It is difficult to assess tumors of the parotid gland preoperatively. However, it is essential for the surgeon to know which kind of tumor is present. Ultrasound is the method of choice, but there is still no reliable differential diagnostic tool for determining whether a tumor is malignant or benign.
OBJECTIVE:
The aim of our study was to examine the value of Virtual Touch imaging quantification (VTIQ) elastograpy in distinguishing between malignant and benign tumors as well as in identifying the most common benign tumor types.
METHODS:
The parenchyma of 100 parotid glands and 12 lymph nodes of healthy volunteers and 50 tumors of the parotid gland were analyzed via ultrasound, color Doppler ultrasound, and VTIQ, and the results were then compared with histopathology.
RESULTS:
In comparison with benign tumors, in malignant tumors the tumor border was diffuse, the perfusion higher, and the VTIQ quality much lower. Share wave velocity of the user-defined region of interest was more frequently higher than 6.8 m/s in malignant tumors in comparison to benign tumors.
CONCLUSIONS:
VTIQ in combination with ultrasound examination provides additional information for distinguishing between benign and malignant tumors and shows promise for integration into preexisting ultrasound protocols.
DumitriuD., DudeaS.M., Botar-JidC. and BaciutG., Ultrasonographic and sonoelastic features of pleomorphic adenomas of salivary glands, Med Ultrason12 (2010), 175–183.
2.
BurkeC.J., ThomasR.H. and HowlettD., Imaging the major salivary glands, Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg49 (2011), 261–269.
3.
StewartC.J., MacKenzieK., McgarryG.W. and MowatA., Fine-needle aspiration cytology of salivary gland: A review of 341 cases, Diagn Cytopathol22 (2000), 139–146.
4.
BajajY., SinghS., CozensN. and SharpbJ., Critical clinical appraisal of the role of ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration cytology in the management of parotid tumours, J Laryngol Otol119 (2005), 289–292.
5.
KayaG. and HowlettD.C., The diagnosis of parotid lesions, Eur Radiol25 (2015), 3025–3026.
6.
NightingaleK., SooM.S., NightingaleR. and TraheyG., Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging: In vivo demonstration of clinical feasibility, Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology28 (2002), 227–235.
7.
Carneiro-PlaD., Ultrasound elastography in the evaluation of thyroid nodules for thyroid cancer, Current Opinion in Oncology25 (2013), 1–5.
8.
TrottmannM., MarconJ., D’AnastasiM., et al., Shear-wave elastography of the testis in the healthy man - determination of standard values, Clin Hemorheol Microcirc62 (2016), 273–228.
9.
CantisaniV., LodiseP., GrazhdaniH., et al., Ultrasound elastography in the evaluation of thyroid pathology. Current status, European Journal of Radiology83 (2014), 420–428.
10.
SporeaI., SirliR., PopescuA., et al., Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI)–a new modality for the evaluation of liver fibrosis, Medical Ultrasonography12 (2010), 26–31.
11.
PuH., ZhaoL.X., YaoM.H., XuG., LiuH., XuH.X. and WuR., Conventional US combined with acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastography for prediction of triple-negative breast cancer and the risk of lymphatic metastasis, Clin Hemorheol Microcirc65(4) (2017), 335–347.
12.
HeY.P., XuH.X., LiX.L., LiD.D., BoX.W., ZhaoC.K., LiuB.J., WangD. and XuH.X., Comparison of Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging Quantification (VTIQ) and Toshiba shear wave elastography (T-SWE) in diagnosis of thyroid nodules: Initial experience, Clin Hemorheol Microcirc66(1) (2017), 15–26.
13.
Platz Batista da SilvaN., SchauerM., HornungM., LangS., BeyerL.P., WiesingerI., StroszczynskiC., and JungE.M., Intrasurgical dignity assessment of hepatic tumors using semi-quantitative strain elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for optimisation of liver tumor surgery, Clin Hemorheol Microcirc64(4) (2016), 735–745.
14.
ZengelP., SchrotzlmairF., SchwarzF., et al., Elastography: A new diagnostic tool for evaluation of obstructive diseases of the salivary glands; primary results, Clin Hemorheol Microcirc50 (2012), 91–99.
15.
NightingaleK., McAleaveyS. and TraheyG., Shear-wave generation using acoustic radiation force: In vivo and ex vivo results, Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology29(12) (2003), 1715–1723.
16.
HabermannC.R., ArndtC., GraessnerJ., et al., Diffusion weighted echo – planar MR imaging of primary parotid gland tumos; is a prediction of different histologic subtypes possible?AJNR Am J Neuroradiol30 (2009), 591–596.
17.
BozzatoA., ZenkJ., GreesH., et al., Potential of ultrasound diagnosis for parotid tumors; analysis of qualitative and quantitative parameters, Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg137 (2007), 642–646.
18.
AdamietzB.R., Meier-MeitingerM., FaschingP., et al., New diagnostic criteria in real-time elastography for the assessment of breast lesions, Ultraschall Med32 (2011), 67–73.
19.
LuoS., KimE.H., DigheM. and KimY., Thyroid nodule classification using ultrasound elastography via linear discriminant analysis, Ultrasonics51 (2011), 425–431.
20.
GoertzR.S., AmannK., HeideR., BernatikT., NeurathM.F. and StrobelD., An abdominal and thyroid status with Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Elastometry - a feasibility study: Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Elastometry of human organs, Eur J Radiol80(3) (2011), e226–e230.
21.
XuJ.M., XuX.H., XuH.X., et al., Conventional US;US elasticity imaging, and acoustic radiation force impulse imaging for prediction of malignancy in thyroid nodules, Radiology272 (2014), 577–586.
22.
DumitriuD., DudeaS.M., Botar-JidC. and BaciutG., Ultrasonographic and sonoelastographic features of pleomorphic adenomas of the salivary glands, Med Ultrason12 (2010), 175–183.
23.
DumitriuD., DudeaS., Botar-JidC., BaciutM. and BaciutG., Real-time sonoelastography of major salivary gland tumors, AJR Am J Roentgenol197 (2011), W924–W930.
24.
BhatiaK.S., RasalkarD.D., LeeY.P., et al., Evaluation of real-time qualitative sonoelastography of focal lesions in the parotid and submandibular glands: Applications and limitations, Eur Radiol20 (2010), 1958–1964.
25.
LiC., ZhangC., LiN. and LiJ., Compression Real-time Elastography for Evaluation of Salivary Gland Lesions A Meta-analysis, J Ultrasound Med35(5) (2016), 999–1007.
26.
ZhouH., ZhouX.L., XuH.X., HeY.P., BoX.W., LiX.L., LiuB.J., LiD.D. and WangD., Initial Experience With Ultrasound Elastography for Diagnosis of Major Salivary Gland Lesions, J Ultrasound Med35(12) (2016), 2597–2606.
27.
MansourN., StockK.F., ChakerA., BasM. and KnopfA., Evaluation of parotid gland lesions with standard ultrasound, color duplex sonography, sonoelastography, and acoustic radiation force impulse imaging - a pilot study, Ultraschall Med33(3) (2012), 283–288.
28.
MatsuzukaT., SuzukiM., SaijoS., IkedaM., MatsuiT., NomotoY., NomotoM., ImaizumiM., TadaY. and OmoriK., Stiffness of salivary gland and tumor measured by new ultrasonic techniques: Virtual touch quantification and IQ, Auris Nasus Larynx42(2) (2015), 128–133.
29.
ZhangS., ZhuJ., ZhangX., HeJ. and LiJ., Assessment of the Stiffness of Major Salivary Glands in Primary Sjögren’s Syndrome through Quantitative Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Imaging, Ultrasound Med Biol42(3) (2016), 645–653.
