Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Gastric cancer (GC) remains poor prognosis and survival issues due to the resistance of chemotherapies, such as cisplatin. The long non-coding RNA small nucleolar RNA host gene 7 (lncRNA-SNHG7) is known as an oncogenic molecule in diverse cancers. Here, we demonstrate that SNHG7 was significantly upregulated in gastric cancer and positively correlated with cisplatin resistance of gastric cancer cells that SNHG7 was significantly upregulated in cisplatin resistant cells. Silencing SNHG7 dramatically sensitized cisplatin resistant cells. In contrast, a negative correlation between lncRNA-SNHG7 and miR-34a was found that miR-34a was downregulated in gastric cancer patient tissues and significantly sensitized cisplatin resistant gastric cancer cells. Intriguingly, bioinformatical analysis indicated miR-34a has putative biding site for SNHG7 and such negative association between SNHG7 and miR-34a was verified in gastric cancer tissues. The cisplatin resistant cells displayed increased glycolysis rate and SNHG7 promoted cellular glycolysis rate of gastric cancer cells. Luciferase assay illustrated LDHA, a glycolysis enzyme, was the direct target of miR-34a. Importantly, inhibiting SNHG7 successfully suppressed LDHA expressions and sensitized cisplatin resistant cells and such inhibitory effects could be recovered by further anti-miR-34a. These findings suggest an important regulator mechanism for the SNHG7-mediated cisplatin resistance via miR-34a/LDHA-glycolysis axis.

Keywords

Gastric cancer lncRNA-SNHG7 miR-34a cisplatin resistance Warburg effect

1. Introduction

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide and represents a high incidence of cancer-related death [1]. Currently, GC is the fifth most frequently diagnosed cancer and the third leading cause of cancer death [1, 2]. The primary treatment approach is a surgical resection with combination of chemotherapy such as cisplatin, a platinum-based compound [3]. Despite the recent discoveries in surgical techniques and chemotherapeutic agents, the mortality and average 5-year survival rate did not effectively improved [4]. Seriously, although impressive clinical responses were observed from those chemotherapeutic agents initially, development of acquired chemoresistant cancer phenotypes limited the clinical applications of them [5]. Thus, investigation of underlining molecular mechanisms for chemoresistance is an urgent task to effectively improve treatment results.

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are a group of RNAs with relative long ( $\sim$ 200 nucleotides), and without protein-coding capacity [6]. Accumulating evidence indicates that lncRNAs involve in diverse biological processes as essential regulators including cancer cell proliferation, apoptosis, carcinogenesis, chemoresistance and metastasis [7]. The lncRNA SNHG7 is located on chromosome 9q34.3, with a length of 2176 bp [8]. Recent studies revealed SNHG7 was negatively associated with cancer survival rate and upregulated in multiple cancers, such as colon cancer [9], lung cancer [10], bladder cancer [11], and breast cancer [12], suggesting an oncogenic function of SNHG7. MicroRNAs are non-coding RNAs with relative short length ( $\sim$ 20–25 nucleotides), which complimentary bind to the 3’-untranslated region (3’-UTR) of mRNA and subsequently cause degradation of the target mRNA [13]. It is widely recognized that lncRNAs participate in post-transcriptional regulation by interacting with miRNAs [14]. However, the precise roles and biological mechanisms of the SNHG7-miRNA association in the chemoresistance of gastric cancer are still under investigation.

In cancer cells, the rate of glucose metabolism is dramatically higher than untransformed cells, even with enough oxygen, a phenomenon known as the “Warburg effect” [15]. Moreover, the Warburg effect is apparently associated with chemosensitivity of cancer cells [16]. A recent study revealed that 5-Fu resistant cancer cells displayed upregulated glycolysis rate, and such chemoresistance could be effectively overcome by inhibiting glycolysis enzyme, PKM2 [17], suggesting glycolysis inhibition of cancer cells could enhance the chemotherapeutic effects of anti-cancer agents.

In this study, we aimed to explore the functions of SNHG7 in chemoresistant gastric cancer cells. The potential mechanisms of SNHG7/miR-34a-mediated cisplatin resistance will be investigated. In addition, the specific roles of SNHG7 in regulating the cellular glucose metabolism of gastric cancer cells will be examined. Our study will contribute to develop novel and promising targets against the cisplatin resistant gastric cancer.

2. Materials and methods

2.1 Patient samples

This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital (number 2020KY012-KS001). Human gastric cancer tissue samples used for this study came from 30 gastric cancer and 30 normal gastric tissues. Samples were collected from the Department of General Surgery, the Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital from January 2017 to June 2018. All patients received no radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy before surgery. Upon dissection, tissues were stored immediately at liquid nitrogen and then transferred to $-$ 80 ${}^{\circ}$ C until use. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

2.2 Cell culture and reagents

The human gastric epithelial cell line and gastric cancer cell lines were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). Cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 $\mu$ g/ml streptomycin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA) at 37 ${}^{\circ}$ C under a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO ${}_{2}$ . The establishment of cisplatin resistance gastric cancer cells from HGC27 was performed according to previous descriptions [18]. Rabbit monoclonal anti-LDHA (#3582), anti-Hexokinase 2 (#2867); anti-PKM 2 (#4053); and anti- $\beta$ -actin (#4970) antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA). Cisplatin were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Shanghai, China).

2.3 Prediction of lncRNA-miRNA and miRNA-mRNA interactions

The interaction between lnRNA-SNHG7 and miR-34a was predicted by starBase of ENCORI (http://star base.sysu.edu.cn/) according to previous reports [19]. The binding of miR-34a on 3’UTR of LDHA was predicted from the TargetScan.org.

2.4 Plasmid, shRNA and miRNAs transfection

The gastric cancer cells were cultured to about 80% confluence in 24 or 96-well plates then cells using were transfected with the indicated shRNA, miRNAs, or plasmid DNA using Lipofectamine 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The shRNA-SNHG7 or negative control was conducted by RiboBio (Guangzhou, China). The miR-34a precursor, miR-34a inhibitors or negative control were purchased from GenePharma (Shanghai, China) and transfected at 50 nM. The overexpression plasmid of LDHA was purchased from Origen.com and transfected at 2 ug. After 48 hours transfection, the cells were harvested for downstream experiments.

2.5 RNA isolation and qRT-PCR

The total RNA was extracted from the gastric tumor tissues or adjacent normal gastric tissues by the Trizol method according to the manufacturer’s instructions. First-strand cDNA was synthesized by reversely transcribing RNA into complementary DNA from 500 ng total RNA using a SuperScript First-Standard Synthesis System (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. qRT-PCR experiments were performed using the SYBR Green qPCR Master Mix (ThermoFisher Scientific, Shanghai, China). The fold changes were analyzed using the 2 ${}^{-\Delta\Delta\text{Ct}}$ method. Experiments were performed in triplicate and repeated three times.

2.6 Luciferase reporter assays

The luciferase assay was performed according to previous descriptions [20]. 5 $\times$ 10 ${}^{4}$ gastric cancer cells were grown in a 24-well plate, and co-transfected with pMIR vectors containing wild-type or mutated 3’UTR of LDHA reporter plasmid and miR-34a precursor or negative control miRNAs by lipofectamine 2000. Forty-eight hours after transfection, luciferase activity was measured using the Dual Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Experiments were performed in triplicate and repeated three times.

2.7 Measurements of glucose metabolism rate

The glucose uptake and lactate product measurements were performed using the glucose test kit (Applygen Technologies, Beijing, China) and the L-lactate assay kit (BioVision, Milpitas, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Results were normalized according to the cell number by dividing the readings from treated cells to that of control cells. Experiments were performed in triplicate and repeated three times.

2.8 Cell viability assay

The cell viability assay was performed by MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) method (Sigma-Aldrich, Shanghai, China) according to the manufacture’s instruction. Briefly, cells (5 $\times$ 10 ${}^{3}$ cells/well) were seeded into 96-well plates. The next day cells were washed by PBS, 0.5 mg/ml MTT solution was added into cells and cultured at 37 ${}^{\circ}$ C incubator for 2 hours. Cells were then incubated with 100 ul DMSO for 2 hours at 37 ${}^{\circ}$ C. The optical density (OD) of formazan concentrations was determined at 540 nm. Results were normalized by cell numbers.

2.9 Western blot assay

Total proteins were extracted from gastric cancer tissues or cells using the RIPA buffer with protease inhibitor cocktail (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. After 15 min incubation with lysis buffer on ice, samples were centrifuged at 10,000 g for 10 min at 4 ${}^{\circ}$ C. Equal amount protein from each sample with loading buffer were separated by 10% of sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred onto PVDF membrane (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA). The membranes were blocked by 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) then were incubated with the specific primary antibodies rabbit monoclonal anti-Hexokinase2, anti-LDHA and anti-PKM2 at 1:1000 for measurements of glycolysis rate at 4 ${}^{\circ}$ C for overnight. Membranes were incubated with the diluted horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labeled secondary antibody (goat anti-rabbit IgG) (1:3000) for 1 hour at room temperature. The membranes were then visualized with the enhanced electrochemiluminescence (Solarbio, Beijing, China) and photographed.

2.10 Statistical analysis

Results were analyzed by the Prism 6.0 software package (GraphPad Software, Inc.). All experiments were performed three times. Paired student $t$ -tests or unpaired $t$ -tests tests were used to compare data from two groups. One-way ANOVA method was used for analyzing data from multiple groups. $p<$ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Figure 1.

SNHG7 is upregulated in gastric tumor and contributes to cisplatin resistance. (A) The expressions of SNHG7 in 30 pairs of gastric cancer tissues and adjacent normal tissues were detected by qRT-PCR. (B) The expressions of SNHG7 in normal gastric epithelial cells and five gastric cancer cell lines were detected by qRT-PCR. $\beta$ -actin was an internal control. (C) SNHG7 overexpression plasmid or control plasmid was transfected in to HGC27 and (D) AGS cells for 48 hours, the expressions of SNHG7 were detected by qRT-PCR. (E) HGC27 and (F) cells without or with SNHG7 overexpression were treated with cisplatin at the indicated concentrations for 48 hours, the cell viabilities were measured by MTT assay. The error bars in graphs represented SD, and each experiment was repeated three times. ${}^{*}p<$ 0.05; ${}^{**}p<$ 0.01; ${}^{***}p<$ 0.001.

Figure 2.

SNHG7 is positively correlated with cisplatin resistance of gastric cancer cells. (A) Verifying the cisplatin resistance from HGC27 cells. HGC27 parental and cisplatin resistant cells were treated with cisplatin at 0, 5, 10, 15, 20 or 25 $\mu$ M for 48 hours, the cell viabilities were measured by MTT assay. (B) Expressions of SNHG7 were compared between HGC27 parental and cisplatin resistant cells by qRT-PCR. (C) HGC27 cisplatin resistant cells were transfected with control shRNA or sh SNHG7 for 48 hours, the expressions of SNHG7 were detected by qRT-PCR. $\beta$ -actin was an internal control. (D) The above cells were treated with cisplatin at 0, 5, 10, 15, 20 or 25 $\mu$ M for 48 hours, followed by cell viability measurements by MTT assay. The error bars in graphs represented SD. ${}^{*}p<$ 0.05; ${}^{**}p<$ 0.01; ${}^{***}p<$ 0.001.

Figure 3.

miR-34a is downregulated in gastric cancers and negatively correlates with cisplatin resistance. (A) The expressions of miR-34a in 30 pairs of gastric cancer tissues and adjacent normal tissues were detected by qRT-PCR. (B) The expressions of miR-34a in normal gastric epithelial cells and five gastric cancer cell lines were detected by qRT-PCR. Human U6 was an internal control. (C) Expressions of miR-34a from HGC27 parental and cisplatin resistant cells were detected by qRT-PCR. (D) HGC27 cisplatin resistant without or with miR-34a overexpression were treated with cisplatin at the indicated concentrations for 48 hours, cell viabilities were measured by MTT assay. The error bars in graphs represented SD, and each experiment was repeated three times. ${}^{*}p<$ 0.05; ${}^{**}p<$ 0.01; ${}^{***}p<$ 0.001.

Figure 4.

SNHG7 inhibits miR-34a expression through interaction with miR-34a. (A) Prediction of binding sequence of miR-34a on SNHG7 from starBase. (B) Negative correlation between miR-34a and SNHG7 expression in gastric cancer tissues. (C) HGC27 and AGS cells were transfected with control or SNHG7 overexpression plasmid for 48 hours, expressions of miR-34a were determined by qRT-PCR. (D) HGC27 and AGS cells were transfected with control shRNA or SNHG7 shRNA for 48 hours, expressions of miR-34a were determined by qRT-PCR. The error bars in graphs represented SD, and each experiment was repeated three times. ${}^{*}p<$ 0.05; ${}^{***}p<$ 0.001.

Figure 5.

SNHG7 promotes glycolysis rates of gastric cancer cells. (A) The glucose uptake and lactate product were measured from the HGC27 parental and cisplatin resistant cells. (B) Protein expressions of glycolysis enzymes from HGC27 parental and cisplatin resistant cells were determined by Western blot. $\beta$ -actin was an internal control. (C) HGC27 and (D) AGS cells were transfected with control or SNHG7 overexpression vector for 48 hours, the glucose uptake and lactate product were measured. (E) HGC27 and (F) AGS cells were transfected with control miRNAs or miR-34a precursor for 48 hours, the glucose uptake and lactate product were measured. The error bars in graphs represented SD, and each experiment was repeated three times. ${}^{*}p<$ 0.05; ${}^{**}p<$ 0.01; ${}^{***}p<$ 0.001.

Figure 6.

miR-34a directly targets 3’UTR of LDHA mRNA. (A) Bioinformatic analysis predicted that 3’UTR of LDHA mRNA harbored miR-34a binding sites. (B) HGC27 and AGS cells were transfected with control miRNAs or miR-34a. The protein expressions of LDHA were determined by Western blot. $\beta$ -actin was an internal control. (C) The significantly negative correlation between miR-34a and LHDA mRNA expressions was observed in gastric cancer tissues. (D) HGC and (E) AGS cells were co-transfected with control or miR-34a precursor and wild type 3’UTR or binding site mutant 3’UTR of LDHA for 48 hours. The luciferase activity was measured. The error bars in graphs represented SD, and each experiment was repeated three times. ${}^{**}p<$ 0.01; ${}^{***}p<$ 0.001.

Figure 7.

Restoration of LDHA recovers the glycolysis and cisplatin resistance of gastric cancer cells. (A) HGC27 cisplatin resistant cells were transfected with control, miR-34a alone or miR-34a plus LDHA overexpression plasmid for 48 hours, the expressions of LDHA were measured by Western blot. $\beta$ -actin was an internal control. (B) HGC27 cisplatin resistant cells were transfected as above, the glucose uptake and (C) lactate product were measured. (D) HGC27 and (E) AGS cells were transfected with control, miR-34a alone or miR-34a plus LDHA overexpression plasmid for 48 hours, cells were treated with cisplatin at the indicated concentrations for 48 hours, cell viability was measured by MTT assay. (F) HGC27 cisplatin resistant cells were transfected with control, miR-34a alone or miR-34a plus LDHA overexpression plasmid for 48 hours, cells were treated with cisplatin at 0, 5, 10, 15, 20 or 25 $\mu$ M for 48 hours, cell viability was measured by MTT assay. The error bars in graphs represented SD, and each experiment was repeated three times. ${}^{**}p<$ 0.01; ${}^{***}p<$ 0.001.

Figure 8.

The SNHG7-promoted cisplatin resistance is through miR-34a/LDHA axis. (A) HGC27 cells were transfected with control, SNHG7 shRNA alone or SNHG7 shRNA plus miR-34a inhibitor for 48 hours, protein expressions of LDHA were detected by Western blot. $\beta$ -actin was an internal control. (B) The above cells were subjected to qRT-PCR assay to compare the miR-34a expressions. (C) The glucose uptake, (D) lactate product and (E) mRNA expressions of glycolysis enzymes were measured from the above cells. (F) HGC27 cisplatin resistant cells were transfected with control, SNHG7 shRNA alone or SNHG7 shRNA plus miR-34a inhibitor for 48 hours, followed by treatments with cisplatin at the indicated concentrations for 48 hours. Cell viabilities were examined by MTT assay. The error bars in graphs represented SD, and each experiment was repeated three times. ${}^{**}p<$ 0.01; ${}^{***}p<$ 0.001.

3. Results

3.1 LncRNA-SNHG7 is upregulated in gastric cancer and positively correlates with cisplatin resistance

To investigate the clinical relevance of SNHG7 during the progression of gastric cancer, we collected the gastric tumor tissues and their corresponding adjacent normal tissues ( $n=$ 30). Results indicated that the SNHG7 levels were significantly increased in tumor tissues compared with gastric normal tissues (Fig. 1A). Meanwhile, the SNHG7 was significantly upregulated in five gastric cancer cells compared with normal gastric epithelial cells (Fig. 1B), suggesting an oncogenic role of SNHG7 in gastric cancer. Since the acquired chemo-resistance frequently occurs in gastric cancers and the mechanisms are not well understood. We first assessed the effects of SNHG7 on cisplatin sensitivity of gastric cancer cells. SNHG7 was overexpressed in HGC27 and AGS cells by transfection of SNHG7 overexpression plasmid (Fig. 1C and D). As we expected, gastric cancer cells with SNHG7 overexpression showed increased cell viability under cisplatin treatments (Fig. 1E and F). To further elucidate the role of lncRNA-SNHG7 in cisplatin resistance of human gastric cancer, we established a cisplatin resistant cell line using the HGC27 cell line [18]. As shown in Fig. 2A, parental HGC27 cells, which have a cisplatin IC50 at 8.32 $\mu$ M, displayed reduced cell viabilities with cisplatin treatments. But the IC50 of cisplatin resistant cells (23.72 $\mu$ M) was significantly higher compared with that of parental cells (Fig. 2A). Furthermore, we observed the cisplatin resistant cells displayed significantly increased lncRNA-SNHG7 expression (Fig. 2B). To investigate the direct roles of SNHG7 in cisplatin sensitivity, we effectively knocked down the SNHG7 expressions by transfecting SNHG7 shRNA into HGC27 cisplatin resistant cells (Fig. 2C). Cell viability results demonstrated cisplatin resistant gastric cancer cells with SNHG7 inhibition were more sensitive to cisplatin (Fig. 2D). The cisplatin IC50 of cells with SNHG7 knockdown was significantly lower than that of control cells. Taken together, the above results demonstrated SNHG7 is positively associated with cisplatin resistance in gastric cancer.

3.2 miR-34a is downregulated in gastric cancer and negatively correlate with cisplatin resistance

We next to evaluate the molecular mechanisms for the SNHG7-mediated cisplatin resistance. Previous studies have demonstrated lncRNAs can act as miRNA sponges to suppress their regulatory effects on targets mRNAs [19]. Moreover, miR-34a has been reported to be negatively correlated with cisplatin resistance in osteosarcoma [21], suggesting miR-34a might be a downstream effector of SNHG7, which involves in cisplatin resistance. Expectedly, the miR-34a expressions were significantly downregulated in tumor tissues compared with gastric normal tissues (Fig. 3A). Similar trend was observed that miR-34a was suppressed in gastric cancer cells compared with normal gastric epithelial cells (Fig. 3B). Consistently, miR-34a was found downregulated in cisplatin resistant HGC27 cells compared with parental cells (Fig. 3C). Thus, we hypothesized miR-34a could sensitizes gastric cancer cells to chemotherapy. Results in Fig. 3D illustrated overexpression of miR-34a significantly increased the sensitivity of cisplatin resistant cells (Fig. 3D). The IC50 of miR-34a overexpressing cells was 7.62 $\mu$ M, which is around 3 folds less than that of cisplatin resistant cells. In summary, the above results demonstrated miR-34a has suppressive roles in gastric cancer cells and could sensitize cisplatin resistant cells.

3.3 SNHG7 suppresses miR-34a expression via sponging

Accumulating evidence indicated that lncRNAs contain motifs which are complementary to miRNAs sequences to negatively regulate miRNAs. A putative complementary sequence was predicted for miR-34a in SNHG7 Starbase (http://starbase.sysu.edu.cn/index.php) (Fig. 4A), suggesting SNHG7 could inhibit miR-34a expression via direct binding to seeding region of miR-34a. Meanwhile, we found a negative correlation between SNHG7 and miR-34a in gastric tumor specimen (Fig. 4B). Consistently, overexpression of SNHG7 in gastric cancer cells significantly inhibited miR-34a expressions (Fig. 4C). On the other way, knocking down SNHG7 obviously upregulated miR-34a expressions (Fig. 4D). These results revealed SNHG7 suppresses miR-34a expression by sponging it.

3.4 Cisplatin resistant gastric cancer cells showed elevated glycolysis rate

Accumulating evidence suggests that malignant cancer cells demand increased glucose metabolism via a higher anaerobic glycolysis rate, a phenomenon was known as “the Warburg effect” [15]. Moreover, the acquired chemoresistance of cancer cells were frequently associated with higher glycolysis rate [16]. To investigate the molecular mechanism for the SNHG7/miR-34a-meidated cisplatin resistance, we compared the glycolysis rates of HGC27 parental and cisplatin resistant cells. Interestingly, the glucose uptake and lactate product, two glycolysis speed limit steps [15], as well as glycolysis key enzymes were apparently increased in cisplatin resistant cells (Fig. 5A and B), indicating the dysregulated cellular glycolysis rate was tightly associated with cisplatin resistance. Consistent results from Fig. 5C and D demonstrated overexpression of SNHG7 facilitated glucose uptake and lactate product of gastric cancer cells. On the contrary, overexpression of miR-34a significantly suppressed glycolysis rates of HGC27 and AGS cells (Fig. 5E and F). These results suggested targeting the SNHG7-promoted cellular glycolysis rate might contribute to anti-chemoresistance of gastric tumor.

3.5 miR-34a directly targets glycolysis enzyme LDHA to increase the cisplatin sensitivity of gastric cancer cells

To identify the potential target of miR-34a, we analyzed the miR-34a binding sites on mRNAs through the TargetScan databases. Among candidates, we found the 3’-UTR of human LDHA, a glycolysis key enzyme which catalyzes the convert of pyruvate to lactate, contains a putative miR-34a binding region (Fig. 6A). Consistent results from Spearman’s correlation analysis demonstrated overexpression of miR-34a significantly decreased the protein levels of LDHA (Fig. 6B). Importantly, the reverse correlation between miR-34a and LDHA mRNA expressions was found in gastric tumor specimen (Fig. 6C). To verify whether miR-34a could directly bind to the 3-UTR region of LDHA mRNA, a luciferase reporter assay was performed by co-transfecting control miRNA, miR-34a precursor and original-LDHA 3’UTR or nucleotides mutant LDHA 3’UTR (Fig. 6A) into HGC27 and AGS cells. Luciferase assay showed that miR-34a significantly decreased the luciferase activity of plasmid containing the wild type LDHA 3’-UTR but not the binding site mutant LDHA 3’-UTR. Taken together, the above results strongly demonstrated miR-34a could directly target 3’UTR of LDHA mRNA in gastric cancer cells and tumor. To test whether the miR-34a/LDHA-mediated glycolysis inhibition led to cisplatin sensitization, we transfected HGC27 cisplatin resistant cells with control miRNAs, or miR-34a precursor or miR-34a plus LDHA overexpression plasmid. Western blot results demonstrated co-transfection of miR-34a and LDHA successfully rescued the LDHA protein expressions (Fig. 7A). Furthermore, the glucose uptake (Fig. 7B) and lactate product (Fig. 7C) were significantly recovered in miR-34a and LDHA co-transfected cells. We next asked whether the miR-34a/LDHA axis was response for the miR-34a-mediated cisplatin sensitization by rescue experiments. As we expected, restoration of LDHA expression in miR-34a overexpressed cells contradicted the miR-34a-mediated cisplatin sensitization in gastric cancer cells (Fig. 7D and E). Importantly, recovering LDHA successfully restored the cisplatin resistance of HGC27 cisplatin resistant cells (Fig. 7F).

3.6 The acquired cisplatin resistance is through the SNHG7-miR-34a-glycolysis axis

Our results revealed SNHG7 negatively regulated miR-34a, suggesting that the miR-34a/LDHA binding was associated with the SNHG7-mediated cisplatin resistance. To test this hypothesis, lncRNA-SNHG7 was knocked down in HGC27 cells, or knock down SNHG7 plus anti-miR-34a treatment. We detected inhibition of endogenous SNHG7 significantly induced miR-34a expressions and downregulated LDHA expressions (Fig. 8A and B). Moreover, knockdown SNHG7 plus anti-miR-34a recovered the LDHA protein levels in HGC27 cells (Fig. 8A and B), suggesting SNHG7 could upregulate LDHA through suppressing miR-34a in gastric cancer cells. Furthermore, inhibiting the SNHG7 downregulation-induced miR-34a apparently recovered glucose uptake and lactate product (Fig. 8C and D). Consistent results in Fig. 8E showed GLUT1, HK2 and PKM2 which are glycolysis key enzymes were significantly downregulated by SNHG7 knocking down, however, such downregulation was rescued by further miR-34a inhibition (Fig. 8E). Finally, we transfected HGC27 cisplatin resistant cells with control, sh SNHG7 or sh SNHG7 plus anti-miR-34a, followed by treatments with increased concentrations of cisplatin. Expectedly, SHHG7 knockdown cells showed increased cisplatin sensitivity, however, such sensitization effect was further recovered by miR-34a inhibition, suggesting the SNHG7-mediated cisplatin resistance was through the miR-34a-LDHA axis.

4. Discussion

Gastric cancer, one of the most common types of cancer, represents a high incidence of cancer-related death. Although impressive clinical responses were observed from primary therapeutic approaches such as surgical resection with combination of chemotherapy, a large group of patients developed acquired chemoresistant cancer phenotypes, which limit the clinical applications of them [3, 4]. Thus, investigation of effective therapeutic treatments against chemoresistance is an urgent task. Previous studies revealed multiple signaling molecules which were known important regulators for gastric cancer cisplatin sensitivity, such as RAP2A which led to increase cisplatin resistance [22]. In addition, the GPR30-mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) also contributed to cisplatin resistance [23]. Accumulated evidence demonstrated that lncRNAs have critical regulators during cancer development by functioning as oncogenes or tumor suppressors [7]. This study revealed the oncogenic roles of lncRNA SNHG7 in gastric cancer. We demonstrated that SNHG7 was significantly upregulated in gastric cancer tissues and cells and positively associated with cisplatin resistance. SNHG7 was apparently upregulated cisplatin resistant gastric cancer cell line, indicating targeting SNHG7 might effectively sensitize gastric cancer cells to cisplatin. Although previous studies have described oncogenic roles of SHHG7 in multiple cancers, our results firstly demonstrated the functions of SNHG7 in cisplatin resistance of gastric cancer.

It is widely recognized that miRNAs play an essential role in regulating cancer cell malignant progresses [13]. Among them, miR-34a was known to be downregulated and act as a tumor suppressive miRNA in multiple cancers [24]. In addition, miR-129 and miR-424 have been reported to regulate cisplatin resistance of gastric cancer through direct targeting SMURF1 and MAPK3, respectively [25, 26]. Recent studies demonstrated lncRNAs exert its function to negatively regulate gene expressions through directly interaction with microRNAs as competing endogenous RNAs to further upregulate the targets of miRNAs. SNHG7 has been revealed to directly inhibit miR-5095, which targeted CTNNB1 mRNA to subsequently suppress the Wnt/ $\beta$ -catenin signaling pathway of glioblastoma cells [27]. In addition, SNHG7 was associated with a poor clinical outcome of lung cancer patients through functioning as a competitive endogenous RNA to inhibit miR-193b [28]. In this study, we found that SNHG7 could specifically bind to the seeding region of tumor suppressor miR-34a and promote the cisplatin resistance via upregulated the targets of miR-34a. Consistent results demonstrated overexpression of NEAT1 inhibited miR-34a and NEAT1 downregulation led to significantly increased miR-34a. This negative correlation was further verified in gastric cancer tissues. Furthermore, luciferase assay demonstrated miR-34a could direct target LDHA. Rescue experiments verified the miR-34a-suppressed glycolysis was through direct targeting LDHA.

Cancer cells display adaption to tumor micro-environment by switching oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) to less efficient glycolysis for not only producing energy but suppling building blocks for their high proliferation rate, a phenomenon called Warburg effect. An increasing number of recent studies have demonstrated that the Warburg effect favors tumor chemoresistance by diverse mechanisms [15]. Consequently, inhibition of glycolysis effectively decreased the cell proliferation rate and overcame drug resistance [16]. In this study, we consistently showed cisplatin resistant cells have upregulated glycolysis rate and lncRNA-NEAT1 expressions, compared with parental cells. Restoration of LDHA in miR-34a overexpressing gastric cancer cells recovers cisplatin resistance. Importantly, our date demonstrated that inhibition of NEAT1 significantly sensitized cisplatin resistant cells and such sensitization was further blocked by miR-34a inhibition, suggesting the NEAT1-promoted cisplatin resistance was through miR-34a/LDHA axis.

In summary, we report lncRNA-NEAT1 contributed to cisplatin resistance of gastric cancer cells. NEAT1 suppressed miR-34a expression, leading to a de-repression of LDHA. These findings emphasized an ceRNA role of SNHG7 against miR-34a via regulation of glycolysis during chemoresistance, presenting lncRNA-NEAT1 as a promising therapeutic target for overcoming cisplatin resistance of gastric cancer.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest

The authors in this study declare no conflicts of interest.

References

den Hoed

C.M.

and Kuipers

E.J.

, Gastric cancer: How can we reduce the incidence of this disease? Curr Gastroenterol Rep 18(7) (2016), 34.

Guggenheim

D.E.

and Shah

M.A.

, Gastric cancer epidemiology and risk factors, J Surg Oncol 107(3) (2013), 230–236.

Song

Yang

and Fang

, Progress in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer, Tumour Biol 39(7) (2017), 1010428317714626.

Scott

L.J.

, Apatinib: A review in advanced gastric cancer and other advanced cancers, Drugs 78(7) (2018), 747–758.

Marin

J.J.

Al-Abdulla

Lozano

Briz

Bujanda

Banales

J.M.

and Macias

R.I.

, Mechanisms of resistance to chemotherapy in gastric cancer, Anticancer Agents Med Chem 16(3) (2016), 318–334.

Kumar

M.M.

and Goyal

, LncRNA as a therapeutic target for angiogenesis, Curr Top Med Chem 17(15) (2017), 1750–1757.

Peng

W.X.

Koirala

and Mo

Y.Y.

, LncRNA-mediated regulation of cell signaling in cancer, Oncogene 36(41) (2017), 5661–5667.

Cui

Zhang

Chen

Zhao

and Liang

, A comprehensive genome-wide analysis of long noncoding RNA expression profile in hepatocellular carcinoma, Cancer Med 6(12) (2017), 2932–2941.

Shan

Pan

Liu

and Jia

, LncRNA SNHG7 sponges miR-216b to promote proliferation and liver metastasis of colorectal cancer through upregulating GALNT1, Cell Death Dis 9(7) (2018), 722.

10.

She

Huang

Zhou

Huang

Chen

and He

, lncRNA-SNHG7 promotes the proliferation, migration and invasion and inhibits apoptosis of lung cancer cells by enhancing the FAIM2 expression, Oncol Rep 36(5) (2016), 2673–2680.

11.

Zhong

Long

Xiao

and Hu

, LncRNA-SNHG7 regulates proliferation, apoptosis and invasion of bladder cancer cells assurance guidelines, J BUON 23(3) (2018), 776–781.

12.

Luo

Song

Tang

Sun

D.H.

and Ji

D.G.

, LncRNA SNHG7 promotes development of breast cancer by regulating microRNA-186, Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 22(22) (2018), 7788–7797.

13.

Rupaimoole

and Slack

F.J.

, MicroRNA therapeutics: Towards a new era for the management of cancer and other diseases, Nat Rev Drug Discov 16(3) (2017), 203–222.

14.

Zhang

Pian

Chen

Zhang

and Chen

, Identification of cancer-related miRNA-lncRNA biomarkers using a basic miRNA-lncRNA network, PLoS One 13(5) (2018), e0196681.

15.

Pavlova

N.N.

and Thompson

C.B.

, The emerging hallmarks of cancer metabolism, Cell Metab 23(1) (2016), 27–47.

16.

Icard

Shulman

Farhat

Steyaert

J.M.

Alifano

and Lincet

, How the Warburg effect supports aggressiveness and drug resistance of cancer cells? Drug Resist Updat 38 (2018), 1–11.

17.

Xie

Tong

Peng

Huang

Wang

and Liang

, Overexpression of microRNA-122 re-sensitizes 5-FU-resistant colon cancer cells to 5-FU through the inhibition of PKM2 in vitro and in vivo , Cell Biochem Biophys 70(2) (2014), 1343–1350.

18.

Liu

Lei

Deng

and Dong

, α-hederin increases the apoptosis of cisplatin-resistant gastric cancer cells by activating mitochondrial pathway in vivo and vitro, Onco Targets Ther 12 (2019), 8737–8750.

19.

J.H.

Liu

Zhou

L.H.

and Yang

J.H.

, starBase v2.0: Decoding miRNA-ceRNA, miRNA-ncRNA and protein-RNA interaction networks from large-scale CLIP-Seq data, Nucleic Acids Res 42 (2014), D92–97.

20.

Xiang

Yan

Sun

Feng

and Chen

, Decreased expression of long non-coding RNA SNHG7 cause recurrent spontaneous abortion through suppression proliferation and invasion of trophoblast cells via miR-34a, Am J Transl Res 11(1) (2019), 463–472.

21.

Q.C.

Wang

and Wu

, miR-34a increases cisplatin sensitivity of osteosarcoma cells in vitro through up-regulation of c-Myc and Bim signal, Cancer Biomark 21(1) (2017), 135–144.

22.

Zhang

Wei

Min

Wang

Yin

Cao

and Shen

, Knockdown of RAP2A gene expression suppresses cisplatin resistance in gastric cancer cells, Oncol Lett 19(1) (2020), 350–358.

23.

Wang

Sun

Wang

Chen

Wang

Chen

and Cheng

, Cisplatin resistance in gastric cancer cells is involved with GPR30-mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transition, J Cell Mol Med 24(6) (2020), 3625–3633.

24.

Slabáková

Culig

Remšík

and Souček

, Alternative mechanisms of miR-34a regulation in cancer, Cell Death Dis 8(10) (2017), e3100.

25.

Cao

H.Y.

Xiao

C.H.

H.J.

H.Z.

Hong

Guo

C.Y.

and Yuan

J.F.

, MiR-129 reduces CDDP resistance in gastric cancer cells by inhibiting MAPK3, Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 23(15) (2019), 6478–6485.

26.

Zhao

Liu

and Li

, MicroRNA-424 regulates cisplatin resistance of gastric cancer by targeting SMURF1 based on GEO database and primary validation in human gastric cancer tissues, Onco Targets Ther 12 (2019), 7623–7636.

27.

Ren

Yang

Xue

Pan

S.J.

and Sun

, Long noncoding RNA SNHG7 promotes the progression and growth of glioblastoma via inhibition of miR-5095, Biochem Biophys Res Commun 496(2) (2018), 712–718.

28.

She

Yan

Huang

Zhou

and He

, miR-193b availability is antagonized by LncRNA-SNHG7 for FAIM2-induced tumour progression in non-small cell lung cancer, Cell Prolif 51(1) (2018), e12406.

LncRNA-SNHG7 interferes with miR-34a to de-sensitize gastric cancer cells to cisplatin

Abstract

Keywords

1. Introduction

2. Materials and methods

2.1 Patient samples

2.2 Cell culture and reagents

2.3 Prediction of lncRNA-miRNA and miRNA-mRNA interactions

2.4 Plasmid, shRNA and miRNAs transfection

2.5 RNA isolation and qRT-PCR

2.6 Luciferase reporter assays

2.7 Measurements of glucose metabolism rate

2.8 Cell viability assay

2.9 Western blot assay

2.10 Statistical analysis

3.1 LncRNA-SNHG7 is upregulated in gastric cancer and positively correlates with cisplatin resistance

3.2 miR-34a is downregulated in gastric cancer and negatively correlate with cisplatin resistance

3.3 SNHG7 suppresses miR-34a expression via sponging

3.4 Cisplatin resistant gastric cancer cells showed elevated glycolysis rate

3.5 miR-34a directly targets glycolysis enzyme LDHA to increase the cisplatin sensitivity of gastric cancer cells

3.6 The acquired cisplatin resistance is through the SNHG7-miR-34a-glycolysis axis

4. Discussion

Footnotes

Conflict of interest

References