How others behave (descriptive norm) and what they expect from us (injunctive norm) has a strong influence on how we behave. However, children and adolescents often overestimate the prevalence of negative behavior among their peers. The current study tested whether prompting peer norms for cyberbullying may foster anti-cyberbullying norms in an experimental design with N = 510 seventh, eighth and nine graders. In a pre-post control-group design, students completed an online survey during school lessons assessing the individual and classroom anti-cyberbullying norm before and after receiving simulated information about the classroom norm on cyberbullying. Results showed that individual anti-cyberbullying norms are negatively related to cyberbullying behavior. However, students did not change their individual norm differentially after reading the information about the classroom anti-cyberbullying norm. Possibly, the intervention was too minimal to change normative attitudes about cyberbullying or the school class is not a relevant reference group for online behavior of students.
Bastiaensens,S, Pabian,S, Vandebosch,H, Poels,K, Van Cleemput,K, DeSmet,A, De Bourdeaudhuij,I. (2016). From normative influence to social pressure: How relevant others affect whether bystanders join in cyberbullying. Social Development25, 193–211.
doi: 10.1111/sode.12134
2.
Berkowitz,A. D. (2005). An overview of the social norms approach. In
L.Lederman,
L.Stewart,
F.Goodhart & L.Laitman (Eds.), Changing the culture of college drinking: A socially situated prevention campaign (pp. 187–208). Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
3.
Bongardt,D. V. D, Reitz,E, Sandfort,T, Deković,M. (2015). A meta-analysis of the relations between three types of peer norms and adolescent sexual behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19, 203–234. 10.1177/1088868314544223.
4.
Brechwald,W. A, Prinstein,M. J. (2011). Beyond homophily: A decade of advances in understanding peer influence processes. Journal of Research on Adolescence21, 166–179. 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00721.x.
5.
Cialdini,R. B, Kallgren,C. A, Reno,R. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. In
M.P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology,
Vol. 24 (pp. 201–234). Cambridge, US: Academic Press.
6.
Cialdini,R. B, Trost,M. R. (1998) Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. In
D.T. GilbertS.T. Fiske &
G.Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vols. 1-2, 4th ed., pp. 151–192). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
7.
Diethelm,P. A, Farley,T. (2015). Refuting tobacco industry funded research: Empirical data shows a decline in smoking prevalence following introduction of plain packaging in Australia. Tobacco Prevention and Cessation, 1, 1–7. 10.18332/tpc/60650.
8.
Dotson,K. B, Dunn,M. E, Bowers,C. A. (2015). Stand-alone personalized normative feedback for college student drinkers: A meta-analytic review, 2004 to 2014. PLoS ONE, 10, e0139518. 10.1371/journal.pone.0139518.
9.
Fabrigar,L. R, MacDonald,T. K, Wegener,D. T. (2018) The origins and structure of attitudes. In
D.Albarracín, & B.T.Johnson (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes, Vol. 1: Basic principles (2nd ed.), pp.
109–157). New York: Routledge.
10.
Feldman,J. M, Lynch,J. G. (1988). Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 421–435. 10.1037/0021-9010.73.3.421.
11.
Festl,R, Scharkow,M, Quandt,T. (2013). Peer influence, internet use and cyberbullying: A comparison of different context effects among German adolescents. Journal of Children and Media7, 446–462. 10.1080/17482798.2013.781514.
12.
Field,A. (2013) Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. And sex and drugs and rock n roll (4th edition). London: Sage.
13.
FrancoisA, Lindstrom JohnsonS, WaasdorpT. E, Parker,E. M, Bradshaw,C. P. (2017). Associations between adolescents’ perceptions of alcohol norms and alcohol behaviors: Incorporating within-school variability. American Journal of Health Education48, 80–89. 10.1080/19325037.2016.1271756.
14.
Gámez-Guadix,M, Gini,G. (2016). Individual and class justification of cyberbullying and cyberbullying perpetration: A longitudinal analysis among adolescents. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 44, 81–89.
10.1016/j.appdev.2016.04.001.
15.
Glass,G. V, Peckham,P. D, Sanders,J. R. (1972). Consequences of failure to meet assumptions underlying the fixed effects analyses of variance and covariance. Review of Educational Research42, 237–288. 10.3102/00346543042003237.
16.
Haines,M, Spear,S. F. (1996). Changing the perception of the norm: A strategy to decrease binge drinking among college students. Journal of American College Health, 45, 134.
17.
Heirman,W, Walrave,M. (2012). Predicting adolescent perpetration in cyberbullying: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Psicothema24, 614–620.
18.
Hinduja,S, Patchin,J. W. (2013). Social influences on cyberbullying behaviors among middle and high school students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence42, 711–722. 10.1007/s10964-012-9902-4.
19.
IBM (2017). IBM SPSS Statistics, Version 25. Armonk, NY: IBM.
20.
Juvonen,J, Gross,E. F. (2008). Extending the school grounds?— Bullying experiences in cyberspace. Journal of School Health78, 496–505. 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2008.00335.x.
21.
Kowalski,R. M, Guimetti,G. W, Schroeder,A. N, Lattanner,M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin140, 1073–1137. 10.1037/a0035618.
22.
LaFontana,K. M, Cillessen,A. H. N. (2010). Developmental changes in the priority of perceived status in childhood and adolescence. Social Development, 19, 130–147.
23.
Law,D. M, Shapka,J. D, Hymel,S, Olson,B. F, Waterhouse,T. (2012). The changing face of bullying: An empirical comparison between traditional and internet bullying and victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 226–232. 10.1016/j.chb.2011.09.004.
24.
Miller,D. T, Prentice,D. A. (2016). Changing norms to change behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 339–361. 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015013.
25.
Modecki,K. L, Minchin,J, Harbaugh,A. G, Guerra,N. G, Runions,K. C. (2014). Bullying prevalence across contexts: A meta-analysis measuring cyber and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 55, 602–611. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.06.007.
Office of Parliamentary Counsel (2013). Tobacco Plain Packaging Regulations 2011. Select Legislative Instrument No. 263, 2011 as amended made under the Tobacco Plain Packaging Act 2011. Federal Register of Legislative Instruments F2013C00801.Canberra, Australia: Office of Parliamentary Counsel.
28.
Perkins,H.W, Craig,D.W. Perkins,J.M.
(2011). Using social norms to reduce bullying: A research intervention among adolescents in five middle schools. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations14, 703–722. 10.1177/1368430210398004.
29.
Pfetsch,J. (2013) Direktes und Indirektes Cyberbullying und Cyberviktimisierung (DICC), Kurzfassung. Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript [Direct and indirect cyberbullying and cybercivtimization, short version. Unpublished manuscript]. Berlin: Technische Universität Berlin.
30.
Pieschl,S,
Urbasik,S.
(2013) Does the cyberbullying prevention program Surf-Fair work? An evaluation study. In
R.Hanewald , (Ed.), From cyber bullying to cyber safety: Issues and approaches in educational contexts (pp. 205–224). New York: Nova Science.
31.
Pischke,C. R, Helmer,S. M, McAlaney,J, Bewick,B. M, Vriesacker,B, Van Hal, G, Zeeb, H. (2015). Normative misperceptions of tobacco use among university students in seven European countries: Baseline findings of the ‘Social Norms Intervention for the prevention of Polydrug usE’ study. Addictive Behaviors, 51, 158–164. 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.07.012.
32.
Pischke,C. R, Zeeb,H, van Hal,G, Vriesacker,B, McAlaney,J, Bewick,B. M,... Mikolajczyk, R. T. (2012). A feasibility trial to examine the social norms approach for the prevention and reduction of licit and illicit drug use in European University and college students. BMC Public Health12, 882. 10.1186/1471-2458-12-882.
33.
Pyżalski,J. (2012). From cyberbullying to electronic aggression: Typology of the phenomenon. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties17, 305–317. 10.1080/13632752.2012.704319.
34.
Salmivalli,C, Voeten,M. (2004). Connections between attitudes, group norms, and behaviour in bullying situations. International Journal of Behoral Development, 28, 246–258. 10.1080/01650250344000488.
35.
Sandstrom,M. J, Bartini,M. (2010). Do perceptions of discrepancy between self and group norms contribute to peer harassment at school?Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 32, 217–225. 10.1080/01973533.2010.495645
36.
Sandstrom,M, Makover,H, Bartini,M. (2013). Social context of bullying: Do misperceptions of group norms influence children’s responses to witnessed episodes?Social Influence, 8, 196–215. 10.1080/15534510.2011.651302.
37.
Sasson,H, Mesch,G. (2017). The role of parental mediation and peer norms on the likelihood of cyberbullying. The Journal of Genetic Psychology178, 15–27. 10.1080/00221325.2016.1195330.
38.
Schultze-Krumbholz,A, Zagorscak,P, Scheithauer,H. (2017). A school-based cyberbullying preventive intervention approach: The Media Heroes program. In
M.Campbell & S.Bauman (Eds.), Reducing cyberbullying in schools: International evidence-based best practice (pp. 145–158). San Diego, CA/Cambridge, MA, USA: Academic Press.
39.
Stock,C, Vallentin-Holbech,L, Rasmussen,B. M. (2016). The GOOD life: Study protocol for a social norms intervention to reduce alcohol and other drug use among Danish adolescents. BMC Public Health, 16, 704. 10.1186/s12889-016-3333-1.
40.
Tokunaga,R. S. (2010). Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior26, 277–287. 10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.014.
41.
Wilcox,R. R. (2012). Introduction to robust estimation and hypothesis testing (3rdedition). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
