Insofar as development implies economic growth, the term ‘sustainable development’ appears to some as a contradiction in terms. However, such conclusions still lack a thorough examination of the conceptual structure of the two terms between which there is a purported contradiction. In order to address this issue, the present paper scrutinises some of the assumptions which underwrite the ideologies of sustainability and of development. It is argued that there are key assumptions which both ideas have in common, and that sustainable development is thus perfectly coherent on a conceptual level. It is alternatives which retain either term (such as ‘sustainable degrowth') that are embroiled in paradox. The paper then examines two concepts for criticising the ideology of economic growth in other terms: dépense and conviviality. It is argued that the latter is preferable to the former for the purpose of developing post-sustainable critiques of growth.
BatailleG.1985. Visions of Excess: Selected Writings 1927–1939. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
2.
BlüdhornI.2016. ‘Sustainability – Post-sustainability – Unsustainability’. In GabrielsonT., HallC., MeyerJ. and SchlosbergD. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Environmental Political Theory, pp. 259–273. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
BohmD.2003. On Dialogue. Taylor & Francis e-Library.
4.
BruniL. and SugdenR.. 2008. ‘Fraternity: why the market need not be a morally free zone’. Economics and Philosophy24 (1): 35–64. Crossref.
5.
BruniL. and ZamagniS.. 2007. Civil Economy: Efficiency, Equity, Public Happiness (Vol. 2). Bern: Peter Lang.
6.
BurkeB.J. and ShearB.. 2014. ‘Introduction: engaged scholarship for non-capitalist political ecologies’. Journal of Political Ecology21 (1): 127–144. Crossref.
7.
CaradonnaJ.L.2014. Sustainability: A History. New York: Oxford University Press.
8.
CaradonnaJ.L.2015. ‘The historiography of sustainability: an emergent subfield’. Ekonomska i ekohistorija: časopis za gospodarsku povijest i povijest okoliša11 (1): 7–18.
9.
CayleyD.1992. Ivan Illich in Conversation: The Testament of Ivan Illich. Toronto: House of Anansi.
10.
DaleG.2018. ‘Sustaining what? Scarcity, growth, and the natural order in the discourse on sustainability, 1650-1900’. In CaradonnaJ.L., (ed.) Routledge Handbook of the History of Sustainability, pp. 71–95. Oxford: Routledge.
11.
D'AlisaG., KallisG. and DemariaF.. 2015. ‘Epilogue: from austerity to dépense’. In D'AlisaG., DemariaF. and KallisG. (eds), Degrowth: A Vocabulary for a New Era, pp. 215–220. Oxford: Routledge London.
12.
DeriuM.2015. ‘Conviviality’. In D'AlisaG., DemariaF. and KallisG. (eds), Degrowth: A Vocabulary for a New Era, pp. 79–83. Oxford: Routledge London.
13.
DesmondW.2016. The Intimate Universal: the Hidden Porosity among Religion, Art, Philosophy, and Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
14.
Du PisaniJ.A.2006. ‘Sustainable development–historical roots of the concept’. Environmental Sciences3 (2): 83–96. Crossref.
15.
EspositoR.2010. Communitas: The Origin and Destiny of Community. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
16.
GovindrajanR.2015. “‘The goat that died for family”: animal sacrifice and interspe-cies kinship in India's Central Himalayas’. American Ethnologist42 (3): 504–519. Crossref.
17.
GraeberD.2011. ‘Consumption’. Current Anthropology52 (4): 489–511. Crossref.
18.
GroberU.2012. Sustainability: A Cultural History. Totnes: Green Books.
19.
GudemanS.2012. ‘Vital energy: the current of relations’. Social Analysis56 (1): 57–73. Crossref.
20.
HirschmanA.O.1977. The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism before Its Triumph. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
IllichI.1973. Tools for Conviviality. Glasgow: Fontana/Collins.
23.
IllichI.1996. Philosophy… artifacts… friendship. Presentation given to The American Catholic Philosophical Association at their annual meeting in Los Angeles, California, March 23, 1996. http://www.pudel.uni-bremen.de/pdf/Illich96PHILARPU.pdf (accessed 20 January 2018).
24.
IllichI. and VerneE.. 1976. Imprisoned in the Global Classroom. London: Writers and Readers Publishing Cooperative Ltd.
25.
IllichI., BrownJ. and MitchamC.. 1997. ‘Land of found friends’. Whole Earth90: 22–28.
26.
IllichI. and CayleyD.. 2005. The Rivers North of the Future: The Testament of Ivan Illich. Toronto: House of Anansi.
27.
IngoldT.2015. The Life of Lines. Abingdon: Routledge.
28.
KallisG., DemariaF. and D'alisaG.. 2015. ‘Introduction: degrowth’. In D'AlisaG., DemariaF. and KallisG. (eds), Degrowth: A Vocabulary for a New Era, pp. 1–17. Oxford: Routledge London.
29.
KochM.2018. ‘The naturalization of growth: Marx, the regulation approach and Bourdieu’. Environmental Values27 (1): 9–27. Crossref.
30.
KruegerR. and GibbsD. (eds). 2007. The Sustainable Development Paradox: Urban Political Economy in the United States and Europe. New York: Guilford Press.
31.
LandaI.2014. ‘Bataille: the master, the slave, and consumption’. Critical Sociology41 (7–8): 1087–1102. Crossref.
MacIntyreA.2007. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Notre Dame: Notre Dame Press.
34.
ManiatesM. and MeyerJ. M. (eds). 2010. The Environmental Politics of Sacrifice. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
35.
MarderM.2017. Energy Dreams: of Actuality. New York: Columbia University Press.
36.
Martínez-AlierJ.2012. ‘Environmental justice and economic degrowth: an alliance between two movements’. Capitalism Nature Socialism23 (1): 51–73. Crossref.
37.
MascoJ.1995. “‘It is a strict law that bids us dance”: cosmologies, colonialism, death, and ritual authority in the Kwakwaka'wakw potlatch, 1849 to 1922’. Comparative Studies in Society and History37 (1): 41–75. Crossref.
38.
McEvoyJ.2003. ‘Ultimate goods: happiness, friendship, and bliss’. In McGradeA.S., (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Philosophy, pp. 254–275. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
MebratuD.1998. ‘Sustainability and sustainable development: historical and conceptual review’. Environmental Impact Assessment Review18 (6): 493–520. Crossref.
40.
MichéaJ.2009. The Realm of Lesser Evil. Cambridge: Polity Press.
41.
MilbankJ. and PabstA.. 2016. The Politics of Virtue: Post-liberalism and the Human Future. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.
42.
MitchamC.1995. ‘The concept of sustainable development: its origins and ambivalence’. Technology in Society17 (3): 311–326. Crossref.
43.
MuracaB.2012. ‘Towards a fair degrowth-society: justice and the right to a “good life” beyond growth’. Futures44 (6): 535–545. Crossref.
44.
MuracaB. and NeuberF.. 2017. ‘Viable and convivial technologies: considerations on Climate Engineering from a degrowth perspective’. Journal of Cleaner Production197: 1810–1822. Crossref.
45.
PabstA.2017. ‘Fall and redemption: the romantic alternative to liberal pessimism’. Telos178: 33–53. Crossref.
46.
RavenscroftS.2016. ‘Modernity and the economics of gift and charity: On Ivan Illich's critique of abstract philanthropy’. Telos2016 (174): 149–170. Crossref.
