This paper conducts a bibliometric analysis of Information Literacy Education (ILE) research in China, using data from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) from 1995 to 2023. Through polynomial fitting analysis of the annual number of publications, the research is periodized into four stages. For each stage, co-word networks were constructed from the abstracts, followed by hierarchical clustering with Louvain community detection and weighted degree centrality. Python modules with a step-range traversal loop were also employed to optimize cluster modularity, enabling an accurate visualization of research landscapes at each stage. Finally, drawing on evolutionary theory for bibliometric analysis, diachronic comparisons were conducted to reveal both the continuity and divergence in the concept of ILE and its related research. The dynamic interplay between the technological subsystem and ILE as a social subsystem serves as the driving mechanism behind these developments, framed within the theoretical guidance of Sociotechnical Systems Theory (STST).
BoHXVeraJAD (2023) Information Literacy Education in the context of education informatization. International Journal of Science and Engineering Applications. 12(7): 19–23. DOI: 10.7753/IJSEA1207.1003.
2.
BörnerKChenCBoyackKW (2003) Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology37(1): 179–255.
3.
BruceC (2000) Information literacy programs and research: An international review. Australian Library Journal49(3): 209–218.
4.
BrucknerEEbelingWScharnhorstA (2005) The application of evolution models in scientometrics. Scientometrics18(1–2): 21–41.
5.
ChalihaAHajarikaMBhuyanT, et al. (2024) Innovative approaches to information literacy: enhancing skills in the digital age. Library of Progress-Library Science, Information Technology and Computer44(3): 19914–19926.
6.
ChenC-CWangN-CTangK-Y, et al. (2022) Research issues of the top 100 cited articles on information literacy in higher education published from 2011 to 2020: A systematic review and co-citation network analysis. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology38(6): 34–52.
7.
ChenMYangYXuJ, et al. (2017) Design and Implementation of the information literacy evaluation system for high school students. 2017 international conference of educational innovation through technology (EITT), pp.182–186. https://doi.org/10.1109/EITT.2017.52
8.
CohenE.LloydS. (2014) Disciplinary evolution and the rise of the transdiscipline. Informing Science: the International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 17: 189–215.
9.
ErmakovaLBordignonFTurenneN, et al. (2018) Is the abstract a mere teaser? Evaluating generosity of article abstracts in the environmental sciences. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics3: 16.
10.
GaoH (2021) Research on information literacy education of university libraries in the era of Big Data. In: 2021 2nd international conference on artificial intelligence and education (ICAIE), pp.732–737. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAIE53562.2021.00161
11.
GeelsFW (2004) From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy33(6–7): 897–920.
12.
GongQF (2022) A new exploration of lexicographic archaeology based on co-word network analysis—Taking cihai as an example. Foreign Languages Research39(4): 91–98.
13.
GriesbaumJMichelADreisiebnerS, et al. (2024) Information literacy: Concepts, research, and promotion. In: Handbook on Information Sciences. (ed. Peter Heisig) Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp.312–324. Available at: https://www.elgaronline.com/edcollchap/book/9781035343706/chapter19.xml
14.
GuoJHuangJ (2021) Information literacy education during the pandemic: The cases of academic libraries in Chinese top universities. Journal of Academic Librarianship47(4): 102363.
15.
HassanWDuarteAE (2024) Bibliometric analysis: A few suggestions. Current Problems in Cardiology49: 102640.
16.
HicksAMcKinneyPInskipC, et al. (2022) Leveraging information literacy: Mapping the conceptual influence and appropriation of information literacy in other disciplinary landscapes. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science55: 548–566.
17.
HuangL (2015) A review of the research and practice on the domestic information literacy education in the last two decades. Library Journal34(3): 16–22.
18.
HuangQ (2022) Recent advances of information literacy education for international students in Chinese academic libraries. Journal of Academic Librarianship48(2): 102497.
19.
HuHB (2013) Overview of research on China’s information literacy education during 1995-2011. Library Tribune33(1): 168–172.
20.
HunsapunN (2023) Exploring Trends and Insights of Information Literacy Education in Asian Countries. Taiwan: National Taiwan Normal University.
JinGQ (1995) An overview on information literacy education in the information society. Library and Information Service 16(6): 52–55.
23.
LiJX (2002) The Public Library and Citizens’ Information Literacy Education in China: A Case Study of Wuhan Area, China[Paper presentation]. 68th IFLA Council and General Conference: Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom.
24.
LiuFZhangQ (2021) A new reciprocal teaching approach for information literacy education under the background of Big Data. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET)16(03): 246.
25.
LiuWLiuC (2021) Evolution characteristics of the information literacy education policy for Chinese college students. Journal of Contemporary Educational Research5(9): 75–80.
26.
LiuZXShiHJLiL, et al. (2021) Community detection algorithm based on degree-centralized local extension. Computer and Digital Engineering49(10): 2073–2077.
27.
LiXWangX (2009) Information literacy education for improving innovative ability of postgraduate in China. In: 2009 first international workshop on education technology and computer science, pp.408–412. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/4958803/
28.
LloydA (2006) Information literacy landscapes: An emerging picture. Journal of Documentation62(5): 570–583.
29.
MengYL (2021) Research on information literacy education of university library in digital intelligence environment-based on visual bibliometric statistical analysis. Library Work and Study. 43(9): 44–52. DOI: 10.16384/j.cnki.lwas.2021.09.006.
30.
NewmanMEJ (2003) The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review45(2): 167–256.
31.
OpsahlTAgneessensFSkvoretzJ (2010) Node centrality in weighted networks: Generalizing degree and shortest paths. Social Networks32(3): 245–251.
32.
PengWKeY (2012) Study on information literacy education of American State University and its enlightenment on the related education development of Chinese local colleges. In: Advanced technology in teaching—Proceedings of the 2009 3rd international conference on teaching and computational science (WTCS 2009) (ed WuY), pp. 673–677. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11276-8_89
33.
PintoMEscalona-FernándezMIPulgarínA (2013) Information literacy in social sciences and health sciences: A bibliometric study (1974–2011). Scientometrics95(3): 1071–1094.
34.
PintoMFernandez-PascualRCaballero-MariscalD, et al. (2020) Information literacy trends in higher education (2006-2019): Visualizing the emerging field of mobile information literacy. Scientometrics124(2): 1479–1510.
35.
SampleA (2020) Historical development of definitions of information literacy: A literature review of selected resources. Journal of Academic Librarianship46(2): 102116.
36.
ScharnhorstABörnerKBesselaarPVD (2012) Models of Science Dynamics: Encounters Between Complexity Theory and Information Sciences. Berlin: Springer.
37.
SerranoMÁBoguñáMVespignaniA (2009) Extracting the multiscale backbone of complex weighted networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America106(16): 6483–6488.
38.
ŠpiranecSBanek ZoricaM (2010) Information Literacy 2.0: Hype or discourse refinement?Journal of Documentation66(1): 140–153.
39.
SunP (2002) Information literacy in Chinese higher education. Library Trends51(2): 210–217.
40.
TristE. L. (1981) The Evolution of Socio-technical Systems: A Conceptual Framework and an Action Research Program. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Labour, Ontario Quality of Working Life Centre.
41.
TuominenKSavolainenRTaljaS (2005) Information literacy as a sociotechnical practice. Library Quarterly75(3): 329–345.
42.
UzeugbuCP (2014) Introduction to information literacy education. Information Literacy Education for Tertiary Institutions by AruaA. UzuegbyC Land UgahAD (Eds) Umuahia, Nigeria: ZehCommon.
43.
WangMHuaYChenY, et al. (2023) Factors affecting university students’ information literacy education: An empirical study using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Journal of Information Science. DOI: 10.1177/01655515231191210.
44.
WangWMuqiH (2024) Research on strategies for improving information literacy education quality in universities of ethnic regions under multicultural backgrounds. Journal of Modern Education and Culture1(1): 1–6. DOI: 10.70767/jmec.v1i1.83.
45.
WangXYeH (2023) Research on Information Literacy Education Model in the Big Data Environment—A case study of six Hainan high school Libraries. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences9(1): 1–14. DOI: 10.2478/amns.2023.1.00348.
46.
XieSFWangPJiaoSJ (2011) Statistics and analysis of papers on information literacy education in domestic universities from 1999 to 2009. Journal of Jining Medical University34(1): 59–62.
47.
YangWL (2022) Overview of information literacy research in China 2011-2020. Education Observation11(8): 5–8.
48.
YuLZWangJL (2020) From context-independent skills to embedded practice: A review of information literacy research and practice. Journal of Library Science in China46(2): 38–55.
49.
ZhaoYRTianPLChangRR (2021) Research on the theme structure of data science by means of complex network. Research on Library Science. 40(11): 2–12. DOI: 10.15941/j.cnki.issn1001-0424.2021.11.001.
50.
ZhouH (2024) Research on the construction of information literacy education system in universities under AI environment. Advances in Education, Humanities and Social Science Research9(1): 71.
51.
ZhuSYangHHMacLeodJ, et al. (2019) Investigating teenage students’ information literacy in China: A social cognitive theory perspective. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher28(3): 251–263.
52.
ZurkowskiPG (1974) The information service environment relationships and priorities. Related Paper No. 5, 2.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
