Synthetic biology, materials chemistry and soft robotics are fast becoming leading disciplines within the field of practices which look to nature for inspiration and opportunities. In this article I discuss how these molecular-scale practices fit within the existing trends of bio-informed design defined at the macro level, that is, bionics, biomimetics and more specifically biomimicry. Based on the metaphysical views underlying bio-informed design practices, I argue that none of them currently fit the biomimicry model, as they are not consistently concerned with environmental sustainability. While biomimetic chemistry loosely belongs to the field of biomimetics, and soft robotics to the field of bionics, both practices have a profound impact on their respective fields, as they question the places of nature and engineers.
ArroyoM., and DeSimoneA.. 2014. ‘Shape control of active surfaces inspired by the movement of euglenids’. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids62: 99–112. Crossref.
4.
Bensaude-VincentB.2007. ‘Reconfiguring nature through syntheses: from plastics to biomimetics’. In Bensaude-VincentB. and NewmanW. (eds), The Natural and the Artificial: An Ever-Evolving Polarity, pp. 293–312. Cambridge MA, MIT Press.
5.
Bensaude-VincentB.2016. ‘The moral economy of synthetic biology’. In BoldtJ., (ed.) Synthetic Biology: Metaphors, Worldviews, Ethics and Law, pp. 87–100. Wiesbaden: Springer.
6.
Bensaude-VincentB., and Benoit-BrowaeysD.. 2011. Fabriquer la vie: où va la biologie de synthèse. Paris: Seuil.
7.
BenyusJ.1997. Biomimicry: Innovation Inspired by Nature. New York: Morrow.
8.
BenyusJ.2002. Biomimicry: Innovation Inspired by Nature. New York: Harper Perennial.
9.
BirchK, LevidowL. and PapaioannouT.. 2010. ‘Sustainable capital? The neoliberali-zation of nature and knowledge in the European knowledge-based bio-economy’. Sustainability2: 2898–2918. Crossref.
10.
BlokV.2017. ‘Earthing technology: towards an ecocentric concept of biomimetic technologies in the anthropocene’. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology21(2/3): 127–149. Crossref.
11.
BlokV., and GremmenB.. 2016. 'Ecological innovation: biomimicry as a new way of thinking and acting ecologically’. Journal of Agricultural and Envionmental Ethics29(2): 203–217. Crossref.
12.
BoschkeF.L., . 1985. Biomimetic and Bioorganic Chemistry. Berlin: Springer.
13.
BoydW., PrudhamS. and SchurmanR.. 2001. ‘Industrial dynamics and the problem of nature’. Society and Natural Resources14: 555–570. Crossref.
14.
BoyleM., SmaldoneR., WhalleyA.C., AmbrogioM.W. and StoddartJ.F.. 2011. ‘Mechanised materials’. Chemical Science2: 204–210. Crossref.
15.
CarlsonR.H.2010. Biology is Technology: The Promise, Peril, and New Business of Engineering Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
CoppensM.O.2012. ‘A nature-inspired approach to reactor and catalysis engineering’. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering1: 281–289. Crossref.
17.
DeplazesA.2009. ‘Piecing together a puzzle’. EMBO Reports10: 428–432. Crossref.
18.
DicksH.2016. ‘The philosophy of biomimicry’. Philosophy of Technology29: 223–243. Crossref.
19.
DicksH.2017. ‘Environmental ethics and biomimetic ethics: nature as object of ethics and nature as source of ethics’. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics30: 255–274. Crossref.
20.
DupuyJ.P.2008 [2000]. The Mechanization of the Mind, rev. edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
DupuyJ.P.2009. ‘Cybernetics is an antihumanism: advanced technologies and the rebellion against the human condition’. AntiMatters3(2): 47–64.
22.
EndyD.2005. ‘Foundations for engineering biology’. Nature438: 449–453. Crossref.
Galileo. 1957. ‘Excerpts from The Assayer [1623]’. In Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo, trans. DrakeS., pp. 229–280. New York: Anchor Books.
25.
GeselowitzD.B.1998. ‘In memoriam: Otto H. Schmitt’. Annals of Biomedical Engineering26(5): 739–740. Crossref.
26.
IidaF, and LaschiC.. 2011. ‘Soft robotics: challenges and perspectives’. Procedia Computer Science7: 99–102. Crossref.
27.
IouguinaA., DawsonJ.W., HallgrimssonB. and SmartG.. 2014. ‘Biologically informed disciplines: a comparative analysis of terminology within the fields of bionics, bio-mimetics, biomimicry and bio-inspiration, among others’. International Journal of Design and Nature and Ecodynamics9(3): 197–205. Crossref.
28.
ISO (International Organization for Standardization). 2015. ‘Biomimetics: terminology, concepts and methodology’, ISO 18458:2015. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/62500.html (accessed 26 October 2017).
29.
JonesR.L.2004. Soft Machines: Nanotechnology and Life. New York: Oxford University Press.
30.
LeducS.1912. La biologie synthétique. Paris: Poinat Maynard.
31.
LevidovL., BirchK. and PapaioannouT.. 2012. ‘EU agri-innovation policy: two contending visions of the bio-economy’. Critical Policy Studies6: 40–65. Crossref.
MathewsF.2011. ‘Towards a deeper philosophy of biomimicry’. Organization and Environment24(4): 364–387. Crossref.
34.
MazzolaiB., BeccaiL. and MattoliV.. 2014. ‘Plants as models in biomimetics and biorobotics: new perspectives’. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology2: 1–5. Crossref.
35.
Merleau-PontyM.1995. La nature: notes – cours du Collège de France (1956–1957). Paris: Seuil.
PassetR.1996 [1979]. L'économique et le vivant, 2nd edn. Paris: Economica.
38.
PassetR.2012. La bioéconomie de la dernière chance. Paris: Les Liens Qui Libèrent.
39.
SimondonG.1989 [1958]. Du mode d'existence des objets techniques, 2nd edn. Paris: Aubier.
40.
SloterdijkP., and HeinrichsH.J.. 2011 [2006]. Neither Sun nor Death, trans. CorcoranS.. Los Angeles: Semiotexte.
41.
TrogodasP., NigraM. and CoppensM.O.. 2016. ‘Nature inspired optimization of hierarchical porous media for catalytic and separation processes’. New Journal of Chemistry40: 4016–4026. Crossref.
VincentJ.F.2005. ‘Deconstructing the design of a biological material’. Journal of Theoretical Biology236(1): 73–78. Crossref.
44.
VincentJ.F., BogatyrevaO., BogatyrevN., BowyerA. and PahlA.K.. 2006. ‘Biomimetics: its practice and theory’. Journal of the Royal Society Interface3: 471–482. Crossref.
45.
VogelS.1998. Cats' Paws and Catapults: Mechanical Worlds of Nature and People. New York: Norton.
46.
WahlD.C.2006. ‘Bionics versus biomimicry: from control of nature to sustainable participation in nature’. In BrebbiaC.A., (ed.) Design and Nature III: Comparing Design in Nature with Science and Engineering, pp. 289–298. Ashurst: Wessex Institute of Technology Press.
