This study examines how bullies, victims, bully-victims, and uninvolved adolescents perceive the activities of the class project of the ViSC social competence program. The ViSC program is a whole school socio-ecological anti-bullying program that was implemented in 43 classes, grade 7, 8, and 9, in three Cypriot schools. A sample of 778 adolescents (52% girls, Mage = 13.9, SD = 0.86) who participated in the ViSC class project, answered open-format questions concerning most-and least-liked class project activities. Applying normative cut-off scores, four groups of adolescents were identified: 47 (6%) bullies, 64 (8%) victims, 45 (6%) bully-victims, and 609 (80%) uninvolved. There were meaningful differences between these groups regarding their most and least liked program activities. While uninvolved adolescents liked the behavioural improvement and victims liked the knowledge improvement more than the other groups; bullies and bully-victims did not like anything about the program content more often compared to the other groups. The findings are discussed regarding their practical implications for program development to better serve the needs of different bully-victim groups.
Atria, M., & Spiel, C. (2007). The Viennese Social Competence (ViSC) training for students: Program and evaluation. In
J.E. Zins,
M.J. Elias & C.A. Maher ,
(Eds.), Bullying, victimization and peer harassment: A handbook of prevention and intervention (pp. 179–198). New York: The Haworth Press.
2.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory.Engleworth Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3.
Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Child Development, 71, 364–374. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.364
4.
Bull, H.D., Schultze, M., & Scheithauer, H. (2009). School-based prevention of bullying and relational aggression: The Fairplayer.Manual. International Journal of Developmental Science, 3, 312–317. doi: 10.3233/DEV-2009-3310
5.
Caravita, S. C. S., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2012). Agentic or communal? Associations between interpersonal goals, popularity, and bullying in middle childhood and early adolescence. Social Development, 21, 376–395. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2011.00632.x
6.
Card, N. A., & Little, T. D (2006). Proactive and reactive aggression in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis of differential relations with psychosocial adjustment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30, 466–480. doi: 10.1177/0165025406071904
7.
Cook, C., Williams, K., Guerra, N., Kim, T., & Sadek, S. (2010). Predictors of bullying and victimization in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic investigation. School Psychology Quarterly, 25, 65–83. doi: 10.1037/a0020149
8.
Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A (1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children's social-adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 74–101. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.115.1.74
9.
Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A (1996). Social information-processing mechanisms on reactive and proactive aggression. Child Development, 67, 993–1002. doi: 10.2307/1131875
10.
De Bruyn, E. H., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Wissink, I. B (2010). Associations of peer acceptance and perceived popularity with bullying and victimization in early adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 30, 543–566. doi: 10.1177/0272431609340517
11.
Dogan, A., Keser, E, Sen, Z., Yanagida, T., Gradinger, P., & Strohmeier, D. (2017). Evidence based bullying prevention in Turkey: Implementation of the ViSC Social Competence Program. International Journal ofDevelopmental Science, 11, 93–108. doi: 10.3233/DEV-170223
12.
Ettekal, I., & Ladd, G. W (2017). Developmental continuity and change in physical, verbal, and relational aggression and peer victimization from childhood to adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 53, 1709–1721. doi: 10.1037/dev0000357
13.
Farrell, A. D., Henry, D. B., & Bettencourt, A. (2013). Methodological challenges examining subgroup differences: Examples from universal school-based youth violence prevention trials. Prevention Science, 14, 121–133. doi: 10.1007/s11121-011-0200-2
14.
Farrington, D., Gaffney, H., Losel, F., & Ttofi, M. M (2017). Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of developmental prevention programs in reducing delinquency, aggression, and bullying. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 33, 91–106. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2016.11.003
15.
Fixsen, D. L., Schultes, M.-T., & Blase, K. A (2016). Bildung-Psychology and implementation science. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13, 666–680. doi: 10.1080/17405629.2016.1204292
16.
Garandeau, C. F., Lee, I. A., & Salmivalli, C. (2014). Differential effects of the KiVa anti-bullying program on popular and unpopular bullies. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 35, 44–50. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2013.10.004
17.
Georgiou, S. N., & Stavrinides, P. (2008). Bullies, victims and bully-victims: Psycho-social profiles and attribution styles. School Psychology International, 29, 574–589. doi: 10.1177/0143034308099202
18.
Georgiou, S. N., & Stavrinides, P. (2012). Social-psychological profiles of early adolescents involved in bullying activities. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 1, 60–68. doi: 10.6000/1929-4409.2012.01.5
19.
Gollwitzer, M., Banse, R., Eisenbach, K., & Naumann, E. (2007). Effectiveness of the Vienna social competence training on implicit and explicit aggression. Evidence from an Aggressiveness IAT. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 150–156. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759.23.3.150
20.
Gollwitzer, M., Eisenbach, K., Atria, M., Strohmeier, D., & Banse, R. (2006). Evaluation of aggression-reducing effects of the "Viennese Social Competence Training."Swiss Journal of Psychology, 65, 125–135. doi: 10.1024/1421-0185.65.2.125
21.
Gomez-Ortiz, O., Romera, E. M., & Ortega Ruiz, R. (2017). Multidimensionality of social competence: Measurement of the construct and its relationship with bullying roles. Revista de Psicodidactica, 22,37–44. doi: 10.1387/RevPsicodidact.15702
22.
Gradinger, P., & Strohmeier, D. (2018). Cyberbullying prevention within a socio-ecological framework: The ViSC social competence program. In
M.Campbell & S.Bauman (Eds.), Reducing cyberbullying in schools: International evidence-based best practices (pp. 189–202). London: Elsevier Academic Press.
23.
Gradinger, P., Yanagida, T., Strohmeier, D., & Spiel, C. (2016). Effectiveness and sustainability of the ViSC Social Competence Program to prevent cyberbullying and cyber-victimization: Class and individual level moderators. Aggressive Behavior, 42, 181–193. doi: 10.1002/ab.21631
24.
Gresham, F. M., & Elliott, S. N (1990). Social Skills Rating System manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Servic.
25.
Jenkins, N. L., Demaray, K. M., Fredrick, S. S., & Summers, H. K (2016). Associations among middle school students' bullying roles and social skills. Journal of School Violence, 15,259–278. doi: 10.1080/15388220.2014.986675
26.
Jenson, J. M., Brisson, D., Bender, K. A., & Williford, A. P (2013). Effects of a bullying prevention program on youths' patterns of aggression and victimization during the transition to middle school. Social Work Research, 37, 361–372. doi: 10.1093/swr/svt030
27.
Juvonen, J., & Graham, S. (2014). Bullying in schools: The power of bullies and the plight of victims. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 159–185. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115030
28.
Juvonen, J., Schacter, H. L., Sainio, M., & Salmivalli, C. (2016). Can a school-wide bullying prevention program improve the plight of victims? Evidence for riskx intervention effects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 84, 334–344. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000078
29.
Kljakovic, M., & Hunt, C. (2016). A meta-analysis of predictors of bullying and victimization in adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 49, 134–145. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.03.002
30.
Kollerova, L., Mazzone, A., Yanagida, T., Soukup, P., & Strohmeier, D. (2018). "They think that I should defend." Effects of peer and teacher injunctive norms on defending victimized classmates in early adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47, 2424–2439. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0918-2
31.
Malti, T., Gasser, L., & Buchmann, M. (2009). Aggressive and prosocial children's emotion attributions and moral reasoning. Aggressive Behavior, 35, 90–102. doi: 10.1002/ab.20289.
32.
Pellegrini, A. D., & Bartini, M. (2000). Longitudinal study of bullying, victimization, and peer affiliation during the transition from primary school to middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 699–725.
33.
Roland, E., & Vaaland, G. (2006). ZERO teacher's guide to the Zero Anti-Bullying Programme. Stavanger: Centre for Behavioural Research, University of Stavanger.
34.
Rubin, K. H., & Rose-Krasnor, L. (1992). Interpersonal problem-solving and social competence in children. In
V.B.van Hasselt & M.Hersen (Eds.), Handbook of social development: A life-span perspective ( pp. 283–323). New York: Plenum.
35.
Salmivalli, C. (1999). Participant role approach to school bullying: Implications for interventions. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 453–459. doi: 10.1006/jado.1999.0239
36.
Salmivalli, C., & Isaacs, J. (2005). Prospective relations among victimization, rejection, friendlessness, and children's self-and peer-perceptions. Child Development, 761161–1171. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00842.x
37.
Smith, P. K., Cowie, H., & Berdondini, L. (1994). Cooperation and bullying. In
P. Kutnick
&
C. Rogers
(Eds.), Groups in schools (pp.195–210). London: Cassell.
38.
Solomontos-Kountouri, O., Gradinger, P., Yanagida, T., & Strohmeier, D. (2016). The implementation and evaluation of the ViSC Program in Cyprus: Challenges of cross-national dissemination and evaluation results. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13, 737–755. doi: 10.1080/17405629.2015.1136618
39.
Solomontos-Kountouri, O., Tsagkaridis, K., Gradinger, P., & Strohmeier, D. (2017). Academic, socio-emotional and demographic characteristics of adolescents involved in traditional bullying, cyberbullying, or both: Looking at variables and persons. International Journal ofDevelopmental Science, 11, 19–30. doi: 10.3233/DEV-17219
40.
Spiel, C., & Strohmeier, D. (2011). National strategy for violence prevention in the Austrian public school system: Development and implementation. International Journal ofBehavioral Development, 35, 412–418. doi: 10.1177/0165025411407458
41.
Strohmeier, D., Aoyama, I., Gradinger, P., & Toda, Y. (2013). Cybervictimization and cyberaggression in Eastern and Western countries: Challenges of constructing a cross culturally appropriate scale. In
S.BaumanD.Cross & J.Walker (Eds.), Principles of cyberbullying research: Definitions, measures, and methodology (pp. 202–221). New York and London: Routledge.
42.
Strohmeier, D., Hoffmann, C., SchillerE.-M., Stefanek, E., & Spiel, C. (2012). ViSC Social Competence Program. New Directions for Youth Development, 133, 71–84. doi: 10.1002/yd.20008
43.
Sutton, J., Smith, P.K., & Swettenham, J. (1999). Social cognition and bullying: Social inadequacy or skilled manipulation?British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 435–450. doi: 10.1348/026151099165384
44.
Swearer, S. M., Espelage, D. L., Vaillancourt, T., & Hymel, S. (2010). What can be done about school bullying? Linking research to educational practice. Educational Researcher, 39, 38–47. doi: 10.3102/0013189X09357622
45.
Topping, K., Bremmer, W., & Holmes, E. A (2000). Social competence: The social construction of the concept. In
R.Bar-On & J.D. Parker(Eds.), The handbook of emotional intelligence (pp. 28–39). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
46.
Trip, S., Bora, C., Sipos-Gug, S., Tocai, I., Gradinger, P., Yanagida, T., & Strohmeier, D. (2015). Bullying prevention in schools by targeting cognitions, emotions and behavior: Evaluating the effectiveness of the REBE-ViSC Program. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62, 732–740. doi: 10.1037/cou0000084
47.
Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P (2011). Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: A systematic meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7, 27–56. doi: 10.1007/s11292-010-9109-1
48.
Vaillancourt, T., McDougall, P., Hymel, S., Krygsman, A., Miller, J., Stiver, K.,… & Davis, C. (2008). Bullying: Are researchers and children/youth talking about the same thing?International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32, 486–495. doi: 10.1177/0165025408095553
49.
Yanagida, T., Gradinger, P., Strohmeier, D., Solomontos-Kountouri, O., Trip, S., & Bora, C. (2016). Cross-national prevalence of traditional bullying, traditional victimization, cyberbullying and cyber-victimization: Comparing single-item and multiple-item approaches of measurement. International Journal of Developmental Science, 10, 21–32. doi: 10.3233/DEV-150173
50.
Yanagida, T., Strohmeier, D, & Spiel, C. (2016). Dynamic change of aggressive behavior and victimization among adolescents: Effectiveness of the ViSC Program. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2016.1233498
51.
Yang, A., & Salmivalli, C. (2013). Different forms of bullying and victimization: Bully-victims versus bullies and victims. European Journal ofDevelopmental Psychology, 10, 723–738. 10.1080/17405629.2013.793596
52.
Yang, A., & Salmivalli, C. (2015). Effectiveness of the KiVa antibullying programme on bully-victims, bullies and victims. Educational Research, 57, 80–90. doi: 10.1080/00131881.2014.983724
53.
Zych, I., Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P (2017a). Protecting children against bullying and its consequences. New York: Springer.
54.
Zych, I., Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P (2017b). Empathy and callous-unemotional traits in different bullying roles: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trauma Violence Abuse. doi: 10.1177/1524838016683456
