This article argues that holistic ecocentrism unnecessarily introduces elements to explain why we ought to halt biodiversity loss. I suggest that atomistic accounts can justify the same conclusion by utilising fewer elements. Hence, why we ought to preserve biodiversity can be made reasonable without adding elements such as intrinsic values of ecosystems or moral obligations to conserve collectives of organisms. Between two equally good explanations of the same phenomenon, the explanation utilising fewer elements, which speaks in favour of atomistic accounts, will be the better one.
AngermeierP.L.1994. ‘Does biodiversity include artificial diversity?’ Conservation Biology8(2): 600–602. Crossref.
2.
AttfieldR.2011. ‘Sober, environmentalists, species and ignorance’. Environmental Ethics33(3): 307–316. Crossref.
3.
AttfieldR.2015. The Ethics of the Global Environment, 2nd edition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
4.
CahenH.1988. ‘Against the moral considerability of ecosystems’. Environmental Ethics10(3): 196–216. Crossref.
5.
CallicottJ.B.2013. Thinking Like a Planet. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6.
GarsonJ., PlutynskiA. and SarkarS. (eds). 2017. The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Biodiversity. London: Routledge.
7.
KorsgaardC.M.2018. Fellow Creatures: Our Obligations to the Other Animals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
MaclaurinJ. and SterelnyK.. 2008. What Is Biodiversity?Chicago: Chicago University Press.
9.
MaierD.S.2012. What's So Good about Biodiversity?Dordrecht: Springer.
10.
McShaneK.2017. ‘Is biodiversity intrinsically valuable? (and what might that mean?)’. In GarsonJ., PlutynskiA. and SarkarS. (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Biodiversity, pp. 155–167. London: Routledge.
11.
MikkelsonG.M. and ChapmanC.A.. 2014. ‘Individualistic environmental ethics: A reductio ad exstinctum?’ Environmental Ethics36(3): 333–338. Crossref.
12.
OksanenM. and PietarinenJ. (eds). 2004. Philosophy and Biodiversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
RawlesK.2004. ‘Biological diversity and conservation policy’. In OksanenM. and PietarinenJ. (eds), Philosophy and Biodiversity, pp. 199–216. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref.
14.
ReganT.2004. The Case for Animal Rights. Berkeley, CA: The University of California Press.
15.
RolstonH.1994. ‘Value in nature and the nature of value’. In AttfieldR. and BelseyA. (eds), Philosophy and the Natural Environment, pp. 13–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref.
16.
RolstonH.2012. A New Environmental Ethics. New York: Routledge.
17.
SarkarS.2005. Biodiversity and Environmental Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
SingerP.2002. Animal Liberation. New York: Ecco.
19.
SoberE.2015. Ockham's Razors: A User's Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref.
20.
TardiffA.1996. ‘Simplifying the case for vegetarianism’. Social Theory and Practice22(3): 299–314. Crossref.
21.
TaylorP.W.2011. Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.