Anthropocentrism has been proposed as the underlying cause of modern society's environmental impact. Concomitantly, hunter-gatherers’ orientation towards nature is connected with minimal environmental change or conservation, and seen as validating the idea that ‘what people do about their ecology depends upon what they think about themselves in relation to things around them’ (White 1967: 1205). Here it is argued that the notion that orientation towards nature is instrumental in environmental impact in any generalisable way has little empirical support and, most importantly, is under-theorised and conceptually flawed. Employing a strong structurationist approach, it is shown that the tendency to abstract particular values from their social and environmental context must be resisted and that a deeper conception of the ‘inner lives’ of agents is required. Such an approach is more expansive and engages with a range of other motives as well as the unintended environmental consequences of actions.
AraujoB.B.A., . 2017. ‘Bigger kill than chill: The uneven roles of humans and climate on late Quaternary megafaunal extinctions’. Quaternary International431 (B): 216–222. Crossref
2.
Bar-YosefO.2001. ‘From sedentary foragers to village hierarchies: The emergence of social institutions’. Proceedings of the British Academy110: 1–38.
3.
BarryJ.1999. Rethinking Green Politics: Nature, Virtue and Progress.London: Sage.
BourdieuP.1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
CallicottJ.B.1982. ‘Traditional American Indian and Western European attitudes toward nature: An overview’. Environmental Ethics4 (4): 293–318. Crossref
7.
CallicottJ.B.1989. ‘American Indian land wisdom? Sorting out the issues’. Journal of Forest History33 (1): 35–42. Crossref
8.
CallicottJ.B.1994. Earth's Insights: A Survey of Ecological Ethics from the Mediterranean Basin to the Australian Outback.Berkeley: University of California Press.
9.
CallicottJ.B.2012. ‘The road to harmony between humans and nature lies in a philosophical revolution’. UNESCO Division of Ethics and Global Change.
10.
CallicottJ.B., and AmesR.T.1989. ‘Introduction: The Asian traditions as a conceptual resource for environmental philosophy’. In CallicottJ.B. and AmesR.T. (eds), Nature in Asian Traditions of Thought, pp. 1–21. Delhi: Sri Satguru Publications.
11.
CallicottJ.B., and OverholtT.W.2003. ‘Traditional American Indian attitudes toward nature’. In SolomonR.C. and HigginsK.M. (eds), From Africa to Zen: An Invitation to World Philosophy, pp. 45–66. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
CoddingB.F., . 2014. ‘Conservation or co-evolution? Intermediate levels of Aboriginal burning and hunting have positive effects on kangaroo populations in Western Australia’. Human Ecology42 (5): 659–669. Crossref
14.
CristE., and KopninaH.2014. ‘Unsettling anthropocentrism’. Dialectical Anthropology38: 387–396. Crossref
15.
CrononW.1996. ‘The trouble with wilderness: Or, getting back to the wrong nature’. Environmental History1 (1): 7–28. Crossref
16.
de NascimentoL., . 2020. ‘Human impact and ecological changes during prehistoric settlement on the Canary Islands’. Quaternary Science Reviews239: art. 106332. Crossref
17.
DevallB., and SessionsG.1985. Deep Ecology. Salt Lake City, UT: Gibbs Smith.
18.
DiamondJ.1986. ‘Ecological collapses of ancient civilizations: The golden age that never was’. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences47 (5): 37–59. Crossref
19.
DiamondJ.1989. ‘The present, past and future of human-caused extinctions’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B, Biological Sciences325 (1228): 469–477. Crossref
20.
DiamondJ.2005. Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed.London: Penguin.
EhrlichP.R., and HoldrenJ.P.1972. ‘One-dimensional ecology’. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists16: 18–27.
23.
FeeneyJ.2019. ‘Hunter-gatherer land management in the human break from ecological sustainability’. Anthropocene Review6 (3): 223–242. Crossref
24.
GambonH., and RistS.2019. ‘Worldview matters: Mosetene ontology and resource use in the Pilon Lajas Indigenous Territory and Biosphere Reserve in the Bolivian Amazon’. Human Organization78 (1): 54–63. Crossref
25.
GiddensA.1984. The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
26.
GrimJ.A., and TuckerM.E.2014. Ecology and Religion. Washington, DC: Island Press.
27.
HamesR.2007. ‘The ecologically noble savage debate’. Annual Review of Anthropology36: 177–190. Crossref
IngoldT.2000. The Perception of the Environment: Essays in Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London: Routledge.
30.
KayC.E.1994. ‘Aboriginal overkill: The role of Native Americans in structuring Western ecosystems’. Human Nature5 (4): 359–398. Crossref
31.
KayC.E., and SimmonsR.T.2002. Wilderness and Political Ecology: Aboriginal Influences and the Original State of Nature. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
32.
KopninaH.2015. ‘Revisiting the Lorax complex: deep ecology and biophilia in cross-cultural perspective’. Environmental Sociology1 (4): 315–324. Crossref
33.
KopninaH., 2016 ‘Half the earth for people (or more)? Addressing ethical questions in conservation’. Biological Conservation203: 176–185. Crossref
34.
KopninaH.2019. ‘Anthropocentrism and post-humanism’. In CallanH. (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology. Crossref
35.
KopninaH., . 2018. ‘Anthropocentrism: More than just a misunderstood problem’. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics31: 109–127. Crossref
36.
KrechS.1999. The Ecological Indian: Myth and History. New York: Norton.
37.
KrechS.2005. ‘Reflections on conservation, sustainability, and environmentalism in indigenous North America’. American Anthropologist107 (1): 78–86. Crossref
38.
LepofskyD., and CaldwellM.2013. ‘Indigenous marine resource management on the northwest coast of North America’. Ecological Processes2 (1): art. 12. Crossref
39.
LightfootK.G., . 2013. ‘Rethinking the study of landscape management practices among hunter-gatherers in North America’. American Antiquity78 (2): 285–301. Crossref
40.
ManesC.1990. Green Rage: Radical Environmentalism and the Unmaking of Civilization.Boston: Little Brown.
41.
MartinP.S.1967. ‘Prehistoric overkill’. In P.S. Martin and WrightH.E. (eds), Pleistocene Extinctions: The Search for a Cause, pp. 75–120. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
42.
MatthewsT.J., LeidingerL.K.T. and Sarmento CabralJ.2020. ‘The effect of species extinctions on island biogeographic patterns’. Ecological Research35 (2): 372–381. Crossref
43.
McElweeP., . 2020. ‘Working with indigenous and local knowledge (ILK) in large-scale ecological assessments: Reviewing the experience of the IPBES Global Assessment’. Journal of Applied Ecology57: 1666–1676. Crossref
44.
McGregorD., WhitakerS. and SritharanM.2020. ‘Indigenous environmental justice and sustainability’. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability43: 35–40. Crossref
45.
MeadG., and NevesB.2018. ‘Recursive approaches to technology adoption, families, and the life course: Actor network theory and strong structuration theory’. In NevesB. and CasimiroC (eds), Connecting Families? Information and Communication Technologies, Generations, and the Life Course, pp. 41–58. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
46.
MonjeauJ.A., . 2017. ‘The controversy space on Quaternary megafaunal extinctions’. Quaternary International431: 194–204. Crossref
47.
MooreD.R., and McPhailK.2016. ‘Strong structuration and carbon accounting: A position-practice perspective of policy development at the macro, industry and organizational levels’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal29 (7): 1–7. Crossref
48.
MouzelisN.1995. Sociological Theory: What Went Wrong?London: Routledge.
49.
MouzelisN.2008. Modern and Postmodern Social Theorizing: Bridging the Divide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50.
NadasdyP.2005. ‘Transcending the debate over the ecologically noble Indian: Indigenous peoples and environmentalism’. Ethnohistory52 (2): 291–331. Crossref
51.
NaessA.1989. Ecology, Community and Lifestyle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52.
NortonB.G.1984. ‘Environmental ethics and weak anthropocentrism’. Environmental Ethics6: 131–148. Crossref
53.
OelschlaegerM.1991. The Idea of Wilderness: From Prehistory to the Age of Ecology.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
PassmoreJ.1980. Man's Responsibility for Nature, 2nd edn. London: Duckworth.
56.
ReddekopJ., and TrownsellT.2021. ‘Disrupting anthropocentrism through relational-ity’. In D. Chandler. F. Müller and RotheD (eds), International Relations in the Anthropocene, pp. 441–458. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
57.
SessionsG.1991. ‘Ecocentrism and the anthropocentric detour’. In SessionsG. (ed.), Deep Ecology for the Twenty-First Century, pp. 156–184. Boston: Shambala.
58.
SmithE.A., and WishnieM.2000. ‘Conservation and subsistence in small-scale societies’. Annual Review of Anthropology29: 493–524. Crossref
StonesR.2015. Why Current Affairs Needs Social Theory.London: Bloomsbury.
61.
TaylorB., . 2020. ‘The need for ecocentrism in biodiversity conservation’. Conservation Biology349 (5): 1089–1096.
62.
ThomasK.1984. Man and the Natural World. London: Penguin.
63.
TuanY.F.1968. ‘Discrepancies between environmental attitude and behaviour: Examples from Europe and China’. Canadian Geographer12 (3): 176–191. Crossref
64.
UphamP., . 2018. ‘Agency and structure in a sociotechnical transition: Hydrogen fuel cells, conjunctural knowledge and structuration in Europe’. Energy Research and Social Science37: 163–174. Crossref
65.
WashingtonH.2018. A Sense of Wonder towards Nature: Healing the Planet through Belonging.Abingdon: Routledge
66.
WashingtonH.2017. ‘Why ecocentrism is the key pathway to sustainability’. Ecological Citizen1: 35–41.
