Regression of lumbar disc herniation by physiotherapy. Does non-surgical spinal decompression therapy make a difference? Double-blind randomized controlled trial
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online September, 2017
Regression of lumbar disc herniation by physiotherapy. Does non-surgical spinal decompression therapy make a difference? Double-blind randomized controlled trial
The aim of the study determining whether or not Non-invasive Spinal Decompression Therapy (NSDT) was effective in resorption of herniation, increasing disc height in patients with lumbar disc herniation (LHNP).
METHODS:
A total of twenty patients diagnosed as LHNP and suffering from pain at least 8 weeks were enrolled to the study. Patients were allocated in study (SG) and control groups (CG) randomly. Both groups received combination of electrotherapy, deep friction massage and stabilization exercise for fifteen session. SG received additionally NSDT different from CG. Numeric Anolog Scale, Straight leg raise test, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were applied at baseline and after treatment. Disc height and herniation thickness were measured on Magnetic Resonance Imagination which performed at baseline and three months after therapy.
RESULTS:
Both treatments had positive effect for improving pain, functional restoration and reduction in thickness of herniation. Although reduction of herniation size was higher in SG than CG, no significant differences were found between groups and any superiority to each other ( 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS:
This study showed that patients with LHNP received physiotherapy had improvement based on clinical and radiologic evidence. NSDT can be used as assistive agent for other physiotherapy methods in treatment of lumbar disc herniation.
ApfelCCCakmakkayaOSMartinWRichmondCMacarioAGeorgeE, et al. Restoration of disk height through non-surgical spinal decompression is associated with decreased discogenic low back pain: A retrospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010; 11(1): 155.
2.
PopeTBloemHLBeltranJMorrisonWWilsonDB. Imaging of the Musculoskeletal System, 2-Volume Set: Expert Radiology Series (Clinics (Elsevier)): Saunders. 2008.
3.
SchoenfeldAJWeinerBK. Treatment of lumbar disc herniation: Evidence-based practice. Int J Gen Med. 2010; 3: 209.
4.
LurieJDTostesonANTostesonTDCarrageeECarrinoJKaiserJ, et al. Reliability of magnetic resonance imaging readings for lumbar disc herniation in the spine patient outcomes research trial (SPORT). Spine. 2008; 33(9): 991.
5.
YıldırımP. Tai chi egzersizinin etkileri ve klinik uygulamaları. Turk Fiz Rehab Derg. 2014; 60(Ekim): 36-42.
6.
WeinsteinJNTostesonTDLurieJDTostesonANHanscomBSkinnerJS, et al. Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: The spine patient outcomes research trial (SPORT): A randomized trial. Jama. 2006; 296(20): 2441-50.
7.
LeslieJPergolizziJVMacarioAApfelCCClairDRichmondC, et al. Prospective evaluation of the efficacy of spinal decompression via the DRX9000 for chronic low back pain. J Med. 2008; 2-8.
8.
OcakFDMKaraaslanMTutarİKonuralpNGüzelantAYÖzgüzelH, et al. Lomber disk hernilerinde konservatif tedavi etkinliǧinin klinik parametreler ve manyetik rezonans görüntüleme yöntemi ile deǧerlendirilmesi. Türk Fiz Tıp Rehab Derg. 2007; 53: 108-12.
9.
DeLoachLJHigginsMSCaplanABStiffJL. The visual analog scale in the immediate postoperative period: Intrasubject variability and correlation with a numeric scale. Anesth Analg. 1998; 86(1): 102-6.
10.
HsiehC-YWalkerJMGillisK. Straight-leg-raising test comparison of three instruments. Phys Ther. 1983; 63(9): 1429-33.
11.
FairbankJCPynsentPB. The Oswestry disability index. Spine. 2000; 25(22): 2940-53.
PortneyLWatkinsM. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice, 474-482 Appleton & Lange Norwalk. CT, USA. 1993.
14.
KarabekirHSYildizhanABalciCAtarEK. Spontaneous regression of lumbar disc herniation. Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia). 2007; 12(1): 76-8.
15.
IkedaTNakamuraTKikuchiTUmedaSSendaHTakagiK. Pathomechanism of spontaneous regression of the herniated lumbar disc: Histologic and immunohistochemical study. J Spinal Disord Tech. 1996; 9(2): 136-40.
16.
ChiuC-CChuangT-YChangK-HWuC-HLinP-WHsuW-Y. The probability of spontaneous regression of lumbar herniated disc: A systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2015; 29(2): 184-95.
17.
MatsubaraYKatoFMimatsuKKajinoGNakamuraSNittaH. Serial changes on MRI in lumbar disc herniations treated conservatively. Neuroradiology. 1995; 37(5): 378-83.
18.
AutioRAKarppinenJNiinimäkiJOjalaRKurunlahtiMHaapeaM, et al. Determinants of spontaneous resorption of intervertebral disc herniations. Spine. 2006; 31(11): 1247-52.
19.
RomanowskiMRomanowskaJGrześkowiakM. A comparison of the effects of deep tissue massage and therapeutic massage on chronic low back pain. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011; 176: 411-4.
20.
LundonKBoltonK. Structure and function of the lumbar intervertebral disk in health, aging, and pathologic conditions. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2001; 31(6): 291-306.
21.
ChoiJLeeSHwangboG. Influences of spinal decompression therapy and general traction therapy on the pain, disability, and straight leg raising of patients with intervertebral disc herniation. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015; 27(2): 481.
22.
AokiYNakajimaAOhtoriSTakahashiHWatanabeFSonobeM, et al. Increase of nerve growth factor levels in the human herniated intervertebral disc: Can annular rupture trigger discogenic back pain? Arthritis Res Ther. 2014; 16(4): R159.
23.
LeeYLeeC-RChoM. Effect of decompression therapy combined with joint mobilization on patients with lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus. J Phys Ther Sci. 2012; 24(9): 829-32.
24.
HahneAJFordJJHinmanRSTaylorNFSurkittLDWaltersAG, et al. Outcomes and adverse events from physiotherapy functional restoration for lumbar disc herniation with associated radiculopathy. Disabil Rehabil. 2011; 33(17-18): 1537-47.
25.
FritzJMThackerayAChildsJDBrennanGP. A randomized clinical trial of the effectiveness of mechanical traction for sub-groups of patients with low back pain: Study methods and rationale. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010; 11(1): 81.
26.
FritzJMLindsayWMathesonJWBrennanGPHunterSJMoffitSD, et al. Is there a subgroup of patients with low back pain likely to benefit from mechanical tractionResults? Of a randomized clinical trial and subgrouping analysis. Spine. 2007; 32(26): E793-E800.
27.
MaS-YKimH-D. The efficacy of spinal decompression via DRX3000 combined with a spinal mobilization and a lumbar stabilization exercise program for patients with discogenic low back pain. J Phys Ther Sci. 2010; 22(4): 345-54.
28.
TempleAK. Effects of spinal decompressor (DRX9000) for lumbar disc herniation. Journal of Saitama Kenou Rehabilitation. 2006; 6.
29.
PergolizziJApfelCCakmakkayaSFlorioFMartinWRichmondC. Restoration of disc height reduces chronic low back pain: 717. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008; 33(5): e219.
30.
UnluZTascıSTarhanSPabuscuYIslakS. Comparison of 3 physical therapy modalities for acute pain in lumbar disc herniation measured by clinical evaluation and magnetic resonance imaging. J Manip Physiol Ther. 2008; 31(3): 191-8.
31.
HaroHKomoriHKatoTHaraYTagawaMShinomiyaK, et al. Experimental studies on the effects of recombinant human matrix metalloproteinases on herniated disc tissues – how to facilitate the natural resorption process of herniated discs. J Orthop Res. 2005; 23(2): 412-9.
32.
DoitaMKanataniTHaradaTMizunoK. Immunohistologic study of the ruptured intervertebral disc of the lumbar spine. Spine. 1996; 21(2): 235-41.
33.
OzturkBGunduzOHOzoranKBostanogluS. Effect of continuous lumbar traction on the size of herniated disc material in lumbar disc herniation. Rheumatol Int. 2006; 26(7): 622-6.
34.
SariHAkarirmakÜKaracanIAkmanH. Computed tomographic evaluation of lumbar spinal structures during traction. Physiother Theory Pract. 2005; 21(1): 3-11.
