A continuing debate about corporate and collective rights and responsibilities has taken place within several academic disciplines, including business-ethics and legal-philosophy; but also in the behavioral and systems sciences, economics and accounting-theory. Accordingly, there are many distinctive types of contribution to the debate. The relationship between these types is quite complex, but it can be untangled. Accordingly, an organizing framework is set out with the intention of helping researchers to place contributions to the debate relative to each other. Some weaknesses are thereby highlighted and previously obscure connections are revealed. An extension of the framework then serves to structure some general criticisms of the entire debate (i.e. the meta-debate). It is duly suggested that the notion of ‘corporate moral agency’ might be thought of in future as epistemological organizing principle, rather than a political battleground or solvable puzzle.
AckoffR.L. and EmeryF., On Purposeful Systems. Tavistock Publications, 1972.
2.
AlzolaM., Character and environment: The status of virtues in organization, Journal of Business Ethics78 (2008), 343–57.
3.
ArnoldD., Corporate Moral Agency, Studies in Philosophy30 (2006), 279–291.
4.
AshmanI. and WinstanleyD., For or against corporate identiy? Personification and the problem of moral agency, Journal of Business Ethics76 (2007), 83–95.
5.
BarkerE., Gierje Natural Law and the Theory of SocietyCambridge: CUP, 1950.
6.
BevanD. and CorvellecH., The impossibility of corporate ethics: A Levinasian approach to managerial ethics, Business Ethics: A European Review16(3) (2007), 208–219.
7.
BouchardF. and HunemanP., From Groups to Individuals: Evolution and Emerging Individuality. The Vienna Series in Theoretical Biology. Cambridge: MIT Press. 2013
8.
BrownM., Civilizing the Economy. Cambridge University Press, 2010.
9.
BuchholzR. and RosenthalS., Integrating ethics all the way through: The issue of moral agency reconsidered. Journal of Business Ethics66 (2006), 233–243.
10.
CarsonT., Corporate moral agency: A case from literature, Journal of Business Ethics13 (1994), 155–156.
11.
CorlettJ., Collective moral responsibility, Journal of Social Philosophy32 (2001), 573–584.
12.
DancyJ., Can a particularist learn the difference between right and wrong?20th World Congress of Philosophy. Boston, 1998.
13.
DanleyJ., Corporate moral agency: The case for anthropological bigotry, In: Hoffman and Moore (eds.), Business Ethics: Readings and Cases in Corporate Morality, McGraw Hill, 1984, 172–179.
14.
DubbinkW. and SmithJ., A Political Account of Corporate Moral Responsibility,” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice (June 2010).
15.
ElsterJ., The Multiple Self. Cambridge University Press, 1986.
16.
EwinR., The moral status of the corporation, Journal of Business Ethics10 (1991), 749–756.
17.
FreemanR., Divergent stakeholder theory, Academy of Management Review24(2) (1999), 233–236.
18.
FrenchP., Collective and Corporate Responsibility. Columbia University Press: NY. 1984.
19.
FreundE., The Legal Nature of the Corporation. Batoche Books, Kitchener (2000) (orig.1897).
20.
FriedmanM., The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York TimesSept 13th1970.
21.
GarrettJ., Un-redistributable corporate moral responsibility, Journal of Business Ethics8(7) (1989), 535–545.
22.
GindisD., From fictions and aggregates to real entities in the theory of the firm, Journal of Institutional Economics5(1) (2009), 25–46.
23.
GiniA., Work, identity and self; how we are formed by the work we do, Journal of Business Ethics17 (1998), 707–14.
24.
GoodpasterK. and MatthewsJ, Can a corporation have a conscience? In HoffmanWM & MooreJM (eds.) Business Ethics: Readings and cases in corporate morality. (McGraw Hill: NY) pp. 150–162, 1982.
25.
GunkelD., The Machine Question: Critical Perspectives on AI, Robots and Ethics. MIT Press. 2012.
26.
Hall-StoresJ., Beyond AI: Creating the Conscience of the Machine.Prometheus: NY. 2007.
27.
IyerA., The missing dynamic: Corporations individuals and contracts, Journal of Business Ethics67 (2006), 433–436.
28.
IsaacsT., Collective moral responsibility and collective intention, Midwest Studies in Philosophy30 (2006), 59–73.
29.
JacksonK., Global distributive justice and the corporate duty to aid. Journal of Business Ethics12(7) (1993), 547–551.
30.
JanisI. and MannL., Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice and Commitment. NY: Free Press. 1977.
31.
KerenG., Optimality as an epistemological organizing principle, Behavioral and Brain Sciences16(3) (1993), 622–623.
32.
KerlinM. and FrenchPeter, corporate ethics and the wizard of Oz. Journal of Business Ethics16 (1997), 1431–1438.
33.
LeviI., Hard Choices: Decision Making Under Unresolved Conflict,CUP: Cambridge, MA. 1986.
34.
ListC. and PettitP., Group Agency: The Possibility, Design and Status of Corporate Agents. Oxford: OUP. 2011.
35.
ManningR., Corporate Responsibility and Corporate Personhood, Journal of Business Ethics3 (1984), 77–84.
36.
MayL., The Morality of Groups: Collective Responsibility, Group Based Harm and Corporate Rights. IN: University of Notre Dame Press. 1987.
37.
McCloskeyD., The Rhetoric of Economics, Madison:University of Wisconsin Press. 1998.
38.
McMahonC., The ontological and moral status of organizations, Business Ethics Quarterly5(3) (1995), 543–554.
39.
MargolisJ. and WalshP., Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business, Administrative Science Quarterly48(2) (2003), 268–306.
40.
ModgilS. and ModgilC. (Eds.). Lawrence Kohlberg: Consensus and Controversy. Lewes: The Falmer Press. 1986.
41.
MoonJ., CraneA. and MattenD., Can corporations be citizens? Corporate citizenship as a metaphor for business participation in society, Business Ethics Quarterly15(3) (2005), 427–451.
42.
MunzerS., A Theory of Property. Cambridge Studies in philosophy and Law. Cambridge: CUP. 1990.
43.
NarvesonJ., Collective responsibility, Journal of Ethics6 (2002), 179–198.
44.
OzarD., Do Corporations Have Moral Rights?Journal of Business Ethics4 (1985), 277–281.
PhillipsM., Corporate moral responsibility: When it might matter, Business Ethics Quarterly5(3) (1995), 555–577.
47.
PruzanP., The question of organizational consciousness: Can organizations have values, virtues, visions?Journal of Business Ethics29 (2001), 271–284.
48.
RankinN., Corporations as persons: Objections to Goodpaster’s “Principle of Moral Projection”, Journal of Business Ethics6 (1987), 633–643.
49.
RosenthalS. and Bucholtz.R., The empirical-normative split in business ethics: A pragmatic alternative, Business Ethics Quarterly10(2) (2000), 399–408.
50.
SeabrightM. and KurkeL., Organizational ontology and the moral status of the corporation, Business Ethics Quarterly7(4) (1997), 91–108.
51.
SenA., Does business ethics make economic sense?Business Ethics Quarterly3(1) (1993), 45–54.
52.
SennettR., The Corrosion of Character: The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism. London: Norton, 2000.
53.
SingerA., Planning, Consciousness and Conscience, Journal of Business Ethics3 (1984), 113–117.
54.
SingerA., Strategy as Rationality, Human Systems Management11(1) (1992), 7–22.
55.
SingerA., Strategy as Moral Philosophy, Strategic Management Journal15 (1994), 191–213.
56.
SingerA., Teaching ethics cases: A pragmatic approach, Business Ethics: A European Review22(1) (2012a), 16–31. [doi: 10.1111/beer.12004]
57.
SingerA., Biology and freedom: An emerging stakeholder imperative, Human Systems Management31 (2012b), 85–95.
58.
SingerA., Corporate moral agency and artificial intelligence, International Journal of Social and Organizational Dynamics in Information Technology3(1) (2013), 1–13.
59.
SridharB. and CamburnA, Stages of moral development of corporations, Journal of Business Ethics12(9) (1993), 727–743.
60.
VelasquezM., Debunking corporate moral responsibility, Business Ethics Quarterly13(4) (2003), 531–562.
61.
Wagner-TsukamotoS., An economic approach to business ethics: Moral agency of firms and the enabling and constraining effects of economic interactions in a market economy, Journal of Business Ethics60(1) (2009), 75–89.
62.
WallachW. and AllenC., Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right From Wrong. Oxford: OUP, 2009.
63.
WatsonG., FreemanR. and ParmarB, Connected moral agency in organizational ethics, Journal of Business Ethics81 (2008), 323–343.
64.
WeaverW., Corporations as intentional systems, Journal of Business Ethics17 (1998), 87–97.
65.
WerhaneP., Corporate and individual moral responsibility: A reply to Jan Garrett, Journal Of Business Ethics8 (1989), 821–822.
66.
WerhaneP., The normative/descriptive distinction in methodologies of business ethics, Business Ethics Quarterly4(2) (1994), 175–179.
