Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been used to solubilize freeze-dried chitosan (CS) formulations to form injectable implants for tissue repair.
OBJECTIVE:
To determine whether the in vitro performance of the formulations depends on the type of PRP preparation used to solubilize CS.
METHODS:
Formulations containing 1% (w/v) CS with varying degrees of deacetylation (DDA 80.5–84.8%) and number average molar mass (M n 32–55 kDa), 1% (w/v) trehalose and 42.2 mM calcium chloride were freeze-dried. Seven different PRP preparations were used to solubilize the formulations. Controls were recalcified PRP.
RESULTS:
CS solubilization was achieved with all PRP preparations. CS-PRP formulations were less runny than their corresponding PRP controls. All CS-PRP formulations had a clotting time below 9 minutes, assessed by thromboelastography, while the leukocyte-rich PRP controls took longer to coagulate (>32 min), and the leukocyte-reduced PRP controls did not coagulate in this dynamic assay. In glass culture tubes, all PRP controls clotted, expressed serum and retracted (43–82% clot mass lost) significantly more than CS-PRP clots (no mass lost). CS dispersion was homogenous within CS-PRP clots.
CONCLUSIONS:
In vitro performance of the CS-PRP formulations was comparable for all types of PRPs assessed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
