Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2021-06-08
The influence of social entrepreneurship on the organizational learning,partnership,competitive advantages,and business performance (a study of a creative industry-based small scale apparel business in DKI Jakarta)
Based on the empirical consideration of small business apparel condition, theoretical consideration, suggestion, and limitations of previous research, this research is very essential to learn the influence of social entrepreneurship on organizational learning, partnerships, competitive advantage, and business performance in small scale businesses by raising the case of industry apparel oriented to the creative industry.
OBJECTIVE:
To analyze the The Influence Of Social Entrepreneurship On The Organizational Learning, Partnership, Competitive Advantages, And Business Performance.
METHODS:
The number of sample was 168 small businesses in DKI Jakarta. Data analysis using GSCA (generalized structured component analysis) to confirm the model that has been submitted into empirical data.
RESULTS:
Social entrepreneurship has a significant impact on organizational learning, business partnerships, competitive advantage, and business performance. However, the reciprocal relationship between those five variables is also very strong.
CONCLUSIONS:
Of the five variables, the overall model is dominated by the strength of business performance. The purpose of establishing business performance characteristics was to ensure that management runs well based on the principles of social entrepreneurship. business performance through good corporate governance is a necessity in the era of competition to increase the company value and prosper all employees and the community.
MarijanK. Developing small and medium industries through a cluster approach. INSAN. 2005;7(3):45–56.
2.
IdrisS, PrimianaI. Effect of competitive strategy and partnership strategy for small industry performance. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management. 2015;III(4):34–45.
3.
Mayer-HaugK, ReadS, BrinckmannJ, DewN, GrichnikD. Entrepreneurial talent and venture performance: A meta-analytic investigation of SMEs. Research Policy. 2013;42(6-7):1251–73.
4.
AntoldiF, CerratoD, DepperuD. Strategic Networks, Trust and the competitive advantage of SMEs. In Export Consortia in Developing Countries (pp. 23-43). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 2011. DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-24879-5_2.
5.
ViscontiRM. Microfinance vs. tradisional banking in developing countries. Int. J. Financial Innovation in Banking. 2016;1(1):42–61. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJFIB.2016.076613
6.
BharadwajB. Roles of Coopetaivenes in Poverty Reduction: A Cse of Nepal. Administration and Management Review. 2012;24(1).
7.
KrausS, BurtscherJ, NiemandT, TiernoNR, SyrjaP. Configurational paths to social performance in smes: the interplay of innovation, sustainability, resources and achievement motivation. Sustainability. 2017;9:1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101828
8.
KazmiSH, HashimM, KeeDM, KhanFU. Social enterpreneurship and its impact on economy: in perspective of pakistan. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Science. 2016;6(4):161–166.
9.
FrankN, NgoziE, NkemA. Role of Cooperatives in Small and Medium Scale Enterprises (SMEs) Development in Nigeria: Challenge and the Way Forward. African Research Review. 2012;6(4):140–156. DOI: 10.4314/afrrev.v6i4.10
10.
MajeeW, HoytA. Cooperatives and Community Development: A Perspective on the Use of Cooperatives in Development. Journal of Community Practice. 2011;19(1):48–61. Doi: 10.1038/28160.
11.
SabatiniF, ModenaF, TortiaE. Do Cooperative Enterprises Create Social Trust? European Research Institute on Cooperative and Social Enterprises (Euricse): Trento. 2011.
12.
RahimHL, MohtarS, RamliA. The effect of social entrepreneurial behaviour towards organizational performance: A study on Bumiputera entrepreneurs in Malaysia. International Academic Research Journal of Business and Technology. 2015;1(2):117–125.
13.
NuryantiBL, NurjamanJ. The influence of creativity through the competitiveness of business. Journal AdBispreneur. 2017;2(3):255–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01455-0
14.
BongoI, ArenaM, AzzoneG, CalderiniM. Indicators and metrics for social business: a review of current approaches. Journal of Social Enterpreneurship. 2016;7(1):1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2015.1049286
15.
VasakariaV. A Study on Social Entrepreneurship and the Characteristics of Social Entrepreneur, The Icfaian Journal of Management Research. 2008;VII(4). doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1338730
16.
WibhawaB. IBEKA’s social service delivery model in Indonesia’s micro-hydro power. Human Systems Management. 2018;37(4):387–397.
17.
SaparuddinM, BadoB. Effect of business partnerships on business performance on small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and Cooperatives in Jeneponto Regency, South Sulawesi. Jurnal Econosains. 2011;9(2):161–191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21009/econosains.0092.08
18.
HaughHM, TalwarA. Linking social entrepreneurship and social change: The mediating role of empowerment. Journal of Business Ethics. 2016;133(4):643–658.
19.
KotlerP, ArmstrongG. Principles of marketing. Pearson: Australia. 2014.
20.
Wibowo. Manajemen Kinerja. Bumi Aksara: Jakarta. 2008.
21.
FrancoM, HaaseH. Enterpreneurship: an organizational learning approach. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. 2009;16(4):628–641. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242614542852
22.
UrbanB, GaffuriniE. Social enterprises and organizational learning in south africa. Journal of Enterpreneurship in Emerging Economies. 2017;10(1):117–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315613293
23.
LópezSP, PeónJMM, OrdásCJV. Organizational learning as a determining factor in business performance. The learning organization. 2005;12(3):227–245. DOI: 10.1108/09696470510592494.
24.
SyafarudinA. (2013). The Influence of External and Internal Environment on The Competitive Strategy and The Partnership Strategy and Its Impact on The Competitive Advantage and Its Implication on The Performance of Small and Medium Enterprises in West Sumatra. Doctoral Disertation. Faculty of Economics and Business University of Padjadjaran.
25.
AlekamE, MohammedJ, OthmanS, LadinM, RizamM, AlshuaibiAS. The preceding role of social: innovation, knowledge, capital and entrepreneurship as mediating effects in building Malaysian SME business performance. Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development. 2018;9(11). DOI: 10.5958/0976-5506.2018.01662.5
26.
LawKMY, BreznikK. Impacts of innovativeness and attitude on entrepreneurial intention: among engineering and non-engineering students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. 2017;27(4):683–700. DOI: 10.1007/s10798-016-9373-0
KirznerIM. Entrepreneurship and competition. 1973.
30.
ShaneSA. A general theory of entrepreneurship: The individual-opportunity nexus. Edward Elgar Publishing. 2003.
31.
Godói-de-SousaE, JúniorVMV. Social Enterprises in Brazil: Socially Produced Knowledge Versus Social Innovation. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation. 2013;5:166–176. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242013000300015
32.
HaughH, BradyA. (2019). Community perspectives on social entrepreneurship. In A Research Agenda for Social Entrepreneurship. Edward Elgar Publishing.
33.
NelsonJ, JenkinsB. Investing in Social Innovation: Harnessing the potential for partnership between corporations and social entrepreneurs. The new social entrepreneurship: What awaits social entrepreneurial ventures. 2006; 272-302.
34.
YaumidinUK. Social Entrepreneurship and Corporate Social Responsibility: The Challenges of Multi-sector and Multi-dimensional Singergy. Journal of Development Economics. 2016;21(1):7–27.
35.
DobeleL, PietereA. Competitiveness of social entrepreneurship in Latvia. Regional Formation and Development Studies. 2015;17(3):40–50.
36.
TaniM. Social Enterprises’ Social Capital as a source of Competitive Advantage. In 2nd EMES International Conference on Social Enterprise, EMES Conferences Selected Papers Series, Trento (Italy) 2009 July (1-4).
37.
ŻurA. Building competitive advantage through social value creation–a comparative case study approach to social entrepreneurship. Problemy Zarządzania. 2014;49(2):56–71. DOI: 10.7172/1644-9584.49.4
38.
BorzaA, NistorR, MitraC, BordeanO. Social enterprise and competitiveness. Management & Marketing. 2009;4(3):19–34. doi:10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005
39.
YunusM. 2008. Social business entrepreneurs are the solution, in NichollsA. (Ed.), Social Entrepreneurship: New Models of Sustainable Social Change, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 39–44.
40.
MuthalibAZ, HarafahLM, BalakaM. Entrepreneurship and its Impact on Business Performance Improvement and Poverty Reduction (An Empirical Study of Micro Business Industrial Sector in Kendari). International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention. 2014;3(10):55–65.
41.
WantoHS, SuryasaputraR. The effect of organizational culture and organizational learning towards the competitive strategy and company performance (case study of East Java SMEs in Indonesia: Food and beverage industry). Information Management and Business Review. 2012;4(9):467. DOI: 10.22610/imbr.v4i9.1002.g1002
42.
AkhtarN, KhanRA, MujtabaBG. Exploring and measuring organizational learning capability and competitive advantage of petroleum industry firms. International Business and Management. 2013;6(1):89–103. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/j.ibm.1923842820130601.1170
43.
HapsariGRE, HadiwidjojoD, ThoyibA. The effect of organizational learning, market orientation and organizational innovation on competitive advantage (Study at PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk Malang Raya Branch. Journal of Management Application. 2014;12(1):124–134.
44.
MardiyonoA. Effect of Market Orientation, Organizational learning against competitive advantage in improving marketing performance (Theoretical Review). Acitya4 Fiber. 2015(1):48.
45.
ChenB, GraddyEA. Exploring Perceived Effectiveness of Nonprofit Lead-Organization Networks For Social Service Delivery. Working Papers Series. Center for Nonprofit Strategy and Management. 2008.
46.
CegarranavarroJG. An empirical investigation of organizational learning through strategic alliances between SMEs. Journal of Strategic Marketing. 2005;13(1):3–16. DOI: 10.1080/0965254042000328686
47.
DaveyCL, LoweDJ, DuffAR. Generating opportunities for SMEs to develop partnerships and improve performance. Building Research & Information. 2001;29(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210150208741
48.
MeyskensMA. How do partnerships lead to a competitive advantage. Applying the Resource ‘based View to Nascent Social Ventures. FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 2010;238.
49.
SanjayaCF, KusumawardhanyPA, RahayuS. Supply Chain Management Practices Against Competitive Advantage in Minimarkets in Surabaya. The X National Management Research Conference “Accelerating Competitiveness Towards Sustainable Organizational Excellence” Lombok. 2016;20-22 September 2016
50.
FarrellMA, OczkowskiE, KharabshehR. Antecedents and performance consequences of learning success in international joint ventures. Industrial Marketing Management. 2011;40(3):479–488. DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2009.11.001
51.
BorshalinaT. Marketing strategy and the development of Batik Trusmi in the regency of Cirebon which used natural coloring matters. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015;4(169):217–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.305
52.
SiraitML, SukmawatiA, SumertajayaIM. The Effect of Learning Organizations and Innovation on Improving SME Performance in the City of Bogor. Journal of Management. 2015;19(2):290–303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-530x3641-19
53.
KontoghiorghesC, AwbreSM, FeurigPL. Examining the relationship between learning organization characteristics and change adaptation, innovation, and organizational performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly. 2005;16(2):185–212. DOI: 10.1002/hrdq.1133
54.
WelbourneTM, Pardo-del-ValM. Relational capital: strategic advantage for small and medium-size enterprises (SMEs) through negotiation and collaboration. Group Decision and Negotiation. 2009;18(5):483–497. doi:10.1007/s11151-005-0224-5
55.
KurniawanS, PadmadisastraS. The influence of business partnership and competitive strategy on business performance of recreation park services industry in west java, indonesia. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research. 2016;5(2):23–25.
56.
NugrahaFM, NugrohoKS, YuliantiR. Empowerment of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) by the Cooperative, UMKM, and Trade Service Offices of West Jakarta Administration City (Case Study of Tempe and Tofu Producers in Semanan, Kalideres). (Doctoral dissertation, Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University). 2015.
57.
WijetungeW. Service Quality, Competitive advantage and business performance in service providing SMEs in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publication. 2016;6(7):720–728. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14505//jemt.v9.6(30).04
58.
EniolaAA, EktebangH. SME firms performance in Nigeria: Competitive advantage and its impact. International Journal of Research Studies in Management. 2014;3(2):75–86. DOI: 10.5861/ijrsm.2014.854
59.
MohebiMM, FarzollahzadeS. Improving competitive advantage and business performance of SMEs by creating entrepreneurial social competence. MAGNTResearch Report. 2014;2:20–26.
60.
SetyawatiHA. The Effect of Entrepreneurship Orientation and Market Orientation on Company Performance through Competitive Advantage and Perception of Environmental Uncertainty as Prediction of Moderation Variables (Survey on Trade MSMEs in Kebumen Regency). Business Focus: Management and Accounting Assessment Media. 2013;12(2).
61.
MoleongLJ. Qualitative Research Methodology. PT Remaja Rosdakarya: Bandung. 2004.
62.
ArikuntoS. Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. 2006.
63.
SingarimbunM, EffendiS. Metode Penelitian Survei, LP3ES. Jakarta: PT Pustaka LP3ES Indonesia. 2006.
64.
MartonoN. Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jakarta: PT Raya Grafindo Persada. 2010.
65.
BengoI, ArenaM, AzzoneG, CalderiniM. Indicators and metrics for social business: a review of current approaches (vol 7, pg 1, 2016). Journal of Social Entrepreneurship. 2016;7(3):369–369.
66.
LiS, Ragu-NathanB, Ragu-NathanTS, RaoSS. The impact of supply chain management practices on competitive advantage and organizational performance. Omega. 2006;34:107–124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2004.08.002
67.
MunizuM. The Influence of External and Internal Factors on the Performance of Micro and Small Enterprises (MSEs) in South Sulawesi. Journal of Management and Entrepreneurship. 2010;12(1):33–41.
68.
GhozaliI. Application of multivariate analysis with SPSS program. Semarang: Diponegoro University Publishing Agency. 2011.
69.
AzwarS. Reliability and Validity. Student Library: Yogyakarta. 2001.
70.
GhasemiM, TajdarH, Ahmad SanadgolZ, DahmardehHT, ShahriyariS, ShahrakiN. The Analysis of Organizational Learning and role of Knowledge Management Component to Improve its. 2009.
71.
OladeleOK, MohammedNA, SaheedZ. Corporate social responsibility disclosure and financial performance of listed manufacturing firms in Nigeria. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting www. iiste. org ISSN. 2016;2222-1697.
72.
CeciF, LubattiD. Personal relationship and innovation diffusion in SME networks: A content analysis approach. Research Policy. 2012;41:565–579. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.003.566
73.
GranovetterM. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology. 1985;91(3):481–510.
74.
GulatiR. Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly. 1995;619-652. DOI: 10.2307/2393756
75.
LawsonB, PetersenKJ, CousinsPD, HandfieldRB. Knowledge sharing in interorganizational product development teams: The effect of formal and informal socialization mechanisms. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2009;26(2):156–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00343.x
76.
SabellaAR, EidN. A strategic perspective of social enterprise sustainability. Journal of General Management. 2016;41(4):71–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/030630701604100405
77.
HossainA, AktarN. Influence of Perceived Organizational Support, Supervisory Support, and Working Environment on Employee Service Quality: An Empirical Study on Non-Govt. Employees in Bangladesh. 2012;1:2–24.
78.
NathSD,
IslamS,
SahaAK. Corporate board structure and firm performance: the context of pharmaceutical industry in Bangladesh. International Journal of Economics and Finance. 2015;7(7):106–115.
