This paper aims to provide some theoretical starting points for constructing a social science approach to environmental issues which goes beyond narrower forms of constructivism without dismissing the importance of interpretative sociology. An ecological understanding of society is compared with the notion of structuration and integrated into the concept of coevolution in order to shed light on the dynamic nature of socioenvironmental relations and move beyond the constructivist/realist dualism.
AllenPeter M.1994. ‘Evolution, Sustainability, and Industrial Development’, in AyresR. and SimonisU. (ed.) Industrial Metabolism, pp. 78–100. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
2.
AltieriM.A. (ed.) 1987. Agroecology: the scientific basis of alternative agriculture. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.
3.
AyresR. and SimonisU. (eds) 1994. Industrial Metabolism. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
4.
BeckU.1992. Risk Society.LondonSage.
5.
BeinartW. and CoatesP.1995. Environment and History. London: Routledge.
6.
ButtelF.H.1987. ‘New Directions in Environmental Sociology’, Annual Review of Sociology, 13: 465–488.
7.
ButtelF.H.1993. ‘Environmental Sociology as Science and Social Movement’, Environment, Technology and Society, 73: 10–11.
8.
ButtelF.H.1994. ‘Social Institutions and Environmental Change in the Late Twentieth Century: Emerging Social Issues and Tendencies’. Paper presented to the Departamento de Sociologia, Instituto de Economía y Geografía del CSIC, Mérida, Spain.
9.
ButtelF.H., HawkinsA.P. and PowerA.G.1990. ‘From Limits to Growth to Global Change’, Global Environmental Change, 1: 57–66.
10.
ButtelF.H. and TaylorP.J.1992. ‘Environmental Sociology and Global Environmental Change: A Critical Assessment’, Society and Natural Resources, 5: 211–230.
11.
CattonW.R.Jnr. and DunlapR.E.1978a. ‘Environmental Sociology: a new paradigm?’ The American Sociologist, 13: 41–49.
12.
CattonW.R.Jnr. and DunlapR.E.1978b. ‘Paradigms, Theories and the Primacy of the HEP-NEP Distinction’. The American Sociologist, 13: 256–259.
13.
CattonW.R.Jnr. and DunlapR.E.1980. ‘A New Ecological Paradigm for Post-Exuberant Sociology’, American Behavioural Scientist, 24: 15–47.
DunlapR.E. and CattonW.R.Jnr.1979. ‘Environmental Sociology’, Annual Review of Sociology, 5: 243–273.
18.
DunlapR.E. and CattonW.R.Jnr.1994. ‘Struggling with Human Exemptionalism: The rise, decline and revitalisation of environmental sociology’, The American Sociologist, 25: 5–30.
19.
Fischer-KowalskiM and HabereH.1994. The Cultural Evolution of Social Metabolism With Nature.Vienna: Interuniversitares Institut fur Interdisziplinare Forschung und Fortbilding.
20.
GiddensA.1979. Central Problems in Social Theory. London: Macmillan.
21.
GiddensA.1984. The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
22.
GliessmanS.R. (ed.) 1990. Agroecology: researching the ecological basis for sustainable agriculture. London: Springer-Verlag.
23.
GoodlandR.1995. ‘The concept of environmental sustainability’, Annual Review of Ecological Systems, 26: 1–24.
24.
HanniganJ.1995. Environmental Sociology: a Social Constructionist Perspective. Routledge, London.
25.
HusarRudolf B.1994. ‘Ecosystems and the Biosphere: Metaphors for Human-induced Material Flows’, in AyresR. and SimonisU. (ed.) Industrial Metabolism, pp. 21–30. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
26.
IngoldT.1993. ‘Globes and Spheres: the Topology of Environmentalism’, in KayMilton (ed.) Environmentalism: the view from Anthropology. London: Routledge.
27.
IUCN, WWF and UNEP1991. Caring for the Earth: a Strategy for Sustainable Living. London: Earthscan.
28.
LongN. and LongA. (eds) 1994. Battlefields of Knowledge. London: Routledge.
29.
LutzenhiserL.1994. ‘Sociology, Energy and Interdisciplinary Environmental Science’, The American Sociologist, 25: 58–79.
30.
MacnaghtenP. and UrryJ.1995. ‘Towards a Sociology of Nature’, Sociology, 29(2): 203–220.
NorgaardR.B.1984. ‘Coevolutionary Agricultural Development’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 32: 525–546.
33.
O'RiordanT. and TurnerR.K. (eds) 1983. An Annotated Reader in Environmental Planning and Management. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
34.
RedcliftM.1995. ‘In Our Own Image: the Environment and Society as Global Discourse’, Environment and History, 1: 111–123.
35.
RedcliftM. and BentonT. (eds) 1994. Social Theory and the Global Environment. Routledge, London.
36.
RedcliftM.R. and WoodgateG.R.1993. Concepts of the Environment in the Social Sciences. Wye College External Programme, University of London, Wye, Kent.
37.
RedcliftM.R.1996. Wasted: Counting the Costs of Global Consumption. Routledge, London.
38.
SaidE.1993. Culture and Imperialism.London: Chatto and Windus
39.
SchnaibergA.1980. The Environment: from Surplus to Scarcity.New York: Oxford University Press.
40.
SimmonsI.G.1993. Interpreting Nature: Cultural Constructions of the Environment. Routledge, London.
41.
United Kingdom Department of the Environment1996. Indicators of Sustainable Development for the UK. HMSO, London.
42.
WilliamsR.1981. ‘Socialism and Ecology’, Socialist Environment and Resources Association, London.
43.
WoodgateG.R.1992. Sustainability and the Fate of the Peasantry: the Political Ecology of Livelihood Systems in an Upland Agroecosystem in the Central Highlands of Mexico. University of London Ph.D. Thesis.
44.
WynneB.1994. ‘Scientific Knowledge and the global environment’ in RedcliftM. and BentonT. (eds) Social Theory and the Global Environment.Routledge, London.
45.
YearleyS.1994. ‘Social movements and environmental change’, in RedcliftM. and BentonT. (eds) Social Theory and the Global Environment.Routledge, London.
