Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Ranking of universities regarding their web-based activities plays a pivotal role in promoting scientific advancement since it motivates the open access accessibility to scientific results. In this study, a new ranking system based on the website quality factors and traffic evaluation was proposed. Since top-ranked universities are usually considered as the standard models for lower ranked ones, the focus of this study was on top-ranked universities. The proposed ranking was compared with well-known Webometrics ranking system. The website traffic and quality assessment were acquired for websites of top-ranked world universities and the correlation between these indices and the Webometrics ranking was evaluated. The summation of the weighted value of obtained measures according to an optimal weight vector obtained by a genetic algorithm framework was used for ranking purposes. The results showed that the website total traffic size was correlated with Webometrics rank ( $R\approx-$ 0.6, $p<$ 0.01). Also, using the weighted value of website quality and traffic measures, the proposed ranking system could predict Webometrics ranking by the accuracy of up to 69%. Even though the method was proposed for universities, it could be applied for ranking other types of centers or companies, provided that the suitable cost function for the genetics algorithm framework was defined.

Keywords

Webometrics ranking website traffic website quality measures correlation analysis genetics algorithm

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aguillo

I.F.

Ortega

J.L.

Fernández

, & Utrilla

A.M.

(2010). Indicators for a webometric ranking of open access repositories. Scientometrics, 82(3), 477-486. doi: 10.1007/s11192-010-0183-y.

Algina

Moulder

B.C.

, & Moser

B.K.

(2002). Sample size requirements for accurate estimation of squared semi-partial correlation coefficients. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 37(1), 37-57. doi: 10.1207/S15327906MBR3701_02.

Almind

T.C.

, & Ingwersen

(1997). Informetric analyses on the world wide web: methodological approaches to ‘webometrics’. J DOC, 53(4), 404-426.

Asekun-Olarinmoye

(2015). The importance of research in university’s webometric ranking: UNIOSUN case study. Res. J. Health Sci, 3(3), 184-195.

Björneborn

, & Ingwersen

(2004). Toward a basic framework for webometrics. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec, 55(14), 1216-1227.

Elgohary

(2008). Arab universities on the web: a webometric study. Electron Libr, 26(3), 374-386.

Farashi

Bashirian

, & Zareian

(2020). Comparison between top-ranked iranian medical universities and top-ranked world universities based on the website analysis. International Journal of Information Science and Management, 18(2), 203-214.

Fletcher

(2006). The impact of culture on web site content, design, and structure: an international and a multicultural perspective. Journal of Communication Management, 10(3), 259-273. doi: 10.1108/13632540610681158.

Guskov

A.E.

Bykhovtsev

E.S.

, & Kosyakov

D.V.

(2015). Alternative webometrics: study of the traffic of the websites of scientific organizations. Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 42(4), 274-289. doi: 10.3103/S0147688215040139.

10.

Hatch

, & Farhady

(1982). Research design and statistics for applied linguistics.

11.

Jati

, & Dominic

D.D.

(2017). A new approach of indonesian university webometrics ranking using entropy and promethee II. Procedia Comput Sci, 124, 444-451. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2017.12.176.

12.

Jun

S.-P.

Sung

T.-E.

, & Park

H.-W.

(2017). Forecasting by analogy using the web search traffic. Technol Forecast Soc, 115, 37-51. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.09.014.

13.

Longqing

, & Qingfeng

(2011). Data sources of webometrics. Paper presented at the 2011 Seventh International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security.

14.

Nissom

, & Kulathuramaiyer

(2012). The study of Webometrics ranking of World Universities.

15.

Park

H.W.

, & Thelwall

(2006). Web-science communication in the age of globalization. New Media & Society, 8(4), 629-650.

16.

Patidar

, & Vishwakarma

R.G.

(2014, 9–9 Oct. 2014). An implementation of generalized webometrics for all research organizations. Paper presented at the 2014 International Conference on Smart Structures and Systems (ICSSS).

17.

Prasetio

Sharif

O.O.

Perdana

, & Alamanda

D.T.

(2016). Analyzing the impact of traffic source on visit duration. Int J Bus, 21(3), 243.

18.

Sarkar

Pal

, & Kar

(2018). Webometric Mapping of Tourism Sites in India. Webometric Mapping of Tourism Sites in India.

19.

Shadpour

Teimourpour

, & Asadi

(2013). Webometrics-based analysis and ranking of Iranian hospital websites. Int J Hosp Res, 2(2), 77-84.

20.

Singh

Zhao

, & Hu

(2013). Cultural adaptation on the web: a study of american companies’domestic and chinese websites. Journal of Global Information Management, 11(3), 63-80.

21.

Subhani

A.B.

(2014). Intro to WWW Marketing: Abbott Press.

22.

Taheri

Ghazavi

Zahed

Otroj

Mazaheri

, & Soleimanzade-Najafi

N.-S.

(2015). The webometric status of isfahan university of medical sciences, Iran. Acta Inform Med, 23(4), 215-219. doi: 10.5455/aim.2015.23.215-219.

23.

Thelwall

(2008). Bibliometrics to webometrics. J Inf Sci, 34(4), 605-621.

24.

Thelwall

(2009). Introduction to webometrics: quantitative web research for the social sciences. Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services, 1(1), 1-116.

25.

van der Ploeg

Austin

P.C.

, & Steyerberg

E.W.

(2014). Modern modelling techniques are data hungry: a simulation study for predicting dichotomous endpoints. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14(1), 137. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-137.

26.

Vaughan

, & Yang

(2013). Web traffic and organization performance measures: relationships and data sources examined. J Informetr, 7(3), 699-711.

27.

Weideman

(2013). Comparative analysis of homepage website visibility and academic rankings for UK universities. Information Research: An International Electronic Journal, 18(4), n4.

28.

Wimaladharma

, & Herath

H.M.

(2016). An analysis of significance of Revised Web Impact Factor for ranking the websites of state universities in Sri Lanka. Paper presented at the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Information and Automation for Sustainability (ICIAfS).

A complementary webometric ranking system based on the website quality and traffic measures: A study focusing on top-ranked world universities

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References