Although trunk muscles are involved in many important functions, evaluating trunk muscle strength is not an easy task. If trunk muscle mass and thickness could be used as indicators of trunk muscle strength, the burden of measurement would be reduced, but the relationship between trunk muscle strength and trunk muscle mass and thickness has not been clarified.
OBJECTIVE:
The purpose of this study was to clarify the relationship between trunk muscle strength and trunk muscle mass by bioelectrical impedance analysis and trunk muscle thickness by ultrasound imaging in healthy adults.
METHODS:
One hundred and twenty-one healthy university students were included in this study. Trunk flexion/extension muscle strength and trunk muscle mass by bioelectrical impedance analysis, and trunk muscle thickness by ultrasound imaging were measured.
RESULTS:
Both trunk flexion strength and trunk extension strength were significantly correlated with trunk muscle mass and oblique and rectus abdominis muscle thickness. Multiple regression analysis showed that trunk extension muscle strength had an independent relationship with trunk muscle mass.
CONCLUSIONS:
This study demonstrated that trunk muscle mass or trunk muscle thickness can be used as an alternative means for evaluating trunk muscle strength, making the evaluation of trunk muscles less burdensome.
HodgesP.W. and RichardsonC.A., Contraction of the abdominal muscles associated with movement of the lower limb, Phys. Ther.77(2) (1997), 132–144. doi:10.1093/ptj/77.2.132.
2.
Rodríguez-NúñezI.NavarroX.GaticaD. and ManterolaC., Effect of abdominal muscle training on respiratory muscle strength and forced expiratory flows in sedentary, healthy adolescents, Arch. Argent. Pediatr.114(5) (2016), 434–440. doi:10.5546/aap.2016.434.
3.
CoulombeB.J.GamesK.E.NeilE.R. and EbermanL.E., Core stability exercise versus general exercise for chronic low back pain, J. Athl. Train.52(1) (2017), 71–72. doi:10.4085/1062-6050-51.11.16.
4.
PreisingerE.AlacamliogluY.PilsK.SaradethT. and SchneiderB., Therapeutic exercise in the prevention of bone loss. A controlled trial with women after menopause, Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil.74(2) (1995), 120–123.
5.
PfeiferM.SinakiM.GeusensP.BoonenS.PreisingerE. and MinneH.W., ASBMR Working Group on Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation. Musculoskeletal rehabilitation in osteoporosis: A review, J. Bone Miner. Res.19(8) (2004), 1208–1214. doi:10.1359/JBMR.040507.
6.
NeumannD.A., Kinesiology of the Musculoskeletal System: Foundations for Rehabilitation, 3rd edn, Elsevier, 2017.
7.
BuckinxF.ReginsterJ.Y.DardenneN.CroisiserJ.L.KauxJ.F.BeaudartC., Concordance between muscle mass assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis and by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: A cross-sectional study, BMC Musculoskelet Disord.16(60) (2015), 1–7. doi:10.1186/s12891-015-0510-9.
8.
KarelisA.D.ChamberlandG.Aubertin-LeheudreM. and DuvalC., Ecological mobility in Aging and Parkinson (EMAP) group. Validation of a portable bioelectrical impedance analysis for the assessment of body composition, Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab.38(1) (2013), 27–32.
9.
FujimotoK.InageK.EguchiY.OritaS.ToyoguchiT.YamauchiK., Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis are beneficial tools for measuring the trunk muscle mass of patients with low back pain, Spine Surg. Relat. Res.3(4) (2019), 335–341. doi:10.22603/ssrr.2018-0040.
10.
BelavýD.L.ArmbrechtG. and FelsenbergD., Real-time ultrasound measures of lumbar erector spinae and multifidus: reliability and comparison to magnetic resonance imaging, Physiol. Meas.36(11) (2015), 2285–2299. doi:10.1088/0967-3334/36/11/2285.
11.
CostaL.O.MaherC.G.LatimerJ.HodgesP.W. and ShirleyD., An investigation of the reproducibility of ultrasound measures of abdominal muscle activation in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain, Eur. Spine J.18(7) (2009), 1059–1065. doi:10.1007/s00586-009-1018-5.
12.
SutherlinM.A.GageM.MangumL.C.HertelJ.RussellS.SalibaS.A., Changes in muscle thickness across positions on ultrasound imaging in participants with or without a history of low back pain, J. Athl. Train.53(6) (2018), 553–559. doi:10.4085/1062-6050-491-16.
13.
MisuriG.ColagrandeS.GoriniM.IandelliI.ManciniM.DurantiR., In vivo ultrasound assessment of respiratory function of abdominal muscles in normal subjects, Eur. Respir. J.10(12) (1997), 2861–2867. doi:10.1183/09031936.97.10122861.
14.
SionsJ.M.CrippenD.C.HicksG.E.AlroumiA.M.ManalT.J. and PohligR.T., Exploring neuromuscular electrical stimulation intensity effects on multifidus muscle activity in adults with chronic low back pain: an ultrasound imaging-informed investigation, Clin. Med. Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord.12 (2019), 1179544119849570. doi:10.1177/1179544119849570.
15.
SalamatM.R.ShaneiA.KhoshhaliM.SalamatA.H.SiavashM. and AsgariM., Use of conventional regional DXA scans for estimating whole body composition, Arch. Iran Med.17(10) (2014), 674–678.
16.
MogaP.J.ErigM.ChaffinD.B. and NussbaumM.A., Torso muscle moment arms at intervertebral levels T10 through L5 from CT scans on eleven male and eight female subjects, Spine18(15) (1993), 2305–2309. doi:10.1097/00007632-199311000-00028.
17.
BrownS.H.WardS.R.CookM.S. and LieberR.L., Architectural analysis of human abdominal wall muscles: implications for mechanical function, Spine36(5) (2011), 355–362. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d12ed7.
18.
McGillS.M., A revised anatomical model of the abdominal musculature for torso flexion efforts, J. Biomech.29(7) (1996), 973–977. doi:10.1016/0021-9290(95)00148-4.
19.
KimC.R.ParkD.K.LeeS.T. and RyuJ.S., Electromyographic changes in trunk muscles during graded lumbar stabilization exercises, PM&R8(10) (2016), 979–989. doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.05.017.
20.
KavcicN.GrenierS. and McGillS.M., Determining the stabilizing role of individual torso muscles during rehabilitation exercises, Spine29(11) (2004), 1254–1265. doi:10.1097/00007632-200406010-00016.
21.
UrquhartD.M.BarkerP.J.HodgesP.W.StoryI.H. and BriggsC.A., Regional morphology of the transversus abdominis and obliquus internus and externus abdominis muscles, Clin. Biomech.20(3) (2005), 233–241. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.11.007.
22.
SasakiE.SasakiS.ChibaD.YamamotoY.NawataA.TsudaE., Age-related reduction of trunk muscle torque and prevalence of trunk sarcopenia in community-dwelling elderly: Validity of a portable trunk muscle torque measurement instrument and its application to a large sample cohort study, PLoS One13(2) (2018), 1–14. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0192687.
23.
FukumotoY.IkezoeT.YamadaY.TsukagoshiR.NakamuraM.TakagiY., Age-related ultrasound changes in muscle quantity and quality in women, Ultrasound Med. Biol.41(11) (2015), 3013–3017. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.06.017.
24.
SalimiH.OhyamaS.TeraiH.HoriY.TakahashiS.HoshinoM., Trunk muscle mass measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis reflecting the cross-sectional area of the paravertebral muscles and back muscle strength: a cross-sectional analysis of a prospective cohort study of elderly population, J. Clin. Med.10(6) (2021), 1187. doi:10.3390/jcm10061187.
25.
SionsJ.M.ElliottJ.M.PohligR.T. and HicksG.E., Trunk muscle characteristics of the multifidi, erector spinae, psoas, and quadratus lumborum in older adults with and without chronic low back pain, J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther.47(3) (2017), 173–179. doi:10.2519/jospt.2017.7002.
