Picturing finitude: Photography of mountain glaciers as a multiple practice of dealing with environmental loss

Abstract

In recent years, photographs and visualisations of glacier retreat have become emblematic images of climate change and its ecological consequences. This paper presents glacier photography as a subtype of environmental photography. I argue that photographs and photographic projects that focus on glacial retreat are best conceived not only as strategies for proving climate change or as visual rhetoric for social transformation, but also as a practice that potentially plays an integral role in dealing and coping with human-induced environmental loss. To this end, I draw on praxeological accounts in theory of photography and philosophy of art as well as some exemplary photographic projects to develop a framework to analyse glacier photography. With the help of this praxeological framework, multiple orientations in glacier photography are identified: epistemic, aesthetic, emotional and evocative, social, ethical, and political orientations. All these photographic orientations, I argue, point in their own way to the process and consequences of glacial disappearance and loss. The framework presented innovatively brings together scholarship on climate change visualisation, imagery and art, the theory of photography, and philosophical aesthetics.

Keywords

Photography glaciers cryosphere‌environmental loss ecological grief climate change art philosophical aesthetics environmental aesthetics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allison

(2015) The spiritual significance of glaciers in an age of climate change. WIRES Climate Change 6(5): 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.354.

Atkinson

(2021) Mourning climate loss: ritual and collective grief in the age of crisis. CSPA Quartely 32(Spring 21): 8–19.

Barnett

Tschakert

Head

, et al. (2016) A science of loss. Nature Climate Change 6(11): 976–978. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3140.

Barnett

(2022) Mourning in the Anthropocene: Ecological Grief and Earthly Coexistence. Michigan: MSU Press.

Barthes

(1980) La chambre claire: note sur la photographie. Paris: Gallimard.

Becker

(2009) Above zero. Ostfildern: Hatje/Cantz.

Berleant

(1992) The Aesthetics of Environment. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

Bertram

(2014) Kunst als menschliche Praxis: Eine Ästhetik. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

Bosson

J-B

Huss

Osipova

(2019) Disappearing world heritage glaciers as a keystone of nature conservation in a changing climate. Earth’s Future 7(4): 469–479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EF001139.

10.

Boyd

James

RGJ

Young

, et al. (2017) A typology of loss and damage perspectives. Nature Climate Change 7(10): 723–729. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3389.

11.

Brady

(2014) Aesthetic value, ethics and climate change. Environmental Values 23(5): 551–570. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327114X13947900181112.

12.

Brady

(2022) Global climate change and aesthetics. Environmental Values 31(1): 27–46. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327121X16141642287683.

13.

Brady

(2023) Cryosphere aesthetics. In: Man

EKW

Petts

(eds) Comparative Everyday Aesthetics: East-West Studies in Contemporary Living. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 107–122.

14.

Brady

Prior

(2020) Environmental aesthetics: a synthetic review. People and Nature 2(2): 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10089.

15.

Callister

(2007) Picturing loss: family, photographs and the great war. The Round Table 96(393): 663–678. https://doi.org/10.1080/00358530701634242.

16.

Carey

(2007) The history of ice: how glaciers became an endangered species. Environmental History 12(3): 497–527.

17.

Carey

Jackson

Antonello

, et al. (2016) Glaciers, gender, and science. Progress in Human Geography 40(6): 770–793. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132515623368.

18.

Costello

(2017a) On Photography: A Philosophical Inquiry. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315266688.

19.

Costello

(2017b) What's so new about the “new” theory of photography? The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 75(4): 439–452.

20.

Culloty

Murphy

Brereton

, et al. (2019) Researching visual representations of climate change. Environmental Communication 13(2): 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1533877.

21.

Diehl

(2006) The toxic sublime. Art in America 94(2): 118–123.

22.

Dobrin

Morey

(2009) Ecosee: Image, Rhetoric, Nature. New York: SUNY Press.

23.

Dodds

Sörlin

(eds) (2022) Ice humanities: Living, working, and thinking in a melting world. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

24.

Doyle

(2014) Picturing the Clim(a)tic: Greenpeace and the Representational Politics of Climate Change Communication. In: Schneider

Nocke

(eds) Image Politics of Climate Change: Visualizations, Imaginations, Documentations. Bielefeld: transcript, 225–247.

25.

Edmaier

(2022) AlpenEis. München: Rother Bergverlag.

26.

Elíasson

(2019) The Glacier Melt Series 1999/2019. Listasafn Reykjavíkur. Available at: https://glaciermelt.is/ (accessed 2 January 2024).

27.

Epstein

(2023) Social Ontology. In: Zalta EN and Nodelman U (eds) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2023 Edition). Available at: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2023/entries/social-ontology/ (accessed 2 January 2024).

28.

Fischer

Ritschel

(2020) Alpengletscher. Eine Hommage. Innsbruck/Wien: Tyrolia-Verlag.

29.

Franklin

(2008) Environmental Photography. In: Magnum Photos (blog) (published online October 2, 2008). Available at: http://web.archive.org/web/20120605195151/http://blog.magnumphotos.com/2008/10/environmental_photography.html (accessed 4 March 2023).

30.

Giannachi

(2012) Representing, performing and mitigating climate change in contemporary art practice. Leonardo 45(2): 124–131.

31.

Hagg

(2022) Glaciology and Glacial Geomorphology. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-64714-1.

32.

Heine

(2019) Fotografische Bilder des Klimawandels. Strategien und Bildformeln. Frankfurt [Main]: Campus.

33.

Huggel

Muccione

Carey

, et al. (2019) Loss and damage in the mountain cryosphere. Regional Environmental Change 19(5): 1387–1399.

34.

Hulme

. (2009) Why We Disagree about Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

35.

IPCC (2019) Technical Summary [Pörtner H.-O., Roberts DC, Masson-Delmotte V et al. (eds.)]. In: IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate [Pörtner H.-O., Roberts DC, Masson-Delmotte V et al. (eds.)], Cambridge, UK and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 39–69. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157964.002.

36.

Jackson

(2015) Glaciers and climate change: narratives of ruined futures. WIRES Climate Change 6(5): 479–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.351.

37.

Jiménez-Alonso

de Luna

(2021) Narratives of loss: exploring grief through photography. Qualitative Studies 6(1): 91–115. https://doi.org/10.7146/qs.v6i1.124433.

38.

Villanueva

Jilk

, et al. (2023) Artistic representations of data can help bridge the US political divide over climate change. Communications Earth & Environment 4:195. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00856-9.

39.

Lorenzoni

Nicholson-Cole

Whitmarsh

(2007) Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change 17(3-4): 445–459.

40.

Magnason

(2019) ‘The Glaciers of Iceland Seemed Eternal. Now a Country Mourns Their Loss’, The Guardian, August 14, 2019, sec. Opinion. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/aug/14/glaciers-iceland-country-loss-plaque-climate-crisis. (accessed 30 November 2023).

41.

Mannerfelt

Schytt

Hugonnet

, et al. (2022) Halving of Swiss glacier volume since 1931 observed from terrestrial image photogrammetry. The Cryosphere 16(8), 3249–3268. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-16-3249-2022.

42.

Marzeion

Cogley

Richter

, et al. (2014) Attribution of global glacier mass loss to anthropogenic and natural causes. Science 345(6199): 919–921. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1254702.

43.

Miller

(2020) Contemporary Photography and Theory: Concepts and Debates. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003085072.

44.

Nurmis

(2016) Visual climate change art 2005–2015: Discourse and practice. WIRES Climate Change 7(4): 501–516. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.400.

45.

Ojala

Cunsolo

Ogunbode

, et al. (2021) Anxiety, worry, and grief in a time of environmental and climate crisis: a narrative review. Annual Review of Environment and Resourcee 46(1): 35–58. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-022716.

46.

O’Neill

(2020) More than meets the eye: a longitudinal analysis of climate change imagery in the print media. Climatic Change 163(1): 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02504-8.

47.

O’Neill

Smith

(2014) Climate change and visual imagery. WIRES Climate Change 5(1): 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.249.

48.

Oreggioni

(2021) Filosofia tra i ghiacci. Milano: Meltemi.

49.

Parak

(ed.) (2013) Eco-Images. Historical Views and Political Strategies. Munich: Rachel Carson Center for Environment and Society.

50.

Peeples

(2011) Toxic sublime: imaging contaminated landscapes. Environmental Communication 5(4): 373–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2011.616516.

51.

Prosser

(2005) Light in the Dark Room: Photography and Loss. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.

52.

Remaud

(2022) Thinking like an Iceberg (tran. S Muecke). Cambridge, UK/Medford, MA: Polity.

53.

Roeser

Taebi

Doorn

(2020) Geoengineering the climate and ethical challenges: what we can learn from moral emotions and art. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 23(5): 641–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2020.1694225.

54.

Roosen

Klöckner

Swim

(2017) Visual art as a way to communicate climate change: a psychological perspective on climate change-related art. World Art 8(1): 85–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/21500894.2017.1375002.

55.

Rudiak-Gould

(2013) “We have seen it with our own eyes”: why we disagree about climate change visibility. Weather, Climate, and Society 5(2): 120–132. https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-12-00034.1.

56.

Schmidt

(2021) Glacial deaths, geologic extinction. Environmental Humanities 13(2): 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-9320156.

57.

Schneider

Nocke

. (2014) Image Politics of Climate Change: Visualizations, Imaginations, Documentations. Bielefeld: transcript.

58.

Schwartz

(2017) While the Fires Burn. A Glacier Odyssey. London: Thames & Hudson.

59.

Sontag

(2008) On Photography. London/ New York/Toronto: Penguin Classics.

60.

Thomsen

(2015) Seeing is questioning: prompting sustainability discourses through an evocative visual agenda. Ecology and Society 20(4):9. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07925-200409.

61.

Unverzart

(2014) ALP: Alpine Landscape Pictures, Bilingual Edition. Munich/London/New York: Prestel Verlag.

62.

van Dooren

Rose

(2017) Keeping faith with the dead: mourning and de-extinction. Australian Zoologist 38(3): 375–378.

63.

Walsh

(2015) The visual rhetoric of climate change. WIRES Climate Change 6(4): 361–368. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.342.

64.

Wissmann

(2007) “This Is What I See”: (Re)Envisioning Photography as a Social Practice. In: Hill

Vasudevan

(eds) Media, Learning, and Sites of Possibility. New York: Peter Lang, 13–45.

65.

Zekollari

Huss

Farinotti

(2019) Modelling the future evolution of glaciers in the European Alps under the EURO-CORDEX RCM ensemble. The Cryosphere 13(4): 1125–1146. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-13-1125-2019.

66.

Zylinska

(2018) Photography after extinction. In: Grusin

(ed) After Extinction. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 51–70.