2013;22(2):363–80.
38.
CamgözSM, KarapinarPB. Linking secure attachment to commitment: Trust in supervisors. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. 2016;37(3):387–402.
39.
JainP, DuggalT, AnsariAH. Examining the mediating effect of trust and psychological well-being on transformational leadership and organizational commitment. Benchmarking: An International Journal.. 2019;26(5):1517–32.
40.
AvolioBJ, BassBM. Individual consideration viewed at multiple levels of analysis: A multi-level framework for examining the diffusion of transformational leadership. The Leadership Quarterly. 1995;6(2):199–218.
41.
BlauP. Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York, NY: John Wiley. 1964.
42.
CropanzanoR, MitchellMS. Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management. . 2005;31(6):874–900.
43.
MayerRC, GavinMB. Trust in management and performance: Who minds the shop while the employees watch the boss?Academy of Management Journal. 2005;48(5):874–88.
44.
AriyabuddhiphongsV, KahnSI. Transformational leadership and turnover intention: The mediating effects of trust and job performance on caf employees in Thailand. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism. 2017;16(2):215–33.
45.
WhitesideDB, BarclayLJ. Echoes of silence: Employee silence as a mediator between overall justice and employee outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics. 2013;116(2):251–66.
46.
WetzelsM, Odekerken-SchröderG, Van OppenC. Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quarterly. 2009:177-95.
47.
ChinWW. How to write up and report PLS analyses. In: Vinzi VE, Chin WW, Henseler j, Wang H. editors. Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications. Heidelberg: Springer. 2010. p. 655-690.
48.
HairJFJr, SarstedtM, HopkinsL, KuppelwieserVG. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). European Business Review. 2014;26(2):106–21.
49.
PodsakoffPM, MacKenzieSB, PodsakoffNP. Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology. 2012;63:539–69.
WeerawardenaJ, MortGS, SalunkeS, KnightG, LieschPW. The role of the market sub-system and the socio-technical sub-system in innovation and firm performance: A dynamic capabilities approach. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 2015;43(2):221–39.
WetzelsM, Odekerken-SchröderG, Van OppenC. Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quarterly. 2009:177-95.
54.
O’CassA, WeerawardenaJ. The effects of perceived industry competitive intensity and marketing-related capabilities: Drivers of superior brand performance. Industrial Marketing Management. 2010;39(4):571–81.
55.
FornellC, LarckerDF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research. 1981;18(1):39–50.
56.
KockN. Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration (IJeC). 2015;11(4):1–10.
57.
KockN, LynnG. Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: An illustration and recommendations. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 2012;13(7):546–80.
58.
NitzlC, RoldanJL, CepedaG. Mediation analysis in partial least squares path modeling. Industrial Management & Data Systems. 2016;116(9):1849–64.
59.
AbdillahMR, LinCT, AnitaR, SurotoB. Knowledge-sharing behavior among banking officers in Indonesia. Journal of International Studies. 2018;11(2):136–53.
NovakA, BreznikK, NatekS. How leaders can initiate knowledge management in organizations: Role of leadership style in building knowledge infrastructure. Human Systems Management. 2020;39(1):37–50.
