Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Abelson interactor 1 (ABI1) is associated with the metastasis and prognosis of many malignancies. The association between ABI1 transcript spliced variants, their molecular constitutive exons and exon–exon junctions (EEJs) in 14 cancer types and clinical outcomes remains unsolved.

OBJECTIVE:

To identify novel cancer metastatic and prognostic biomarkers from ABI1 total mRNA, TSVs, and molecular constitutive elements.

METHODS:

Using data from TCGA and TSVdb database, the standard median of ABI1 total mRNA, TSV, exon, and EEJ expression was used as a cut-off value. Kaplan-Meier analysis, Chi-squared test ( $X^{2}$ ) and Kendall’s tau statistic were used to identify novel metastatic and prognostic biomarkers, and Cox regression analysis was performed to screen and identify independent prognostic factors.

RESULTS:

A total of 35 ABI1-related factors were found to be closely related to the prognosis of eight candidate cancer types. A total of 14 ABI1 TSVs and molecular constitutive elements were identified as novel metastatic and prognostic biomarkers in four cancer types. A total of 13 ABI1 molecular constitutive elements were identified as independent prognostic biomarkers in six cancer types.

CONCLUSIONS:

In this study, we identified 14 ABI1-related novel metastatic and prognostic markers and 21 independent prognostic factors in total 8 candidate cancer types.

Keywords

ABI1 transcript variant molecular constitutive element metastasis prognosis cancer biomarker

1. Introduction

Cancer is a major public health problem worldwide, being the second leading cause of death in the United States and the third in China [1, 2]. Although there has been tremendous progress in the diagnosis and treatment of this condition, the prognosis of patients with tumor metastasis is poor. Metastasis is still the largest obstacle to resolving cancer cases and the main cause of cancer-related death [3, 4].

Metastatic cells exhibit extraordinary phenotypic plasticity, not only in adapting to unfamiliar microenvironments but also in surviving aggressive treatments and immune responses. A major source of phenotypic variability is alternative splicing (AS) of pre-messenger RNA [5]. There are multiple transcript spliced variants (TSVs) in many mRNAs related to tumor metastasis and prognosis, and their protein expression products act either synergistically or antagonistically, and jointly participate in the precise regulation of tumor cell adhesion, invasion, migration, and other tumor cell behaviors [5, 6, 7].

Abelson interactor 1 (ABI1) encodes a class of adaptor proteins that can form complexes with one or more proteins (e.g.WAVE2, NWASP, EPS8 and PI3K) to play important pathophysiological roles [8]. Previous studies showed that the abnormal expression and phosphorylation of ABI1 are involved in the invasion and metastasis of various malignant tumors (colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, pancreatic cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, breast cancer, leukemia, prostate cancer, and ovarian cancer, etc.), being closely related to their prognosis [9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26].

Figure 1.

Flowchart for the identification and analysis of metastatic and prognostic ABI1 total mRNA, TSVs, exons, and EEJs in pan-cancer.

The human ABI1 gene is located at chromosome 10p11.2, and its pre-mRNA can be spliced into at least 12 different ABI1-TSVs. They encode twelve different protein isoforms, and their significant differences in functional domains suggest that the regulation of ABI1-TSVs in pathophysiological processes may be meticulous and complex [8, 24, 25, 26].

Based on previous data analysis of The Cancer Genomic Atlas (TCGA) and TSVdb database (http://tsvdb. com) and in vivo and in vitro studies, we found that alternative splicing is an important mechanism by which ABI1 plays a precise regulatory role in colorectal cancer metastasis, and the key ABI1-TSVs can be used as not only potential molecular markers for colorectal cancer (CRC) metastasis and prognostic assessment [25, 26], but also as important therapeutic targets with their molecular constitutive elements, exons and exon-exon junctions (EEJs). By extension, we believe that it is theoretically and practically significant to systematically analyze the roles and potential applications of ABI1-TSVs and their molecular constitutive elements in the diagnosis and treatment of many cancer types.

As Fig. 1 shows, we preliminarily explored the value of applying ABI1-TSVs and their molecular constitutive elements in the diagnosis and treatment of many cancer types. Based on TCGA and TSVdb databases, we also screened and identified the ABI1-related molecular markers (total mRNA, TSVs, exons, and EEJs) that are closely related to metastasis and function as independent prognostic factors across many cancers.

Table 1

The correlation between clinicopathological characteristics and poor prognosis (OS/DFS) in various tumors

	Cancer species		Gender		Age		Race		T stage		N stage		M stage		Clinical stage		Cancer status
No.		Prognosis	${X}^{2}$	$p$	${X}^{2}$	$p$	${X}^{2}$	$p$	${X}^{2}$	$p$	${X}^{2}$	$p$	${X}^{2}$	$p$	${X}^{2}$	$p$	${X}^{2}$	$p$
1	BLCA (311 cases)	OS	0.049	0.826	12.335	0.000	3.479	0.176	8.136	0.043	9.439	0.024	2.156	0.142	20.020	0.000	30.561	0.000
		DFS	1.004	0.316	0.004	0.950	2.074	0.354	1.556	0.667	$-$	$-$	$-$	$-$	12.934	0.005	20.134	0.000
2	BRCA (991 cases)	OS	0.696	0.405	18.566	0.000	1.875	0.392	10.753	0.013	23.571	0.000	25.110	0.000	46.962	0.000	117.173	0.000
		DFS	0.952	0.329	0.825	0.364	3.245	0.952	27.012	0.000	25.162	0.000	17.217	0.000	33.657	0.000	217.268	0.000
3	CESC (233 cases)	OS	$-$	$-$	0.710	0.400	0.835	0.629	8.353	0.039 ${}^{*}$	8.091	0.004	1.480	0.224	$-$	$-$	89.919	0.000
		DFS	$-$	$-$	0.121	0.728	6.108	0.047	1.121	0.571	8.539	0.003	0.069	0.792	$-$	$-$	102.749	0.000
4	ESCA (180 cases)	OS	2.833	0.092	0.388	0.533	3.248	0.197	3.202	0.361	13.834	0.003	14.639	0.000	25.958	0.000 ${}^{**}$	13.261	0.000
		DFS	1.777	0.182	0.689	0.407	17.550	0.000	5.528	0.137	1.948	0.583	$-$	$-$	3.728	0.155	0.002	0.968
5	KICH (61 cases)	OS	0.039	0.843	0.677	0.410	4.287	0.117	9.729	0.002	52.991	0.000	9.368	0.002	48.238	0.000	30.429	0.000
		DFS	3.771	0.052	0.244	0.622	0.045	0.831	0.548	0.459	$-$	$-$	$-$	$-$	0.719	0.698	11.169	0.001
6	KIRC (500 cases)	OS	0.009	0.925	12.651	0.000	0.854	0.652	94.391	0.000	14.799	0.000	96.607	0.000	128.481	0.000	128.587	0.000
		DFS	2.664	0.104	0.153	0.696	0.000	0.994	6.067	0.048	0.156	0.693	$-$	$-$	6.176	0.046	25.605	0.000
7	KIRP (245 cases)	OS	0.245	0.621	0.093	0.760	4.895	0.087	36.002	0.000 ${}^{**}$	13.540	0.001	108.495	0.000	75.629	0.000	48.119	0.000
		DFS	4.693	0.003	0.000	0.996	21.314	0.000	4.896	0.086	5.282	0.022	$-$	$-$	8.254	0.016 ${}^{*}$	0.055	0.815
8	LIHC (304 cases)	OS	0.648	0.421	1.246	0.264	1.067	0.587	52.808	0.000	1.470	0.225	7.965	0.005	38.536	0.000	2.898	0.089
		DFS	0.562	0.453	0.227	0.634	4.210	0.122	44.158	0.000	0.408	0.523	4.666	0.000	39.763	0.000	65.909	0.000
9	LUAD (430 cases)	OS	0.004	0.948	1.853	0.173	5.056	0.008	7.085	0.069	11.230	0.004	0.907	0.341	43.327	0.000	31.536	0.000
		DFS	0.138	0.710	2.847	0.092	0.100	0.951	53.660	0.000	0.985	0.611	$-$	$-$	1.233	0.540	34.466	0.000
10	LUSC (420 cases)	OS	0.463	0.496	3.473	0.062	1.732	0.421	4.879	0.181	0.232	0.63	0.37	0.543	5.726	0.126	18.594	0.000
		DFS	2.868	0.090	0.429	0.512	1.234	0.54	2.848	0.416	0.051	0.821	$-$	$-$	0.016	0.992	28.468	0.000
11	OV (298 cases)	OS	$-$	$-$	5.308	0.021	0.192	0.909	$-$	$-$	$-$	$-$	$-$	$-$	4.067	0.131	29.907	0.000
		DFS	$-$	$-$	1.330	0.249	0.061	0.970	$-$	$-$	$-$	$-$	$-$	$-$	3.542	0.170	55.296	0.000
12	PAAD (148 cases)	OS	1.762	0.184	2.587	0.108	0.206	0.902	5.635	0.131	6.581	0.010	0.068	0.794	5.314	0.150	21.705	0.000
		DFS	2.962	0.085	0.661	0.416	0.276	0.599	4.462	0.216	8.086	0.004	$-$	$-$	5.656	0.059	6.241	0.012
13	PRAD (225 cases)	OS	$-$	$-$	$-$	$-$	$-$	$-$	$-$	$-$	$-$	$-$	$-$	$-$	$-$	$-$	$-$	$-$
		DFS	0.000	0.998	$-$	$-$	0.390	0.823	8.340	0.015	0.722	0.395	$-$	$-$	8.878#	0.003	59.815	0.000
14	STAD (318 cases)	OS	0.030	0.863	1.773	0.183	0.043	0.979	5.321	0. 150	5.234	0.155	2.899	0.089	7.230	0.065	18.255	0.000
		DFS	4.346	0.037	0.017	0.897	8.091	0.018	9.879	0.020	0.126	0.988	$-$	$-$	3.263	0.196	9.932	0.002

BLCA (Bladder urothelial carcinoma); BRCA (Breast invasive carcinoma); CESC (Cervical squamous cell carcinoma); ESCA (Esophageal adenocarcinoma); KICH (Kidney chromophobe); KIRC (Kidney renal clear cell carcinoma); KIRP (Kidney papillary renal cell carcinoma); LIHC (Liver hepatocellular Carcinoma); LUAD (Lung adenocarcinoma); LUSC (Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma); OV (Ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma); PAAD (Pancreatic adenocarcinoma); PRAD (Prostate adenocarcinoma) STAD (Stomach adenocarcinoma); $P<$ 0.05 was considered statistically significant; # Gleason Stage.

2. Materials and methods

2.1 Acquisition of clinicopathological information and RNA sequencing data

As Table 1 shows, we downloaded clinicopathological information on patients with 14 cancer types from TCGA (version 20,160,128) [27], and sequencing data on ABI1 total mRNA, TSVs, and molecular constitutive elements (exons and EEJs) from TSVdb [28]. A total of 4439 patients (BLAC 311, BRAC 991, CESC 233, ESCA 180, KICH 60, KIRC 500, KIRP 245, LIHC 304, LUAD 430, LUSC 420, OV 298, PAAD 128, and STAD 318) with complete overall survival data and 225 patients (PRAD, cases without mortality) with complete disease-free survival data were selected in our study.

Table 2
The correlation between ABI1 total mRNA, TSVs and OS/DFS in selected tumors

Cancer species	BLCA		BLCA		BRAC		BRAC		ESCA		ESCA		KICH		KICH
Prognosis	OS		DFS		OS		DFS		OS		DFS		OS		DFS
ABI1 related factors	$X^{2}$	$p$	$X^{2}$	$p$	$X^{2}$	$p$	$X^{2}$	$p$	$X^{2}$	$p$	$X^{2}$	$p$	$X^{2}$	$p$	$X^{2}$	$p$
ABI1-Total mRNA	0.728	0.393	1.160	0.282	1.369	0.242	0.002	0.964	0.000	0.992	1.060	0.303	1.453	0.228	2.638	0.104
ABI1-TSV-1	3.845	0.050 ${}^{*}$	4.909	0.027 ${}^{*}$	0.870	0.351	2.254	0.133	0.148	0.701	0.003	0.959	0.220	0.639	0.095	0.758
ABI1-TSV-2	0.212	0.645	0.071	0.790	0.001	0.974	0.017	0.895	0.871	0.351	0.167	0.682	2.087	0.149	1.931	0.165
ABI1-TSV-3	7.193	0.007 ${}^{*}$	7.193	0.007 ${}^{*}$	0.014	0.907	1.541	0.215	4.121	0.042 ${}^{*}$	0.838	0.360	0.334	0.563	0.294	0.587
ABI1-TSV-4	4.096	0.043 ${}^{*}$	4.096	0.043 ${}^{*}$	0.712	0.399	0.213	0.644	5.307	0.021 ${}^{**}$	1.593	0.207	1.826	0.177	1.092	0.296
ABI1-TSV-5	1.472	0.225	1.472	0.225	1.142	0.215	2.876	0.090	0.149	0.700	0.639	0.424	0.341	0.559	0.298	0.585
ABI1-TSV-6	1.192	0.275	1.192	0.275	0.024	0.876	0.235	0.628	0.016	0.898	0.092	0.761	0.594	0.441	0.067	0.796
ABI1-TSV-7	1.415	0.234	1.415	0.234	0.010	0.921	0.006	0.940	0.708	0.400	0.151	0.698	1.369	0.242	0.272	0.602
ABI1-TSV-8	1.857	0.173	1.857	0.173	0.864	0.353	1.213	0.271	0.026	0.871	1.684	0.194	0.058	0.810	0.067	0.796
ABI1-TSV-9	0.155	0.694	0.254	0.615	0.447	0.504	0.025	0.875	0.268	0.604	0.004	0.951	0.519	0.471	0.112	0.738
ABI1-TSV-10	0.485	0.486	0.034	0.854	0.126	0.722	0.044	0.834	1.012	0.314	0.167	0.682	0.981	0.322	2.211	0.137
ABI1-TSV-11	0.377	0.539	0.004	0.952	1.262	0.261	1.473	0.225	4.099	0.043 ${}^{*}$	1.163	0.281	0.543	0.461	0.319	0.572
ABI1-TSV-12	1.755	0.185	0.800	0.371	0.770	0.380	0.067	0.796	0.880	0.348	0.140	0.709	0.335	0.563	0.359	0.549

Cancer species	KIRC		KIRC		KIRP		KIRP		LIHC		LIHC		LUAD		LUAD
Prognosis	OS		DFS		OS		DFS		OS		DFS		OS		DFS
ABI1 related factors	$X^{2}$	$p$	$X^{2}$	$p$	$X^{2}$	$p$	$X^{2}$	$p$	$X^{2}$	$p$	$X^{2}$	$p$	$X^{2}$	$p$	$X^{2}$	p
ABI1-Total mRNA	1.299	0.254	3.332	0.068	5.404	0.020 ${}^{*}$	4.306	0.038 ${}^{*}$	2.522	0.112	2.205	0.138	5.598	0.018 ${}^{*}$	0.028	0.868
ABI1-TSV-1	5,876	0.015 ${}^{**}$	1.172	0.279	0.369	0.544	0.058	0.810	3.524	0.060	1.383	0.240	3.211	0.062	0.009	0.923
ABI1-TSV-2	1.287	0.257	0.003	0.956	2.729	0.099	0.009	0.923	2.033	0.154	0.276	0.600	0.339	0.560	0.074	0.785
ABI1-TSV-3	0.364	0.546	0.003	0.956	0.687	0.407	0.008	0.927	0.605	0.437	3.375	0.066	7.723	0.005 ${}^{**}$	0.008	0.927
ABI1-TSV-4	9.790	0.002 ${}^{**}$	0.107	0.743	0.098	0.754	0.820	0.365	3.914	0.048 ${}^{*}$	0.375	0.540	1.523	0.217	0.684	0.408
ABI1-TSV-5	0.017	0.897	0.679	0.410	1.880	0.17	3.510	0.061	0.063	0.802	0.000	0.988	0.873	0.350	2.430	0.119
ABI1-TSV-6	0.659	0.417	0.237	0.627	1.940	0.164	0.109	0.741	1.442	0.230	0.981	0.322	0.416	0.519	0.017	0.895
ABI1-TSV-7	0.002	0.965	0.027	0.869	0.001	0.976	1.730	0.188	1.155	0.283	0.626	0.429	0.244	0.621	0.131	0.717
ABI1-TSV-8	8.664	0.003 ${}^{**}$	0.560	0.454	4.135	0.042 ${}^{*}$	0.791	0.374	1.626	0.202	0.905	0.341	1.021	0.312	0.147	0.701
ABI1-TSV-9	0.072	0.788	0.118	0.731	0.017	0.896	0.695	0.404	0.007	0.934	2.939	0.086	0.553	0.457	1.339	0.247
ABI1-TSV-10	0.011	0.915	0.353	0.552	0.400	0.527	1.105	0.293	0.121	0.728	0.592	0.442	0.508	0.476	0.763	0.382
ABI1-TSV-11	0.072	0.788	0.118	0.731	0.305	0.581	0.002	0.964	0.004	0.953	0.009	0.926	0.049	0.825	1.069	0.301
ABI1-TSV-12	2.024	0.155	0.107	0.744	0.049	0.824	10.635	0.001 ${}^{*}$	0.846	0.358	2.939	0.086	0.025	0.875	0.675	0.411

${}^{*}$ Poor prognosis; ${}^{**}$ Good prognosis.

Table 3

The correlation between ABI1 exons and OS/DFS in selected tumors

Cancer species	BLCA		BLCA		BRAC		BRAC		ESCA		ESCA		KICH		KICH
Prognosis	OS		DFS		OS		DFS		OS		DFS		OS		DFS
ABI1 related factors	$X^{2}$	$p$	$X^{2}$	$p$	$X^{2}$	$p$	$X^{2}$	$p$	$X^{2}$	$p$	$X^{2}$	$p$	$X^{2}$	$p$	$X^{2}$	$p$
ABI1-Exon-1	8.131	0.004 ${}^{*}$	1.612	0.204	0.201	0.654	0.053	0.818	1.327	0.249	0.022	0.882	7.700	0.006 ${}^{*}$	0.723	0.395
ABI1-Exon-2	0.169	0.681	0.184	0.668	0.006	0.940	1.121	0.290	0.620	0.431	2.422	0.431	0.341	0.559	0.298	0.585
ABI1-Exon-3	6.584	0.010 ${}^{*}$	1.658	0.198	0.169	0.681	0.000	0.998	4.028	0.045 ${}^{**}$	0.097	0.756	7.524	0.006 ${}^{*}$	0.813	0.367
ABI1-Exon-4	6.981	0.008 ${}^{*}$	3.327	0.068	1.338	0.247	0.015	0.903	5.495	0.019 ${}^{**}$	0.004	0.953	8.456	0.004 ${}^{*}$	0.723	0.395
ABI1-Exon-5	3.772	0.052	3.278	0.070	0.016	0.900	0.000	0.991	2.459	0.117	10.216	0.001 ${}^{*}$	1.396	0.237	0.294	0.587
ABI1-Exon-7	6.292	0.012 ${}^{*}$	4.002	0.045 ${}^{*}$	1.124	0.289	0.469	0.494	1.893	0.169	0.097	0.756	4.313	0.038 ${}^{*}$	0.380	0.538
ABI1-Exon-8	7.470	0.006 ${}^{*}$	5.398	0.020 ${}^{*}$	0.884	0.357	0.177	0.674	2.522	0.112	0.004	0.932	4.060	0.044 ${}^{*}$	0.174	0.677
ABI1-Exon-9	10.531	0.001 ${}^{*}$	4.323	0.038 ${}^{*}$	0.733	0.392	0.017	0.896	1.813	0.178	0.007	0.932	8.073	0.004 ${}^{*}$	0.216	0.642
ABI1-Exon-10	1.503	0.220	9.216	0.002 ${}^{*}$	1.534	0.216	0.081	0.896	0.351	0.554	0.104	0.747	0.514	0.474	0.654	0.419
ABI1-Exon-11.1-11.2	4.661	0.031 ${}^{*}$	2.541	0.111	1.299	0.216	0.081	0.776	9.389	0.002 ${}^{**}$	0.001	0.980	3.750	0.053 ${}^{*}$	0.095	0.758
ABI1-Exon-12	7.344	0.007 ${}^{*}$	5.286	0.021 ${}^{*}$	1.410	0.235	1.148	0.284	3.618	0.057	0.140	0.708	2.034	0.154	1.092	0.296
ABI1-Exon-13	2.084	0.149	1.623	0.203	1.957	0.162	0.016	0.900	1,317	0.251	0.168	0.682	1.349	0.246	0.216	0.642
ABI1-Exon-14	1.252	0.263	0.234	0.629	2.411	0.121	0.129	0.719	0.859	0.354	0.013	0.909	1.453	0.228	2.184	0.139

Cancer species	KIRC		KIRC		KIRP		KIRP		LIHC		LIHC		LUAD		LUAD
Prognosis	OS		DFS		OS		DFS		OS		DFS		OS		DFS
ABI1 related factors	$X^{2}$	$p$	$X^{2}$	$p$	$X^{2}$	$p$	$X^{2}$	$p$	$X^{2}$	$p$	$X^{2}$	$p$	$X^{2}$	$p$	$X^{2}$	$p$
ABI1-Exon-1	17.738	0.000 ${}^{**}$	0.001	0.972	1.267	0.260	5.427	0.020 ${}^{*}$	0.274	0.600	0.590	0.443	2.468	0.116	0.592	0.442
ABI1-Exon-2	3.149	0.076	0.128	0.720	0.057	0.811	1.023	0.312	0.173	0.678	0.066	0.797	0.056	0.812	1.636	0.201
ABI1-Exon-3	12.658	0.000 ${}^{**}$	0.515	0.473	1.016	0.313	6.197	0.013 ${}^{*}$	5.776	0.016 ${}^{*}$	3.344	0.067	7.481	0.006 ${}^{*}$	0.201	0.654
ABI1-Exon-4	16.206	0.000 ${}^{**}$	0.000	0.996	2.239	0.135	6.688	0.010 ${}^{*}$	7.605	0.006 ${}^{*}$	3.766	0.052 ${}^{*}$	4.513	0.034 ${}^{*}$	0.002	0.962
ABI1-Exon-5	8.947	0.003 ${}^{**}$	0.837	0.360	1.215	0.270	2.386	0.122	0.707	0.400	0.001	0.982	2.259	0.133	0.005	0.944
ABI1-Exon-7	17.299	0.000 ${}^{**}$	0.304	0.581	2.463	0.117	7.057	0.007 ${}^{*}$	6.864	0.009 ${}^{*}$	2.368	0.124	2.482	0.115	0.027	0.870
ABI1-Exon-8	16.115	0.000 ${}^{**}$	0.002	0.967	2.468	0.116	5.012	0.024 ${}^{*}$	5.900	0.015 ${}^{*}$	3.697	0.055	6.814	0.009 ${}^{*}$	0.002	0.968
ABI1-Exon-9	18.230	0.000 ${}^{**}$	0.001	0.979	1.383	0.240	7.045	0.008 ${}^{*}$	7.888	0.005 ${}^{*}$	4.423	0.035 ${}^{*}$	5.540	0.019 ${}^{*}$	0.022	0.081
ABI1-Exon-10	0.048	0.826	0.512	0.474	2.336	0.126	0.208	0.649	1.797	0.180	0.641	0.423	4.343	0.037 ${}^{**}$	1.937	0.164
ABI1-Exon-11.1-11.2	17.825	0.000 ${}^{**}$	0.000	0.996	0.972	0.324	6.845	0.009 ${}^{*}$	10.325	0.001 ${}^{*}$	5.750	0.016 ${}^{*}$	1.240	0.265	1.488	0.233
ABI1-Exon-12	19.471	0.000 ${}^{**}$	0.067	0.796	1.326	0.250	4.921	0.021 ${}^{*}$	8.555	0.003 ${}^{*}$	2.950	0.086	1.573	0.210	0.255	0.613
ABI1-Exon-13	7.862	0.005 ${}^{**}$	1.618	0.203	3.210	0.073	3.365	0.067	15.847	0.000 ${}^{*}$	5.607	0.018 ${}^{*}$	1.980	0.159	0.024	0.878
ABI1-Exon-14	1.725	0.189	1.200	0.273	0.253	0.615	1.526	0.217	12.464	0.000 ${}^{*}$	3.924	0.048 ${}^{*}$	3.792	0.052 ${}^{*}$	0.802	0.370

${}^{*}$ Poor prognosis; ${}^{**}$ Good prognosis.

Table 4

The correlation between ABI1 Constitutive EEJs and OS/DFS in selected tumors

Cancer species	BLCA		BLCA		BRAC		BRAC		ESCA		ESCA		KICH		KICH
Prognosis	OS		DFS		OS		DFS		OS		DFS		OS		DFS
ABI1 related factors	$X^{2}$	$p$	$X^{2}$	$p$	$X^{2}$	$p$	$X^{2}$	$p$	$X^{2}$	$p$	$X^{2}$	$p$	$X^{2}$	$p$	$X^{2}$	$p$
ABI1-EEJ-2-1	0.465	0.495	0.581	0.446	0.126	0.723	0.403	0.525	0.031	0.861	2.094	0.148	$-$	$-$	$-$	$-$
ABI1-EEJ-3-1	0.000	0.999	1.052	0.305	0.164	0.685	0.033	0.857	1.573	0.210	0.807	0.369	0.021	0.886	0.350	0.554
ABI1-EEJ-3-2	1.925	0.165	0.355	0.552	0.016	0.898	1.702	0.192	0.715	0.398	0.350	0.554	0.107	0.743	0.045	0.831
ABI1-EEJ-4-3	0.016	0.899	2.204	0.138	0.097	0.755	0.515	0.473	1.213	0.271	0.012	0.912	2.263	0.132	0.045	0.831
ABI1-EEJ-5-4	1.072	0.300	0.752	0.386	0.073	0.787	0.021	0.885	1.047	0.306	0.562	0.454	0.681	0.409	0.350	0.554
ABI1-EEJ-7-3	0.881	0.348	1.838	0.175	0.499	0.480	0.600	0.438	2.606	0.106	0.073	0.786	4.521	0.033 ${}^{*}$	1.002	0.317
ABI1-EEJ-7-4	0.949	0.330	1.797	0.180	1.367	0.242	0.629	0.428	0.007	0.935	0.257	0.612	3.813	0.051 ${}^{*}$	2.184	0.139
ABI1-EEJ-7-5	0.332	0.565	1.712	0.191	0.448	0.503	0.196	0.658	0.696	0.404	1.081	0.298	0.006	0.938	0.216	0.642
ABI1-EEJ-8-7	1.429	0.232	0.227	0.634	0.010	0.922	0.559	0.455	0.441	0.507	3.527	0.060	2.218	0.136	0.095	0.758
ABI1-EEJ-9-8	1.723	0.189	2.742	0.098	1.565	0.211	7.619	0.006 ${}^{*}$	0.343	0.558	0.008	0.928	0.003	0.958	0.002	0.963
ABI1-EEJ-10-9	1.763	0.184	0.096	0.757	0.757	0.384	0.013	0.911	0.000	0.997	0.023	0.881	$-$	$-$	$-$	$-$
ABI1-EEJ-11.1-9	0.027	0.870	0.794	0.373	1.453	0.228	0.024	0.876	3.789	0.052	3.299	0.069	2.348	0.125	0.265	0.607
ABI1-EEJ-11.2-9	4.014	0.045 ${}^{*}$	0.016	0.900	3.803	0.051 ${}^{**}$	0.035	0.851	1.591	0.207	0.120	0.729	0.606	0.436	1.948	0.265
ABI1-EEJ-11.1-10	0.112	0.738	0.096	0.757	1.236	0.266	0.014	0.907	10.096	0.001 ${}^{*}$	1.071	0.301	$-$	$-$	$-$	$-$
ABI1-EEJ-12-9	0.198	0.656	0.067	0.796	1.364	0.243	1.264	0.261	0.436	0.509	0.189	0.664	1.202	0.273	0.112	0.738
ABI1-EEJ-13-9	0.001	0.980	0.017	0.898	0.177	0.674	0.351	0.553	6.517	0.011 ${}^{*}$	6.033	0.014 ${}^{*}$	0.004	0.948	0.216	0.642
ABI1-EEJ-12-11.2	0.090	0.764	1.512	0.219	3.519	0.061	0.044	0.833	6.331	0.012 ${}^{**}$	3.413	0.065	0.051	0.821	1.815	0.178
ABI1-EEJ-13-11.2	0.709	0.400	0.001	0.971	6.711	0.010 ${}^{**}$	0.008	0.931	0.905	0.341	0.254	0.614	0.940	0.332	1.948	0.163
ABI1-EEJ-13-12	1.374	0.241	0.021	0.884	0.703	0.402	2.012	0.156	6.060	0.014 ${}^{**}$	4.149	0.042 ${}^{*}$	0.037	0.848	0.022	0.881
ABI1-EEJ-14-13	8.533	0.003 ${}^{**}$	6.483	0.011 ${}^{**}$	1.241	0.265	0.037	0.848	4.181	0.041 ${}^{*}$	0.010	0.919	7.7000	0.006 ${}^{**}$	0.000	0.987

Table 4, continued
Cancer species	KIRC		KIRC		KIRP		KIRP		LIHC		LIHC		LUAD		LUAD
Prognosis	OS		DFS		OS		DFS		OS		DFS		OS		DFS
ABI1 related Factors	$X^{2}$	$p$	$X^{2}$	$p$	$X^{2}$	$p$	$X^{2}$	$p$	$X^{2}$	$p$	$X^{2}$	$p$	$X^{2}$	$p$	$X^{2}$	$p$
ABI1-EEJ-2-1	0.173	0.805	0.128	0.720	0.119	0.730	0.145	0.704	$-$	$-$	$-$	$-$	0.106	0.745	1.726	0.189
ABI1-EEJ-3-1	11.303	0.001 ${}^{**}$	0.055	0.814	0.232	0.630	1.284	0.257	4.113	0.043 ${}^{**}$	0.068	0.795	4.537	0.033 ${}^{*}$	1.407	0.236
ABI1-EEJ-3-2	0.743	0.389	$-$	$-$	$-$	$-$	$-$	$-$	0.000	0.986	0.523	0.470	1.277	0.259	5.673	0.017 ${}^{*}$
ABI1-EEJ-4-3	1,414	0.234	0.046	0.830	1.428	0.232	0.014	0.906	0.036	0.850	0.490	0.484	3.846	0.050 ${}^{*}$	2.674	0.102
ABI1-EEJ-5-4	0.380	0.538	0.686	0.407	0.099	0.753	1.225	0.268	0.225	0.635	0.487	0.485	5.503	0.019 ${}^{**}$	3.027	0.082
ABI1-EEJ-7-3	3.692	0.055 ${}^{**}$	1.052	0.305	0.000	0.985	3.492	0.062	3.894	0.048 ${}^{*}$	0.196	0.658	0.018	0.893	1.149	0.284
ABI1-EEJ-7-4	9.495	0.002 ${}^{**}$	0.295	0.587	0.040	0.841	0.373	0.541	1.397	0.237	0.006	0.938	4.436	0.035 ${}^{*}$	1.433	0.231
ABI1-EEJ-7-5	1.399	0.237	0.632	0.427	0.318	0.573	2.864	0.091	0.152	0.696	0.081	0.776	7.743	0.005 ${}^{**}$	0.030	0.862
ABI1-EEJ-8-7	1.960	0.162	0.072	0.789	1.582	0.208	0.524	0.469	1.368	0.242	2.209	0.154	0.519	0.471	1.292	0.256
ABI1-EEJ-9-8	0.029	0.864	0.103	0.748	0.917	0.338	0.280	0.597	2.784	0.095	2.730	0.098	0.249	0.618	0.853	0.356
ABI1-EEJ-10-9	0.223	0.636	0.568	0.451	25.245	0.000 ${}^{*}$	6.038	0.014 ${}^{*}$	0.363	0.547	0.438	0.508	2.048	0.152	2.545	0.111
ABI1-EEJ-11.1-9	1.612	0.204	0.160	0.689	0.316	0.574	1.662	0.197	3.459	0.063	0.582	0.446	0.951	0.329	0.003	0.960
ABI1-EEJ-11.2-9	0.364	0.546	1.124	0.289	2.287	0.130	0.035	0.851	2.298	0.130	6.603	0.012 ${}^{*}$	1.922	0.166	1.965	0.161
ABI1-EEJ-11.1-10	0.713	0.398	0.433	0.510	$-$	$-$	$-$	$-$	0.169	0.681	23.823	0.000 ${}^{*}$	0.274	0.600	$-$	$-$
ABI1-EEJ-12-9	1.967	0.161	1.013	0.314	0.065	0.798	0.752	0.386	0.008	0.928	1.556	0.212	2.677	0.102	0.803	0.370
ABI1-EEJ-13-9	0.795	0.372	0.682	0.409	0.127	0.721	0.229	0.632	0.328	0.567	3.135	0.077	0.034	0.854	0.619	0.431
ABI1-EEJ-12-11.2	0.027	0.871	0.704	0.401	0.003	0.954	2.510	0.113	3.343	0.068	0.077	0.781	1.962	0.161	0.005	0.942
ABI1-EEJ-13-11.2	0.018	0.895	0.947	0.331	0.355	0.551	0.013	0.910	0.131	0.718	1.494	0.222	7.648	0.006 ${}^{**}$	2.486	0.115
ABI1-EEJ-13-12	0.343	0.558	0.450	0.502	0.186	0.666	0.129	0.719	1.360	0.244	1.372	0.241	4.707	0.030 ${}^{*}$	0.275	0.600
ABI1-EEJ-14-13	9.132	0.003 ${}^{*}$	0.042	0.838	0.167	0.682	0.235	0.628	0.500	0.480	0.322	0.570	2.159	0.142	0.245	0.621

${}^{*}$ Poor prognosis; ${}^{**}$ Good prognosis.

2.2 Baseline analysis and cancer type selection

As Tables 2, 3 and 4 shows, after the Kaplan–Meier analysis, cancer types with at least two of T-, N-, M-,and/or clinical stages significantly associated with overall survival (OS) and/or disease-free survival (DFS) were selected as candidate cancer types for subsequent analysis.

Identification of ABI1-related and novel metastatic and prognostic biomarkers in pan-cancer.

The standard median RNA-Seq by Expectation Maximization (RSEM) value (from the TSVdb database) was used as a cut-off value to define high or low expression levels of ABI1 total mRNA, TSVs (Table 2), and molecular constitutive elements exons (Table3) and EEJs (Table 4). Those prognosis-related ABI1 total mRNA, TSVs, and constitutive elements (exons and EEJs) screened in pan-cancer by the Kaplan–Meier analysis and the novel metastatic and prognostic biomarkers were identified by further chi-squared test ( $X^{2}$ ) and Kendall’s tau statistic in across all 8 selected cancer types.

2.3 Identification of ABI1-related and independent prognostic biomarkers in pan-cancer

Combining the baseline and ABI1-related survival analyses, Cox regression analysis was further performed to identify the independent prognostic factors from ABI1 total mRNA, TSVs, and molecular constitutive elements (exons and EEJs) expressed in pan-cancer.

2.4 Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 20.0 (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA). Kaplan–Meier analysis and log-rank test were used for survival analysis to determine the prognostic values of ABI1 total mRNA, TSVs, and molecular constitutive elements (exons and EEJs) in various cancer types. Those that are significantly correlated with prognosis were selected for further chi-squared test ( $X^{2}$ ) and Kendall’s tau statistic analysis to further establish their correlation with the clinical pathological features (Such as T, N, M, and clinical stage) of various cancer types. Among them, Chi-squared test was used to compare two groups, while one-way ANOVA was used to compare three or more groups. Cox proportional hazards regression model was used for univariate and multivariate analyses to determine the effects of ABI1 total mRNA, TSVs, and molecular constitutive elements (exons and EEJs) on OS and/or DFS in pan-cancer. $P<$ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1 Correlation between clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival (OS)/disease-free survival (DFS) in various tumors

As shown in Table 1, T-, N-, M-, and clinical stages represent the main characteristics of metastasis in tumor patients. Our analysis of the correlations of T-, N-, M-, and clinical stages with overall survival (OS) and/or disease-free survival (DFS) found that, among the 14 cancer types (BLCA, BRAC, CESE, ESCA, KICH, KIRC, KIRP, LIHC, LUSC, LUAD, OV, PAAD, PRAD, and STAD), only 8 have at least 2 of T-, N-, M-, and clinical stages closely related to OS and/or DFS. All eight cancer types (BLCA, BRAC, ESCA, KICH, KIRC, KIRP, LIHC, and LUAD) were selected to perform subsequent screening and identification of prognosis-related ABI1 total mRNA, TSVs, exons, and EEJs.

3.2 Correlations of ABI1 total mRNA, TSVs, exon, and EEJs expression levels with overall survival (OS)/disease-free survival (DFS) in eight selected cancers

As shown in Tables 2, 3 and 4, with regard to cancer types, we screened 14, 3, 11, 10, 17, 12, 13, and 15 ABI1 total mRNA, TSVs, exons, and EEJs closely related to OS and/or DFS in BLCA, BRAC, ESCA, KICH, KIRC, KIRP, LIHC, and LUAD, respectively.

In BLCA, KICH, and LIHC, with the exceptions of upregulated expression of ABI1-EEJ-14-13 (BLCA and KICH) and ABI-EEJ-3-1 (LIHC) indicating a good prognosis, upregulated expression of the other 13 (BLCA), 9 (KICH), and 12 (LIHC) ABI1-related factors indicated a poor prognosis. Meanwhile, in KIRC, with the exception that the upregulated expression of ABI1-EEJ-14-13 indicated a poor prognosis, the upregulated expression of all of the 16 ABI1-related factors indicated a good prognosis.

In BRAC, patients with high expression of ABI1-EEJ-11.2-9 and 13-11.2 had long OS, and patients with high expression of ABI1-EEJ-9-8 had short DFS. In ESCA, the high expression of ABI1-TSV-3, -11, ABI1-EEJ-11.1-10, -13-9, -14-13 predicted a poor prognosis, while the high expression of ABI1-TSV-4, ABI1-exon-3, -4, -11, ABI1-EEJ-12-11.2 and -13-12 predicted a good prognosis. In LUAD, patients with high expression of ABI1 total mRNA, ABI1-exon-3, -4, -8, -9, -14, ABI1-EEJ-3-1, -4-3, -7-4, and 13-12 had long OS, while patients with high expression of ABI1-TSV-3, ABI1-exon-10, ABI1-EEJ-5-4, -7-5, and -13-11.2 had short OS.

In KIRP, the upregulated expression of all of 12 ABI1-related factors was associated with poor prognosis, of which 2 were associated with short OS and 10 with short DFS.

From the ABI1-related factors studied, the prognosis of KIRP and LUAD patients with high expression of ABI1 total mRNA is poor. No prognosis-related ABI1-TSVs were screened in patients with BRAC and KICH. Upregulated ABI1-TSV-1 expression is involved in the poor prognosis of patients with BLCA. High expression of ABI1-TSV-3 is related to the poor prognosis of patients with BLCA and ESCA, but to the good prognosis of patients with LUAD. High expression of ABI1-TSV-4 is related to the poor prognosis of patients with BLCA and LIHC, but the good prognosis of patients with ESCA and LIHC. High expression of ABI1-TSV-8 is related to the poor prognosis of patients with KIRP, but the good prognosis of patients with KIRC. Upregulated ABI1-TSV-11 expression is involved in the poor prognosis of patients with ESCA.

No prognosis-related ABI1-exons were screened in patients with BRAC and KIRP. High ABI1-exon-1 expression is related to the poor prognosis of patients with BLCA and KICH, but the good prognosis of patients with KIRC. Upregulated expression of both ABI1-exon-3 and -4 is involved in the poor prognosis of patients with BLCA, KICH, LIHC, and LUAD, but in the good prognosis of patients with ESCA and KIRC. High ABI1-exon-5 expression is related to the good prognosis of patients with KIRC. High ABI1-exon-7 expression is related to the poor prognosis of patients with BLCA, KICH, and LIHC, but the good prognosis of patients with KIRC. High ABI1-exon-8 and -9 expression is involved in the poor prognosis of patients with BLCA, KICH, LIHC, and LUAD, but the good prognosis of patients with KIRP. High ABI1-exon-11 expression is involved in the poor prognosis of patients with BLCA, KICH, and LIHC, but the good prognosis of patients with ESCA and KIRP. High ABI1-exon-12 expression is involved in the poor prognosis of patients with BLCA and LIHC, but the good prognosis of patients with KIRC. High ABI1-exon-13 expression is involved in the poor prognosis of patients with LIHC, but the good prognosis of patients with KIRC. High ABI1-exon-14 expression is involved in the poor prognosis of patients with LIHC and LUAD.

Upregulated ABI1-EEJ-3-1 expression is related to shorter OS in LUAD, but longer OS in LIHC and KIRC. High expression of ABI1-EEJ-4-3 in patients with LUAD is associated with a shorter OS, while high ABI1-EEJ-5-4 and -7-5 are associated with longer OS. High ABI1-EEJ-7-3 and -7-4 expression is related to shorter OS in patients with LIHC and KICH but longer OS in patients with KIRC. ABI1-EEJ-10-9 upregulation is involved in poor prognosis in patients with KIRP and shorter DFS in patients with BRAC. ABI1-EEJ-11.1-10 is related to shorter OS in ESCA and DFS in LIHC. ABI1-EEJ-11.2-9 is related to shorter OS in BLCA and DFS in LIHC, but longer OS in BRAC. ABI1-EEJ-12-11.2 is associated with longer OS, while ABI1-EEJ-13-9 is associated with shorter OS in patients with ESCA. High ABI1-13-11.2 expression shows poor prognosis in patients with LUAD and good prognosis in patients with BRAC. ABI1-EEJ-13-12 is related to good prognosis in patients with ESCA. ABI1-EEJ-14-13 is associated with poor prognosis in patients with ESCA and KIRC, but good prognosis in patients with BLCA and KICH.

Table 5
Identification ABI1 TSV and molecular constitutive elements as metastatic and prognostic biomarkers in selected tumors

Cancer types	ABI1 related factors	Statistics	T stage	N stage	M stage	Clinical stage	Statistics	T stage	N stage	M stage	Clinical stage
BLCA	ABI1-TSV-3 ${}^{*}$	$\chi$ 2	11.350	12.823	11.493	12.546	$K$	0.150	0.218	0.195	0.157
		$p$	0.045	0.021	0.005	0.004	$p$	0.054	0.005	0.057	0.003
	ABI1-Exon-1 ${}^{*}$	$\chi$ 2	6.272	4.162	3.579	11.404	$K$	0.123	0.123	0.176	0.150
		$p$	0.281	0.516	0.192	0.007	$p$	0.115	0.115	0.086	0.005
	ABI1-Exon-9	$\chi$ 2	3.739	6.134	4.365	7.673	$K$	0.053	0.127	0.172	0.103
		$p$	0.588	0.276	0.137	0.037	$p$	0.497	0.105	0.093	0.055
ESCA	ABI1-TSV-11	$\chi$ 2	12.153	4.448	8.106	17.878	$K$	$-$ 0.105	0.120	0.114	0.037
		$p$	0.025	0.345	0.016	0.001	$p$	0.157	0.112	0.178	0.625
	ABI1-Exon-5	$\chi$ 2	10.878	3.488	8.229	8.225	$K$	0.115	$-$ 0.033	$-$ 0.001	0.121
		$p$	0.021	0.470	0.015	0.077	$p$	0.120	0.658	0.992	0.108
	ABI1-EEJ-13-9 ${}^{*}$	$\chi$ 2	15.765	19.607	8.690	17.933	$K$	$-$ 0.111	0.233	$-$ 0.058	0.000
		$p$	0.005	0.000	0.012	0.001	$p$	0.135	0.002	0.496	0.998
	ABI1-EEJ-12-11 ${}^{**}$	$\chi$ 2	22.056	15.725	15.038	19.803	$K$	0.054	$-$ 0.207	$-$ 0.126	$-$ 0.099
		$p$	0.000	0.003	0.000	0.000	$p$	0.462	0.006	0.137	0.191
	ABI1-EEJ-13-12 ${}^{**}$	$\chi$ 2	14.556	15.124	14.916	18.329	$K$	0.085	$-$ 0.231	$-$ 0.181	$-$ 0.151
		$p$	0.009	0.004	0.000	0.001	$p$	0.251	0.002	0.033	0.045
KICH	ABI1-Exon-7 ${}^{*}$	$\chi$ 2	6.845	9.056	1.357	9.040	$K$	$-$ 0.189	0.385	0.036	$-$ 0.166
		$p$	0.061	0.029	0.507	0.025	$p$	0.119	0.014	0.836	0.167
	ABI1-EEJ-14-13 ${}^{**}$	$\chi$ 2	3.930	4.861	3.357	9.796	$K$	0.110	$-$ 0.332	$-$ 0.268	0.076
		$p$	0.226	0.182	0.187	0.008	$p$	0.363	0.033	0.118	0.528
KIRC	ABI1-TSV-1 ${}^{**}$	$\chi$ 2	10.164	0.826	1.264	14.531	$K$	$-$ 0.084	$-$ 0.040	$-$ 0.050	$-$ 0.087
		$p$	0.017	0.662	0.532	0.002	$p$	0.049	0.533	0.275	0.037
	ABI1-TSV-4 ${}^{**}$	$\chi$ 2	14.929	0.033	3.003	12.122	$K$	$-$ 0.149	$-$ 0.002	$-$ 0.057	$-$ 0.129
		$p$	0.002	0.984	0.223	0.007	$p$	0.000	0.973	0.215	0.002
	ABI1-Exon-1 ${}^{**}$	$\chi$ 2	11.334	1.679	8.442	10.628	$K$	$-$ 0.132	$-$ 0.047	$-$ 0.074	$-$ 0.130
		$p$	0.010	0.432	0.015	0.014	$p$	0.002	0.469	0.107	0.002
	ABI1-Exon-3 ${}^{**}$	$\chi$ 2	9.247	1.277	9.286	9.377	$K$	$-$ 0.120	$-$ 0.045	$-$ 0.053	$-$ 0.114
		$p$	0.026	0.528	0.010	0.025	$p$	0.005	0.491	0.248	0.006
	ABI1-Exon-4 ${}^{**}$	$\chi$ 2	13.094	1.277	16.342	14.227	$K$	$-$ 0.143	$-$ 0.045	$-$ 0.112	$-$ 0.146
		$p$	0.004	0.528	0.000	0.003	$p$	0.001	0.491	0.015	0.000
	ABI1-Exon-7 ${}^{**}$	$\chi$ 2	9.294	0.943	16.151	8.071	$K$	$-$ 0.120	$-$ 0.042	$-$ 0.080	$-$ 0.117
		$p$	0.026	0.624	0.000	0.045	$p$	0.005	0.513	0.083	0.005
	ABI1-Exon-8 ${}^{**}$	$\chi$ 2	8.111	1.679	14.119	7.524	$K$	$-$ 0.112	$-$ 0.047	$-$ 0.045	$-$ 0.102
		$p$	0.044	0.432	0.001	0.057	$p$	0.009	0.469	0.324	0.014
	ABI1-Exon-11 ${}^{**}$	$\chi$ 2	8.090	2.681	6.528	9.092	$K$	$-$ 0.117	$-$ 0.051	$-$ 0.072	$-$ 0.113
		$p$	0.044	0.262	0.038	0.028	$p$	0.006	0.427	0.116	0.007
	ABI1-Exon-12 ${}^{**}$	$\chi$ 2	19.528	0.268	11.752	20.087	$K$	$-$ 0.187	$-$ 0.033	$-$ 0.139	$-$ 0.183
		$p$	0.000	0.875	0.003	0.000	$p$	0.000	0.606	0.003	0.000
	ABI1-Exon-13	$\chi$ 2	1.548	0.831	8.118	2.338	$K$	$-$ 0.380	$-$ 0.011	$-$ 0.019	$-$ 0.029
		$p$	0.671	0.660	0.017	0.505	$p$	0.376	0.863	0.684	0.487
	ABI1-EEJ-3-1 ${}^{**}$	$\chi$ 2	6.509	0.657	8.442	6.812	$K$	$-$ 0.106	$-$ 0.025	$-$ 0.074	$-$ 0.108
		$p$	0.089	0.720	0.015	0.078	$p$	0.012	0.705	0.107	0.009
	ABI1-EEJ-14-13 ${}^{*}$	$\chi$ 2	18.349	1.585	12.579	15.605	$K$	0.141	0.074	0.099	0.162
		$p$	0.000	0.453	0.002	0.001	$p$	0.000	0.256	0.032	0.000

The correlation between ABI1 TSVs, Constitutive exons and EEJs and T, N, M or Clinical Stage in selected tumors. ${}^{*}$ poor prognosis; ${}^{**}$ good prognosis.

3.3 TCGA and TSVdb pan-cancer transcriptomic data analysis of ABI1 TSVs, exons, and EEJs identifies novel cancer metastatic markers (Table 5)

To screen and identify ABI1-related factors related to tumor metastasis, we used chi-squared test and Kendall’s tau statistic to establish the correlations of prognosis-related ABI1 total mRNA, ABI1-TSV, ABI1-exon, and ABI1-EEJ expression levels with T-, N-, M-, and clinical stages.

As shown in Table 5, prognosis- and metastasis-related ABI1 factors were screened in only 4 (BLCA, ESCA, KICH, and KIRC) of the 8 selected cancer types. In BLCA, the high expression of ABI1-TSV-3 and ABI1-exon-1 was not only positively correlated with metastasis, but also a key factor associated with poor prognosis. In ESCA, the high expression of ABI1-EEJ-13-9 is a poor prognostic factor positively related to metastasis, while ABI1-EEJ-12-11 and ABI1-EEJ-13-12 are good prognostic factors negatively related to metastasis. In KICH, the high expression of ABI1-exon-7 is a poor prognostic factor positively related to metastasis, while ABI1-EEJ-14-13 is a good prognostic factor negatively related to metastasis. Except for ABI1-EEJ-14-13, the high expression of 10 other ABI1 factors was negatively correlated with metastasis, which was a key factor associated with the good prognosis of KIRC.

Table 6
Identification ABI1 molecular constitutive elements as independent prognostic factors in selected tumors

Cancer species	Independent risk factors	Prognosis	HR	Cancer species	Independent risk factors	Prognosis	HR
BLCA	ABI1-Exon-3	OS ${}^{*}$	HR $=$ 2.089, 95% (1.073–4.067), $P$ $=$ 0.030	BLCA	ABI1-Exon-10	DFS ${}^{*}$	HR $=$ 2.374, 95% (1.390–4.053), $P=$ 0.002
BRAC	ABI1-EEJ-11.2-9	OS ${}^{**}$	HR $=$ 0.401, 95% (0.219–0.735), $P=$ 0.003	BRAC	ABI1-EEJ 9-8	DFS ${}^{*}$	HR $=$ 0.496, 95% (0.300–0.820), $P=$ 0.006
	ABI1-EEJ-13-11.2	OS ${}^{**}$	HR $=$ 0.506, 95% (0.279–0.917), $P=$ 0.025
ESCA	ABI1-Exon-11.1-11.2	OS ${}^{**}$	HR $=$ 0.459, 95% (0.258–0.814), $P=$ 0.008	ESCA	ABI1-Exon-5	DFS ${}^{*}$	HR $=$ 4.622, 95% (0.980–21.804), $P=$ 0.053
	ABI1-EEJ-11.1-10	OS ${}^{*}$	HR $=$ 3.466, 95% (1.295–9.275), $P=$ 0.013
KIRC	ABI1-Exon-5	OS ${}^{**}$	HR $=$ 1.907, 95% (1.061–3.428), $P=$ 0.031	KIRC	$-$	$-$	$-$
	ABI1-Exon-9	OS ${}^{**}$	HR $=$ 0.282, 95% (0.149–0.536), $P=$ 0.000
	ABI1-Exon-11.1-11.2	OS ${}^{**}$	HR $=$ 0.418, 95% (0.266–0.656), $P=$ 0.000
KIRP	$-$	$-$	$-$	KIRP	ABI1-TSV-12	DFS ${}^{*}$	HR $=$ 5.544, 95% (1.970–15.607), $P=$ 0.001
					ABI1-Exon-7	DFS ${}^{*}$	HR $=$ 6.563, 95% (2.107–20.442), $P=$ 0.001
LIHC	ABI1-Exon-14	OS ${}^{*}$	HR $=$ 2.920, 95% (1.734–4.917), $P=$ 0.000	LIHC	ABI1-Exon-13	DFS ${}^{*}$	HR $=$ 1.514, 95% (1.032–2.222), $P=$ 0.034
					ABI1-Exon-14	DFS ${}^{*}$	HR $=$ 2.920, 95% (1.734–4.917), $P=$ 0.000
					ABI1-EEJ-11.2-9	DFS ${}^{*}$	HR $=$ 1.574, 95% (1.063-2.329), $P=$ 0.023
LUAD	ABI1-Exon-8	OS ${}^{*}$	HR $=$ 2.976, 95% (1.420-6.235), $P=$ 0.004	LUAD	$-$	$-$	$-$
	ABI1-EEJ-3-1	OS ${}^{*}$	HR $=$ 2.745, 95% (1.430-5.270), $P=$ 0.002
	ABI1-EEJ-4-3	OS ${}^{*}$	HR $=$ 0.310, 95% (0.160-0.6033), $P=$ 0.001
	ABI1-EEJ-13-11.2	OS ${}^{**}$	HR $=$ 0.415, 95% (0.215–0.801), $P=$ 0.009

${}^{*}$ Poor prognosis; ${}^{**}$ Good prognosis.

3.4 TCGA and TSVdb pan-cancer transcriptomic data analysis of ABI1 TSVs, exons, and EEJs identifies novel and independent prognostic markers (Table 6)

To screen and identify ABI1-related factors that can act as independent prognostic markers, we performed Cox proportional hazards regression analysis of ABI1 TSVs, exons, and EEJs. As shown in Table 6, a total of 13 ABI1-related and independent OS prognostic factors were identified from 7 cancer types (BLCA, BRAC, ESCA, KIRC, KIRP, LIHC, and LUAD) and eight ABI1-related and independent DFS prognostic factors were identified from 5 cancer types (BLCA, BRCA, ESCA, KIRP, and LIHC).

4. Discussion

Clinical, in vitro, and in vivo studies have shown that the abnormal expression and phosphorylation of ABI1 play an important role in the occurrence and progression of many tumors [9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26]. ABI1 functions as an oncogene in colorectal cancer, breast cancer, liver cancer, pancreatic cancer, and ovarian cancer, and patients suffering from these conditions with high ABI1 expression have a high rate of metastasis and a poor prognosis [10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, 23]. Meanwhile, it also functions as an anti-oncogene in gastric cancer and prostate cancer, so patients suffering from these conditions with high ABI1 expression have a low rate of metastasis and a good prognosis [9, 19, 20]. The mechanism by which ABI1 can form complexes with a variety of proteins is insufficient to explain these contradictory roles in different tumors, while the fact that ABI1 encodes multiple transcript variants (protein isoforms) may be important for explaining this. It is also an important link towards the future development of ABI1-based tumor diagnosis and treatment methods.

Here, we obtained clinical and RNA sequencing data from TCGA and TSVdb databases, and identified for the first time that the elevated expression of ABI1 total mRNA, TSVs, and molecular constitutive elements (exons and EEJs) was related to metastasis and prognosis, and their respective functions as independent prognostic factors in all eight selected cancer types (Tables 1 and 2). Among the eight selected cancer types, ABI1-related factors (total mRNA, TSVs, exons, and EEJs) have three different patterns of correlation with prognosis. In BLCA, KICH, KIRP, and LIHC, ABI1-related factors are associated with a poor prognosis in terms of OS, KIRC and BRAC are mainly associated with a good prognosis in terms of OS, while in ESCA and LUAD, these two correlation patterns coexist; this resembles our previous results on colorectal cancer [25, 26] and unpublished data]. This result for LIHC is consistent with that reported previously [12], while the result for BRAC is inconsistent [13]. This discrepancy may be mainly due to the difference between protein-based and nucleic acid-based detections, or because there is no further pathological grouping of BRAC.

The above three patterns of correlations between ABI1-related factors and prognosis suggest the need to use different research strategies to study the molecular mechanisms and application potential of ABI1 in various cancers. Regarding the first and second patterns, we need to know more about the mechanism regulating its expression and the types of protein complexes that it forms (WAVE2, NWASP, or EPS8 complex). For the third pattern, we also need to consider the synergy and/or antagonism of ABI1-TSVs and molecular constitutive elements, respectively.

Metastasis is the key factor leading to poor cancer prognosis, with which ABI1 is closely related. We analyzed the correlation between 35 ABI1-related prognostic factors (identified from eight tumor types) and metastasis-related indicators, which identified 14 metastatic and prognostic biomarkers from four cancer types. These results provide good reference data for clarifying the mechanism by which ABI1 affects tumor metastasis and developing targeted therapy for tumor metastasis from different perspectives. In BLCA, we can focus on the structure of ABI-TSV-3 and ABI1-exon-1 to explore the molecular mechanisms by which they affect metastasis and prognosis. In ESCA, based on the structural characteristics of EEJs (such as ABI1-EEJ-13-9), we can establish specific nested RT-PCR and/or rolling-circle amplification (RCA) technology for the evaluation of clinical metastasis and prognosis [29]. Based on the EEJ splicing pattern, we can also screen the target exon-skipping and exon-inclusion SSO (splicing switching oligonucleotides) [30] and minigene technology [31] for specific intervention in the splicing pattern of EEJ, so as to achieve the purpose of treatment.

As Table 6 shows, we identified 21 ABI1-related independent prognostic biomarkers, of which 13 OS-related biomarkers were from 6 cancer types and 8 DFS-related biomarkers were from 5 cancer types. Like the above metastatic and prognostic markers, most of them are categorized as markers expressed at exon [32] and/or EEJ levels. This also means that the expression of ABI1 total mRNA, TSVs, exons, and EEJs has different values for understanding the molecular mechanism by which ABI1 acts in tumors and developing ABI1-based diagnostic and therapeutic methods.

Taking the findings of this study together, using TCGA and TSVdb RNA-seq data, we systematically analyzed the correlations of the expression levels of ABI1 total mRNA, TSVs, exons, and EEJs with tumorigenesis and progression in many cancer types. We found that ABI1-TSVs and their molecular components (exons and EEJs) have significant specificity depending on the cancer type, which provides clinical data support for the accurate diagnosis and treatment of various cancer types based on ABI1. At the same time, it further proves that the ABI1 splicing mechanism is the key mechanism affecting the occurrence and development of various cancer types, in addition to abnormal expression and phosphorylation. The establishment of a complete set of research models for the screening, functional and mechanistic analysis, detection, and targeting of ABI1 TSVs and molecular components provides a good reference for research on such TSVs. At the same time, the establishment of research models based on ABI1-TSVs and molecular constitutive elements is also of great value for research on other gene TSVs.

This study is still limited to a preliminary analysis of bioinformatic data of ABI1-TSVs and molecular constitutive elements (exons and EEJs). In future study, the obtained results need to be further verified, in combination with in vivo/in vitro experiments and clinical studies.

Abbreviation

Bladder urothelial carcinoma: BLCA

Breast invasive carcinoma: BRCA

Cervical squamous cell carcinoma: CESC

Esophageal carcinoma: ESCA

Kidney chromophobe: KICH

Kidney renal clear cell carcinoma: KIRC

Kidney renal papillary cell carcinoma: KIRP

Liver hepatocellular carcinoma: LIHC

Lung adenocarcinoma: LUAD

Lung squamous cell carcinoma: LUSC

Ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma: OV

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: PAAD

Prostate adenocarcinoma: PRAD

Stomach adenocarcinoma: STAD

Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein family verprolin homologous protein 2: WAVE2

Neural Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome: NWASP

Epidermal growth factor receptor pathway substrate 8: EPS8

Phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase: PI3K

Author contributions

Conception: Jingzhu Guo and Weidong Yu.

Interpretation or analysis of data: Tingru Lin and Yifang Peng.

Preparation of the manuscript: Tingru Lin, Na Wu and Weidong Yu.

Revision for important intellectual content: Mei Li, Yulan Liu and Xin Yu.

Supervision: Na Wu and Weidong Yu.

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 30872923, 81672853, 32070116) and Peking University People’s Hospital Research and Development Foundation (No. RDB 2020-11). We also thank the editors from BioMed Proofreading LLC for comprehensive editing of this manuscript.

We acknowledge TCGA, TSVdb and NCBI database for providing their platforms and contributors for uploading their meaningful datasets.

References

Siegel

R.L.

Miller

K.D.

Fuchs

H.E.

and Jemal

, Cancer statistics, CA Cancer J Clin 72 (2022), 7–33.

Zhou

Wang

Zeng

Yin

Zhu

Chen

Wang

Liu

Zhang

Afshin

Gakidou

Glenn

Krish

V.S.

Miller-Petrie

M.K.

Mountjoy-Venning

W.C.

Mullany

E.C.

Redford

S.B.

Liu

Naghavi

Hay

S.I.

Wang

Murray

C.J.L.

and Liang

, Mortality, morbidity, and risk factors in China and its provinces, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017, Lancet 394 (2019), 1145–1158.

Fares

M.Y.

Khachfe

H.H.

Salhab

H.A.

and Fares

, Molecular principles of metastasis: a hallmark of cancer revisited, Signal Transduct Target Ther 5 (2020), 28.

Banerjee

Smith

Eccles

M.R.

Weeks

R.J.

and Chatterjee

, Epigenetic basis and targeting of cancer metastasis, Trends Cancer 8 (2022), 226–241.

Marzese

D.M.

Manughian-Peter

A.O.

Orozco

J.I.J.

and Hoon

D.S.B.

, Alternative splicing and cancer metastasis: prognostic and therapeutic applications, Clin Exp Metastasis 35 (2018), 393–402.

De Faria Poloni

and Bonatto

, Influence of transcriptional variants on metastasis, RNA Biol 15 (2018), 1006–1024.

Sebestyen

Zawisza

and Eyras

, Detection of recurrent alternative splicing switches in tumor samples reveals novel signatures of cancer, Nucleic Acids Res 43 (2015), 1345–56.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/10006.

Cui

Dong

Chen

Zhang

and Liu

, Downregulation of ABI1 expression affects the progression and prognosis of human gastric carcinoma, Med Oncol 27 (2010), 632–9.

10.

Steinestel

Bruderlein

Lennerz

J.K.

Steinestel

Kraft

Propper

Meineke

and Moller

, Expression and Y435-phosphorylation of Abelson interactor 1 (Abi1) promotes tumour cell adhesion, extracellular matrix degradation and invasion by colorectal carcinoma cells, Mol Cancer 13 (2014), 145.

11.

Tod

Hanley

C.J.

Morgan

M.R.

Rucka

Mellows

Lopez

M.A.

Kiely

Moutasim

K.A.

Frampton

S.J.

Sabnis

Fine

D.R.

Johnson

Marshall

J.F.

Scita

Jenei

and Thomas

G.J.

, Pro-migratory and TGF-beta-activating functions of alphavbeta6 integrin in pancreatic cancer are differentially regulated via an Eps8-dependent GTPase switch, J Pathol 243 (2017), 37–50.

12.

Wang

J.L.

Yan

T.T.

Long

and Cai

W.W.

, Oncogenic function and prognostic significance of Abelson interactor 1 in hepatocellular carcinoma, Int J Oncol 50 (2017), 1889–1898.

13.

Wang

Tran-Thanh

Moreno

J.C.

Cawthorn

T.R.

Jacks

L.M.

Wang

D.Y.

McCready

D.R.

and Done

S.J.

, Expression of Abl interactor 1 and its prognostic significance in breast cancer: a tissue-array-based investigation, Breast Cancer Res Treat 129 (2011), 373–86.

14.

Wang

Navab

Iakovlev

Leng

Zhang

Tsao

M.S.

Siminovitch

McCready

D.R.

and Done

S.J.

, Abelson interactor protein-1 positively regulates breast cancer cell proliferation, migration, and invasion, Mol Cancer Res 5 (2007), 1031–9.

15.

Sun

Zhuang

Gilmore

W.C.

Cobos

Tao

and Dai

, Abl interactor 1 regulates Src-Id1-matrix metalloproteinase 9 axis and is required for invadopodia formation, extracellular matrix degradation and tumor growth of human breast cancer cells, Carcinogenesis 30 (2009), 2109–16.

16.

Clough

Sun

Abbott

B.L.

Hogan

C.J.

and Dai

, Bcr-Abl induces abnormal cytoskeleton remodeling, beta1 integrin clustering and increased cell adhesion to fibronectin through the Abl interactor 1 pathway, J Cell Sci 120 (2007), 1436–46.

17.

Sun

Clough

Cobos

Tao

and Dai

, Abi1 gene silencing by short hairpin RNA impairs Bcr-Abl-induced cell adhesion and migration in vitro and leukemogenesis in vivo, Carcinogenesis 29 (2008), 1717–24.

18.

Sun

Wang

Tao

and Dai

, MT1-MMP as a downstream target of BCR-ABL/ABL interactor 1 signaling: polarized distribution and involvement in BCR-ABL-stimulated leukemic cell migration, Leukemia 22 (2008), 1053–6.

19.

Xiong

Chorzalska

Dubielecka

P.M.

White

J.R.

Vedvyas

Hedvat

C.V.

Haimovitz-Friedman

Koutcher

J.A.

Reimand

Bader

G.D.

Sawicki

J.A.

and Kotula

, Disruption of Abi1/Hssh3bp1 expression induces prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in the conditional Abi1/Hssh3bp1 KO mice, Oncogenesis 1 (2012), e26.

20.

Nath

Mondragon

Post

Chen

White

J.R.

Hryniewicz-Jankowska

Caza

Kuznetsov

V.A.

Hehnly

Jamaspishvili

Berman

D.M.

Zhang

Kung

S.H.Y.

Fazli

Gleave

M.E.

Bratslavsky

Pandolfi

P.P.

and Kotula

, Abi1 loss drives prostate tumorigenesis through activation of EMT and non-canonical WNT signaling, Cell Commun Signal 17 (2019), 120.

21.

Zhang

Tang

Chen

Duan

Xiao

Liu

and Shen

, Upregulation of Abelson interactor protein 1 predicts tumor progression and poor outcome in epithelial ovarian cancer, Hum Pathol 46 (2015), 1331–40.

22.

Chen

Pan

Z.K.

and Huang

, Integrity of SOS1/ EPS8/ABI1 tri-complex determines ovarian cancer metastasis, Cancer Res 70 (2010), 9979–90.

23.

Fang

Chen

Zhu

J.Y.

Wang

Teng

Ding

H.F.

Jing

S.B.

and Huang

, Epithelial-mesenchymal transition of ovarian cancer cells is sustained by Rac1 through simultaneous activation of MEK1/2 and Src signaling pathways, Oncogene 36 (2017), 1546–1558.

24.

Baba

R.A.

Bhat

H.F.

Wani

L.A.

Bashir

Wani

M.M.

Qadri

S.K.

and Khanday

F.A.

, E3B1/ABI-1 isoforms are down-regulated in cancers of human gastrointestinal tract, Dis Markers 32 (2012), 273–9.

25.

Peng

Y.F.

Guo

J.Z.

Zhang

Chen

J.Y.

Lin

T.R.

and Yu

W.D.

, Abelson interactor 1 splice isoform-L plays an anti-oncogenic role in colorectal carcinoma through interactions with WAVE2 and full-length Abelson interactor 1, World J Gastroenterol 27 (2021), 1595–1615.

26.

Zhang

Zhong

Chen

Lin

Sun

Wang

Liu

Zhang

Liu

Guo

and Yu

, The roles and prognostic significance of ABI1-TSV-11 expression in patients with left-sided colorectal cancer, Sci Rep 11 (2021), 10734.

27.

TCGA, http://cancergenome.nih.gov.

28.

Sun

Duan

Chen

Zhang

Lai

and Zhang

, TSVdb: a web-tool for TCGA splicing variants analysis, BMC Genomics 19 (2018), 405.

29.

Sun

Zhao

Liang

Jiang

and Tian

, Extrachromosomal circular DNAs are common and functional in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, Ann Transl Med 9 (2021), 1464.

30.

Zhang

Sun

Wang

Liu

and Zhang

, The landscape and biological relevance of aberrant alternative splicing events in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, Oncogene 40 (2021), 4184–4197.

31.

Caswell

J.L.

Camarda

Zhou

A.Y.

Huntsman

Brenner

S.E.

Zaitlen

Goga

and Ziv

, Multiple breast cancer risk variants are associated with differential transcript isoform expression in tumors, Hum Mol Genet 24 (2015), 7421–31.

32.

Yin

Yan

Wang

Deng

Tang

Cao

and Qiu

, Detecting Prognosis Risk Biomarkers for Colon Cancer Through Multi-Omics-Based Prognostic Analysis and Target Regulation Simulation Modeling, Front Genet 11 (2020), 524.

Pan-cancer transcriptomic data of ABI1 transcript variants and molecular constitutive elements identifies novel cancer metastatic and prognostic biomarkers

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

OBJECTIVE:

METHODS:

RESULTS:

CONCLUSIONS:

Keywords

1. Introduction

2.1 Acquisition of clinicopathological information and RNA sequencing data

Table 2 The correlation between ABI1 total mRNA, TSVs and OS/DFS in selected tumors

2.3 Identification of ABI1-related and independent prognostic biomarkers in pan-cancer

2.4 Statistical analysis

3. Results

3.1 Correlation between clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival (OS)/disease-free survival (DFS) in various tumors

3.2 Correlations of ABI1 total mRNA, TSVs, exon, and EEJs expression levels with overall survival (OS)/disease-free survival (DFS) in eight selected cancers

Table 5 Identification ABI1 TSV and molecular constitutive elements as metastatic and prognostic biomarkers in selected tumors

Table 6 Identification ABI1 molecular constitutive elements as independent prognostic factors in selected tumors

4. Discussion

Abbreviation

Author contributions

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

References

Table 2
The correlation between ABI1 total mRNA, TSVs and OS/DFS in selected tumors

Table 5
Identification ABI1 TSV and molecular constitutive elements as metastatic and prognostic biomarkers in selected tumors

Table 6
Identification ABI1 molecular constitutive elements as independent prognostic factors in selected tumors