In this paper I critically reflect on the sustainability potential of biomimetic technologies by focusing on writings of the German philosopher Peter Sloterdijk. Although I agree with Sloterdijk that biomimetic technologies – or, as he calls them, ‘homeotechnologies’ – offer specific opportunities for a more peaceful co-existence of humans and nature, I will argue that his reflections are based on a series of problematic assumptions. I will conclude by arguing that the ‘homeotechnological turn’ can be effected only if it is developed within the context of a different ecological ethos from the technocentric ethos that currently dominates our attitude towards nature.
Bensaude-VincentB., ArribartH., BouligandY. and SanchezC.. 2002. ‘Chemists and the school of nature’. New Journal of Chemistry1: 1–5. CrossRef.
2.
BenyusJ.M.2002. Biomimicry: Innovation Inspired by Nature.New York: Harper Perennial.
3.
Buckminster FullerR.2008 [1969]. Operating Manual for Spaceship Earth. Baden: Lars Müller Publishers.
4.
DeLongE.F.2005. ‘Microbial community genomics in the ocean’. Nature Reviews Microbiology3: 459–469. CrossRef.
5.
EldenS. and MendietaE.. 2009. ‘Being-with as making worlds: The “second coming” of Peter Sloterdijk’. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space27 (1): 1–11. CrossRef.
6.
GüntherG.1963. Das Bewußtsein der Maschinen: Eine Metaphysik der Kybernetik. Krefeld and Baden-Baden: Agis Verlag.
7.
HandelsmanJ.2007. ‘Metagenomics and microbial communities’. Encyclopedia of Life Sciences. doi:10.1002/9780470015902.a0020367.
8.
HandelsmanJ., RondonM.R., BradyS.F., ClardyJ. and GoodmanR.M.. 1998. ‘Molecular biological access to the chemistry of unknown soil microbes: A new frontier for natural products’. Chemistry and Biology5: 245–249. CrossRef.
9.
HawkenP., LovinsA.B. and LovinsL.H.. 1999. Natural Capitalism: Creating the Next Industrial Revolution.Boston: Little, Brown & Company.
10.
HeideggerM.1976, May 31. ‘Nur noch ein Gott kann uns retten’. Der Spiegel30: 193–219.
11.
JonasH.1984. The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
12.
KatzE.2000. ‘The Big Lie: The human restoration of nature’, in ThroopW. (ed.) Environmental Restoration: Ethics, Theory, and Practice, pp. 83–93. New York: Prometheus Books.
13.
KockelkorenP.1994. ‘Naar een technische intimiteit met de dingen’. Wijsgerig Perspectief34 (6): 187–193.
14.
LemmensP.C.2008. Gedreven door techniek. De menselijke conditie en de biotech-nologische revolutie. Oisterwijk: Box Press.
15.
LemmensP.C.2011. ‘Leven op en in een overlevingsmachine. De globale ecologische crisis als wooncrisis’, in Van den BornR., DrenthenM., LemmensP.C. and Van SlobbeTh. (eds.) Plaats. Filosofische beschouwingen over verbondenheid met natuur en landschap, pp. 180–200. Zeist: KNNV Uitgeverij.
16.
MathewsF.2011. ‘Towards a deeper philosophy of biomimicry’. Organization and Environment24 (4): 364–387. CrossRef.
17.
McDonoughW. and BraungartM.. 2002. Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things. New York: North Point Press.
18.
MeadowsD.H., MeadowsD.L., RandersJ. and BehrensW.W.III.1972. The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome's Project on the Predicament of Mankind. New York: Universe Books.
PlumwoodV.2002. Environmental Culture: the Ecological Crisis of Reason. New York: Routledge.
21.
RiesenfeldC.S., SchlossP.D. and HandelsmanJ.. 2004. ‘Metagenomomics: Genomic analysis of microbial communities’. Annual Reviews of Genetics38: 525–552. CrossRef.
22.
ScottD.2001. ‘A perspective on the Earth from the Moon’. Earth Moon and Planets85 (6): 411–418.
23.
SloterdijkP.1989. Eurotaoismus. Zur Kritik der politischen Kinetik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
24.
SloterdijkP.2001. Nicht gerettet. Versuche nach Heidegger. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. [The chapter ‘Der Operable Mensch: Zur Einführung des Konzepts Homöotechnik’ (pp. 212–234) is translated into English by J. Westerdale and G. Sautter. 2000. ‘The operable man: On the ethical state of gene technology’. Lecture at UCLA conference Enhancing the Human. Los Angeles: Goethe Institute, unpublished.].
25.
SloterdijkP.2005. Sphären. Eine Trilogie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
26.
SloterdijkP. and HeinrichsH-J.. 2006. Die Sonne und der Tod. Dialogische Untersuchungen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. [Translated into English by S. Corcoran, 2011. Neither Sun nor Death. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).].
27.
SloterdijkP.2009a. Du mußt dein Leben ändern – Über Anthropotechnik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
28.
SloterdijkP.2009b, December 21. ‘Das 21. Jahrhundert beginnt mit dem Debakel vom 19. Dezember 2009’, Süddeutsche Zeitung294.
29.
SloterdijkP.2011. ‘Wie groß ist ‘groß’?’, in Das Raumschiff Erde hat keinen Notausgang, pp. 93–110. Berlin: Suhrkamp. [Anonymous translation on the website of Collegium International: http://www.collegium-international.org (accessed 30 October 2012).].
30.
ThackerE.2005. The Global Genome: Biotechnology, Politics, and Culture. Cambridge: MIT Press.
31.
Van TuinenS.2009. ‘Air conditioning spaceship earth: Peter Sloterdijk's ethico-aesthetic paradigm’. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space27 (1): 105–118. CrossRef.
