Clinical application of super sensitive microflow ultrasound on the detection of intraplaque neovascularization in patients with atheromatous carotid artery plaque
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online December 19, 2022
Clinical application of super sensitive microflow ultrasound on the detection of intraplaque neovascularization in patients with atheromatous carotid artery plaque
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a routine technique for detecting intraplaque neovascularization (IPN). However, the invasiveness and complexity of CEUS severely limit its clinical application. This article aims to investigate the application value of AngioPLUS (AP) technique in assessing IPN formation in patients with atheromatous (AS) carotid artery plaque.
METHODS:
Patients diagnosed with carotid artery atherosclerosis combined plaque formation were recruited and their demographic characteristics including serum fasting blood glucose (FBG), triglyceride (TG), and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) were collected. AP was used to scoring intraplaque microvascular flow (IMVF), measuring the thickness and length of the plaque and determining the number of IPN of the plaque.
RESULTS:
IMVF score evaluated by AP was positively correlated with plaque length, thickness, IPN number, serum TG, LDL and FBG levels in patients with carotid atherosclerosis with plaque. The evaluation results of CEUS score and IMVF classification detected by AP of plaques were consistent in patients with carotid atherosclerosis.
CONCLUSION:
IMVF scoring by AP is a promising approach to assess IPN and plaque status in patients with atheromatous carotid artery plaque.
SpacekM, ZemanekD, HutyraM, SlukaM, TaborskyM, Vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque - a review of current concepts and advanced imaging. Biomedical Papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia2018;162(1):10–17.
2.
BuonR, GuidolinB, JaffreA, LafumaM, BarbieuxM, NasrN, et al., Carotid ultrasound for assessment of nonobstructive carotid atherosclerosis in young adults with cryptogenic stroke. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases2018;27(5):1212–1216.
3.
SavasS, TopalogluN, KazciO, KosarPN, Classification of carotid artery intima media thickness ultrasound images with deep learning. Journal of Medical Systems2019;43(8):273.
4.
ZamaniM, SkagenK, ScottH, LindbergB, RussellD, SkjellandM. Carotid plaque neovascularization detected with superb microvascular imaging ultrasound without using contrast media. Stroke2019;50(11):3121–3127.
5.
ThimT, HagensenMK, BentzonJF, FalkE, From vulnerable plaque to atherothrombosis. Journal of Internal Medicine2008;263(5):506–516.
6.
MagnoniM, AmmiratiE, MoroniF, NorataGD, CamiciPG, Impact of cardiovascular risk factors and pharmacologic treatments on carotid intraplaque neovascularization detected by contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography2019;32(1):113–120e116.
7.
Van der VekenB, De MeyerGR, MartinetW, Intraplaque neovascularization as a novel therapeutic target in advanced atherosclerosis. Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets2016;20(10):1247–1257.
8.
HyafilF, KleinI, DesillesJP, MazighiM, Le GuludecD, AmarencoP, Rupture of nonstenotic carotid plaque as a cause of ischemic stroke evidenced by multimodality imaging. Circulation2014;129(1):130–131.
9.
PfisterK, RennertJ, GreinerB, JungW, StehrA, GossmannH, et al., Pre-surgical evaluation of ICA-stenosis using 3D power Doppler, 3D color coded Doppler sonography, 3D B-flow and contrast enhanced B-flow in correlation to CTA/MRA: First clinical results. Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation2009;41(2):103–116.
10.
WilsonSR, GreenbaumLD, GoldbergBB, Contrast-enhanced ultrasound: What is the evidence and what are the obstacles?AJR: American Journal of Roentgenology2009;193(1):55–60.
11.
SaitoK, NagatsukaK, Ishibashi-UedaH, WatanabeA, KannkiH, IiharaK, Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the evaluation of neovascularization in atherosclerotic carotid artery plaques. Stroke2014;45(10):3073–3075.
12.
PiscagliaF, BolondiL, Italian Society for Ultrasound in M Biology Study Group on Ultrasound Contrast A, The safety of Sonovue in abdominal applications: Retrospective analysis of 8 investigations. Ultrasound Med Biol2006;32(9):1369–1375.
13.
JungHK, ParkAY, KoKH, KohJ, Comparison of the diagnostic performance of power doppler ultrasound and a new microvascular doppler ultrasound technique (AngioPLUS) for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine2018;37(11):2689–2698.
14.
ChangY, ChenL, WestraJ, SunZ, GuanC, ZhangY, et al., Reproducibility of quantitative flow ratio: An inter-core laboratory variability study. Cardiology Journal2020;27(3):230–237.
15.
KimS, LeeHJ, KoKH, ParkAY, KohJ, JungHK, New Doppler imaging technique for assessing angiogenesis in breast tumors: Correlation with immunohistochemically analyzed microvessels density. Acta Radiologica2018;59(12):1414–1421.
16.
CantisaniV, DavidE, FerrariD, FanelliF, Di MarzoL, CatalanoC, et al., Color doppler ultrasound with superb icrovascular imaging compared to contrast-enhanced ultrasound and computed tomography angiography to identify and classify endoleaks in patients undergoing EVAR. Annals of Vascular Surgery. 2017;40136-40145.
17.
MaurielloA, ServadeiF, SangiorgiG, AnemonaL, GiacobbiE, LiottiD, et al., Asymptomatic carotid plaque rupture with unexpected thrombosis over a non-canonical vulnerable lesion. Atherosclerosis2011;218(2):356–362.
18.
KooleD, HeyligersJ, MollFL, PasterkampG, Intraplaque neovascularization and hemorrhage: Markers for cardiovascular risk stratification and therapeutic monitoring. Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine (Hagerstown, Md)2012;13(10):635–639.
19.
FinkenzellerT, TackeJ, ClevertDA, JungW, KubaleR, SchreyerA, et al., Quantification of extracranial ICA stenoses with vessel ultrasound by CCDS and B-flow in comparison to 64-slice multidector CTA, contrast-enhanced MRA and DSA. Ultraschall in der Medizin2008;29(3):294–301.
20.
PartoviS, LoebeM, AschwandenM, BaldiT, JagerKA, FeinsteinSB, et al., Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for assessing carotid atherosclerotic plaque lesions. AJR: American Journal of Roentgenology2012;198(1):W13–W19.
21.
WilsonSR, LyshchikA, PiscagliaF, CosgroveD, JangHJ, SirlinC, et al., CEUS LI-RADS: Algorithm, implementation, and key differences from CT/MRI. Abdom Radiol (NY)2018;43(1):127–142.
22.
SongY, XingH, ZhangZ, FelixLO, Detection of carotid atherosclerotic intraplaque neovascularization using superb microvascular imaging: A meta-analysis. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine2021;40(12):2629–2638.
23.
SchinkelAFL, BoschJG, StaubD, AdamD, FeinsteinSB, Contrast-enhanced ultrasound to assess carotid intraplaque neovascularization. Ultrasound Med Biol2020;46(3):466–478.
24.
ClevertDA, SommerWH, HelckA, SaamT, ReiserM, Improved carotid atherosclerotic plaques imaging with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation2011;48(1):141–148.
25.
WeskottHP, B-flow–a new method for detecting blood flow. Ultraschall in der Medizin2000;21(2):59–65.
26.
WangQ, HuangY, ZhangY, WangY, XieY, ZhangL, et al., Carotid artery vulnerable plaque model for cerebrovascular events by conventional ultrasound & contrast-enhanced ultrasound: A preliminary study. Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation2022;80(2):197–209.
27.
HoshinoM, ShimizuT, OguraH, HagiwaraY, TakaoN, SogaK, et al., Intraplaque microvascular flow signal in superb microvascular imaging and magnetic resonance imaging carotid plaque imaging in patients with atheromatous carotid artery stenosis. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases2018;27(12):3529–3534.
28.
ZhuYC, JiangXZ, BaiQK, DengSH, ZhangY, ZhangZP, et al., Evaluating the efficacy of atorvastatin on patients with carotid plaque by an innovative ultrasonography. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases2019;28(3):830–837.
29.
OuraK, KatoT, OhbaH, TerayamaY, Evaluation of intraplaque neovascularization using superb microvascular imaging and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases2018;27(9):2348–2353.
