By reading the titles, abstracts, and keywords of LIS doctoral dissertations in China from 2011–2020 and conducting cluster analysis and network analysis of keywords, this study aims to understand the intelligence structure of LIS doctoral dissertations in China, as well as the disciplines and topics intersecting with LIS. The results indicated that Wuhan University had the highest number of doctoral dissertations among all the selected universities offering LIS doctoral education. Research fields mainly focus on online information behavior and information services. The findings could be because of the development of computer science and information technology in the past decade, which indicates that the research direction of LIS in China follows the trend of time development.
AndersenJ. P., & HammarfeltB. (2011). Price revisited: on the growth of dissertations in eight research fields. Scientometrics, 88(2), 371-383.
2.
ÅströmF. (2007). Changes in the LIS research front: Time-sliced cocitation analyses of LIS journal articles, 1990–2004. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(7), 947-957.
3.
BarooahP. K.BegumD., & SharmaN. N. (1999). Bibliometric study of the doctoral dissertations in organic chemistry submitted by ST workers of RRL, Jorhat to evaluate the utility factor of the library Bibliometric study of the doctoral dissertations in organic chemistry submitted by ST workers of RRL, Jorhat to evaluate the utility factor of the library. Annals Library Science & Documentation, 46(1), 1-8.
4.
BatesM. J. (1999). The invisible substrate of information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(12), 1043-1050.
5.
BauinS. (1986). Aquaculture: A field by bureaucratic fiat. In Mapping the dynamics of science and technology, Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp. 124-141.
6.
ButtlarL. (1999). Information sources in library and information science doctoral research. Library & Information Science Research, 21(2), 227-245.
7.
CalegariS., & PasiG. (2010). Ontology-based information behaviour to improve web search. Future Internet, 2(4), 533-558.
8.
CallonM.RipA., & LawJ. (Eds.). (1986). Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: Sociology of science in the real world. Springer.
9.
Cambridge Dictionary. (n.d.). Discipline. Retrieved on July 29, 2020 from: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/discipline.
10.
CaoX.ZhouC. L., & TianF. J. (2010). A Co-word Analysis of Tourism Science PhD Dissertation Themes Selection in China. Tourism Forum, 6.
11.
ChenC.WuG. & TangQ. (2008). The development of library and information education in China in the past 30 years. Library Intelligence, 9, 5-14.
12.
ChenY., & YangZ. (2003). A study on the graduate curricula of information science. Library and Information Service, 2, 113-116.
13.
ConnawayL. S., & RadfordM. L. (2017). Research methods in library and information science (6th ed.). Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited.
14.
CoulterN.MonarchI., & KondaS. (1998). Software engineering as seen through its research literature: A study in co-word analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(13), 1206-1223.
15.
CourtialJ. (1994). A coword analysis of scientometrics. Scientometrics, 31(3), 251-260.
16.
DeoV. N.MohalS. M., & SurveyS. S. (1995). Bibliometric study of doctoral dissertations on English language and literature. Annals of Library Science and Documentation, 42(3), 81-95.
17.
DoraM., & Anil KumarH. (2017). An empirical analysis of the research trends in the field of library and information science in India–2004-2015, COLLNET journal of scientometrics and information management, 11(2), 361-378.
18.
FinlayC. S.SugimotoC. R.LiD., & RussellT. G. (2012). LIS dissertation titles and abstracts (1930–2009): Where have all the librar* gone?The library quarterly, 82(1), 29-46.
19.
FranklinR. E., & JaegerP. T. (2007). A decade of doctorates: An examination of dissertations written by African American women in library and information studies, 1993–2003. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science,187-201.
GargK. C., & SainiV. (2015). Bibliometrics of Postgraduate Dissertations and Doctoral Theses submitted to Indira Gandhi Agricultural University (IGAU) during 1971-2010. Library Herald, 53(3), 284-292.
22.
GuoX. (2011). Citation Analysis for dissertations of doctoral candidates majored in Library Science. Library Work and Study, 2, 65-68.
JanssensF.LetaJ.GlänzelW., & De MoorB. (2006). Towards mapping library and information science. Information processing & management, 42(6), 1614-1642.
25.
JinM. (2010). Survey research on method system of Ph.D. thesis of Library and Information Science in China. Library and Information Service (in China), 54(15), 81-85.
26.
KushkowskiJ. D.ParsonsK. A., & WieseW. H. (2003). Master’s and doctoral thesis citations: Analysis and trends of a longitudinal study. portal:Libraries and the Academy, 3(3), 459-479.
27.
LiC. L., & ZhaiX. M. (2008). Analysis on Research Hotspots of China’s Library Science and Information Science Based on Dissertations. Information Science, 7.
28.
LiaoJ. (2009). Chinese-American alliances: American professionalization and the rise of the modern Chinese library system in the 1920s and 1930s. Library & Information History, 25(1), 20-32.
29.
LiuZ., & CaoH. (2011). The goal of library science education reform: orientated to wider information profession. Journal of National Library of China, 1, 3-11.
30.
LuoX. (1987). Management development and its practice in Chinese library and information services. International Library Review, 17(2), 129-149.
31.
MaF. (1996). Current situation and development of Library and Information Science education in China. Library and Information Science, 1996(1), 12-15.
32.
MerighiM. A.GonçalvesR., & FerreiraF. C. (2007). Bibliometric study on nursing theses and dissertations employing a phenomenological approach: tendency and perspectives. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 15(4), 645-650.
33.
MittalR. (2011). Library and information science research trends in India. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 58, 319-325.
34.
MokhtarpourR., & KhassehA. A. (2020). Twenty-six years of LIS research focus and hot spots, 1990–2016: A co-word analysis. Journal of Information Science, 1-15.
35.
MondalS.BandyopadhyayA. K., & RoyB. K. (2017). Bibliometric Analysis of Doctoral Dissertations in Political Science: a study of The University of Burdwan. International Research: Journal of Library and Information Science, 7(3), 576-594.
36.
NishatN.ChakrabartiK., & KirtaniaD. K. (2019). Bibliometric study of the M. Phil. Dissertations in Library & Information Science awarded under the University of Calcutta during the period from 2004 to 2016. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1-11.
37.
Olmeda-GómezC.Ovalle-PerandonesM. A., & Perianes-RodríguezA. (2017). Co-word analysis and thematic landscapes in Spanish information science literature, 1985–2014. Scientometrics, 113(1), 195-217.
38.
Pečarić., & TuM. (2012). Understanding the Development of Information Science in Croatia. Co-word Analysis of Doctoral Dissertations from 1978 to 2009. Zarza̧dzanie Biblioteka̧, 1(4), 97-112.
39.
PreborG. (2010). Analysis of the interdisciplinary nature of library and information science. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 42(4), 256-267.
40.
RaywardW. B. (1997). The origins of information science and the International Institute of Bibliography/International Federation for Information and Documentation (FID). Journal of the American Society for information science, 48(4), 289-300.
41.
RikkenF.KiersH., & VosR. (1995). Mapping the dynamics of adverse drug reactions in subsequent time periods using INDSCAL. Scientometrics, 33(3), 367-380.
42.
SaracevicT. (1999). Information Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(12), 1051-1063.
43.
ScalfaniV. F. (2017). Text analysis of chemistry thesis and dissertation titles. Science and Technology Librarianship, 86, 16.
44.
SchlatcherG. A., & ThomisonD. (1974). Library Science Dissertations, 1925-19272: An Annotated Bibliography. Littleton: Libraries Unlimited.
45.
SchlaterG. A., & ThomisonD. (1982). Library science dissertations, 1973-1981: an annotated bibliography. Littleton: Libraries Unlimited.
46.
ShuF.LarivièreV.MongeonP.JulienC. A., & PiperA. (2016). On the evolution of library and information science doctoral dissertation topics in North America (1960–2013). Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 57(2), 131-142.
47.
Simmons University. (n.d.). Computer science library and information science (31). Accessed on July 29, 2020, from: https://www.simmons.edu/undergraduate/academics/majors-minors/computer-science-library-and-information-science-3plus1.
48.
SkinnerJ. (2016). Bibliometrics and social network analysis of doctoral research: Research rrends in distance learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Accessed on Dec 17, 2020 from: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1031&context=oils_etds.
49.
SugimotoC. R. (2011). The shifting sands of disciplinary development: Analyzing Library and Information Science. Journal of Computer Vision, 78(1), 15-27.
50.
SunJ., & ChuX. (2012). On hotspots of Mster and Ph. D. Degree’s dissertations in the field of knowledge management during the last decade: A co-words analysis. Journal o Intelligence, 6.
51.
The committee of library science education of Chinese education ministry. (2009). Standards for undergraduate library science education in higher education institutions. Retrieved from: http://www.docin.com/p-50603779.html.
52.
The University of Hawai’i at Manoa. (n.d.). MLISc/Information and Computer Sciences (ICS) MS. Accessed on July 29, 2020, from: http://www.hawaii.edu/lis/programs/dual-degrees/information-and-computer-sciences/.
53.
ThelwallM., & MaflahiN. (2015). How important is computing technology for library and information science research?. Library & Information Science Research, 37(1), 42-50.
54.
UçakN. Ö., & AlU. (2009). The differences among disciplines in scholarly communication. A bibliometric analysis of theses. Libri, 59(3), 166-179.
55.
van BaalenP., & KarstenL. (2012). The evolution of management as an interdisciplinary field. Journal of Management History, 18(2), 219-237.
56.
WangL.ZhangQ., & ChengH. (2010). The history of Chinese literature and library history education in recent ninety years. Library Tribune, 30(6), 58-65.
57.
WangX., & DingK. (2001). Discipline structure and development trend of management science. Academic Exchange, 1, 17-22.
58.
WangY. (2011). University curriculum: Necessity and possibility to reform students’ personal knowledge. Journal of Higher Education, 32(4), 70-71.
59.
WangZ. (2009). The review and reflection on the nine decades of library science education in China. Journal of Library Science in China, 135(184), 70-78.
60.
WangZ.LiT., & YanB. (2009). Education and training of LIS graduate students in China and America: Comparative study on master’s curricula. Library Journal, 28(5), 57-63.
61.
WangZ.PanY.XuF., & YanB. (2009). The analysis of journal papers of Information Science doctors in China. Library and Information (in China), 29(2), 51-56.
62.
XiaoX.SiL., & HuangR. (2008). Investigation and analysis of the development status of education in Chinese library science. Library Intelligence, 1, 5-16.
63.
YangZ. (2011). Survey on research methods of Library and Information Science PhD dissertation: a case study of National Science Library. Journal of the National Library of China (in China), 20(3), 82-88.
64.
YiZ. (2013). History of library developments in China. Accessed on July 29, 2020 from: http://library.ifla.org/143/1/164-yi-en.pdf.
65.
ZhangY. (2014). The development of library and information science in China. Library Associations and Institutions, 49(4), 296-306.
66.
ZhangW.XingY. N.ChengJ., & DuanH. M. (2018). The Study of Hotspots on Nursing Dissertation Based on Co-Word Analysis in China. Nursing Informatics, 270-270.
67.
ZhaoD., & StrotmannA. (2008). Information science during the first decade of the web: An enriched author cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(6), 916-937.
68.
ZinsC. (2007). Knowledge map of information science. Journal of the American society for Information Science and Technology, 58(4), 526-535.
69.
ZongQ. J.ShenH. Z.YuanQ. J.HuX. W.HouZ. P., & DengS. G. (2013). Doctoral dissertations of Library and Information Science in China: A co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 94(2), 781-799.
