Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Metabolism of neoplastic cells is shifted toward high glucose uptake and enhanced lactate production. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), which is comprised of two major subunits, LDH-A and LDH-B, reversibly catalyzes the conversion of pyruvate to lactate or lactate to pyruvate. LDH-A has a higher affinity for pyruvate and is a key enzyme in the glycolytic pathway. Elevated LDH is a negative prognostic biomarker not only because it is a key enzyme involved in cancer metabolism, but also because it allows neoplastic cells to suppress and evade the immune system by altering the tumor microenvironment. LDH-A alters the tumor microenvironment via increased production of lactate. This leads to enhancement of immune-suppressive cells, such as myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), and dendritic cells (DCs); and inhibition of cytolytic cells, such as natural killer (NK) cells and cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTLs). By promoting immune-suppression in the tumor microenvironment, LDH-A is able to promote resistance to chemo/radio/targeted therapy. Here we discuss the evidence that LDH is both a metabolic and an immune surveillance prognostic biomarker and its elevation is harbinger of negative outcome in both solid and hematologic neoplasms.

Keywords

LDH (lactate dehydrogenase)cancer metabolism biomarker cancer immune surveillance biomarker

1. Introduction

In many neoplastic cells, metabolism is shifted toward high glucose uptake and enhanced lactate production, regardless of oxygen availability. This phenomenon is known as the Warburg effect, and it is one of the fundamental metabolic rewiring processes that ensues during malignant transformation [1]. This occurs not because of the mitochondrial dysfunction, as was thought originally, but because of the dependency of cancer cells on the multiple metabolites of glucose involved in the synthesis of nucleic acids, fatty acids, and lactate to promote intracellular signaling, microenvironmental angiogenesis, and net tumor growth [2]. It is estimated that tumor cells utilize up to 30 times more glucose than normal cells and produce up to 40 times more lactic acid, irrespective of oxygen supply [3].

One of the key enzymes in the glycolytic pathway is lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), a tetrameric enzyme that catalyzes the reversible conversion of pyruvate to lactate, coupled with the oxidation of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide dehydrogenase (NADH) to NAD $+$ , in the final step of the glycolytic pathway. LDH is comprised of two major subunits, LDH-A and LDH-B, which can assemble into five different isoenzymes (LDH1, LDH2, LDH3, LDH4, and LDH5). LDH-A, which is encoded by the gene LDHA, is the predominant form in skeletal muscle and has a higher affinity for pyruvate. The LDH5 tetramer that contains only LDH-A subunits favors the conversion of pyruvate to lactate and produces NAD $+$ . In contrast, LDH-B, encoded by gene LDHB, is mainly found in heart muscle and converts lactate to pyruvate, which can be further oxidized in mitochondria [4].

Elevated LDH is well established as a negative prognostic biomarker in many cancers and is directly correlated with increased tumor growth and proliferative index, maintenance, metastasis, and tumor survival. Here, we propose that elevated LDH conveys a poor prognosis not only because it is a key enzyme involved in cancer metabolism, but also because it alters the tumor microenvironment in hematologic and solid neoplasms, allowing tumor cells to suppress and evade the immune system.

2. Elevated serum LDH in immunosuppressed conditions

The link between elevated serum LDH and immunosuppression, independent of malignancy, has been suggested before. Studies have shown that there is a correlation between the incidence of opportunistic infections in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), CD4 $+$ T cell counts, and levels of serum LDH. In a retrospective analysis of patients with HIV, bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine that there was an inverse relationship between serum LDH levels and CD4 $+$ lymphocyte counts [5]. LDH levels $>$ 225 units per liter (U/L) was correlated with a significantly lower CD4 $+$ T cell count when compared to LDH levels $<$ 225 U/L. Definitive Pneumocystic carinii pneumonia (PCP) and toxoplasmosis are also significantly associated with higher serum LDH levels. Furthermore, initiation of highly reactive antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected individuals led to decreased serum LDH when compared to LDH levels among HIV-seropositive patients who were antiretroviral therapy naive [6], suggesting that as the host immune system recovers, serum LDH levels decrease.

The link between immunosuppression and malignancy has been studied extensively in patients who receive pharmacological immunosuppression for a variety of reasons such as solid organ transplantation and autoimmune diseases [7, 8]. Elevated LDH is a common laboratory finding in these patient populations and often is considered a negative risk factor for clinical outcomes [9, 10].

LDH is normally cleared by receptor-mediated endocytosis by macrophages in the liver, spleen and bone marrow [11]; however, when the immune system within the tumor microenvironment is altered during tumor growth, this may lead to insufficient elimination of LDH from tumor. These data suggest that in addition to increased production of LDH by neoplastic cells mainly due to Warburg effect, decreased destruction or clearance of LDH in immunocompromised environment may contribute to the high serum LDH level in these patients. Here, we propose that a serum LDH level above the upper limits of normal is not only a negative prognostic biomarker for malignant cells, but can also be a marker of immune suppression in host. The mechanisms involved in tumor-induced immunosuppression that are associated with both plasma and tumor high LDH levels are described below.

3. Elevated serum LDH is a negative prognostic biomarker for multiple hematologic and solid neoplasms

Total LDH has become a valuable prognostic bio- marker. Elevated serum LDH is a well-established strong negative predictor of survival in patients with Hodgkin’s and non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. In one of the first studies investigating the prognostic effects of LDH, Garcia et al. [12] found that serum LDH levels $>$ 320 U/L (above the upper limit of normal), age and clinical stage had a significant prognostic influence for achieving complete remission (CR) in patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma. In this study, only an elevated LDH had prognostic influence in increasing the probability of disease relapse and decreasing disease free survival. In another study, Ferraris et al. [13] reported that serum LDH levels were negatively correlated with survival in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Ultimately, high serum LDH has been included as one of the negative risk factors in the International Prognostic Index (IPI) and Age-adjusted International Prognostic Index for non-Hogkin’s lymphoma [14]. Similarly, elevated LDH levels in multiple myeloma were correlated with advanced disease and inferior overall survival in all myeloma subgroups, independent of the International Staging System [15].

Figure 1.

Neoplastic cell metabolism and resultant effects of LDH-A on immune cells within the tumor microenvironment. Within cancer cells, metabolism is shifted toward enhanced lactate production, regardless of oxygen availability (Warburg effect). Within a hypoxic environment, 1) the oncoproteins HIF-1 $\alpha$ (hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha) and c-Myc activate LDH-A, driving lactate production, and 2) activate PDK1 (pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1), which phosphorylates PDH (pyruvate dehydrogenase) and blocks conversion of pyruvate to acetyl-CoA, driving conversion of pyruvate to lactate instead. 3) HIF-1 $\alpha$ also upregulates GLUT-1 and GLUT-3 to increase the cell’s uptake of glucose. Excessive levels of lactate produced by LDH-A within tumor cells are removed by MCT (monocarboxylate transporter). This leads to local acidosis of the tumor microenvironment, generating a drug bioavailability barrier called ion trapping phenomenon. There are multiple immune cells within the tumor microenvironment, some of which are TAMs (tumor-associated macrophages), MDSCs (myeloid-derived suppressor cells, that are immature monocytes, macrophages, granulocytes and dendritic cells that regulate and suppress T cells), and CTL (cytotoxic T-lymphocytes). 4) Lactate within TAMs induce VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) and ArgI (arginase I), which induce neovascularization, tissue remodeling, immune suppression, and tumor proliferation. 5) Within monocytes and macrophages, lactate stimulates IL-23 (Interleukin 23), which in turn induces IL-17 and matrix metalloprotease 9, which result in angiogenesis, local inflammation, and tumor growth. 6) Within CTLs, lactate blocks both cytokine (particularly IFN- $\gamma$ , TNF- $\alpha$ and IL-2) production and lytic granule exocytosis by selectively targeting p38/c-Jun-N terminal kinase activation. Abbreviations: NADH, nicotine adenine dinucleotide, reduced; PKM2, isoform of pyruvate kinase; TNF- $\alpha$ , tumor necrosis factor-alpha; IFN- $\gamma$ , interferon-gamma.

In a meta-analysis including 73 clinical studies, Petrelli et al. [16] showed that a high LDH is associated with poor survival in several solid tumors; this prognostic effect was most pronounced in renal cell carcinoma, as well as gastric, prostate, nasopharyngeal and lung cancers. Determination of elevated serum LDH was based on a predefined cut-off for serum LDH (median 254 U/L) in 34 out of these 73 clinical studies.

Similarly, in the prognostic staging system for cutaneous melanoma, elevated serum LDH above the upper limits of normal (ULN) at the time of staging was the most predictive independent factor of diminished survival [17], even after accounting for site and number of metastases. The degree of elevation of LDH above ULN also correlated with worse overall survival in patients with melanoma.

In a retrospective analysis of prognostic factors in patients with bone metastases from breast cancer, serum LDH above the ULN but less than two-times the ULN correlated with a two-fold increased risk of death; while serum LDH levels above two-times the ULN correlated with a six-fold increased risk of death [18].

Importantly, the degree of elevation of serum LDH has prognostic significance in men with germ cell tumors. The International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group risk stratification system includes ß human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-hCG), $\alpha$ -fetoprotein (AFP), and LDH as serum tumor markers of prognostic significance [19].

Overall, in clinical studies assay conditions in relation to serum LDH were not standardized, so there were no cut-off levels when relating LDH levels to prognosis of the many malignancies described above. Instead, the degree of elevation of LDH mentioned was in relationship to the upper limit of normal provided by each laboratory. There is variation in absolute reference ranges for the upper limit of normal across centers.

4. LDH-A and neoplastic tissues

4.1 Role of LDH-A in tumor growth, maintenance and metastasis

Neoplastic cells have fundamentally enhanced production of lactic acid with preferentially high production of LDH isoenzymes rich in LDH-A. The expression of LDH-A is upregulated by the oncoproteins hypoxia-induced factor (HIF-1 $\alpha$ ) [20] and c-Myc [21], which are key transcription factors that directly bind to LDHA promoter sites. Hypoxia within tumor cells and in the microenvironment signals the activation of HIF-1 $\alpha$ , which in turn upregulates the glucose transporters GLUT-1 and GLUT-3 to increase the concentration of glucose within tumor cells [22]. c-Myc plays a role in cell growth, apoptosis and transformation though multiple mechanisms [23]. In hypoxic cancer cells, HIF-1 $\alpha$ and c-Myc also robustly activate pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1 (PDK1), which phosphorylates pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) and blocks the conversion of pyruvate to acetyl-CoA (Fig. 1) [24]. By inhibiting mitochondrial oxidation of pyruvate under hypoxic conditions, pyruvate is preferentially metabolized to lactate by LDH-A [25].

Malignant tissues often express higher levels of LDH-A compared to non-malignant tissues, which suggests an association between LDH-A and malignant transformation [26]. Inhibition of LDH-A results in stimulation of mitochondrial respiration and compromises the ability of tumor cells to proliferative under hypoxia. Rizwan et al. [27] transfected murine cell models of breast cancer with plasmids to specifically knockdown expression of the LDH-A gene. LDH-A knockdown cells had lower glycolytic rates when compared to that of wild-type cancer cells, which corresponded to an increase in mitochondrial respiration and a lower rate of lactate production both in vivo and in vitro. In vivo, LDH-A depleted tumors had significantly smaller tumor volumes with lower doubling times when compared to wild-type tumors, which corresponded with a reduction and delay in the development of metastases. In a similar study, Fantin et al. [22] used mammary tumor cells with LDH-A knockdown to demonstrate that reduced levels of the enzyme led to reduced cellular transformation and delayed tumor formation. Cells with decreased LDH-A activity had increased oxygen consumption and compromised tumorigenic potential.

Le et al. [28] inhibited LDH-A using either short interfering RNA (siRNA) or a small-molecule inhibitor (FX11 [3-dihydroxy-6-methyl-7-(phenylmethyl)-4-pro pylnaphthalene-1-carboxylic acid]). FX11 is a small molecule that preferentially inhibited LDH-A as opposed to LDH-B. Reduction of LDH-A expression within both human B-lymphoma and pancreatic cancer xenograft models led to ineffective mitochondrial respiration, depleted cellular energy levels, increased oxidative stress, and triggered cell death.

High LDH-A expression is also associated with greater metastatic potential. In a retrospective analysis of patients with advanced small cell lung cancer, elevated serum LDH was correlated with a higher incidence of liver and bone metastases [29], and was an independent predictor of mortality after adjustment was made for age and performance status. Patients with highly elevated serum LDH tended to have more metastatic sites.

When LDH-A was silenced in murine pancreatic cancer cells, the resultant tumors were significantly smaller when compared with wild-type cancer cells [30]. The LDH-A deficient pancreatic cancer cells also secreted less lactate into the surrounding culture. In prostate cancer cells, silencing of LDH-A also resulted in an altered tumor metabolism and microenvironment [31]. The rate of cancer cell apoptosis was significantly increased after LDH-A was inhibited and the number of migrated cells was dramatically decreased in vitro relative to wild-type cancer cells. These preclinical and clinical data strongly suggest that LDH-A is a key enzyme in tumor metabolism, growth and metastatic ability.

4.2 Role of LDH-A in resistance of tumor to therapy

By producing lactate and altering the tumor microenvironment, LDH-A can induce resistance to che- motherapy. Maiso and colleagues [32] showed that both HIF-1 $\alpha$ and LDH-A are overexpressed in multiple myeloma cell lines resistant to different treatments such as dexamethasone, melphalan, and bortezomib. When LDH-A was silenced in vivo, increased sensitivity to bortezomib was restored in both normoxic and hypoxic conditions. Metabolic alterations seem to play a crucial role in drug resistance in multiple myeloma.

In breast cancer cells, those that were resistant to paclitaxel had increased LDH-A expression and activity [33]. When LDH-A was downregulated by siRNA, sensitivity to paclitaxel was increased by at least two-fold in paclitaxel-resistant cells. When paclitaxel-resistant cells were treated with oxamic acid, a specific LDH-A inhibitor, and taxol, these cells displayed a high rate of apoptosis. The therapeutic combination of paclitaxel and oxamic acid was more effective in killing paclitaxel-resistant cells compared to either treatment alone, suggesting a synergistic inhibitory effect. While this study provided promising evidence for using LDH-A inhibition as an area of targeted therapy, further research is required to prove that downregulation of LDH-A mediated sensitization of breast cancer cells to paclitaxel is indeed a consequence of inhibition of glycolysis.

Acidic extracellular microenvironment created by high LDH-A level, generates a drug bioavailability barrier called ion trapping phenomenon, which negatively impacts the efficacy of weak base chemotherapeutic agents. According to the Henderson-Hasselbach equation, for a non-ionized weak base chemotherapy B, which is permeant across the cell membrane, with the corresponding ionized impermeant conjugate acid BH ${}^{+}$ , the ratio of concentration of BH ${}^{+}$ to concentration of B is 10 ${}^{\rm-(pH-pKa)}$ . If the pKa for the weak base chemotherapy B is 8.4 and physiologic pH is 7.4, the ratio will be 10:1. Nevertheless, in the presence of high LDH-A and acidic microenvironment (e.g. pH of 6.4), the ratio of ionized BH ${}^{+}$ to non-ionized B will be 100:1, which can negatively significantly affect the entrance of chemotherapy to the cells [34]. Acidic microenvironment also reported to increase activity of multidrug transporter, p-glycoprotein [35].

These observations taken together suggest that LDH-A is more than a marker of tumor burden. Instead, LDH-A seems to have a tumor-protective effect that could relate at least in part to the changes in the tumor microenvironment.

5. LDH-A promotes immune escape for neoplastic cells

5.1 The tumor microenvironment

The tumor microenvironment is a network of extracellular matrix, cells and soluble factors [36, 37, 38]. One of the key soluble factors within the microenvironment is lactate. Excessive levels of lactate produced by LDH-A within tumor cells are excreted from cytoplasm by monocarboxylate transporters (MCT), which catalyze the proton-linked transport of lactate across the plasma membrane. The exported lactate leads to local acidosis of the tumor microenvironment, lowering the extracellular pH to 6.0–6.5 [37]. Lactate has various immune suppressive effects, as described in detail below.

Within the tumor microenvironment, there are im- mune-suppressive cells and immune-stimulatory cells. Cancer-associated immune suppressor cells include tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). TAMs are pro-inflammatory cells that promote tumor growth via chemokines and cytokines such as interlukin 6 (IL-6), IL-23, IL-12 and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF- $\alpha$ ). MDSCs are a population of immature myeloid cells made up of monocytes, macrophages, granulocytes and dendritic cells that regulate and suppress T cells [39].

5.2 Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs)

TAMs are one of the most common stromal cell types found in tumors. They are enriched in well-perfused areas where they potentiate tumor growth and invasion. Carmona-Fontaine et al. [40] used computational modeling to show that differential sensitivity to acidic microenvironment created by ischemia/hypoxia and lactic acid between cancer cells (specifically aggressive metastatic breast adenocarcinoma cells) and macrophages was sufficient to generate particular spatial localization patterns for TAMs within tumors. TAMs in vivo are enriched in perivascular and cortical areas, where concentration of lactate is less in contrast to the neoplastic cells that can thrive in lactate rich area.

Lactate produced by tumor cells is diffused to the well-perfused areas and picked up by TAMs through MCTs on the cell membrane, where it can induce transcription of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and arginase 1 (Arg1) (Fig. 1). Lactic acid alone was sufficient to induce VEGF and Arg1 expression in macrophages in a dose-dependent manner [41]. Compared to all other cells within the tumor combined, TAMs express the highest levels of VEGF and Arg1 messenger RNA. Upregulation of VEGF and Arg1 in macrophages induce neovascularization and provide substrates for cancer cell proliferation [42, 43]. Arg1 is also able to induce immune suppression by depleting L-arginine in the microenvironment. Macrophages use L-arginine to synthesize nitric oxide (NO) and polyamines through inducible NO synthase and arginase, respectively [43]. The released NO contributes to the tumoricidal activity of macrophages, whereas polyamines may promote the growth of tumor cells. Depletion of L-arginine inhibits T-cell proliferation and downregulation of CD3 $\zeta$ chain expression in T lymphocytes [44].

Lactate also polarizes TAMs to differentiate into a so-called “M2” macrophage-like state, favoring tumor growth. M2 macrophages are involved in tissue repair, wound healing and use oxidative metabolism for fuel. This is in contrast to M1 macrophages that act as first line of defense against bacterial infections and obtain energy through glycolysis. Once inside TAMs, lactic acid induces an transcriptional profile that induces differentiation into M2 macrophages [44]. Macrophages stimulated with lactic acid also result in significantly larger tumors than non-lactic acid stimulated cells. Colegio et al. [41] injected mice with murine tumor models of Lewis lung carcinoma (LCC) and melanoma cell lines and compared tumor growth when injected with lactic acid-stimulated macrophages. When exposed to lactic acid-stimulated macrophages, both LCC cells and melanoma cells resulted in larger tumors than with co-injection of control-medium-stimulated macrophages.

Shime et al. [45] showed that tumor-derived lactate is a pro-inflammatory mediator by stimulating IL-23 production from monocytes and macrophages. IL-23 is overexpressed in and around tumor cells, where it induces local inflammation and tumor growth by inducing the production of IL-17 and IL-22. IL-23 also promotes the expression of matrix metalloprotease 9 to increase angiogenesis and metastatic behavior and reduce CD8 $+$ T cell infiltration in the tumor microenvironment (Fig. 1).

Collectively, these findings suggest a model in which TAMs are recruited to well-perfused areas of the tumor microenvironment, where tumor-derived lactic acid induces HIF-1 $\alpha$ -dependent polarization of macrophages and expression of VEGF and Arg1. To date, the link between lactate and macrophages within the tumor microenvironment has been well established, but the association between macrophages and LDH-A can only be inferred. If levels of LDH-A and lactate are directly correlated, then LDH-A can be a surrogate marker of macrophage polarization and immune evasion.

5.3 Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs)

MDSCs contribute greatly to tumor evasion from immune attack by controlling the responses of cytotoxic cells such as T cells and NK cells and by migrating into the tumor site and differentiating into highly immune suppressive TAMs. MDSCs regulate and suppress T cells by taking up antigens, processing them and presenting them to CD8 $+$ T cells in the context of MHC class I, thereby mediating antigen-specific T cell tolerance [31]. Corzo et al. demonstrated that hypoxia, one of the major characteristics of the tumor microenvironment, alters the function of MDSC via HIF-1 $\alpha$ , which causes rapid upregulation of arginase I and nitric oxide. HIF-1 $\alpha$ redirects tumor MDSCs to suppress both antigen-specific CD8 $+$ T cells and nonspecific T cells, while MDSCs from peripheral lymphoid organs only suppressed antigen-specific T cells. Tumor MDSCs are, therefore, relatively selective inhibitors of host immune cells, allowing tumors to bypass the immune system and promote growth [46, 47].

HIF-1 $\alpha$ promotes the expression of LDH-A, which may play a role in MDSCs regulation. Husain et al. [30] used mice injected with wild-type and LDH-A deficient pancreatic cancer cells to demonstrate that LDH-A-depleted tumors led to a decrease in concentration of MDSCs in the tumor microenvironment. Exogenous lactate increased the frequency of MDSCs generated from mouse bone marrow cells with granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and IL-6 in vitro. Importantly, MDSCs isolated from LDH-A depleted tumor-bearing mice had lower suppressive effects on natural killer (NK) cells. Depletion of glucose levels using a ketogenic diet to lower lactate production by glycolytic tumors in these mice resulted in smaller tumors, decreased MDSC frequency, and improved antitumor immune response. Ketogenic-fed mice had increased effector functions (increased frequencies of CD4 and CD8 T cells) as well as reduced tumor suppressor function (decreased MDSC and regulatory T cell frequencies). These findings suggested that lowered glucose and reduced lactate production from lowered LDH-A gene expression led to inhibition of innate immune response against developing tumors via regulation of MDSCs and NK cell activity.

NK cells from LDH-A-depleted tumors had improved cytolytic function against neoplastic cells. Addition of exogenous lactate abrogated these effects to a great extent; lactate promoted the survival and proliferation of MDSCs generated from bone marrow cells via granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and IL-6, which interfered with the lytic function of NK cells [30].

5.4 Natural killer (NK) cells

The strong link between LDH-A and NK cells has been reported in a few studies. In the same study mentioned before, Husain et al. [30] also used mouse models of pancreatic cancer to demonstrate the functional link between LDH-A and NK activity. Tumor cells with high LDH-A activity could significantly decrease NK cytolytic activity compared to tumor cells without LDH-A. A high lactate concentration also decreased cytotoxic activity of NK cells independent of the acidity of the culture medium when the culture medium was treated with varying concentrations of hydrochloric acid or lactic acid. Lactate-treated NK cells expressed lower levels of perforin and granzyme B when compared to untreated cells. These findings suggest that the observed low cytotoxic activity of NK cells is engendered by lactate, resulting in reduced expression of perforin and granzyme B pathway.

LDH-A also promotes immune escape by inducing expression of certain ligands that allow tumor cells to evade host immune cells. Crane et al. [48] found that sera from patients with glioblastoma multiforme have elevated amounts of LDH, which correlated directly with expression of the natural killer group 2, member D (NKG2D) ligands on circulating host monocytes rather than tumor cells. In fact, glioblastoma-derived LDH5, which is composed only of LDH-A subunits, was sufficient to induce an increase in the amount of NKG2D ligand expression on monocytes. Importantly, when cultured with healthy monocytes, the sera from patients with glioblastoma multiforme was able to induce transcription of NKG2D, suggesting that LDH-A in the plasma was able to induce NKG2D ligand expression on healthy monocytes. Interactions between NKG2D ligand-bearing myeloid cells and NK cells down-modulate NKG2D receptors on NK cells and impair their ability to attack and eliminate tumors. Chronic exposure of NK cells to NKG2D ligand-bearing cells causes down-modulation of the NKG2D receptor on NK cells and inactivation of the NKG2D cytotoxic pathway [49]. For example, freshly isolated tumor-infiltrating NK cells from patients with glioblastoma multiforme had low expression of NKG2D and impaired NKG2D-dependent function [48]. Crane et al. also found that in a small cohort of patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme, there was a decrease in the amount of NKG2D ligand expression on circulating monocytes after surgical reduction of the tumor, suggesting that ligand expression is dependent on tumor volume. Therefore, LDH, produced by tumor cells, is correlated with an increased expression of NKG2D ligands on immune cells, allowing the tumor cells evade the host’s immune system. NKG2D ligands have also been found on circulating monocytes isolated from patients with breast, prostate, and hepatitis C virus-induced hepatocellular carcinomas [48], suggesting that tumor-derived LDH-A can induce NKG2D ligands on myeloid cells in these malignancies as well, subverting antitumor immune responses.

5.5 T cells

Several studies have shown a link between tumor-derived lactate and T cell function. Fischer et al. [50] established that tumor-derived lactic acid suppressed cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTLs) proliferation in a dose-dependent manner. They first demonstrated that serum lactate levels was significantly elevated in patients with high tumor burden. They then incubated cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTLs) in a lactate-rich med- ium, which led to cell death. In contrast, treatment of CTLs in an H ${}^{+}$ -enriched, acidic environment did not have the same effect. Therefore, acidification alone did not account for the suppressive effect of lactic acid on CTLs. Tumor-derived lactate also significantly impaired production of IL-2 and IFN- $\gamma$ in CTLs, independent of acidification alone. Lactate-treated CTLs also had reduced cytotoxicity, in contrast to cells treated with sodium lactate or hydrochloric acid, possibly because lactate strongly derogated the intracellular amount of perforin and granzyme B. Incubation in a lactate-free medium restored the CTL function after a recovery period. Lactic acid has been shown to selectively target p38 and c-Jun N-terminal kinase activation, leading to reduced cytokine (particularly IFN- $\gamma$ , TNF- $\alpha$ and IL-2) production and impaired lytic granule exocytosis in CTLs [43]. These effects were seen when lactic acid was either externally added to CTL medium or naturally produced by tumor cells.

In an attempt to find a link between cancer metabo- lism and immune cell infiltration, Singer et al. [51] used renal cell carcinoma cells to show that cancer cells strongly expressed LDH5 and GLUT-1 compared to their nonmalignant counterparts, which is in line with the finding that tumor cells secrete high amounts of lactate. In addition, there was an inverse relationship between GLUT-1 expression and the number of CD8 $+$ T cells infiltrating RCC tumors, suggesting that an accelerated glucose metabolism is associated with a low infiltration of CD8 $+$ effector cells. The number of CD3 $+$ CD8 $+$ FOXP3 $+$ T cells was significantly elevated in RCC lesions compared to normal kidney epithelium, but effector molecules such as granzyme B and perforin were decreased in tumor infiltrating T cells, indicating that RCCs are infiltrated by functionally inactive cytotoxic T cells. LDH5 in tumor cells had a negative impact on infiltration by CD3 $+$ T cells, but not with CD8 $+$ , granzyme B $+$ , or FOXP3 $+$ T cells, suggesting that LDH5 expression modulates the activity of many different T cells in the tumor environment.

5.6 Dendritic cells

Dendritic cells (DCs), a type of antigen-presenting cells, are important for activation of specific antitumor T-cell responses. Circulating and tumor-associated DCs are phenotypically and functionally defective [52] whereby these tumor-infiltrating DCs have decreased IL-2 production and exist as an immature phenotype. Defective DCs represent one of the mechanisms of tumor evasion from immune system control. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), produced by virtually all tumor cells, is one factor responsible for the defective function of these cells. VEGF binds to hematopoietic progenitor cells and, via inhibition of transcription factor NF-kB, inhibits their differentiation into mature DCs, thereby leading to tumor-associated DCs that exist in inactive states [14]. Animal models have shown that the type, phenotype and amount of tumor-associated dendritic cells (TADCs) are dynamic over time and influence disease progression at different stages of tumor growth. As tumor burden increases, the number of TADCs have been demonstrated to increase, which was associated with a concomitant loss of T cell infiltration [53]. Tumor cells suppress the function of DCs or alter the tumor microenvironment so that immune-suppressive dendritic cells are recruited.

Lactic acid has been shown to modulate the activation and antigen expression of immune-suppressive DCs. Gottfried et al. [54] used multicellular spheroids of melanoma and prostate carcinoma cell lines that better mimicked the tumor microenvironment to show that lactic acid altered the function of DCs and promoted a tumor-associated DC phenotype that suppresses the host’s immune system. Addition of lactic acid during DC differentiation in vitro induced a phenotype comparable with tumor-infiltrating DCs that were generated within melanoma and prostate carcinoma spheroids. In contrast, hypoxia and acidification alone had little effect on DC differentiation in vitro.

In a spontaneous murine mouse model of aggressive ovarian cancer, tumor growth was associated with increasingly dense immune infiltrates, which included DCs, macrophages, MDSCs and T cells [55]. In the early stages of ovarian cancer progression, depletion of infiltrating DCs led to accelerated tumor growth. As the tumor progressed, the tumor microenvironment caused a phenotypic switch of DCs to TADCs that had immune-suppressive effects. Coinciding with the expansion of immune-suppressive DCs activity in the tumor microenvironment, tumors abrogate protective immunity and start growing in an aggressive manner. Correspondingly, late depletion of TADCs led to inhibition of tumor growth.

Lactate also leads to a concentration-dependent inhibition of T-cell proliferation, by influencing the functional activity of dendritic cells. Lactate suppresses the production of IL-6, IL-12 and TNF- $\alpha$ of tumor-associated DCs. In an attempt to investigate how LDH-A affect DCs, Gottfried et al. [54] proceeded to block LDH-A function by oxamic acid, leading to reduced lactate concentrations. Blocking of LDH-A with oxamic acid caused phenotypical reversal of tumor-associated DCs, but the effect of LDH-A inhibition on cytokine production and function of DCs was not studied. Given the close relationship between LDH-A and lactic acid, elevated LDH-A levels are expected to suppress the production of IL-6, IL-12 and TNF- $\alpha$ of immune-suppressive DCs.

5.7 Monocytes

Tumor-infiltrating monocytes also exhibit protumoral characteristics, including decreased TNF secretion and increased IL-10 or IL-23 production. Peter et al. [56] obtained monocytes from healthy donors to analyze the global effects of lactic acid on gene expression during monocyte activation. Monocytes were cultured with lactic acid, sodium lactate or acidic pH in vitro. Lactic-acid significantly delayed the upregulation of the majority of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced genes, important monocyte effector proteins like cytokines (including TNF and IL-23) and suppressed the genes coding for the chemokines (including CCL2 and CCL7) compared to sodium lactate or acidification. This global alteration of normal monocytes could be one of the mechanisms of how the host’s immune system is altered by tumor-derived metabolites [56].

6. LDH-C and the testis

Discussion of LDH would not be complete without mentioning LDH-C, which is a sixth isozyme found specifically within mature human testis. LDH-C was the first testicular specific isozyme discovered in male germ cells [57]. The synthesis of LDH-C in the testis takes place during sexual maturation, when spermatids prefer lactate as an energy source over glucose, fructose and pyruvate [58].

During the last two decades of investigation, there have been identification of testis-specific genes, which are expressed only in the germinal epithelium of the testis and not in somatic tissues. Six out of 21 germ cell specific genes have been detected in tumors. The sperm-specific LDH-C gene has been shown to express in a broad spectrum of human tumors, with high frequency in lung cancer, melanoma, and breast cancer [59]. Ectopic activation of testis-specific genes in cancer is a frequent phenomenon. Expression of LDH-C in tumors is not induced by hypoxia nor is it mediated by gene promotor demethylation. As LDH-C has a preference for lactate as a substrate, LDH-C activation in cancer may depend on lactate for cellular energy production [59].

Within the testis, the somatic Sertoli cell presents several common metabolic features analogous to cancer cells, aligning with Otto Warburg observations on metabolism in cancer cells. The somatic Sertoli cells present a high glycolytic flux to ensure the production of high lactate levels and factors required for the development of germ cells. However, Sertoli cells only proliferate during a specific time period and in all species, they cease to divide in adulthood. Therefore, Sertoli cells have a Warburg-like metabolic behavior without the uncontrolled mitotic proliferation seen within cancer cells that is associated with stimulation of growth factors. The high glycolytic flux in Sertoli cells support the nutritional needs of the developing germ cell, but is not associated with cell proliferation [60].

LDH-C has been a unique target for contraception in both males and females and offers potential future for cancer immunotherapy [59].

7. Concluding thoughts and future directions

In summary, LDH is a key enzyme involved in glycolysis, the preferred metabolic pathway neoplastic cells undergo, resulting in the accumulation and secretion of lactic acid into the extracellular space. Even though the link between glycolysis and cellular proliferation is complex, as suggested by Sertoli cells, there is no denying that LDH could be a marker of rapid cellular metabolism in highly proliferative neoplastic cells. In addition, elevated serum LDH may be a marker for tumor-derived immune suppression; thereby, offering a potential explanation as to why it is a negative prognostic biomarker for a variety of hematologic and solid neoplasms. By promoting immune suppression in the tumor microenvironment, LDH-A is able to stimulate tumor growth, metastasis and resistance to chemo/radio/targeted therapy.

To date, research has focused on the role of LDH-A within tumor cells and tissues. Some of the more promising findings have been the effect of specific LDH-A inhibitors, such as oxamic acid and FX11, on reversing therapy resistance. Investigation into the role of specific LDH isoenzymes, both LDH-A and LDH-C, within malignant cells and tissues may open an exciting area of targeted therapy. Moreover, with the discovery of modern and effective immunotherapies for different malignancies in the past few years, elevated LDH can be used in designing clinical trials for appropriate patient selection, and perhaps decreasing the cost by predicting response.

References

Pelicano

Martin

D.S.

R.H.

and Huang

, Glycolysis inhibition for anticancer treatment, Oncogene 25 (2006), 4633–4646.

DeBerardinis

R.J.

Lum

J.J.

Hatzivassiliou

and Thompson

C.B.

, The biology of cancer: Metabolic reprogramming fuels cell growth and proliferation, Cell Metab 7 (2008), 11–20.

Holm

Hagmuller

Staedt

Schlickeiser

Gunther

H.J.

Leweling

Tokus

and Kollmar

H.B.

, Substrate balances across colonic carcinomas in humans, Cancer Res 55 (1995), 1373–1378.

Dawson

D.M.

Goodfriend

T.L.

and Kaplan

N.O.

, Lactic dehydrogenases: functions of the two types rates of synthesis of the two major forms can be correlated with metabolic differentiation, Science 143 (1964), 929–933.

Butt

A.A.

Michaels

and Kissinger

, The association of serum lactate dehydrogenase level with selected opportunistic infections and HIV progression, Int J Infect Dis 6 (2002), 178–181.

Ramana

K.V.

Rao

Kandi

Singh

P.A.

and Kumar

V.B.

, Elevated activities of serum lactate dehydrogenase in human immunodeficiency virus sero-positive patients in highly active antiretroviral therapy era, Journal of Dr NTR University of Health Sciences 2 (2013), 162–166.

Penn

and Starzl

T.E.

, Proceedings: The effect of immunosuppression on cancer, Proc Natl Cancer Conf 7 (1972), 425–436.

Kristinsson

S.Y.

Bjorkholm

Hultcrantz

Derolf

A.R.

Landgren

and Goldin

L.R.

, Chronic immune stimulation might act as a trigger for the development of acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndromes, J Clin Oncol 29 (2011), 2897–2903.

Karuturi

Shah

Frank

Fasan

Reshef

Ahya

V.N.

Bromberg

Faust

Goral

Schuster

S.J.

Stadtmauer

E.A.

and Tsai

D.E.

, Plasmacytic post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder: A case series of nine patients, Transpl Int 26 (2013), 616–622.

10.

LaCasce

A.S.

, Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders, Oncologist 11 (2006), 674–680.

11.

Smit

M.J.

Duursma

A.M.

Bouma

J.M.

and Gruber

, Receptor-mediated endocytosis of lactate dehydrogenase M4 by liver macrophages: A mechanism for elimination of enzymes from plasma, Evidence for competition by creatine kinase MM, adenylate kinase, malate, and alcohol dehydrogenase, J Biol Chem 262 (1987), 13020–13026.

12.

Garcia

Hernandez

J.M.

Caballero

M.D.

Gonzalez

Galende

del Canizo

M.C.

Vazquez

and San Miguel

J.F.

, Serum lactate dehydrogenase level as a prognostic factor in Hodgkin’s disease, Br J Cancer 68 (1993), 1227–1231.

13.

Ferraris

A.M.

Giuntini

and Gaetani

G.F.

, Serum lactic dehydrogenase as a prognostic tool for non-Hodgkin lymphomas, Blood 54 (1979), 928–932.

14.

Shipp

M.A.

et al., A predictive model for aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, The International Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Prognostic Factors Project, N Engl J Med 329 (1993), 987–994.

15.

Terpos

Katodritou

Roussou

Pouli

Michalis

Delimpasi

Parcharidou

Kartasis

Zomas

Symeonidis

Viniou

N.A.

Anagnostopoulos

Economopoulos

Zervas

Dimopoulos

M.A.

and Greek

, Myeloma study group, high serum lactate dehydrogenase adds prognostic value to the international myeloma staging system even in the era of novel agents, Eur J Haematol 85 (2010), 114–119.

16.

Petrelli

Cabiddu

Coinu

Borgonovo

Ghilardi

Lonati

and Barni

, Prognostic role of lactate dehydrogenase in solid tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 76 studies, Acta Oncol 54 (2015), 961–970.

17.

Balch

C.M.

Soong

S.J.

Atkins

M.B.

Buzaid

A.C.

Cascinelli

Coit

D.G.

Fleming

I.D.

Gershenwald

J.E.

Houghton

, Jr. Kirkwood

J.M.

McMasters

K.M.

Mihm

M.F.

Morton

D.L.

Reintgen

D.S.

Ross

M.I.

Sober

Thompson

J.A.

and Thompson

J.F.

, An evidence-based staging system for cutaneous melanoma, CA Cancer J Clin 54 (2004), 131–149; quiz 182–184.

18.

Brown

J.E.

Cook

R.J.

Lipton

and Coleman

R.E.

, Serum lactate dehydrogenase is prognostic for survival in patients with bone metastases from breast cancer: A retrospective analysis in bisphosphonate-treated patients, Clin Cancer Res 18 (2012), 6348–6355.

19.

Wilkinson

P.M.

and Read

, International germ cell consensus classification: A prognostic factor-based staging system for metastatic germ cell cancers, international germ cell cancer collaborative group, J Clin Oncol 15 (1997), 594–603.

20.

Semenza

G.L.

, HIF-1: mediator of physiological and pathophysiological responses to hypoxia, J Appl Physiol (1985) 88 (2000), 1474–1480.

21.

Shim

Dolde

Lewis

B.C.

C.S.

Dang

Jungmann

R.A.

Dalla-Favera

and Dang

C.V.

, c-Myc transactivation of LDH-A: Implications for tumor metabolism and growth, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94 (1997), 6658–6663.

22.

Fantin

V.R.

St-Pierre

and Leder

, Attenuation of LDH-A expression uncovers a link between glycolysis, mitochondrial physiology, and tumor maintenance, Cancer Cell 9 (2006), 425–434.

23.

Dang

C.V.

, c-Myc target genes involved in cell growth, apoptosis, and metabolism, Mol Cell Biol 19 (1999), 1–11.

24.

Emadi

Sadowska

Carter-Cooper

Bhatnagar

van der Merwe

Levis

M.J.

Sausville

E.A.

and Lapidus

R.G.

, Perturbation of cellular oxidative state induced by dichloroacetate and arsenic trioxide for treatment of acute myeloid leukemia, Leuk Res 39 (2015), 719–729.

25.

Kim

J.W.

Tchernyshyov

Semenza

G.L.

and Dang

C.V.

, HIF-1-mediated expression of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase: A metabolic switch required for cellular adaptation to hypoxia, Cell Metab 3 (2006), 177–185.

26.

Goldman

R.D.

Kaplan

N.O.

and Hall

T.C.

, Lactic dehydrogenase in human neoplastic tissues, Cancer Res 24 (1964), 389–399.

27.

Rizwan

Serganova

Khanin

Karabeber

Thakur

Zakian

K.L.

Blasberg

and Koutcher

J.A.

, Relationships between LDH-A, lactate, and metastases in 4T1 breast tumors, Clin Cancer Res 19 (2013), 5158–5169.

28.

Cooper

C.R.

Gouw

A.M.

Dinavahi

Maitra

Deck

L.M.

Royer

R.E.

Vander Jagt

D.L.

Semenza

G.L.

and Dang

C.V.

, Inhibition of lactate dehydrogenase A induces oxidative stress and inhibits tumor progression, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107 (2010), 2037–2042.

29.

Hermes

Gatzemeier

Waschki

and Reck

, Lactate dehydrogenase as prognostic factor in limited and extensive disease stage small cell lung cancer – a retrospective single institution analysis, Respir Med 104 (2010), 1937–1942.

30.

Husain

Huang

Seth

and Sukhatme

V.P.

, Tumor-derived lactate modifies antitumor immune response: Effect on myeloid-derived suppressor cells and NK cells, J Immunol 191 (2013), 1486–1495.

31.

Xian

Z.Y.

Liu

J.M.

Chen

Q.K.

Chen

H.Z.

C.J.

Xue

Yang

H.Q.

J.L.

Liu

X.F.

and Kuang

S.J.

, Inhibition of LDHA suppresses tumor progression in prostate cancer, Tumour Biol 36 (2015), 8093–8100.

32.

Maiso

Huynh

Moschetta

Sacco

Aljawai

Mishima

Asara

J.M.

Roccaro

A.M.

Kimmelman

A.C.

and Ghobrial

I.M.

, Metabolic signature identifies novel targets for drug resistance in multiple myeloma, Cancer Res 75 (2015), 2071–2082.

33.

Zhou

Zhao

Ding

Liu

Fodstad

Riker

A.I.

Kamarajugadda

Owen

L.B.

Ledoux

S.P.

and Tan

, Warburg effect in chemosensitivity: Targeting lactate dehydrogenase-A re-sensitizes taxol-resistant cancer cells to taxol, Mol Cancer 9 (2010), 33.

34.

Wojtkowiak

J.W.

Verduzco

Schramm

K.J.

and Gillies

R.J.

, Drug resistance and cellular adaptation to tumor acidic pH microenvironment, Mol Pharm 8 (2011), 2032–2038.

35.

Thews

Gassner

Kelleher

D.K.

Schwerdt

and Gekle

, Impact of extracellular acidity on the activity of P-glycoprotein and the cytotoxicity of chemotherapeutic drugs, Neoplasia 8 (2006), 143–152.

36.

Doherty

J.R.

and Cleveland

J.L.

, Targeting lactate metabolism for cancer therapeutics, J Clin Invest 123 (2013), 3685–3692.

37.

Xie

Hanai

Ren

J.G.

Kats

Burgess

Bhargava

Signoretti

Billiard

Duffy

K.J.

Grant

Wang

Lorkiewicz

P.K.

Schatzman

Bousamra

Lane

A.N.

Higashi

R.M.

Fan

T.W.

Pandolfi

P.P.

Sukhatme

V.P.

and Seth

, Targeting lactate dehydrogenase – a inhibits tumorigenesis and tumor progression in mouse models of lung cancer and impacts tumor-initiating cells, Cell Metab 19 (2014), 795–809.

38.

Romero-Garcia

Moreno-Altamirano

M.M.

Prado-Garcia

and Sanchez-Garcia

F.J.

, Lactate contribution to the tumor microenvironment: Mechanisms, effects on immune cells and therapeutic relevance, Front Immunol 7 (2016), 52.

39.

Zamarron

B.F.

and Chen

, Dual roles of immune cells and their factors in cancer development and progression, Int J Biol Sci 7 (2011), 651–658.

40.

Carmona-Fontaine

Bucci

Akkari

Deforet

Joyce

J.A.

and Xavier

J.B.

, Emergence of spatial structure in the tumor microenvironment due to the Warburg effect, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110 (2013), 19402–19407.

41.

Colegio

O.R.

Chu

N.Q.

Szabo

A.L.

Chu

Rhebergen

A.M.

Jairam

Cyrus

Brokowski

C.E.

Eisenbarth

S.C.

Phillips

G.M.

Cline

G.W.

Phillips

A.J.

and Medzhitov

, Functional polarization of tumour-associated macrophages by tumour-derived lactic acid, Nature 513 (2014), 559–563.

42.

Qian

B.Z.

and Pollard

J.W.

, Macrophage diversity enhances tumor progression and metastasis, Cell 141 (2010), 39–51.

43.

Chang

C.I.

Liao

J.C.

and Kuo

, Macrophage arginase promotes tumor cell growth and suppresses nitric oxide-mediated tumor cytotoxicity, Cancer Res 61 (2001), 1100–1106.

44.

Bronte

, Tumor cells hijack macrophages via lactic acid, Immunol Cell Biol 92 (2014), 647–649.

45.

Shime

Yabu

Akazawa

Kodama

Matsumoto

Seya

and Inoue

, Tumor-secreted lactic acid promotes IL-23/IL-17 proinflammatory pathway, J Immunol 180 (2008), 7175–7183.

46.

Corzo

C.A.

Condamine

Cotter

M.J.

Youn

J.I.

Cheng

Cho

H.I.

Celis

Quiceno

D.G.

Padhya

McCaffrey

T.V.

McCaffrey

J.C.

and Gabrilovich

D.I.

, HIF-1alpha regulates function and differentiation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the tumor microenvironment, J Exp Med 207 (2010), 2439–2453.

47.

Corzo

C.A.

Cotter

M.J.

Cheng

Kusmartsev

Sotomayor

Padhya

McCaffrey

T.V.

McCaffrey

J.C.

and Gabrilovich

D.I.

, Mechanism regulating reactive oxygen species in tumor-induced myeloid-derived suppressor cells, J Immunol 182 (2009), 5693–5701.

48.

Crane

C.A.

Austgen

Haberthur

Hofmann

Moyes

K.W.

Avanesyan

Fong

Campbell

M.J.

Cooper

Oakes

S.A.

Parsa

A.T.

and Lanier

L.L.

, Immune evasion mediated by tumor-derived lactate dehydrogenase induction of NKG2D ligands on myeloid cells in glioblastoma patients, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111 (2014), 12823–12828.

49.

Champsaur

and Lanier

L.L.

, Effect of NKG2D ligand expression on host immune responses, Immunol Rev 235 (2010), 267–285.

50.

Fischer

Hoffmann

Voelkl

Meidenbauer

Ammer

Edinger

Gottfried

Schwarz

Rothe

Hoves

Renner

Timischl

Mackensen

Kunz-Schughart

Andreesen

Krause

S.W.

and Kreutz

, Inhibitory effect of tumor cell-derived lactic acid on human T cells, Blood 109 (2007), 3812–3819.

51.

Singer

Kastenberger

Gottfried

Hammerschmied

C.G.

Buttner

Aigner

Seliger

Walter

Schlosser

Hartmann

Andreesen

Mackensen

and Kreutz

, Warburg phenotype in renal cell carcinoma: High expression of glucose-transporter 1 (GLUT-1) correlates with low CD8(+) T-cell infiltration in the tumor, Int J Cancer 128 (2011), 2085–2095.

52.

Dong

and Bullock

T.N.

, Metabolic influences that regulate dendritic cell function in tumors, Front Immunol 5 (2014), 24.

53.

Tran Janco

J.M.

Lamichhane

Karyampudi

and Knutson

K.L.

, Tumor-infiltrating dendritic cells in cancer pathogenesis, J Immunol 194 (2015), 2985–2991.

54.

Gottfried

Kunz-Schughart

L.A.

Ebner

Mueller-Klieser

Hoves

Andreesen

Mackensen

and Kreutz

, Tumor-derived lactic acid modulates dendritic cell activation and antigen expression, Blood 107 (2006), 2013–2021.

55.

Scarlett

U.K.

Rutkowski

M.R.

Rauwerdink

A.M.

Fields

Escovar-Fadul

Baird

Cubillos-Ruiz

J.R.

Jacobs

A.C.

Gonzalez

J.L.

Weaver

Fiering

and Conejo-Garcia

J.R.

, Ovarian cancer progression is controlled by phenotypic changes in dendritic cells, J Exp Med 209 (2012), 495–506.

56.

Peter

Rehli

Singer

Renner-Sattler

and Kreutz

, Lactic acid delays the inflammatory response of human monocytes, Biochem Biophys Res Commun 457 (2015), 412–418.

57.

Goldberg

Eddy

E.M.

Duan

and Odet

, LDHC: The ultimate testis-specific gene, J Androl 31 (2010), 86–94.

58.

Koslowski

Tureci

Bell

Krause

Lehr

H.A.

Brunner

Seitz

Nestle

F.O.

Huber

and Sahin

, Multiple splice variants of lactate dehydrogenase C selectively expressed in human cancer, Cancer Res 62 (2002), 6750–6755.

59.

Gupta

G.S.

, LDH-C4: A target with therapeutic potential for cancer and contraception, Mol Cell Biochem 371 (2012), 115–27.

60.

Oliveira

P.F.

Martins

A.D.

Moreira

A.C.

Cheng

C.Y.

and Alves

M.G.

, The warburg effect revisited-lesson from the sertoli cell, Med Res Rev 35 (2015), 126–151.

Elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) can be a marker of immune suppression in cancer: Interplay between hematologic and solid neoplastic clones and their microenvironments

Abstract

Keywords

1. Introduction

2. Elevated serum LDH in immunosuppressed conditions

3. Elevated serum LDH is a negative prognostic biomarker for multiple hematologic and solid neoplasms

4.1 Role of LDH-A in tumor growth, maintenance and metastasis

4.2 Role of LDH-A in resistance of tumor to therapy

5. LDH-A promotes immune escape for neoplastic cells

5.1 The tumor microenvironment

5.2 Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs)

5.3 Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs)

5.4 Natural killer (NK) cells

5.5 T cells

5.6 Dendritic cells

5.7 Monocytes

6. LDH-C and the testis

7. Concluding thoughts and future directions

References