The General Health Questionnaire 12 (GHQ-12) is a short easy-to-use scale to assess psychological distress. The GHQ-12 has not been validated for assessing psychological distress in patients with chronic low back pain (LBP).
OBJECTIVE:
To investigate the psychometric properties of the GHQ-12 in patients with chronic LBP.
METHODS:
The study involved a population of patients undergoing functional restoration for chronic LBP. The intraclass coefficient correlation was used for test-retest reliability (good if 0.7) and the standard error measurement for absolute reliability. Construct validity was assessed with the Spearman correlation coefficient (moderate and high if 0.35 and 0.5, respectively) and internal consistency with Cronbach’s alpha (suitable if 0.7). Responsiveness was assessed by the Wilcoxon test and effect size.
RESULTS:
Four hundred and five patients were included. The intraclass coefficient correlation was 0.73 and standard error measurement 2.49. The GHQ-12 showed high convergence with the Beck Depression Inventory and subscales of the Dallas Pain Questionnaire for anxiety and depression and for sociability. It showed moderate convergence with the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale and subscales of the Dallas Pain Questionnaire for daily activities and for leisure and occupation. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.89. The GHQ-12 score changed after functional restoration. It was lower (better) with than without improvement.
CONCLUSIONS:
We provide validation of the GHQ-12 for assessing psychological distress in patients with chronic LBP.
GBD 2015 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet2016; 388: 1545-1602.
2.
MaherCUnderwoodMBuchbinderR. Non-specific low back pain. Lancet2017; 389: 736-747.
3.
ThomasESilmanAJCroftPPapageorgiouACJaysonMIVMcFarlaneGJ. Predicting who develops chronic low back pain in primary care: a prospective study. BMJ1999; 318: 1662-7.
4.
CrookJMilnerRSchultzIZStringerB. Determinants of occupational disability following a low back injury: a critical review of the literature. J Occup Rehabil2002; 12: 277-95.
5.
FransenMWoodwardMNortonRCogganCDaweMSheridanN. Risk factors associated with the transition from acute to chronic occupational back pain. Spine2002; 27: 92-8.
6.
PincusTBurtonKVogelSFieldA. A systematic review of psychological factors as predictors of chronicity/disability in prospective cohorts of low back pain. Spine2002; 27: E109-20.
7.
RamondABoutonCRichardIRoquelaureYBaufretonCLegrandEHuezJF. Psychosocial risk factors for chronic low back pain in primary care-a systematic review. Fam Practice2010; 28: 12-21.
8.
BenDebbaMTorgersonWSLongDM. Personality traits, pain duration and severity, functional impairment, and psychological distress in patients with persistent low back pain. Pain1997; 72: 115-25.
9.
Van SusanteJVan de SchaafDPavlovP. Psychological distress deteriorates the subjective outcome of lumbosacral fusion. A prospective study. Acta Orthop Belg1998; 64: 371-7.
10.
NiemistöLSarnaSLahtinen-SuopankiTLindgrenKAHurriH. Predictive factors for 1-year outcome of chronic low back pain following manipulation, stabilizing exercises, and physician consultation or physician consultation alone. J Rehabil Med2004; 36: 104-9.
11.
RyanCGGrayHGNewtonMGranatMH. The relationship between psychological distress and free-living physical activity in individuals with chronic low back pain. Man Ther2010; 15: 185-9.
12.
HenrotinYRozenbergSBalaguéFLeclercARouxECedrashiC. European guide lines (COST B13) for the management of low back pain. Rev Rhum2006; 73: S35-S52.
13.
QaseemAWiltTJMcLeanRMForcieaMA. Noninvasive treatments for acute, subacute, and chronic low back pain: a clinical practice guideline from the Americam College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med2017; 166: 514-30.
14.
GoldbergDPBlackwellB. Psychiatric illness in general practice. A detailed study using a new method of case identification. BMJ1970; 1: 439-43.
15.
LangevinVFrançoisMBoiniSRiouA. General Health Questionnaire (GHQ). www.inrs.fr (accessed on 14 April 2018).
16.
GoldbergDPGaterRSartoriusNUstunTBPiccinelliMGurejeORutterC. The validity of two versions of the WHO study of mental illness in general health care. Psychol Med1997; 27: 191-7.
17.
WernekeUGoldbergDPYalcinIUstunBT. The stability of the factor structure of the general health questionnaire. Psychol Med2000; 30: 823-9.
18.
Salama-YounesMMontazeriAIsmaïlARoncinC. Factor structure and internal consistency of the 12-item general health questionnaire (GHQ-12) and the subjective vitality scale (VS), and the relationship between them: a study from France. Health Qual Life Outcomes2009; 7: 22.
19.
LesageFXMartens-ResendeSDeschampsFBerjotS. Validation of the general health questionnaire (GHQ-12) adapted to a work-related context. Open J Prev Med2011; 1: 44-8.
20.
HärkäpääK. Relatinships of psychological distress and health locus of control beliefs with the use of cognitive and behavioural coping strategies in low back pain patients. Clin J Pain1991; 7: 275-82.
21.
HärkäpääKJävikoskiAMellinGHurriHLuomaJ. Health locus of control beliefs and psychological distress as predictors for treatment outcome in low-back pain patients: results of a 3-month follow-up of a controlled intervention study. Pain1991; 46: 35-41.
22.
LeijonOMulderM. Prevalence of low back pain and concurrent psychological distress over a 16-year period. Occup Envirn Med2009; 66: 137-9.
23.
FrostMHReeveBBLiepaAMStaufferJWHaysRD. Mayo/FDA patient-reported outcomes consensus meeting group. What is sufficient evidence for reliability and validity of patient-reported outcome measure? Value Health2007; 10(Suppl 2): S94-S105.
24.
StreinerDLNormanGR. Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
25.
FermanianJ. Validation of assessment scales in physical medicine and rehabilitation: how are psychometric properties determined? Ann Readapt Med Phys2005; 48: 281-7.
26.
ZerkakDMétivierJCFouquetBBeaudreuilJ. Validation of a French version of Roland-Morris questionnaire in chronic low back pain patients. Ann Phys Rehabil Med2013; 56: 613-20.
27.
PoiraudeauSDuvalletADos SantosILRevelM. Efficacité à un an d’un programme de reconditionnement à l’effort proposé à des lombalgiques chroniques lourdement handicapés. Ann Réadapt Méd Phys, 1999; 42: 33-41.
28.
ParientePDGuelfiJD. Inventaires d’auto-évaluation de la psychopathologie chez l’adulte. I: inventaires multidimensionnels. Psychiatr Psychobiol1990; 5: 49-63.
29.
PichotPLemprièreT. Analyse factorielle d’un questionnaire d’auto-évaluation des symptômes dépressifs. Rev Psychol App1964; 14: 15-29.
30.
KopecJAEsdaileJMAbrahamowiczMAbenhaimLWood-DauphineesSLampingDLWilliamsJI. The Quebec back pain disability scale. Conceptualization and development. J Clin Epidemiol1996; 49: 151-61.
31.
MartyMBlotmanFAvouacBRozenbergSValatJP. Validation of the French version of the Dallas Pain Questionnaire in chronic low back pain patients. Rev Rhum Engl Ed1998; 65: 126-34.
32.
CohenJ. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavorial Sciences. Second Edition. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlaum Associates; 1988.
33.
PiccinelliMBisoffiGBonMGCunicoLTansellaM. Validity and test-retest reliability of the Italian version of the 12-item general health questionnaire in general practice: a comparison between three scoring methods. Compr Psychiatry1993; 34: 198-205.
34.
MontazeriAHarirchiAMShariatiMGarmaroudiGEbadiMFatehA. The 12-item general health questionnaire (GHQ-12): translation and validation study of the iranian version. Health Qual Life Outcomes2003; 1: 66.
35.
HobartJCRiaziALampingDLFitzpatrickRThompsonAJ. How responsive is the multiple sclerosis impact scale (MSIS-29)? A comparison with some other self report scales. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2005; 76: 1539-43.
36.
RiaziACanoSJCooperJMBradleyJLSchapiraAHHobartJC. Coordinating outcomes measurement in ataxia resear: do some widely used generic rating scales tick the boxes? Mov Disord2006; 21: 1396-403.
37.
HugeVSchlodererUSteinbergerMWuenschmannBSchöpsPBeyerAAzadSC. Impact of a functional restoration program on pain and health-related quality of life in patients with chronic low back pain. Pain Med2006; 7: 501-8.
38.
MoradiBHagmannSZahlten-HinguranageACaldeiraFPutzCRosshirtNSchönitEMesrianASchiltenwolfMNeubauerE. Efficacy of multidisciplinary treatment for patients with chronic low back pain: a prospective clinical study in 395 patients. J Clin Rheumatol2012; 18: 76-82.
