The distinction between anthropocentric and non-anthropocentric theories, together with the more fine-grained distinction between anthropocentrism, biocentrism and ecocentrism, are probably two of the most frequently occurring distinctions in the environmental ethics literature. In this essay I draw attention to some problematic aspects of the terminology used to draw these distinctions: the ‘centrism-terminology’. I argue that this terminology is ambiguous and misleading, and therefore confusing. Furthermore, depending on which interpretation it is given, it is also either asymmetric and non-inclusive, or superfluous. Although I find it unlikely that the centrism-terminology will be abandoned, I end the essay by providing a suggestion for an alternative way to categorise theories in environmental ethics.
AttfieldRobin. 2003. Environmental Ethics: An Overview for the Twenty-first Century. Cambridge: Polity Press.
2.
BeckermanWilfred and PasekJoanna. 2010 [2001]. ‘In defense of anthropocen-trism’, reprinted in KellerD. R. (ed.), Environmental Ethics: The Big Questions (Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell), pp. 83–88.
3.
CallicottJ. Baird. 1989. In Defense of the Land Ethic: Essays in Environmental Philosophy. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press.
4.
CallicottJ. Baird. 1995 [1980]. ‘Animal liberation: A triangular affair’ (version with preface from 1994), reprinted in ElliotR. (ed.), Environmental Ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 29–59.
5.
CallicottJ. Baird. 1995. ‘Environmental ethics: Overview’, in ReichW. T. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Bioethics (Revised Edition) (New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan), pp. 676–687.
6.
CallicottJ. Baird. 1999. Beyond the Land Ethic: More Essays in Environmental Philosophy. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press.
7.
CarlsonAllen and LintottSheila (eds.). 2008. Nature, Aesthetics, and Environmentalism: From Beauty to Duty. New York: Columbia University Press.
8.
DesJardinsJoseph R.2006. Environmental Ethics: An Introduction to Environmental Philosophy (Fourth Edition). Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth.
9.
ElliotRobert. 1997. Faking Nature: The Ethics of Environmental Restoration. London: Routledge.
10.
FerréFrederick. 1994. ‘Personalistic organicism: Paradox or paradigm?’, in AttfiieldR. and BelseyA. (eds.), Philosophy and the Natural Environment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 59–73. CrossRef.
11.
HargroveEugene C.1992. ‘Weak anthropocentric intrinsic value’. The Monist75(2): 183–207. CrossRef.
12.
HaywardTim. 1997. ‘Anthropocentrism: A misunderstood problem’. Environmental Values6(1): 49–63. CrossRef.
13.
JamiesonDale. 1998. ‘Animal liberation is an environmental ethic’. Environmental Values7(1): 41–57. CrossRef.
14.
JamiesonDale. 2008. Ethics and the Environment: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef.
15.
JohnsonLawrence E.1991. A Morally Deep World: An Essay on Moral Significance and Environmental Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
KatzEric. 1997. Nature as Subject: Human Obligation and Natural Community. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
17.
KellerDavid R.2010a. ‘Introduction: What is environmental ethics?’, in KellerD. R. (ed.), Environmental Ethics: The Big Questions (Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell), pp. 1–23.
18.
KellerDavid R.2010b. ‘What is anthropocentrism? Introduction’, in KellerD. R. (ed.), Environmental Ethics: The Big Questions (Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell), pp. 59–62.
19.
McShaneKatie. 2007. ‘Anthropocentrism vs. nonanthropocentrism: Why should we care?’ Environmental Values16(2): 169–185. CrossRef.
PalmerClare. 2003. ‘An overview of environmental ethics’, in LightA. and RolstonH.III (eds.), Environmental Ethics: An Anthology (Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishing), pp. 15–37.
25.
ReganTom. 1983. The Case for Animal Rights. Berkeley: University of California Press.
26.
RolstonHolmesIII. 1988. Environmental Ethics: Duties to and Values in the Natural World. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
27.
SamuelssonLars. 2009. The Moral Status of Nature: Reasons to Care for the Natural World. Saarbrücken: VDM verlag.
28.
SamuelssonLars. 2010. ‘Reasons and values in environmental ethics’. Environmental Values19(4): 517–535. CrossRef.
29.
SingerPeter. 1975. Animal Liberation: A New Ethics for Our Treatment of Animals. New York: Random House.
30.
ThompsonJanna. 1990. ‘A refutation of environmental ethics’. Environmental Ethics12(2): 147–160. CrossRef.
31.
WestraLaura. 1994. An Environmental Proposal for Ethics: The Principle of Integrity. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
