Part–whole relations are pervasive throughout domain ontologies and enjoy interest also in, inter alia, NLP and manufacturing, and by philosophers in the scope of mereology. There exist a stable list of part–whole relations that are assumed to be common, yet for isiZulu, among other languages, there were at least linguistic differences. This raises the question whether there are ontological differences, which would imply that the ‘common’ list is not universal across languages and cultures. We investigated this for 18 part–whole terms in the Zulu language that we selected from an initial list of 81 terms collected. They were formalised and aligned to the well-known part–whole relations, and checked against a corpus. While there is a term for general parthood in Zulu, the main difference observed concerns relation proliferation due to very specific relata that are entities typically represented only in domain ontologies. This poses new questions for ontology engineering on how to manage the plurality of relations and for philosophy to possibly extend mereology.
Al Zamil, M.G.H. & Al-Radaideh, Q. (2014). Automatic extraction of ontological relations from Arabic text. Journal of King Saud University – Computer and Information Sciences, 26(4), 462–472. doi:10.1016/j.jksuci.2014.06.007.
2.
Ameka, F. (1996). Body parts in Ewe grammar. In The Grammar of Inalienability: A Typological Perspective on Body Part Terms and the Part–Whole Relation (pp. 783–840). Mouton de Gruyter.
3.
Artale, A., Guarino, N. & Keet, C.M. (2008). Formalising temporal constraints on part–whole relations. In G.Brewka and J.Lang (Eds.), 11th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR’08), Sydney, Australia, September 16–19, 2008 (pp. 673–683). AAAI Press.
4.
Barnett, D. (2004). Some stuffs are not sums of stuff. The Philosophical Review, 113(1), 89–100. doi:10.1215/00318108-113-1-89.
5.
Bennett, K. (2017). Part and whole, again. Philosophical Issues, 27, 7–25. doi:10.1111/phis.12101.
6.
Brakel, J.V. (1986). The chemistry of substances and the philosophy of mass terms. Synthese, 69, 291–324. doi:10.1007/BF00413976.
7.
Buttigieg, P.L., Morrison, N., Smith, B., Mungall, C.J. & Lewis, S.E. (2013). The environment ontology: Contextualising biological and biomedical entities. Journal of Biomedical Semantics, 4, 43. doi:10.1186/2041-1480-4-43.
8.
Byamugisha, J., Keet, C.M. & DeRenzi, B. (2017). Evaluation of a Runyankore grammar engine for healthcare messages. In Proceedings of the 10th International Natural Language Generation Conference (INLG’17), Santiago de Compostela, Spain, September 4–7, 2017 (pp. 105–113). Association for Computational Linguistics.
9.
Cao, X., Cao, C., Wang, S. & Lu, H. (2008). Extracting part–whole relations from unstructured Chinese corpus. In Fifth International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD’08). IEEE Xplore.
10.
Chappell, H. & McGregor, W. (Eds.) (1996). The Grammar of Inalienability: A Typological Perspective on Body Part Terms and the Part–Whole Relation. Mouton de Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110822137.
11.
Climent, S. (2001). Individuation by partitive constructions in Spanish. In P.Bouillon and F.Busa (Eds.), The Language of Word Meaning (pp. 192–214). Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511896316.013.
12.
Coenders, H. (Ed.) (1998). Kramers Woordenboek Nederlands (21st ed.). Elsevier.
Doke, C.M., Malcolm, D.M., Sikakana, J.M.A. & Vilakazi, B.W. (1958). English–Zulu Zulu–English Dictionary. Witwatersrand University Press. 918 pp.
15.
Donnelly, M. & Bittner, T. (2009). Summation relations and portions of stuff. Philosophical Studies, 143, 167–185. doi:10.1007/s11098-007-9197-6.
16.
Engelbrecht, C., Shangase, N.C., Majeke, S.J., Mthembu, S.Z. & Zondi, Z.M. (2010). IsiZulu terminology development in nursing and midwifery. Alternation, 17(1), 249–272.
17.
Fernández-López, M., Gómez-Pérez, A. & Suárez-Figueroa, M.C. (2008). Selecting and customizing a mereology ontology for its reuse in a pharmaceutical product ontology. In C.Eschenbach and M.Grüninger (Eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on Formal Ontology and Information Systems (FOIS’08) (pp. 181–194). IOS Press.
18.
Frescura, F. & Myeza, J. (2016). Illustrated Glossary of Southern African Architectural Terms. Bilingual Glossary Series. UKZN Press.
19.
Galton, A. (2018). Yet another taxonomy of part–whole relations. In CAOS at the Joint Ontology Workshops2018. CEUR-WS.
20.
Guizzardi, G. (2005). Ontological foundations for structural conceptual models. PhD thesis, University of Twente, The Netherlands. Telematica Instituut Fundamental Research Series No. 15.
21.
Guizzardi, G. (2007). Modal aspects of object types and part–whole relations and the de re/de dicto distinction. In 19th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAISE’07), Trondheim, 2007. LNCS (Vol. 4495). Springer.
22.
Hahmann, T. & Brodaric, B. (2014). Voids and material constitution across physical granularities. In Proceedings of the Conference on Formal Ontology and Information Systems (FOIS’14). IOS Press.
23.
Hayman, L.M. (1996). The syntax of body parts in Haya. In H.Chappell and W.McGregor (Eds.), The Grammar of Inalienability: A Typological Perspective on Body Part Terms and the Part–Whole Relation (pp. 865–890). Mouton de Gruyter.
24.
Hussey, N. (2012/2013). The language barrier: The overlooked challenge to equitable health care. SAHR, 189–195.
25.
Ittoo, A. & Bouma, G. (2013). Minimally-supervised extraction of domain-specific part–whole relations using Wikipedia as knowledge-base. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 85, 57–79. doi:10.1016/j.datak.2012.06.004.
26.
Keet, C.M. (2008). A formal theory of granularity. PhD thesis, KRDB Research Centre, Faculty of Computer Science, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Italy. http://www.meteck.org/PhDthesis.html.
27.
Keet, C.M. (2014). A core ontology of macroscopic stuff. In K.Janowicz and S.Schlobach (Eds.), 19th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW’14), 24–28 Nov, 2014, Linkoping, Sweden. LNAI (Vol. 8876, pp. 209–224). Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-13704-9_17.
28.
Keet, C.M. (2016). Relating some stuff to other stuff. In E.Blomqvist, P.Ciancarini, F.Poggi and F.Vitali (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW’16), 19–23 November, 2016, Bologna, Italy. LNAI (Vol. 10024, pp. 368–383). Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-49004-5_24.
29.
Keet, C.M. (2017a). A note on the compatibility of part–whole relations with foundational ontologies. In FOUST-II: 2nd Workshop on Foundational Ontology, JOWO 2017. CEUR-WS (Vol. 2050, p. 10).
30.
Keet, C.M. (2017b). Representing and aligning similar relations: Parts and wholes in isiZulu vs English. In Language, Data, and Knowledge 2017 (LDK’17). LNAI (Vol. 10318, pp. 58–73). Springer.
31.
Keet, C.M. & Artale, A. (2008). Representing and reasoning over a taxonomy of part–whole relations. Applied Ontology, 3(1–2), 91–110. doi:10.3233/AO-2008-0044.
32.
Keet, C.M. & Khumalo, L. (2016). On the verbalization patterns of part–whole relations in isiZulu. In 9th International Natural Language Generation Conference (INLG’16), 5–8 September, 2016, Edinburgh, UK (pp. 174–183). ACL. doi:10.18653/v1/W16-6629.
33.
Keet, C.M. & Khumalo, L. (2018). On the ontology of part–whole relations in Zulu language and culture. In S.Borgo and P.Hitzler (Eds.), 10th International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems 2018 (FOIS’18), 17–21 September, 2018, Cape Town, South Africa. FAIA (Vol. 306, pp. 225–238). IOS Press.
34.
Keet, C.M. & Kutz, O. (2017). Orchestrating a network of mereo(topo)logical theories. In Proceedings of the Knowledge Capture Conference (K-CAP’17), K-CAP 2017 (pp. 11:1–11:8). New York, NY, USA: ACM. 10.1145/3148011.3148013.
35.
Khumalo, L. (2015). Advances in developing corpora in African languages. Kuwala, 1(2), 21–30.
36.
Khumalo, L. (2017). Intellectualization through terminology development. Lexicos, 27, 252–264.
37.
Masolo, C., Borgo, S., Gangemi, A., Guarino, N. & Oltramari, A. (2003). Ontology library. WonderWeb Deliverable D18 (ver. 1.0, 31-12-2003). http://wonderweb.semanticweb.org.
38.
Mbatha, M.O. (Ed.) (2006). Isichazamazwi SesiZulu. Pietermaritzburg: New Dawn Publishers.
39.
Mizoguchi, R. (2010). YAMATO: Yet Another More Advanced Top-level Ontology. In Proceedings of the Sixth Australasian Ontology Workshop. Conferences in Research and Practice in Information, CRPIT (pp. 1–16). Sydney: ACS.
40.
Mossakowski, T., Codescu, M., Neuhaus, F. & Kutz, O. (2015). The distributed ontology, modelling and specification language – DOL. In The Road to Universal Logic – Festschrift for 50th Birthday of Jean-Yves Beziau, Volume II. Studies in Universal Logic. Birkhäuser.
41.
Motik, B., Patel-Schneider, P.F. & Parsia, B. (2009). OWL 2 web ontology language structural specification and functional-style syntax. W3c Recommendation, W3C. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax/.
42.
Motschnig-Pitrik, R. & Kaasboll, J. (1999). Part–whole relationship categories and their application in object-oriented analysis. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 11(5), 779–797. doi:10.1109/69.806936.
Poveda-Villalón, M., Suárez-Figueroa, M.C. & Gómez-Pérez, A. (2012). Validating ontologies with OOPS!. In A.ten Teijeet al. (Eds.), 18th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW’12), Oct 8–12, Galway, Ireland. LNAI (Vol. 7603, pp. 267–281). Germany: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33876-2_24.
45.
Rogers, J. & Rector, A. (2000). GALEN’s model of parts and wholes: Experience and comparisons. In Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium 2000 (pp. 714–718). AMIA.
46.
Rosse, C. & Mejino Jr, J.L.V. (2003). A reference ontology for biomedical informatics: The foundational model of anatomy. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 36(6), 478–500. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2003.11.007.
47.
Shrestha, R., Arnaud, E., Mauleon, R., Senger, M., Davenport, G.F., Hancock, D., Morrison, N., Bruskiewich, R. & McLaren, G. (2010). Multifunctional crop trait ontology for breeders’ data: Field book, annotation, data discovery and semantic enrichment of the literature. AoB PLANTS, 201, plq008.
48.
Smith, B., Ceusters, W., Klagges, B., Köhler, J., Kumar, A., Lomax, J., Mungall, C., Neuhaus, F., Rector, A.L. & Rosse, C. (2005). Relations in biomedical ontologies. Genome Biology, 6, R46.
49.
SNOMED CT (2019). (last accessed: January 2019). http://www.ihtsdo.org/snomed-ct/.
50.
Tandon, N., Hariman, C., Urbani, J., Rohrbach, A., Rohrbach, M. & Weikum, G. (2016). Commonsense in parts: Mining part–whole relations from the web and image tags. In Proceedings of the Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’16) (pp. 243–250). AAAI Press.
51.
The Plant Ontology Consortium (2002). The plant ontology consortium and plant ontologies. Comparative and Functional Genomics, 3, 137–142. doi:10.1002/cfg.154.
52.
Thomson, J.J. (1983). Parthood and identity across time. The Journal of Philosophy, 80(4), 201–220. doi:10.2307/2026004.
53.
Uschold, M. & King, M. (1995). Towards a methodology for building ontologies. In Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing (Co-Located with IJCAI’95).
54.
Varzi, A.C. (2004). Mereology. In E.N.Zalta (Ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2004 ed.). Stanford. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2004/entries/mereology/.
55.
Varzi, A.C. (2007). Spatial reasoning and ontology: parts, wholes, and locations. In M.Aiello, I.Pratt-Hartmann and J.van Benthem (Eds.), Handbook of Spatial Logics (pp. 945–1038). Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5587-4_15.
56.
Velichko, H., et al. (2011). Implicit personality conceptions of the Nguni cultural-linguistic groups of South Africa. Cross-Cultural Research, 45(3), 235–266. doi:10.1177/1069397111402462.
57.
Vieu, L. & Aurnague, M. (2005). Part-of relations, functionality and dependence. In Categorization of Spatial Entities in Language and Cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
58.
Winston, M.E., Chaffin, R. & Herrmann, D. (1987). A taxonomy of part–whole relations. Cognitive Science, 11(4), 417–444. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1104_2.
59.
Yıldız, T., Diri, B. & Yıldırım, S. (2016). Acquisition of Turkish meronym based on classification of patterns. Pattern Analysis and Applications, 19(2), 495–507. 10.1007/s10044-015-0516-9.
