A system dynamics (SD) simulation model, of the interactions among business enterprises that compete in the entertainment industry, integrates ideas from organizational and strategy design, and new-technology adoption. The model describes exactly how the new-technology’s diffusion process of hardware and software clusters alters syndication-firms’ strategic postures, and TV networks’ investment opportunities in infrastructure and production capacity. Building on transaction cost economics (TCE), the model contributes to the merger and acquisition (M&A) literature and provides insight into the emergence of corporate-governance forms.
BarneyJ.B., Returns to bidding firms in mergers and acquisitions: Reconsidering the relatedness hypothesis, Strategic Management Journal9(Summer) (1988), 71–78.
2.
GeorgantzasN.C. and AcarW., Scenario-Driven Planning: Learning to Manage Strategic Uncertainty. Westport, CT, USA: Quorum/Greenwood, 1995.
3.
GeorgantzasN.C. and KatsamakasE., Information systems research with system dynamics, System Dynamics Review24(3) (2008), 247–264.
4.
GeorgantzasN.C. and ShapiroH.J., Viable theoretical forms of synchronous production innovation, Journal of Operations Management11 (1993), 161–183.
5.
GeorgantzasN.C. and ZarifopoulouV., Politeia in person: A civic Eros cookbook for human beings’ economic prosperity. Saarbrücken, Deutschland/Germany: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing; 2017. Available online (2017.05.25): https://tinyurl.com/k83yxfg
6.
GhemawatP., Commitment: The dynamic of strategy. New York, NY, USA: Free Press, 1991.
7.
HedmanJ. and SarkerS., Information systems integration in merger and acquisitions: Research ahead, European Journal of Information Systems24 (2015), 117–120.
8.
HenningssonS. and KettingerW.J., Understanding information systems integration deficiencies in mergers and acquisitions: A configurational perspective, Journal of Management Information Systems33(4) (2016), 942–977.
9.
JarilloJ.C., On strategic networks, Strategic Management Journal9(1) (1988), 31–41.
10.
KatsamakasE.G., Value network competition and information technology, Human Systems Management33(1) (2014), 7–17.
MiczkaS.F. and GrößlerA., Merger dynamics: A system dynamics analysis of post-merger integration processes. In Proceedings of the 22nd International System Dynamics Conference, 25-29 July, Keble College, Oxford University, Oxford, UK, 2004; available online 2017.06.04): https://tinyurl.com/y8w9skty
13.
PorterM.E., Towards a dynamic theory of strategy, Strategic Management Journal12(Winter Special Issue) (1991), 95–117.
14.
PorterM.E., Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York, NY, USA: Free Press, 1985.
15.
PorterM.E., Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York, NY, USA: Free Press, 1980.
16.
PowellW.W., Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. In
CummingsLL and StawB (Eds), Research in organizational behavior, Vol. 12, (pp. 295–336). Greenwich, CT, USA: JAI Press, Inc., 1990.
17.
RandersJ., Guidelines for model conceptualization. In
RandersJ (Ed.), Elements of the system dynamics method, (pp. 117–139). Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 1980.
18.
RingP.S. and Van de VenA.H., Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations, Strategic Management Journal13(7) (1992), 438–498.
19.
SingerA.E., Strategy as rationality, Human Systems Management11(1) (1992), 7–21.
20.
WilliamsonO.E., Strategizing, economizing, and economic organization, Strategic Management Journal12(Winter Special Issue) (1991), 75–94.
21.
WilliamsonO.E., Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York, NY, USA: Free Press, 1975.
