The ViSC program is the first evidence based anti-bullying program implemented in Turkey.
A quasi-experimental longitudinal control group design comprising six schools and 26
classes was realized to examine the program effectiveness regarding different forms of
perpetration and victimization. The effectiveness of two dosages of interventions – school
and class level vs. school level – was investigated. In total, 642 grade 5 students (227
in school and class level, 201 in school level, 214 in control group, 49% girls,
Mage = 10.06) participated. Multilevel
growth models revealed baseline effects indicating that the two intervention groups had
lower levels of perpetration and victimization at pre-test than the controls. Perpetration
and victimization increased in the two intervention groups compared to control group
between pre- and post-test, but also decreased between post-test and follow-up indicating
a sensitizing effect of the program. Results are important for both intervention research
and social policy in Turkey.
BronfenbrennerU.
(1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and
design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press.
2.
BrownT. A.
(2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research
(2nd ed.). New York:
Guilford Press.
3.
BurnukaraP., &
UçanokZ.
(2012). İlk ve orta ergenlikte akran zorbaliği: Gerçekleştiği
yerler ve baş etme yollari, [Bullying during early and middle childhood: Where it
happens and coping strategies]. Türk Psikoloji
Yazilari, 15,
68–82.
4.
CardN. A., &
LittleT.
D. (2006). Proactive and
reactive aggression in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis of differential
relations with psychosocial adjustment. International Journal of
Behavioral Development, 30,
466–480. doi: 10.1177/0165025406071904
5.
CardN. A., StuckyB.
D., SawalaniG. M., &
LittleT.
D. (2008). Direct and indirect
aggression during childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review of gender
differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment.
Child Development, 79,
1185–1229. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01184.x
6.
CraigW., PeplerD., &
AtlasR.
(2000). Observations of bullying in the playground and in the
classroom. School Psychology International,
21, 22–36.
7.
CrickN. R., &
GrotpeterJ.
K. (1995). Relational
aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child
Development, 66, 710–722.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00900.x
8.
CurrieC., GabhainnS.
N., GodeauE., RobertsC., SmithR., CurrieD., PicketW., RichterM., MorganA., &
BarnekowV.
(Eds.). (2008). Inequalities in young
people’s health: HBSC international report from the 2005/06 survey. Health Policy for
Children and Adolescents, No. 5. Copenhagen:
WHO Regional Office for Europe.
9.
CurrieC., ZanottiC., MorganA., CurrieD., de
LoozeM., RobertsC., SamdalO., SmithO. R.
F., & BarnekowV. (Eds.).
(2012). Social determinants of health and well-being among young
people: Health behaviour in school-aged children (HBSC) study: International report from
the 2009/2010 survey. Health Policy for Children and Adolescents, No. 6.
Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for
Europe.
10.
Dogan-AtesA., &
YagmurluB.
(2010). Examining victimization in Turkish
schools. European Journal of Educational Studies,
2, 31–37.
11.
EndersC.
(2010). Applied missing data analysis. New
York, NY: Guilford.
12.
Erdur-BakerÖ.
(2009). Peer victimization, rumination, and problem solving
as risk contributors to adolescents’ depressive symptoms. The
Journal of Psychology, 143,
78–90.
13.
FlayB. R., BiglanA., BoruchR.
F., CastroF. G., GottfredsonD., KellamS., MościckiE.
K., SchinkeS., ValentineJ.
C., & JiP. (2005).
Standards of evidence: Criteria for efficacy, effectiveness, and
dissemination. Prevention Science, 6,
151–175. doi: 10.1007/s11121-005-5553-y
14.
GollwitzerM.,
BanseR., EisenbachK., &
NaumannE.
(2007). Effectiveness of the Vienna social competence
training on implicit and explicit aggression. Evidence from an Aggressiveness
IAT. European Journal of Psychological Assessment,
23, 150–156. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759.23.3.150
15.
GollwitzerM.,
EisenbachK., AtriaM., StrohmeierD., &
BanseR.
(2006). Evaluation of aggression-reducing effects of the
“Viennese social competence training”. Swiss Journal of
Psychology, 65, 125–135.
doi: 10.1024/1421-0185.65.2.125
16.
GottfredsonD. C.,
CookT.
D., GardnerF. E. M.,
Gorman-SmithD.,
HoweG.
W., SandlerI. N., &
ZafftK.
M. (2015). Standards of
evidence for efficacy, effectiveness and scale-up research in prevention science: Next
generation. Prevention Science, 16,
893–926. doi: 10.1007/s11121-015-0555-x
17.
GradingerP., StrohmeierD., &
SpielC.
(2009). Traditional bullying and cyberbullying: Identification
of risk groups for adjustment problems. Journal of
Psychology, 217, 205–213.
doi: 10.1027/0044-3409.217.4.205
18.
GradingerP., YanagidaT., StrohmeierD., &
SpielC.
(2015). Prevention of cyberbullying and cybervictimization:
Evaluation of the ViSC Social Competence Program. Journal of
School Violence, 14, 87–110.
doi: 10.1080/15388220.2014.963231
19.
GradingerP., YanagidaT., StrohmeierD., &
SpielC.
(2016). Effectiveness and sustainability of the ViSC Social
Competence Program to prevent cyberbullying and cyber-victimization: Class and
individual level moderators. Aggressive Behavior,
42, 181–193. doi: 10.1002/ab.21631
20.
HofstedeG.
(2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviours,
institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage.
21.
JuvonenJ., SchacterH.
L., SainioM., &
SalmivalliC.
(2016). Can a school-wide bullying prevention program
improve the plight of victims? Evidence for risk×intervention effects.
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 84,
334–344. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000078
22.
KärnäA., VoetenM., LittleT.
D., PoskipartaE.,
AlanenE., &
SalmivalliC.
(2011). Going to scale: A nonrandomized nationwide trial of
the KiVa antibullying Program for grades 1–9. Journal of
Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79,
796–805. doi: 10.1037/a0025740
23.
KapciE. G.
(2004). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin zorbaliğa maruz kalma
türünün ve sikliğinin depresyon, kaygi ve benlik saygisiyla ilişkisi [The relationship
between the prevalence of bullying and depression, anxiety and self-esteem among
elementary school children]. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim
Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 37,
1–13.
24.
LittleT. D.
(2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling.
New York: Guilford
press.
25.
MaltiT., NoamG.
G., BeelmannA., &
SommerS.
(2016). Toward dynamic adaptation of psychological
interventions for child and adolescent development and mental health.
Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology,
45, 827–836. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2016.1239539
26.
MaltiT., StrohmeierD., &
KillenM.
(2015). The impact of on-looking and including bystander
behavior on judgments and emotions regarding peer exclusion.
British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 33,
295–311. doi: 10.1111/bjd12090
27.
MuthénL. K., &
MuthénB.
O. (1998–2012). Mplus
user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA:
Muthén & Muthén.
28.
NocentiniA., &
MenesiniE.
(2016). KiVa anti-bullying program in Italy: Evidence of
effectiveness in a randomized control trial. Prevention
Science, 17, 1012–1023.
doi: 10.1007/s11121-016-0690-z
29.
OlweusD.
(1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can
do. Oxford, UK:
Blackwell.
30.
PellegriniA. D., &
BartiniM.
(2000). Longitudinal study of bullying, victimization, and
peer affiliation during the transition from primary school to middle
school. American Educational Research Journal,
37, 699–725. doi: 10.3102/00028312037003699
31.
PellegriniA. D., &
LongJ.
D. (2002). A longitudinal
study of bullying, dominance, and victimization during the transition from primary
school through middle school. British Journal of Developmental
Psychology, 20, 259–280.
doi: 10.1348/026151002166442
32.
RolandE.
(2011). The broken curve: Effects of the Norwegian manifesto
against bullying. International Journal of Behavioral
Development, 35, 383–388.
doi: 10.1177/0165025411407454
RolandE., &
VaalandG.
(2006). ZERO teacher's guide to the Zero Anti-Bullying
Programme. Stavanger: Centre for
Behavioural Research, University of Stavanger.
35.
SalmivalliC.
(2010). Bullying and the peer group: A
review. Aggression and Violent Behavior,
15, 112–120. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.007
36.
SalmivalliC., &
NieminenE.
(2002). Proactive and reactive aggression among school
bullies, victims, and bully-victims. Aggressive
Behavior, 28, 30–44.
doi: 10.1002/ab.90004
37.
SchultesM.T.,
StefanekE., van de
SchootR., StrohmeierD., &
SpielC.
(2014). Measuring implementation of a school-based violence
prevention program on two levels: Fidelity and teachers’ responsiveness as predictors of
proximal outcomes. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of
Psychology, 222, 49–57.
doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000165
38.
SmithP., MahdaviJ., CarvalhoM., FisherS., RussellS., &
TippettN.
(2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact on secondary
school pupils. The Journal of Child Psychology and
Psychiatry, 49, 376–385.
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x
39.
SnijdersT., &
BoskerR.
(1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to and advanced
multilevel modeling. London, UK:
SAGE.
40.
SolbergM., &
OlweusD.
(2003). Prevalence estimation of school bullying with the
Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire. Aggressive Behavior,
29, 239–268. doi: 10.1002/ab.10047
41.
Solomontos-KountouriO.,
GradingerP., YanagidaT., &
StrohmeierD.
(2016). The implementation and evaluation of the ViSC
Program in Cyprus: Challenges of cross-national dissemination and evaluation
results. European Journal of Developmental Psychology,
13, 737–755. doi: 10.1080/17405629.2015.1136618
42.
Solomontos-KountouriO.,
TsagkaridisK.,
GradingerP., &
StrohmeierD.
(2017). Academic, socio-emotional and demographic
characteristics of adolescents involved in traditional bullying, cyberbullying, or both:
Looking at variables and persons. International Journal of
Developmental Science, 11,
19–30. doi: 10.3233/DEV-17219
43.
SoydaşD. K., &
UçanokZ.
(2014). Do the characteristics for the adolescent use of
information and communication technologies explain involvement in
cyberbullying?Çocuk ve Gençlik Ruh Sağlği Dergisi, 21,
17–32.
44.
SpielC., SchoberB., &
StrohmeierD.
(2016). Implementing intervention research into public
policy - the “I-Approach” . Prevention Science.
Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s11121-016-0638-3
45.
SpielC., &
StrohmeierD.
(2011). National strategy for violence prevention in
Austrian schools and kindergarten: Development and implementation.
International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35,
412–418. doi: 10.1177/0165025411407458
46.
SpielC., &
StrohmeierD.
(2012). Evidence-based practice and policy: When
researchers, policy makers, and practitioners learn how to work
together. European Journal of Developmental Psychology,
9, 150–162. doi: 10.1080/17405629.2011.616776
47.
SpielC., WagnerP., &
StrohmeierD.
(2012). Violence prevention in Austrian schools:
Implementation and evaluation of a national strategy.
International Journal of Conflict and Violence,, 6,
176–186. doi: 10.4119/ijcv-2910
48.
StefanekE., StrohmeierD., &
YanagidaT.
(2017). Depression in groups of bullies and victims:
Evidence for the differential importance of peer status, reciprocal friends, school
liking, academic self-efficacy, school motivation and achievement.
International Journal of Developmental Science, 11,
31–43. doi: 10.3233/DEV-160214
49.
StrohmeierD.,
AoyamaI., GradingerP., &
TodaY. (2013).
Cybervictimization and cyberaggression in Eastern and Western countries:
Challenges of constructing a cross culturally appropriate scale. In
BaumanS., CrossD., & WalkerJ. (Eds.),
Principles of cyberbullying research: Definitions, measures, and
methodology (p. 202–221). New York
and London: Routlege.
50.
StrohmeierD., &
DoganA.
(2012). Emotional problems and victimization among youth with
national and international migration experiences living in Austria and
Turkey. Emotional & Behavioural Difficulties,
17, 287–304. doi: 10.1080/13632752.2012.704311
51.
StrohmeierD.,
HoffmannC., SchillerE.
M., StefanekE., &
SpielC.
(2012). ViSC Social Competence Program.
New Directions for Youth Development, 133,
71–84. doi: 10.1002/yd.20008
52.
StrohmeierD., &
NoamG.
G. (2012). Bullying in
schools: What is the problem, and how can educators solve it?New Directions for Youth Development, 133,
7–14. doi: 10.1002/yd.20003
53.
SwearerS. M., &
EspelageD.
L. (2004). Introduction: A
social-ecological framework. of bullying among youth. In EspelageD.
L., & SwearerS. M. (Eds.),
Bullying in American schools: A social-ecological perspective on prevention and
intervention (pp. 1–12).
Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc
Publ.
54.
TripS., BoraC.,
Sipos-GugS., TocaiI., GradingerP., YanagidaT., &
StrohmeierD.
(2015). Bullying prevention in schools by targeting
cognitions, emotions and behaviour: Evaluating the effectiveness of the REBE-ViSC
Program. Journal of Counseling Psychology,
62, 732–740. doi: 10.1037/cou0000084
55.
Van de
SchootR., LugtigP., &
Hox.J. (2012).
A checklist for testing measurement invariance.
European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9,
486–492. doi: 10.1080/17405629.2012.686740
56.
VeenstraR., LindenbergS., ZijlstraB.J.H.,
De WinterA.
F., VerhulstF. C., &
OrmelJ.
(2007). The dyadic nature of bullying and victimization:
Testing a dual-perspective theory. Child Development,
78, 1843–1854. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-624.2007.01102.x
57.
VitaroF., BrendgenM., &
BarkerE.
D. (2006). Subtypes of
aggressive behaviors: A developmental perspective. International
Journal of Behoral Development, 30,
12–19. doi: 10.1177/0165025406059968
58.
von
EyeA., & SpielC.
(Eds.). (2010). Conducting person-oriented research [Special
issue]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of
Psychology, 218(3).
59.
YanagidaT., StrohmeierD., &
SpielC.
(2016a). Dynamic change of aggressive
behavior and victimization among adolescents: Effectiveness of the ViSC
Program. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent
Psychology1–15. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2016.1233498
60.
YanagidaT., GradingerP., StrohmeierD., Solomontos-KountouriO.,
TripS., & BoraC.
(2016b). Cross-national prevalence of
traditional bullying, traditional victimization, cyberbullying and cyber-victimization:
Comparing single-item and multiple-item approaches of measurement.
International Journal of Developmental Science, 10,
21–32. doi: 10.3233/DEV-150173
61.
YangA., &
SalmivalliC.
(2013). Different forms of bullying and victimization:
Bully-victims versus bullies and victims. European Journal of
Developmental Psychology, 10,
723–738. doi: 10.1080/17405629.2013.793596
62.
YeagerD. S., FongC.
J., LeeH. Y., &
EspelageD.
L. (2015). Declines in
efficacy of anti-bullying programs among older adolescents: Theory and a three-level
meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental
Psychology, 37, 36–51.
doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2014.11.005
