The subharmonic emission from insonified contrast microbubbles was used to create a new imaging modality called Subharmonic Imaging. The subharmonic response of contrast microbubbles to ultrasound pulses was first investigated for determining adequate acoustic transmit parameters. Subharmonic A-lines and gray scale images were then obtained using a laboratory pulse-echo system in vitro and a modified ultrasound scanner in vivo. Excellent suppression of all backscattered signals other than from contrast microbubbles was achieved for subharmonic A-lines in vitro while further optimization is required for in vivo gray scale subharmonic images.
de JongN.CornetR.LanceC.T., Higher harmonics of vibrating gas-filled microspheres. Part one: simulations, Ultrasonics32, 447–453 (1994).
9.
de JongN.CornetR.LanceC.T., Higher harmonics of vibrating gas-filled microspheres. Part two: measurements, Ultrasonics32, 455–459 (1994).
10.
ChangP.H.ShungK.K.WuS., Second harmonic imaging and harmonic Doppler measurements with Albunex, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelec. Freq. Contr.42, 1020–1027 (1995).
11.
ForsbergF.GoldbergB.B.LiuJ.B., On the feasibility of real-time, in vivo harmonic imaging with proteinaceous microspheres, J. Ultrasound Med.15, 853–860 (1996).
SimpsonD.H.BurnsP.N., Pulse inversion Doppler: a new method for detecting nonlinear echoes from microbubble contrast agents, in Proc. IEEE Ultrasonic Symp., pp. 1597–1600, IEEE cat. no. 97CH36118 (1997).
14.
ShiW.T.ForsbergF.GoldbergB.B., Subharmonic imaging with gas-filled microbubbles, J. Acoust. Soc. Am.101, 3139 (1997) (abstract).
15.
ShankarP.M.KrishnaP.D.NewhouseV.L., Advantages of subharmonic over second harmonic back-scatter for contrast-to-tissue echo enhancement, Ultrasound Med. Biol.24, 395–399 (1998).
16.
ShiW.T.ForsbergF.RaichlenJ.S., Pressure dependence of subharmonic signals from contrast microbubbles, Ultrasound Med. Biol.25, 275–283 (1999).
17.
MuirT.G.CarstensenE.L., Prediction of nonlinear acoustic effects at biomedical frequencies and intensities, Ultrasound Med. Biol.6, 345–357 (1980).
18.
WardB.BakerA.C.HumphreyV.F., Nonlinear propagation applied to the improvement of resolution in diagnostic medical ultrasound. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.101, 143–154 (1997).
19.
LeightonT.G., The Acoustic Bubble (Academic Press, London, 1994).
20.
EllerA.FlynnH.G., Generation of subharmonics of order one-half by bubble in a sound field. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.46, 722–727 (1969).
21.
NeppirasE. A., Subharmonic and other low-frequency emission from bubbles in sound-irradiated liquids. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.46, 587–601 (1968).
22.
ProsperettiA., Nonlinear oscillations of gas bubble in liquids: transient solutions and the connection between subharmonic signal and cavitation, J. Acoust. Soc. Am.57, 810–821 (1975).
23.
de JongN.HoffL.SkotlandT., Absorption and scatter of encapsulated gas filled microspheres: theoretical considerations and some measurements, Ultrasonics30, 95–103 (1992).
24.
LotsbergO.HovemJ.M.AksumB., Experimental observation of subharmonic oscillations in Infoson bubbles, J. Acoust. Soc. Am.99, 1366–1369 (1996).
25.
ShiW.T.ForsbergF.GuptaM., Subharmonic response of a new us contrast agent, Radiology205 (P), 353 (1997) (abstract).
26.
WheatleyM.A.ShenP.SinghalS.GoldbergB.B., Surfactant-stabilized microbubble mixtures, process for preparation and methods of using same, US patent 5352,436 (1994).
27.
WheatleyM.A.SinghalS., Structure studies on stabilized microbubbles: development of a novel contrast agent for diagnostic ultrasound, J. React. Polymers25, 157–166 (1995).
28.
ForsbergF.WuY.MakinI., Quantitative acoustic characterization of a new surfactant-based ultrasound contrast agent, Ultrasound Med. Biol.23, 1201–1208 (1997).
29.
CachardC.BouakkazA.GimenezG., In vitro evaluation of acoustic properties of ultrasound contrast agents: experimental set-up and signal processing, Ultrasonics34, 595–598 (1996).
30.
Van LiewH.D.BurkardM.E., Bubbles in circulating blood: stabilization and simulations of cyclic changes of size and content, J. Appl. Physiol.79, 1379–1385 (1995).
31.
Van LiewH.D.BurkardM.E., Behavior of bubbles of slowly permeating gas used for ultrasonic imaging contrast, J. Invest. Radiol.30, 315–321 (1995).
32.
KabalnovA.KleinD.PeluraT., Dissolution of multicomponent microbubbles in the bloodstream: 1. Theory, Ultrasound Med. Biol.24, 739–749 (1998).
33.
KabalnovA.BradleyJ.FlaimS., Dissolution of multicomponent microbubbles in the bloodstream: 2. Experiment, Ultrasound Med. Biol.24, 751–760 (1998).
34.
DaytonP.A.MorganK.E.KlibanovA.L.BrandenburgerG.H.FerraraK.W.Optical and acoustical observations of the effects of ultrasound on contrast agents, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelec. Freq. Contr.46, 220–232 (1999).
