Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2017-9
The efficacy and safety of combination therapy of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound stimulation in the treatment of unstable both radius and ulna fractures in children
There are few reports of Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) treatment for fresh forearm fractures in children.
Objectives:
LIPUS stimulation was applied after surgery of forearm fractures in children and the efficacy and safety of combination therapy of LIPUS treatment were evaluated.
Patients and methods:
Children with both radius and ulna fracture, twenty-five diaphysis (mid-R&U) and nineteen metaphysis (dist-R&U) fractures, were treated with intramedullary nailing followed by cast and splint mobilization. Thirteen patients in the mid-R&U fracture group and eight patients in the dist-R&U fracture group were combined with LIPUS stimulation postoperatively.
Results:
Periosteal callus appeared significantly earlier after surgery in the LIPUS-treated groups than in the groups without LIPUS treatment. The duration of external fixation was significantly shorter in the dist-R&U fracture group treated with LIPUS stimulation compared with that in the mid-R&U fracture group without LIPUS treatment. Furthermore, the time span needed for bone union in the groups with LIPUS stimulation was significantly shorter than in the groups without LIPUS stimulation.
Conclusions:
It is suggested that LIPUS stimulation can lead to a reduction of treatment periods of unstable forearm fractures safely after operation even in children.
BouldM. and BannisterG.C., Refractures of the radius and ulna in children, Injury30(9) (1999), 583–586. doi:10.1016/S0020-1383(99)00151-5.
2.
DavisD.R. and GreenD.P., Forearm fractures in children: Pitfalls and complications, Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.120 (1976), 172–183.
3.
FernandezF.F.EgenolfM.CarstenC.HolzF.SchneiderS. and WentzensenA., Unstable diaphyseal fractures of both bones of the forearm in children: Plate fixation versus intramedullary nailing, Injury36(10) (2005), 1210–1216. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2005.03.004.
4.
McKibbinB., The biology of fracture healing in long bones, J. Bone Jt. Surg., Br. Vol.60B (1978), 150–162.
5.
LascombesP.PrevotJ.LigierJ.N.MetaizeauJ.P. and PonceletT., Elastic stable intramedullary nailing in forearm shaft fractures in children: 85 cases, J. Pediatr. Orthop.10(2) (1990), 167–171. doi:10.1097/01241398-199003000-00005.
6.
OnoM.BechtoldJ.E.MerkowR.L.ShermanR.E. and GustiloR.B., Rotational stability of diaphyseal fractures of the radius and ulna fixed with Rush pins and/or fracture bracing, Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.240 (1989), 236–243.
7.
AdamczykM.J. and RileyP.M., Delayed union and nonunion following closed treatment of diaphyseal pediatric forearm fractures, J. Pediatr. Orthop.25(1) (2005), 51–55.
8.
WrightT.W. and GlowczewskieF., Vascular anatomy of the ulna, J. Hand. Surg. Am.23(5) (1998), 800–804. doi:10.1016/S0363-5023(98)80153-6.
9.
SchoferM.D.BlockJ.E.AignerJ. and SchmelzA., Improved healing response in delayed unions of the tibia with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound: Results of a randomized Sham-controlled trial, BMC Musculoskelet. Disord.11 (2010), 229. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-11-229.
10.
GebauerD.MayrE.OrthnerE. and RyabyJ.P., Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound: Effects on nonunions, Ultrasound Med. Biol.31 (2005), 1391–1402. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2005.06.002.
11.
NolteP.A.van der KransA.PatkaP.JanssenI.M.RyabyJ.P. and AlbersG.H., Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound in the treatment of nonunions, J. Trauma Acute Care Surg.51(4) (2001), 693–703. doi:10.1097/00005373-200110000-00012.
12.
HeckmanJ.D.RyabyJ.P.McCabeJ.FreyJ.J. and KilcoyneR.F., Acceleration of tibial fracture-healing by non-invasive, low-intensity pulsed ultrasound, J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am.76(1) (1994), 26–34. doi:10.2106/00004623-199401000-00004.
13.
MayrE.FrankelV.H. and RuterA., Ultrasound – An alternative healing method for nonunions?, Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg.120(1–2) (2000), 1–8. doi:10.1007/PL00021234.
14.
GrigoryanM.LynchJ.A.FierlingerA.L.GuermaziA.FanB.MacLeanD.B.MacLeanA. and GenantH.K., Quantitative and qualitative assessment of closed fracture healing using computed tomography and conventional radiography, Acad. Radiol.10(11) (2003), 1267–1273. doi:10.1016/S1076-6332(03)00467-7.
15.
KhanY. and LaurencinC.T., Fracture repair with ultrasound: Clinical and cell-based evaluation, J. Bone Jt. Surg.90(Suppl. 1) (2008), 138–144. doi:10.2106/JBJS.G.01218.
16.
TangC.-H.YangR.-S.HuangT.-H.LuD.Y.ChuangW.J.HuangT.F. and FuW.M., Ultrasound stimulates cyclooxygenase-2 expression and increases bone formation through integrin, focal adhesion kinase, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, and Akt pathway in osteoblasts, Mol. Pharmacol.69(6) (2006), 2047–2057. doi:10.1124/mol.105.022160.
17.
YangR.-S.LinW.-L.ChenY.-Z.TangC.H.HuangT.H.LuB.Y. and FuW.M., Regulation by ultrasound treatment on the integrin expression and differentiation of osteoblasts, Bone36(2) (2005), 276–283. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2004.10.009.
18.
ZhouS.SchmelzA.SeufferleinT.LiY.ZhaoJ. and BachemM.G., Molecular mechanisms of low intensity pulsed ultrasound in human skin fibroblasts, J. Biol. Chem.279(52) (2004), 54463–54469. doi:10.1074/jbc.M404786200.
19.
KumagaiK.TakeuchiR.IshikawaH.YamaguchiY.FujisawaT.KuniyaT.TakagawaS.MuschlerG.F. and SaitoT., Low intensity pulsed ultrasound accelerates fracture healing by stimulation of recruitment of both local and circulating osteogenic progenitors, J. Orthop. Res.30(9) (2012), 1516–1521. doi:10.1002/jor.22103.
20.
TakayamaT.SuzukiN.IkedaK.ShimadaT.SuzukiA.MaenoM.OtsukaK. and ItoK., Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound stimulates osteogenic differentiation in ROS 17/2.8 cells, Life Sci.80(10) (2007), 965–971. doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2006.11.037.
21.
MalizosK.N.HantesM.E.ProtopappasV. and PapachristosA., Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound for bone healing: An overview, Injury37(Suppl. 1) (2006), S56–S62. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2006.02.037.
22.
Bashardoust TajaliS.HoughtonP.MacDermidJ.C. and GrewalR., Effects of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound therapy on fracture healing: A systematic review and meta-analysis, Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil.91(4) (2012), 349–367. doi:10.1097/PHM.0b013e31822419ba.
23.
ReherP.HarrisM.WhitemanM. and MeghjiS., Ultrasound stimulates nitric oxide and prostaglandin E2 production by human osteoblasts, Bone31(1) (2002), 236–241. doi:10.1016/S8756-3282(02)00789-5.
24.
YangK.H.ParviziJ.WangS.J.LewallenD.G.KinnickR.R.GreenleafJ.F. and BolanderM.E., Exposure to low-intensity ultrasound increases aggrecan gene expression in a rat femur fracture model, J. Orthop. Res.14(5) (1996), 802–809. doi:10.1002/jor.1100140518.
25.
KristiansenT.K.RyabyJ.P.McCabeJ.FreyJ.J. and RoeL.R., Accelerated healing of distal radial fractures with the use of specific, low-intensity ultrasound, J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am.79(7) (1997), 961–973. doi:10.2106/00004623-199707000-00002.
26.
LiuY.WeiX.KuangY.ZhengY.GuX.ZhanH. and ShiY., Ultrasound treatment for accelerating fracture healing of the distal radius. A control study, Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira29(11) (2014), 765–770. doi:10.1590/S0102-86502014001800012.
