To evaluate the feasibility of vector flow imaging technique (V Flow) in measurement of wall shear stress (WSS) of common carotid arteries (CCA) in healthy adults and to provide the normal WSS values assessed by V Flow.
METHODS & MATERIALS:
This prospective study was approved by the Ethics Committee of our University. Eighty healthy adult volunteers were included (mean age 43.3 y, 47 females, 33 males). The volunteers were classified into three groups according to their age: group I (age 20 - 39 y), group II (age 40 - 59 y) and group III (age 60 - 80 y). Mindray Resona 8 ultrasound machine and a linear array transducer (3–9 MHz) was used, equipped with the updated V Flow function. Common carotid arteries of both sides were evaluated in three segments (initial segment, middle segment and near bifurcation segment). The WSS values of CCA were measured by two independent radiologists. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of observer reliability in WSS measurement was calculated. Inter-observer reproducibility was also evaluated with the 95% Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LOA).
RESULTS:
V Flow measurements were performed successfully in 79 volunteers (98.8 %, 79/80). The mean value of WSS in right CCA was (0.66±0.24) Pa, in left CCA was (0.66±0.18) Pa (P > 0.05). Mean WSS value had a moderately negative correlation with age group (P < 0.05). The mean WSS value of group I(mean±SD, 0.75±0.25 Pa) is larger than group II (mean±SD, 0.62±0.13 Pa) and group III (mean±SD, 0.49±0.11 Pa) (P < 0.05). The ICC of observer reliability of group I, II and III was 0.96 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.92–0.98), 0.94 (95% CI 0.88–0.97), 0.93 (95% CI 0.76–0.98) respectively. The Bland-Altman plots showed that the 95% LOA were –0.17–0.12 (Pa) for group I, –0.09–0.13 (Pa) for group II and –0.08–0.10 (Pa) for group III.
CONCLUSION:
V Flow measurement is a simple, rapid and feasible imaging method for the WSS assessment of CCA in healthy volunteers, which will probably be an important tool for assessing CCA function.
RahmanMS, WoollardK. Atherosclerosis[J]. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;1003:121–44. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-57613-8_7
2.
KashiwazakiD, ShiraishiK, YamamotoS, et al. Efficacy of carotid endarterectomy for mild (<50%) symptomatic carotid stenosis with unstable plaque[J]. World Neurosurg. 2019;121:e60–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.09.013
3.
LiuZ, ZhaoY, WangX, et al. Low carotid artery wall shear stress is independently associated with brain white-matter hyperintensities and cognitive impairment in older patients[J]. Atherosclerosis. 2016;247:78–86. DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.02.003
4.
GnassoA, CaciaM, CutruzzolaA, et al. Influence of acute reduction of blood viscosity on endothelial function[J]. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2019;72(3):239–45. DOI: 10.3233/CH-180446
5.
PhinikaridouA, HuaN, PhamT, et al. Regions of low endothelial shear stress colocalize with positive vascular remodeling and atherosclerotic plaque disruption: An in vivo magnetic resonance imaging study[J]. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6(2):302–10. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.112.000176
6.
CunninghamKS, GotliebAI. The role of shear stress in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis[J]. Lab Invest. 2005;85(1):9–23. DOI: 10.1038/labinvest.3700215
7.
ThimT, HagensenMK, HorlyckA, et al. Wall shear stress and local plaque development in stenosed carotid arteries of hypercholesterolemic minipigs[J]. J Cardiovasc Dis Res. 2012;3(2):76–83. DOI: 10.4103/0975-3583.95358
8.
CunninghamKS, GotliebAI. The role of shear stress in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis[J]. Lab Invest. 2005;85(1):9–23. DOI: 10.1038/labinvest.3700215
9.
KatakamiN. Utility of carotid wall shear stress as a predictor of coronary atherosclerosis[J]. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2016;23(3):290–1. DOI: 10.5551/jat.ED029
10.
EshtehardiP, BrownAJ, BhargavaA, et al. High wall shear stress and high-risk plaque: An emerging concept[J]. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;33(7):1089–99. DOI: 10.1007/s10554-016-1055-1
11.
TuenterA, SelwanessM, AriasL A, et al. High shear stress relates to intraplaque haemorrhage in asymptomatic carotid plaques[J]. Atherosclerosis. 2016;251:348–54. DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.05.018
12.
WangY, QiuJ, LuoS, et al. High shear stress induces atherosclerotic vulnerable plaque formation through angiogenesis[J]. Regen Biomater. 2016;3(4):257–67. DOI: 10.1093/rb/rbw021
13.
ZhangF, LanningC, MazzaroL, et al. In vitro and preliminary in vivo validation of echo particle image velocimetry in carotid vascular imaging[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011;37(3):450–64. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.11.017
14.
MarklM, WallisW, HarloffA. Reproducibility of flow and wall shear stress analysis using flow-sensitive four-dimensional MRI[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011;33(4):988–94. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22519
15.
BousselL, RayzV, MartinA, et al. Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging measurements in intracranial aneurysms in vivo of flow patterns, velocity fields, and wall shear stress: Comparison with computational fluid dynamics[J]. Magn Reson Med. 2009;61(2):409–17. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21861
16.
CibisM, PottersWV, SelwanessM, et al. Relation between wall shear stress and carotid artery wall thickening MRI versus CFD[J]. J Biomech. 2016;49(5):735–41. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.02.004
17.
JungF. From hemorheology to microcirculation and regenerative medicine: Fahraeus Lecture 2009[J]. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2010;45(2-4):79–99. DOI: 10.3233/CH-2010-1312
18.
PfisterK, RennertJ, GreinerB, et al. Pre-surgical evaluation of ICA-stenosis using 3D power Doppler, 3D color coded Doppler sonography, 3D B-flow and contrast enhanced B-flow in correlation to CTA/MRA: First clinical results[J]. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2009;41(2):103–16. DOI: 10.3233/CH-2009-1161
19.
ClevertDA, JohnsonT, JungEM, et al. Color Doppler, power Doppler and B-flow ultrasound in the assessment of ICA stenosis: Comparison with 64-MD-CT angiography[J]. Eur Radiol. 2007;17(8):2149–59. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0488-7
20.
BechsgaardT, HansenKL, BrandtAH, et al. Vector and doppler ultrasound velocities evaluated in a flow phantom and the femoropopliteal vein[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2017;43(10):2477–87. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.06.020
21.
AvdalJ, LovstakkenL, TorpH, et al. Combined 2-D vector velocity imaging and tracking doppler for improved vascular blood velocity quantification[J]. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2017;64(12):1795–804. DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2017.2757600
22.
TortoliP, BambiG, RicciS. Accurate doppler angle estimation for vector flow measurements[J]. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2006;53(8):1425–31.
23.
GoddiA, FanizzaM, BortolottoC, et al. Vector flow imaging techniques: An innovative ultrasonographic technique for the study of blood flow[J]. J Clin Ultrasound. 2017;45(9):582–8. DOI: 10.1002/jcu.22519
24.
GoddiA, BortolottoC, RacitiMV, et al. High-frame rate vector flow imaging of the carotid bifurcation in healthy adults: Comparison with color doppler imaging[J]. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2018;37(9):2263–75. DOI: 10.1002/jum.14579
25.
YiuBY, LaiSS, YuAC. Vector projectile imaging: Time-resolved dynamic visualization of complex flow patterns[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2014;40(9):2295–309. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.03.014
26.
DuYSYYB. High Frame rate vector flow imaging: Development as a new diagnostic mode on a clinical scanner[J]. Proceedings of the IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium. 2018;1–4.
27.
GoddiA, BortolottoC, FiorinaI, et al. High-frame rate vector flow imaging of the carotid bifurcation[J]. Insights Imaging. 2017;8(3):319–28. DOI: 10.1007/s13244-017-0554-5
28.
BartkoJJ. The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability[J]. Psychol Rep. 1966;19(1):3–11. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.1966.19.1.3
29.
ChoiYJ, BaekJH, HongMJ, et al. Inter-observer variation in ultrasound measurement of the volume and diameter of thyroid nodules[J]. Korean J Radiol. 2015;16(3):560–5. DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2015.16.3.560
30.
HansenF, MangellP, SonessonB, et al. Diameter and compliance in the human common carotid artery–variations with age and sex[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1995;21(1):1–9. DOI: 10.1016/0301-5629(94)00090-5
31.
GnassoA, CaralloC, IraceC, et al. Association between wall shear stress and flow-mediated vasodilation in healthy men[J]. Atherosclerosis. 2001;156(1):171–6. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9150(00)00617-1
32.
CallaghanFM, GrieveSM. Normal patterns of thoracic aortic wall shear stress measured using four-dimensional flow MRI in a large population[J]. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2018;315(5):H1174–81. DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00017.2018
33.
JeonSJ, KwakHS, ChungGH. Widening and rotation of carotid artery with age: Geometric approach[J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018;27(4):865–70. DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.10.026
34.
ZhangB, GuJ, QianM, et al. Correlation between quantitative analysis of wall shear stress and intima-media thickness in atherosclerosis development in carotid arteries[J]. Biomed Eng Online. 2017;16(1):137. DOI: 10.1186/s12938-017-0425-9
35.
BuljanK, SoldoSB, JanculjakD, et al. Relationship between age and thickness of carotid arteries in a population without risk factors for atherosclerosis[J]. Coll Antropol. 2015;39(3):779–84.
36.
Schmidt-TrucksassA, SchmidA, BrunnerC, et al. Arterial properties of the carotid and femoral artery in endurance-trained and paraplegic subjects[J]. J Appl Physiol. 2000;89(5):1956–63. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.2000.89.5.1956
37.
PottersWV, MarqueringHA, VanBavelE, et al. Measuring wall shear stress using velocity-encoded MRI[J]. Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports. 2014;7(4):9257. DOI: 10.1007/s12410-014-9257-1
38.
DammersR,
StifftF,
TordoirJ H, et al.
Shear stress depends on vascular territory: Comparison between common carotid and brachial artery[J]. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2003;94(2):485–9. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00823.2002
39.
GlorFP, AriffB, HughesAD, et al. Image-based carotid flow reconstruction: A comparison between MRI and ultrasound[J]. Physiol Meas. 2004;25(6):1495–509.
40.
BucekRA, ReiterM, KoppensteinerI, et al. B-flow evaluation of carotid arterial stenosis: Initial experience[J]. Radiology. 2002;225(1):295–9. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2243011374
41.
ClevertDA, JohnsonT, JungEM, et al. Color Doppler, power Doppler and B-flow ultrasound in the assessment of ICA stenosis: Comparison with 64-MD-CT angiography[J]. Eur Radiol. 2007;17(8):2149–59. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0488-7
42.
XieX, BaiZY, LiuY, et al. Value of superb micro-vascular imaging in diagnosing carotid artery vulnerable plaque[J]. Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2018;40(4):444–9. DOI: 10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.10424
