Based on an extensive qualitative study, this paper explores sustainability in two Danish ecovillages and discusses the findings (meta)theoretically. Linked to the degrowth literature, it takes its point of departure in critical realism by identifying mechanisms related to (un)sustainability in these ecovillages. The most important mechanism generating their sustainable practices is identified as a subsistence political economy, a mechanism rooted in infrastructures such as regenerative farming and direct democracy. However, there is another important mechanism affecting the sustainability of the ecovillages, namely middle-class ideals. This mechanism generates unsustainable, growth-oriented lifestyles, which are also rooted in infrastructures such as large family houses and divisions between the private and the communal. Generally, it is concluded that in these two ecovillages the subsistence political economy mechanism ensures a move towards more sustainable lifestyles for all villagers, while infrastructure sustaining middle-class ideals pulls in the opposite direction.
BhaskarR (2008) A Realist Theory of Science. London: Routledge.
2.
BhaskarR (2011) Reclaiming Reality: A Critical Introduction to Contemporary Philosophy. London: Routledge.
3.
BhaskarR (2015) The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. London: Routledge.
4.
BrandUWissenM (2021) The Imperial Mode of Living: Everyday Life and the Ecological Crisis of Capitalism. London and New York: Verso.
5.
Buch-HansenH (2019) Reorienting comparative political economy: From economic growth to sustainable alternatives. In: ChertkovskayaEPaulssonABarcaS (eds) Towards a Political Economy of Degrowth. London and New York: Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 39–53.
6.
Buch-HansenHKochMNesterovaI (2024) Deep Transformations: A theory of Degrowth. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
7.
Buch-HansenHNesterovaI (2021) Towards a science of deep transformations: Initiating a dialogue between degrowth and critical realism. Ecological Economics190(December): 107188.
8.
Buch-HansenHNesterovaI (2023) Less and more: Conceptualising degrowth transformations. Ecological Economics205(March): 107731.
9.
Buch-HansenHNielsenP (2020) Critical Realism: Basics and Beyond. London: Bloomsbury.
10.
Buch-HansenHNielsenP (2023) Critical realism, the climate crisis, and (de)growth. Journal of Critical Realism22(3): 347–363.
11.
Buch-HansenHNielsenP (2024) Videnskabsteori i praksis. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.
12.
CattaneoC (2015) Eco-communities. In: D’AlisaGDemariaFKallisG (eds) Degrowth: A Vocabulary for a New Era. Oxon and New York: Routledge, 165–168.
13.
DalyM (2017) Quantifying the environmental impact of ecovillages and cohousing communities: A systematic literature review. Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability22(8): 1–20.
14.
FletcherAJ (2017) Applying critical realism in qualitative research: Methodology meets method. International Journal of Social Research Methodology20(2): 181–194.
15.
FonsecaRAAIrvingMDANasriYXG, et al. (2022) Sustainability and social transformation: The role of ecovillages in confluence with the pluriverse of community-led alternatives. Climate Action1(1): 23.
16.
GaussetQ (2020) Stronger together: How Danish environmental communities influence behavioural and societal changes. In: HoffJGaussetQLexS (eds) The Role of Non-State Actors in the Green Transition: Building a Sustainable Future. Oxon and New York: Routledge, 52–70.
17.
GaussetQJensenPD (2024) Living sustainably in a Danish eco-community: How social and physical infrastructure affect carbon footprints. NPJ Climate Action3(1): 33.
18.
Gibson-GrahamJK (2006) The End of Capitalism (As We Knew It): A Feminist Critique of Political Economy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
19.
HoffJGaussetQLexS (2020) Introduction. In: HoffJGaussetQLexS (eds) The Role of Non-State Actors in the Green Transition: Building a Sustainable Future. Oxon and New York: Routledge, pp.1–13.
20.
JacksonT (2009) Prosperity Without Growth: Economics for a Finite Planet. London and New York: Earthscan.
21.
KallisGPaulsonSD’AlisaG, et al. (2020) The Case for Degrowth. Cambridge and Medford: Polity Press.
22.
LatoucheS (2009) Farewell to Growth. Cambridge: Polity Press.
23.
LitfinKT (2014) Ecovillages: Lessons for Sustainable Community. Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press.
24.
LockyerJ (2017) Community, commons, and degrowth at Dancing Rabbit Ecovillage. Journal of Political Ecology24(1): 519–542.
25.
MarckmannBGram-HansenKChristensenTH (2012) Sustainable living and co-housing: Evidence from a case study of ecovillages. Built Environment38(3): 413–429.
26.
MiesMShivaV (2013) Ecofeminism. London and New York: Zed Books.
27.
MoccaE (2020) The local dimension in the degrowth literature: A critical discussion. Journal of Political Ideologies25(1): 78–93.
28.
NguyenT (2019) The production of community in Munksøgård: Community, values and infrastructures. PhD Thesis, University College London, UK.
ParkerJ (2007) Sustainability. In: HartwigM (ed) A Dictionary of Critical Realism. London and New York: Routledge, pp.449–451.
32.
PikettyT (2020) Capital and Ideology. Cambridge, MA and London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
33.
PistersSRVihinenHFigueiredoE (2020) Inner change and sustainability initiatives: Exploring the narratives from eco-villagers through a place-based transformative learning approach. Sustainability Science15(2): 395–409.
34.
PistersSRVihinenHFigueiredoE, et al. (2023) We learned the language of the tree: Ecovillages as spaces of place-based transformative learning. Journal of Transformative Education21(1): 59–83.
35.
PolewskyMHankammerSKleerR, et al. (2024) Degrowth vs. green growth: A computational review and interdisciplinary research agenda. Ecological Economics217(March): 108067.
36.
SchmelzerMVetterAVansintjanA (2022) The Future Is Degrowth: A Guide to a World beyond Capitalism. London and New York: Verso.
37.
TemesgenAK (2020) Building an island of sustainability in a sea of unsustainability? A study of two ecovillages. Sustainability12(24): 10585.
38.
TilstedJPBjørnA (2023) Green frontrunner or indebted culprit? Assessing Denmark’s climate targets in light of fair contributions under the Paris Agreement. Climatic Change176(8): 03.
39.
TrainerT (2006) On eco-villages and the transition. The International Journal of Inclusive Democracy2(3).
40.
TrainerT (2012) De-growth: Do you realise what it means?Futures44(6): 590–599.
41.
VandeventerJSSchmidB (2024) What does degrowth do in/to empirical research? Methodological deliberations on placing degrowth ‘in the world’. Ecological Economics221(July): 108206.
42.
VercoN (2019) Christiania: A poster child for degrowth? In: NelsonASchneiderF (eds) Housing for Degrowth: Principles, Models, Challenges and Opportunities. Oxfordshire and New York: Routledge, 99–108.
43.
VogelJHickelJ (2023) Is green growth happening? An empirical analysis of achieved versus Paris-compliant CO₂-GDP decoupling in high-income countries. The Lancet Planetary Health7(9): e759–e769.
44.
WindeggerFSpashCL (2023) Reconceptualising freedom in the 21st century: Neoliberalism vs. degrowth. New Political Economy28(4): 554–573.
45.
XueJ (2014) Is eco-village/urban village the future of a degrowth society? An urban planner’s perspective. Ecological Economics105(September): 130–138.
