The viscoelastic properties of cylinders (diameter 5 mm, height 2.2 ± 0.2 mm) of Nagor silicone elastomer of medium hardness, were investigated before and after the specimens had undergone accelerated aging in saline solution at 70°C for 38, 76 and 114 days (to simulate aging at 37°C, for 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively). All sets of specimens were immersed in physiological saline solution at 37°C during testing and the properties were measured using dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA). A sinusoidal cyclic compression of 40 N ± 5 N was applied over a frequency range, f, of 0.02–25 Hz. Values of the storage, , and loss, , moduli were found to depend on f; the dependence of or on the logarithm (base 10) of f was represented by a second-order polynomial. After accelerated aging, the and values did not increase significantly (). Furthermore, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) showed that accelerated aging did not affect the surface morphology of silicone. Attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infra-red spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) showed that accelerated aging had a negligible effect on the surface chemical structures of the material. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) showed no changes to the bulk properties of silicone, following accelerated aging.
SwansonA.B.MeesterW.D.SwansonG.D.RangaswamyL. and SchutG.E.D., Durability of silicone implants – An in vivo study, Orthopaedic Clinics of North America4 (1973), 1097–1112.
2.
MurataH.TaguchiN.HamadaT.KawamuraM. and McCabeJ.F., Dynamic viscoelasticity of soft liners and masticatory function, J. Dent. Res.81 (2002), 123–128.
3.
MurataH.HongG.HamadaT. and PolyzoisG.L., Dynamic mechanical properties of silicone maxillofacial prosthetic materials and the influence of frequency and temperature on their properties, Int. J. Prosthodont.16 (2003), 369–374.
4.
HukinsD.W.L.MahomedA. and KukurekaS.N., Accelerated aging for testing polymeric biomaterials and medical devices, Med. Eng. Phys.30 (2008), 1270–1274.
5.
SimmonsA.HyvarinenJ.OdellR.A.MartinD.J.GunatillakeP.A.NobleK.R. and Poole-WarrenL.A., Long-term in vivo biostability of poly(dimethylsiloxane)/poly(hexamethylene oxide) mixed macrodiol-based polyurethane elastomers, Biomaterials25 (2004), 4887–4900.
SimmonsA.PadsalgikarA.D.FerrisL.M. and Poole-WarrenL.A., Biostability and biological performance of a PDMS-based polyurethane for controlled drug release, Biomaterials29 (2008), 2987–2995.
8.
SimmonsA.HyvarinenJ. and Poole-WarrenL., The effect of sterilisation on a poly(dimethylsiloxane)/poly(hexamethylene oxide) mixed macrodiol-based polyurethane elastomer, Biomaterials27 (2006), 4484–4497.
9.
DoleželB.AdamírováL.NáprstekZ. and VondráčekP., In vivo degradation of polymers. I. Change of mechanical-properties in polyethylene pacemaker lead insulations during long-term implantation in the human-body, Biomaterials10 (1989), 96–100.
10.
HemmerichK.J., Accelerated aging. General aging theory and simplified protocol for accelerated aging of medical devices, Med. Plast. Biomat.July/August (1998), 16–23.
11.
MahomedA.HukinsD.W.L.KukurekaS.N. and ShepherdD.E.T., Effect of accelerated aging on the viscoelastic properties of Elast-Eon™: A polyurethane with soft poly(dimethylsiloxane) and poly(hexamethylene oxide) segments, Mater. Sci. Eng. C30 (2010), 1298–1303.
12.
WardI.M., Mechanical Properties of Solid Polymers, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1990.
13.
FerryJ.D., Viscoelastic Properties of Polymers, John Wiley & Sons, New York, London, 1961.
14.
British Standards Institution, Physical testing of rubber-Part A6: Method for determination of compression set at ambient, elevated or low temperatures, BS-903-A6:1992, p. 18.
15.
MahomedA.HukinsD.W.L. and KukurekaS.N., Viscoelastic properties of medical grade silicones in tension, J. Polym. Mater.26 (2009), 199–206.
16.
MahomedA.ChidiN.M.HukinsD.W.L.KukurekaS.N. and ShepherdD.E.T., Frequency dependence of viscoelastic properties of medical grade silicones, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B89 (2009), 210–216.
17.
JamesG., Advanced Modern Engineering Mathematics, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Wokingham, 1993.
18.
Ghanbari-SiahkaliA.MitraS.KingshottP.AlmdalK.BlochC. and RehmeierH.K., Investigation of the hydrothermal stability of cross-linked liquid silicone rubber (LSR), Polym. Degrad. Stab.90 (2005), 471–480.
19.
CheremisinoffN.P.BoykoR. and LeidyL., Analytical test methods for polymer characterization, in: Elastomer Technology HandbookCheremisinoffN.P., ed., CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, Ann Arbor, London, Tokyo, 1993, pp. 9–16.
20.
MurayamaT., Dynamic Mechanical Analysis of Polymeric Material, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam, Oxford, New York, 1978.
21.
ClarsonS.J.DodgsonK. and SemlyenJ.A., Studies of cyclic and linear poly(dimethylsiloxanes): 19. Glass transition temperatures and crystallization behaviour, Polymer26 (1985), 930–934.
22.
WagnerW.C.KawanoF.DootzE.R. and KoranA., Dynamic viscoelastic properties of processed soft denture liners: Part 2 – Effect of aging, J. Prosth. Dent.74 (1995), 299–304.
23.
Saber-SheikhK.ClarkeR.L. and BradenM., Viscoelastic properties of some soft lining materials II – Ageing characteristics, Biomaterials20 (1999), 2055–2062.
24.
JepsonN.J.A.McCabeJ.F. and StorerR., Age changes in the viscoelasticity of permanent soft lining materials, J. Dent.21 (1993), 171–178.
25.
YuR.KoranA.3rd and CraigR.G., Physical properties of maxillofacial elastomers under conditions of accelerated aging, J. Dent. Res.59 (1980), 1041–1047.
26.
DootzE.R.KoranA. and CraigR.G., Physical-properties of 3 maxillofacial materials as a function of accelerated aging, J. Prosth. Dent.71 (1994), 379–383.
27.
CraigR.G.KoranA. and YuR., Elastomers for maxillofacial applications, Biomaterials1 (1980), 112–117.
28.
GoldbergA.J.CraigR.G. and FiliskoF.E., Polyurethane elastomers as maxillofacial prosthetic materials, J. Dent. Res.57 (1978), 563–569.
29.
WilsonH.J. and TomlinH.R., Soft lining materials: Some relevant properties and their determination, J. Prosth. Dent.21 (1969), 244–250.
